Transcript Slide 1

PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION:
Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness
An International Conference in Africa for policy-makers, program managers, evaluators, sponsors and other
stakeholders in evaluation and development
Sunday 29 March – Thursday 2 April 2009
Participatory Assessment of
Conservation and Livelihood
Indicators in Congo Forest Basin
Sangha Group
Dominique Endamana, Louis Defo, Antoine Eyebe, Jeffrey Sayer, Manuel Ruiz Perez,
Intu A. Boedhihartono, Cléto Ndikumagenge, Kamiss Ami
SUMMARY
- Context
- Steps towards Assessing Landscape performance
- Methodological Approach
- Tools
- Results
- Conclusion
CONTEXT
- TNS 45 200 sq km is one of the 12
priorities landscapes in Congo Basin
Forest
- Managed by 03 countries Cameroon,
Central Africa Republic and Congo
Republic
- Conservation and development
activities are coordinated mainly by
the Congo Basin Forest Partnership
with CARPE and COMIFAC
- Importance of for African dense
forest biodiversity
- Key technical partners include WWF,
IUCN, CIFOR, WCS, GTZ…
Steps towards Assessing TNS
Landscape performance
Congo
2007
Cameroon
2006
CAR
2005
Cameroon
2004
Launching
assessment
landscape
approach:
Concepts &
theories
Selection of
fist set of
monitoring
indicators
and field
testing of
methodolog
y
Refinement
of
methodology
and practical
orientation
Visualisation
of
Cameroon
and CAR
tacking tools
Simulation,
Integration
and linkages
of existing
tracking tools
with priority
objectives of
other ongoing
programmes
(IUCN-LLS
CARPE,
COMIFAC…
)
CAR
2008
Integration of
Governance
aspect in
current
monitoring
model
development
of guidelines
of landscape
management
and
performance
assessment
DATA COLLECTION
PRIMARY DATA
Listening
Learning
Sharing
LLS
DATA COLLECTION
• Review of report of specific studies
• Review of report activities of partners
(WWF, Local NGOs, WCS, GTZ ,
local Gov)
• Ecological and socioeconomic
monitoring report
6
TOOLS
Local Natural Asset
Unit of measurement
Score
Availability of NTFP
Perception of abundance
[1-5]
Availability of wildlife resources
Perception of abundance
[1-5]
Incidence of bush fire
Perception of importance
[1-5]
Process of certification/Progress on sustainable
management forest
% forest concession certified
[1-5]
Pollution/waste liquid
Perception of pollution
[1-5]
Condition of water courses
Perception of state water
course
[1-5]
Global natural asset
Unit of measurement
Rate of deforestation
Percentage
[1-5]
Population of elephant
Number of elephant
[1-5]
Populations of grate apes (Gorilla)
Number of GA/gorilla
[1-5]
Population of Bongo
Number of Bongo
[1-5]
Condition of other biodiversity element
Perception of abundance
[1-5]
Score
TOOLS
Social asset
Unit of measurement
Score
Functioning of organizations for NRM
Perception on functionality
[1-5]
CBNRM initiative
Number of village in co
management process
[1-5]
State governance (state institution effective and
effectiveness)
Perception of effectiveness of
institution
[1-5]
Traditional governance (litigation, conflict, participation of
all social components in community affair, effectiveness of
village chief...)
Percentage of litigations
solved by traditional chief
[1-5]
Corruption perception( public and private sector)
Perception of corruption
[1-5]
Associative activity level
Percentage of HH adhere to
association
[1-5]
implication progress of indigenous people (Baaka, Baka)
in CBNRM
Number of partnership with IP
[1-5]
Participation of baka for taking decision
Percentage of pygmies
involved in local taking
decision
[1-5]
Use of forestry tax
Percentage of forest royalties
invested in social infrastructure
[1-5]
TOOLS
Human Asset
Unit of measurement
Score
Heath access
Number of physician per inhabitant
[1-5]
Quality of education
Number of qualified teacher per pupils
[1-5]
Number of person with technical and professional
qualification
Percentage of employment to locals
[1-5]
Morbidity Children rate
Comparison to national average
[1-5]
Adoption by youth of traditional value on SNRM (rites,
ceremonies, traditional)
Adoption rate
[1-5]
Usage of traditional medicine
Perception on predominance
[1-5]
Physical Asset
Unit of measurement
Cassava machine
Percentage of village with 01 machine for 500
persons
[1-5]
Habitat quality
Percentage with zinc roof
[1-5]
Number of water source supply
Percentage of village with improved water source
[1-5]
Accessibility
Time of travel
[1-5]
National tourism infrastructure
Number of tourist per year
[1-5]
Sport hunting permit
Number of permit per year
[1-5]
Transformation wood industry
Number of job created
[1-5]
Trend of price of 3 first necessity food
Perception of trend
[1-5]
Score
Example of score measurement of social indicators
Score
Social asset
5
4
3
2
1
CBNRM initiative
Co management
Co management
operational at least operational at 2
3 villages
villages
Co management
operational at 1
villages
State governance (state institution
effective and effectiveness)
Very important
Adequate support
support of the
from the
administration to the administration in
respect of the laws elaboration and
and rules
validation
Low support
Little support from from the
the administration administration in Major barrier in the
in the elaboration the elaboration elaboration and
and signature
and signature
signature of file
Traditional governance (litigation,
conflict, participation of all social
components in community affair,
effectiveness of village chief...)
