Transcript Slide 1

Watershed Action Plan
Complete Draft
Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting
April 3, 2003
Outline
Update
● Review Action Plan process.
● Review events since August 2002.
● What’s new in the complete draft?
Outline
Update
● Review Action Plan process.
● Review events since August.
● What’s new in the complete draft?
Evaluate
● Outputs
● Outcomes
Update
2001
June 2002
Action
Worksheets
Draft Chaps.
1–9
Jan. – March 2002
August 2002
General Features
Draft Chap. 10
 Objectives
 WMI’s Role & Future
 Target Audience & Length “Strategic Policy Objectives”
 Contents
 Next Steps for the WMI
Since August 2002
 Regulatory Executive Forum
 Structure & Staffing
 Prioritization Exercise
 San Jose/District Joint Meeting
 Action Plan Revisions
Major Changes in This Draft
 Expanded Chapter 1 to describe
process used to create the Plan.
 Moved “Strategic Objectives” and
“Next Steps” to Chapters 3 – 9
 Focused Chapter 10 on WMI role
 Incorporated comments
 Notes & bibliography
 Added information resources
 Created an Executive Summary
 Graphics & layout
Evaluation
Output:
● Did we do what we said we’d do?
Outcome:
● Will we achieve our aims?
Output
Outcome
Evaluating Outputs
Primary Objectives
Additional Objectives
Target Audiences
Characteristics
Contents
Outline
WAPTAG Achievements
Stayed focused on objectives
Met commitments & deadlines
Delivered more than expected
Maintained our sense of humor
Desired Outcomes
How can we use the
Watershed Action Plan to
preserve and enhance
Basin watersheds?
Strategic Objectives
Incorporate the
Vision into
General Plans &
Specific Area
Plans
Strategic Objectives
Drainage
systems that
detain or retain
runoff.
Strategic Objectives
Integrated
planning of
floodplains &
riparian corridors
Strategic Objectives
Integrated
Water Resources
Planning
Strategic Objectives
Habitat
Conservation
Planning
Strategic Objectives
Expand the
Refuge
Strategic Objectives
Multi-objective
planning and adaptive
management for
in-stream projects &
programs
Strategic Objectives
Better assessments,
TMDLs & discharge
permits
Action Plan Structure
Introduction
Overview
 to  Narratives
● Vision
● Natural & social history
● Regulatory mandates & programs
● Strategic objectives
● Next steps for the WMI
WMI Role
Achieving Strategic Objectives
Objectives
Opportunities
 Implement multi-objective Stream Stewardship Plans
stream restoration projects
for the Guadalupe, West
using adaptive management Valley, & Lower Peninsula
watersheds
 Coordinate TMDL &
permit requirements to
support planning & longterm regulatory stability
Guadalupe Hg TMDL, SFC
Sediment TMDL, PBDEs,
EDCs, Trash “watch list”
 Integrated multi-use
planning of floodplains &
riparian corridors
Water Resources
Protection Collaborative
 Protect natural
communities and species
diversity on a landscape or
ecosystem scale.
HCP/NCCP process and
planning for DESFBNWR
expansion.
WMI Roles
Facilitate
stakeholder processes
Bring consensus
recommendations to
decision-makers
Educate and
involve the public
Some Lessons Learned
 The process is the plan.
 Experience of collective learning,
discovery, and problem-solving.
 Examine political & scientific
facts & uncertainties.
 Prepare for ongoing
adaptive management.
 The ways that we learn, as well
as our knowledge, improve with
experience.
Summary
 The complete draft incorporates
stakeholder comments and the
results of Core Group discussions.
 WAPTAG kept their eye on the ball.
 The Action Plan can help the WMI
achieve significant results.
 Role described in Chapter 10 would
require WMI to build capacity.
Conclusion
Ecosystems are integrated and complex;
social, legal, and political systems are also
integrated and complex. These systems are
in constant change, and change each other.
Successful intervention follows from a
common understanding of how our social,
political, and natural environments
interact.
This Action Plan is one step in the journey
toward that common understanding.
Discussion