Transcript Slide 1

http://www.oiotaggingproject.com
Outline
 Significance
 Background
 Bonefish
 Hawaiian bonefishes
 Tagging program
 Future Research
Significance
 The life cycle of bonefish (Abula spp) is not completely
known
 Two species of bonefish are found in Hawaiian waters
(Shaklee and Tamaru 1981)
 Significant differences between species feeding
apparatuses and fishes live in sympatry
 Hawaiian bonefish have little economic importance
 No life history studies performed on Hawaiian bonefish
 Florida’s bonefish recreational fishery is worth over a
billion dollars and most bonefish research has been
conducted in the Atlantic Ocean (Ault 2005)
Significance:
A case of resource partitioning?
 Slightly overlapping
habitats
 Externally
indistinguishable
 Significantly different
feeding apparatus
• Albula glossodonta
(roundjaw), regulated
• Albula virgata (sharpjaw)
 Genetically distinct,
diverged approximately
20 million years
 Morphological &
perhaps ecological
slow to diverge
www.soest.hawaii.edu
Outline
 Significance
 Background
 Bonefish
Bonefish
• Cosmopolitan species
• Tropical & sub tropical
waters
• Sand and grass flats
•Most species are
morphologically
indistinguishable
•Highly prized as game and
food
A. vulpes
A. nemoptera
Outline
 Significance and Hypotheses
 Background
 Bonefish
 Hawaiian bonefishes
Importance of Bonefish
in Hawaiian Culture
 ‘Ō‘io – Hawaiian name for bonefish
 Important in ancient Hawaiian fish pond aquaculture
 Archeological surveys found 11% of fish remains were bonefish
(Longenecker & Dye 2009)
 Often eaten raw mixed with limu (seaweed) or in fish cakes
 Fishing methods:
 nets, line fishing from canoe (w/ chum) (Titcomb 1972)
Length-frequency distribution (FL - mm) for both
Albula spp. (N = 978)
Species
A. glossodonta
A. virgata
Sample Size
N = 772
N = 206
Mean FL
432.063
333.696
SD
±111.082
±137.343
300
250
A. glossodonta
200
A. virgata
150
100
50
0
100-199 200-299 300-399 399-400 499-500 599-600 699-700
Hawaiian Bonefish
Albula virgata
“Sharp jaw”
Albula glossodonta
“Round jaw”
Photo provided by Kurt Kawamoto
Internal Differences
A. glossodonta
A. virgata
oval
elongate
basibranchial tooth
patch
broadly oval
elongate and
nearly
rectangular
# of upper gill
rakers
8 - 11
7 -11
# of lower gill rakers
10 - 13
10 - 12
# of lateral lines
scales
69 - 78
63 -67
70 - 75
65 - 68
3.0 - 3.3
2.65 - 2.9
parashpenoid tooth
patch
virgata
A. glossodonta
A. virgata
# vertebrae
snout to upper jaw
(cm)
(Randall, J.E. 1981)
Hawaiian Bonefish Today
Landings (lbs x 1,000)
350
321,623
•1900
• Market data
300
250
200
150
86,457
100
44,823
50
3,344
9,822
•1950-2008
• Commercial
Fishing Reports
5,175
0
1880
1900
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
2020
Commercial Bonefish Landings Hawaii 1900-2006
Subsistence
Recreational
Outline
 Significance
 Background
 Bonefish
 Hawaiian bonefishes
 Tagging program
Tag and Release Program
Volunteer Anglers
 2003-2006 Tag-and-release program
 50 anglers, primarily fly-fishers
 2008 Tag-and-release program
 3 month pilot program

32 anglers
 Recruited previous program’s anglers
 January 2011

315 anglers
 Recruited mixed gear fishing clubs
 Annual fishing & seafood festival
 Volunteers with State of Hawai‘i
Ulua/papio tagging project
Tag and Release
Program





