Transcript The Scientific Worldview and the Demise of Cosmogony

Greg Volk
[email protected]
Extraordinary Technology Conference
July 31, 2011
1. Attended Stanford 1979-1984
2. Electrical engineering / physics
3. OCR, CAD software, stock broker,
music arranger, mortgage and real
estate broker, landlord, investor
4. Christian / young earth creationist
Why are toroids & vortices primary?
Define energy, ether, mass, zero point
Connect circuits to quanta & topology
Introduce toroidal coordinates
Discuss toroid knots & other knots
Display the “strobe effect” model
Russ McGlenn
www.tccsa.tc/adventure/
David L. Bergman
Charles W. “Bill” Lucas, Jr.
Common Sense Science
www.commonsensescience.org
Spinning Charged Ring
Hydrogen Molecule
• Predicts known properties of electron and proton
• Predicts properties of neutron, hydrogen and higher
• Uses known laws to establish stable, finite structures
• Provides physical meaning for constants e, c and h
• Explains wave/particle and mass/energy dualities
• Takes into account “coupling” or “mutual” energies
• Supports a vortex-based understanding of physics
• Electrodynamic derivation of gravity
David L. Bergman, “Notions of a Neutron”, Foundations of Science, Vol. 4, No. 2,
11 pages (2001) http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/neutrons.pdf.
• Can a whole be LESS than a sum of parts?
• WHERE is the mutual energy?
• Isn’t all energy ultimately “mutual”?
• ….
• What IS energy anyway?
• Does “coupling” relate to “entanglement”?
• Does it relate to entropy or temperature?
“Space is not nothing, or the mere location
of bodies and forces, but a medium capable
of supporting the strains of electric and
magnetic forces. The energies of the world
are not localized in the particles from which
these forces arose, but rather are to be found
in the space surrounding them.”
-- Michael Faraday
“It is mainly with the hope of making
Faraday's ideas the basis of a mathematical
method that I have undertaken this
treatise.”
-- James Clerk Maxwell
Treatise on Electricity
and Magnetism, 1873
Like elements of charge (matter) repel
Attraction from motion: Ampère / Bernoulli
Fluid through a stream or pipe
Velocity   as channel area  
Narrow stream in sink / waterfall
Parallel currents attract (Ampère)
Ernst Mach, George Berkeley, Aristotle
"Local physical laws are determined by the
large-scale structure of the universe."
- Stephan Hawking, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (1973).
Matter there influences motion here.
Motion is with respect to matter.
- Not space itself, not observer
Imagine an element of matter.
Is it moving? With respect to what?
- If space, by what mechanism?
- If observer, in what frame?
If matter, then all other matter must actually
BE present at that location.
Can matter be present where it is not?
It depends on the definition of ‘matter’.
To exert its influence elsewhere, matter
must possess ‘fields’.
If an element’s field is inseparable from it
(permanently attached), then it is actually
present throughout all space.
Then all forces are ‘local contact forces’.
• Field: the influence a localized element of
matter exerts at other points (D & H)
• Energy density: interaction of an element’s
fields with the total field (D  E  B  H ): ether
• Energy: sum (integral) of all densities.
• Mass: energy as “resistance to motion”.
-The greater an object’s “internal energy”, the
less it is influenced from without.
• The ratio of a whole to the sum of its parts
2
2
2
• Mathematically  A  B
A B


• In physics, A and B are fields, scaled by k.
• Temperature: a measure of mutual energy
2
2
2
A

