Transcript Slide 1

Summary, Conclusions and Actions
Marco de Vos ([email protected])
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What did we do?
• SPDO shared current status and baselines for the SKA
• Community shared science cases for AA-low and AA-mid
• AAVP partners shared technological developments
Mutual appreciation needs to grow.
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What did we learn?
• Much technological potential
 Antenna element, LNA, interconnect, ...
 Configuration, calibration, ...
• Potential science at the edges of the current SKA1 specs
 E.g. detecting the Extended Dark Ages @ 50...100 MHz
• System-level considerations
 “Be Dense” – the case for two elements
 The Processing Balance – maximize A/T within cost-cap
Need to integrate individual reseach
projects into coherent program.
Key vehicle: AAVS1 -> AAVS2 -> …
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What did we miss?
• Still an over-emphasis on receptor technology
 Station-level digital processing (not just BF!!!) is as important
 Processing requirements (HPC) as they develop over time
• Power is still mostly an afterthought.
 Antenna element, LNA, interconnect, ...
 Configuration, calibration, ...
• Industry involvement not addressed.
• Clear goals for the verification systems still missing.
System design ≠ system engineering.
Deep understanding versus strickt process.
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What did we gain?
• We’ve been exercising a new interaction model SPDO <> AAVP
 Preparing for the PEP phase (2013-2016)
“Gently bringing the news that the SKA is becoming an
engineering project very quickly.”
“It’s about the system, not the elements”
“It would be great if we could build a coherent project”
“People start to realise that they need to start writing
things up”
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What should we do?
• Turn AAVP into a coherent program
[AAVP MT]
 Further detailing of AAVS1, AAVS2 could facilitate this
 Maintain focus on SKA1+AIP/SKA2, full system
• Analyse the impact of some science proposals
[Community]
 Detection of Extended DA @ 50...100MHz in SKA1 ??
 HI & pulsars with 2015 AIP AA-mid array if 1500m2 ??
• Engage AAVP and PathFinders in system baseline
[SPDO]
 System requirements spec, top level SKA system design
 Together seek the clever tricks to keep SKA within cost cap.
• Analyse several AA-system level trade-offs
[AAVP]
 Continuous beam-shape cal. versus element calibration
 # elements, station size, station layout, ...
 Processing power SKA1 AA-low and AIP AA-mid
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
What should we do?
• Write things up in reviewable documents
[AAVP, SPDO]
• Read each other’s documents
[all]
• Prepare for PreConstruction Phase
[AAVP SC]
 AA subsystem (PEP-WP6) Workpackage Consortium
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
“We seem to have a plan..."
• Optimise for imaging EoR @ 140MHz
• Optimise for pulsars and HI @ 400MHz
AAVP 2010
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos
Thanks!
• LOC:





Andrew Faulkner (chair)
Paul Alexander
Karen Scrivener
Nima Razavi-Ghods
Eloy de Lera Acedo
• SOC:












AAVP 2010
Paul Alexander
Arnold van Ardenne
Peter Hall
Andrew Faulkner
Chris Carilli
Lincoln Greenhill
Luigina Feretti
Ger de Bruyn
Dave Deboer
Michael Jones
Joe Lazio
Kobus Cloete
Summary, Conclusions & Actions
Marco de Vos