Catch rates
Growth rates
Site fidelity
Migration routes
Encourage conservation
by catch and release
Results
Volunteer Angler Biases
Inaccurate measurement
Missing information
Varied experience
Locations No. Tagged
Total
Effort Hours CPUE
Caught
East Shore
1
4
12
0.33
Ewa Beach
16
41
54.67
0.71
Kahana Bay
2
4
40
0.1
Kailua Bay
8
11
30.75
0.43
89
271
471.98
0.46
Kauai
6
5
N/A
N/A
Lanai
1
6
29
0.21
Malama Bay
Maunalua
Bay
North East
444
1236
1947.2
0.72
148
349
577.33
0.84
6
13
48
0.31
North Shore
15
17
33.78
0.46
Waimanalo
14
40
63.17
0.81
West Shore
16
23
45.4
0.55
766
2020
3353.28
0.49
Kaneohe Bay
Totals
Fishing success by large locations for all tag reports June
2008 - August 2010.
Major tagging locations for ‘ō‘io on
Oahu 2003-2010
• 1,947 ‘ō‘io tagged
May 2003 to
August 2010
• 81% roundjaw,
• 19% sharpjaw
• 25 total recaptures
(1.3%)
• uneven coverage
(Biases: Habitat, Fisheries)
Movement patterns of bonefish from
tag-recapture program
• Average distance
• 1.0 km
229 days
•1 exception
• recapture 78.9 km,
off Molokai
• Average time at-large
228
days
229
days
61 days
• 290 days
Molokai
49 miles
609 days
• Maximum time at-large
• 1,693 days
‘Ō’io Tagging Project Recaptures
Tag Date
Species
Tag
Location
FL
Recap.
Date
Recap.
Location
FL2
2/11/2005
Round Jaw
Paiko Dr.
24.8
4/25/2009
Hawaii Kai
9.0
1534
3302
3/17/2005
Round Jaw
Ala Moana
2/8/2009
28.0
1424
329?
8/28/2005
Round Jaw
Kaneohe Bay
1/12/2009
28.0
1233
2685
7/18/2008
Round Jaw
Aina Haina
20.5
6/4/2009
Ala Moana
Kaneohe Bay
South
Aina Haina
20.5
322
4530
10/1/2008
Sharp Jaw
Kaiser’s Pier
17.0
8/30/2009
Kaiser’s Pier
10.0
333
3620
10/15/2008
Sharp Jaw
Kaiser’s Pier
12/10/2008
Kaiser’s Pier
9.5
57
3621
11/8/2008
Round Jaw
Paiko Dr.
Paiko Dr.
24.0
32
5647
1/12/2009
Round Jaw
Keehi Lagoon
20.0
1/5/2010
Keehi Lagoon
24.0
358
5437
5/1/2009
Round Jaw
Hickam AFB
26.5
6/6/2009
Hickam AFB
26.0
36
1748
5/1/2009
Round Jaw
Hickam AFB
26.0
1/28/2010
Hickam AFB
24.5
272
1750
5/25/2009
Sharp Jaw
Waiau HECO
12.0
2/11/2010
Waiau HECO
15.1
262
6599
7/3/2009
Round Jaw
Sand Island
22.5
7/17/2009
Sand Island
22.5
14
3726
7/13/2009
Round Jaw
Hawaii Kai
21.5
9/13/2009
Hawaii Kai
20.0
62
6305
12/27/2009
Round Jaw
Hickam AFB
22.5
5/19/2010
Hickam AFB
21.0
143
8482
3/20/2010
Round Jaw
Waiau HECO
19.8
4/15/2010
Pearl Harbor
19.5
26
7732
24.0 12/10/2008
Days at Tag
Large No.
Recaptured tagged bonefish with original tag reports from June 2008 - August 2010.
‘Ō’io Tagging Project Activities
 Oʻahu shoreline fishing
tournaments
 Sponsor tagging
categories
 Classroom
demonstrations
 Hawaiʻi Seafood &
Fishing Festival
 Ocean Expo/Ocean
University
Outline
 Significance
 Background
 Bonefish
 Hawaiian bonefishes
 Tagging program
 Future Research
Future Research
 Provide species-specific
biological information
 Age and growth rates
 Bulk and compound
Open tagging project state
wide
Determine fishing effort &
value of recreational fishery
Education and outreach
specific SIA
 Acoustic tagging
 Establish L50
http://www.oiotaggingproject.com
Dave McCoy, Emerald Water Anglers