B

A

B
 2 AB
• Mathematically 

• Take away all interaction energy and get
•
ZERO POINT ENERGY!
200 years ago, “heat” was a “thing” – caloric
- But it measures relative translational motion
Today “light” is still regarded as a “thing”
- But it measures relative rotational motion
Objects have “energy” by their “relationship”
with other objects – in position and motion
ENERGY IS NOT A THING!
Experiments - Eric Laithwaite, Bruce de Palma
Theories - Dennis Allen, Paramahamsa Tewari
My derivation:
E   mc
2
Independently derived by Ajay Sharma
Boyd Bushman (Bill Alek) magnet drop
Is magnetism related to rotation? Absolutely!
Fundamental particles have magnetic moments
Why? Because they consist of charged circuits
Magnetism results from the circulation or
rotation of matter.
Newton’s 3rd Law for continua => circuits
Return to the element of matter
It is part of a part of a part (divisibility)
Can it move in isolation?
No.
-Each infinitesimal element follows another
Can a string of elements move forever? No.
- Sooner or later the moving path returns
Circuits are fundamental!
The Greeks, Kepler, Descartes, Leibniz,
Swedenbourg, Bošković, Ampère, Kelvin
Planck’s “resonators” began quantum theory
Parson, Compton, Bostick, Krafft, Tewari,
Bergman, Lucas, Ginzburg, Kanarev, Sarg
Physical, finite models
Obeys the laws of electrodynamics
Circuits are finite groups
-- Comprised of a collection of elements
Rotation & expansion - group phenomena
Even though the elements comprising
circuits are continuous, circuits are finite
Particles exist BECAUSE circuits are primary
Interactions are quantized, too!
Balance between natural repulsion &
attraction due to motion => Equilibria
Instantaneous Energy  State Energy
Particles expand, contract, translate &
rotate continuously about quantum states
Mathematics deriving states from continua
Magnetic memory
Aka “hysteresis”
Multiple solutions
Bifurcation (Thom)
Catastrophe machines
The Free Energy Catastrophe
Twirly tube demonstration
Blow hard as you like, bugles produce only
multiples of a fundamental frequency
Frequencies depend on a bugle’s geometry
The same with fundamental particles!
Except that states may be integer fractions
of the fundamental
Always from the interaction of frequencies
Wagon wheels on an old western
Roulette wheels in Las Vegas
Lissajous patterns, Rods
Science Museum toy
ALL vortices have a “return” (Davidson, p. 13)
If all particles are circuits, having inertial
frequencies, is the strobe effect fundamental?
Individual
(Electricity)
Group
(Magnetism)
Poles don’t occur singly, but in conjugate pairs
True circuit nature of field or flow lines
For every positive, a negative
for every emission, an absorption
for every action, a reaction
for every explosion, an implosion
for every out, an in; for every up, a down
for every yang, a yin
for every male, a female
rh  a csc 
R  a csc
h  a cot 
r  a cot
rh 2  a2  h 2 R2  a2  r 2
 2  x 2  z2
2hz   2  a2 2Rx   2  a2
Rx  hz  a2
Rx  hz   2
zrh  xr
ρ

a
tan iˆ  sin  kˆ
sec  cos

 sin sin 
 eˆ  
1

 ˆ  
 e  1  cos cos    cos  cos 
sin sin 
cos  
,
1  cos cos
 cos  cos    iˆ 
sin sin 

ˆ
  k 
z
cos  cos
sin   
R 1  cos cos
z r
sin 
tan    
x rh tan

a
ρ
tan cos iˆ  tan sin ˆj  sin  kˆ
sec  cos

Constant  gives a fixed torus
Toroid knots from a fixed ratio of  to 
m  n

 

n


m
a
ρ
tan cos n iˆ  tan sin n ˆj  sin m kˆ
sec  cos m

n = 1, m = 1
Trefoil Knot: n = 2, m = 3
Figure 8 Knot: n = 3, m = 2
n = 5, m = 12
3
5
10
35
Tetra
Cube
Octa
Dod.
“God does not play dice.”
-- Albert Einstein
“Stop telling God what to do with his dice. Anyone
who is not shocked by quantum theory has not
understood a single word. There is no quantum
world. There is only an abstract physical
description. "It is wrong to think that the task of
physics is to find out how nature is. Physics only
concerns what we can say about nature.”
-- Neils Bohr
Sorry, Neils. Sorry, Werner. Yes, we can.
Elementary particles are no more
than unique topological constructs.
Thanks for listening!