More than 90% of 70-90% of
litigations are solved litigations are
by the traditional
solved by the
chief
traditional chief
50-70% of
litigations are
solved by the
traditional chief
20-50% of
litigations are
solved by the
traditional chief
Less than 20% of
litigations are
solved by the
traditional chief
Corruption perception( public and
private sector)
Inexistent
current
generalised
Very generalised
Associative activity level
50-70% of the
90-100% of the
70-90% of the
households
households adhere households adhere adhere to an
to an association
to an association association
20-50% of the
households
adhere to an
association
Less than 20% of
the households
adhere to an
association
Use of forestry tax
20-50% of
90-100% of forestry 70-90% of forestry 50-70% of forestry forestry tax are
tax are invested in tax are invested in tax are invested in invested in the
the social
the social
the social
social
infrastructure
infrastructure
infrastructure
infrastructure
some cases
isolated
Initiation of
process
Zero progress
less than 20% of
forestry tax are
invested in the
social 10
infrastructure
RESULTS
MOD Indicators
0
0
2006
2007
2008
2007
2008
2006
4
2
0
2007
2008
2006
Water infrastructure TNS
2.0
0.0
2007
2.0
2007
2008
2007
2007
2
2008
2006
2.0
2007
2007
4
2
2008
4.0
2.0
0.0
2006
2008
2008
Road infrastructure CAR
2006
2007
4.0
2.0
0.0
2006
2007
2008
2008
Road infrastructure TNS
Habitat quality TNS
4.0
2007
0
2006
2008
0.0
2006
2008
4
Education TNS
4.0
2007
0
2006
2
Habitat quality CAR
2
2008
0.0
2006
2008
4
Health TNS
echelle sur 5
4.0
2007
4
0
2006
0
echelle sur 5
2006
echelle sur 5
echelle sur 5
echelle sur 5
echelle sur 5
0
2
Education CAR
Health CAR
2
4
0
0
2006
Road infrastructure
Cameroon
echelle sur 5
2
Water infrastructure CAR
4
echelle sur 5
2
4
echelle sur 5
2
4
Road Infrastructure
Habitat quality Cameroon
Education Cameroon
echelle sur 5
4
Habitat
echelle sur 5
Health Cameroon
echelle sur 5
echelle sur 5
Water infrastructure
Cameroon
Education
echelle sur 5
Heath
echelle sur 5
Water Access
2006
2007
122008
Cameroon 2006
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Physical
Asset
Global
Natural
Asset
3
1
Human
Asset
Social
Asset
Cameroon 2007
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Physical
Asset
1
Human
Asset
Social
Asset
Physical
Asset
Human
Asset
1
Social
Asset
Physical
Asset
Social
Asset
Human
Asset
3
1
Social
Asset
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Physical
Asset
Global
Natural
Asset
3
1
Human
Asset
Social
Asset
TNS 2008
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Global
Natural
Asset
1
Human
Asset
TNS 2007
Local
Natural
Asset
5
3
1
Global
Natural
Asset
3
CAR 2008
Global
Natural
Asset
3
Human
Asset
TNS 2006
Physical
Asset
Physical
Asset
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Global
Natural
Asset
3
Social
Asset
Local
Natural
Asset
5
CAR 2007
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Physical
Asset
1
Human
Asset
CAR 2006
Global
Natural
Asset
3
Cameroon 2008
Local
Natural
Asset
5
Global
Natural
Asset
Social
Asset
Physical
Asset
Human
Asset
3
1
Global
Natural
Asset
Social
Asset
13
Local Natural Asset Vs Development
Global Natural Asset Vs Development
5
5
4
Development
Development
4
3
TNS08
3
TNS08
TNS07
TNS07
TNS06
TNS06
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
Global Natural
4
5
1
2
3
Local natural
• In general the trends of change are slow
• Change in natural assets is slower than change in
development assets
• Conflict between global and local natural assets
4
5
CONCLUSION
• Assess conservation and development flow benefit in Forest
Congo
• Approach using assist conservation agencies to develop
monitoring framework
• This approach help local people and outside advisers to
better share their understanding of the problem and issues
and to work closely for the same vision
• Communication with decision makers and flight against
corruption
• Framework of discussion and negotiation between main
stakeholders
• Conflict between local natural and global natural asset
• Build partnership with private sector
PARTNERS OF IMPLEMENTATION
Programme Régional de l’Afrique
Centrale pour L’Environnement
MEFE
CSO
GTZ
CBO
16