Transcript Slide 1

School Development Planning Initiative
Self-Evaluation in Schools:
Sharing the Experience
NSPI Conference, March 2009
School self-evaluation is an integral aspect
of school development planning
In practice, the evaluative aspect of SDP is
under-developed in our schools
Neither SSE nor SDP is an end in itself…
SDP Process
Review
Evaluate
Mission
Vision
Aims
Design
Implement
School
Improvement
SDP Process: Key Questions





Where are we now?
Where do we want to be?
How do we get there?
How will we check we are getting there?
How will we know if we have got there?
Who are WE?
Review

Where are we now?

How well are we doing?
Performance
Provision
In relation to:
 our mission, vision, aims and values
 previous performance
 other schools in similar contexts
 good practice
 meeting students’ needs
 meeting expectations of parents…
 national education policy
 other…
School Development Planning: Draft Guidelines and Resources for Post-Primary Schools
Unit 2 Models of School Development Planning
Purpose of Review

Description

Analysis

Judgement

Decision
School Self-Review (1)
School Development Planning: Draft Guidelines and Resources for Post-Primary Schools
Unit 3 Approaches to Review
School Self-Review (2)
The more one tries to observe, the less one
actually sees, because there is no focus….
The more one structures one’s observation, the
more one loses out on the richness of the
context in which the observation takes place….
One tends to focus one’s attention on what one
wants to see…. ‘blind spots’
Michael Schratz
Insiders are sometimes accused of not noticing
things that are right in front of their noses…
We often do not notice very interesting things in
our environment, simply because we have
become so used to them…
Insiders risk having blind spots which prevent
them from seeing things which for others may
seem important to look at…
Trond Alvik
Review Areas
SDPI Review Areas
SDPI Strategic Themes
1. Mission, vision, aims
2. Context factors
3. Curriculum (including
teaching & learning)
4. Care & management of
pupils
5. Staff organisation and
development
6. School-homecommunity links
7. School management &
administration
1. Vision, mission, aims and
values
2. School planning
processes
3. Staff organisation,
teamwork & development
4. Teaching and learning
5. Curriculum
6. Care and management of
students
7. School-home-community
links
8. School management &
administration
Review Areas
SDPI Review Areas
1.
2.
3.
4.
Mission, Vision, Aims
Context Factors
Curriculum
Care & Management of
Pupils
5. Staff Organisation and
Development
6. School-HomeCommunity Links
7. School Management &
Administration
LAOS Areas
1. School Management
2. School Planning
3. Curriculum Provision
4. Learning & Teaching
5. Support for Students
Context factors to be
taken into account
The
Timetable
Guidance,
pastoral care,
behaviour &
discipline
Partnerships
with the
community
Curriculum &
assessment/
organisational
policies
Adapted from
Hopkins &
MacGilchrist
1998
By SDPS
Premises &
school
environment
Resources
TEACHING
PROGRESS AND
ACHIEVEMENT
of the
LEARNER
LEARNING
Schemes
of work
Staff
development
Staffing
& their
organisation
into groups
& teams
Decision
making
processes
Review Data
“Decisions without data are daft”

Data that are already on record within the
school, such as attendance records or test
results

Data that have to be specially collected for
the purpose of the review
Desk research and field research
Review Instruments










Questionnaires (Open/Closed)
Checklists
Interviews
Standard forms
Logs
Observation forms
SCOT Analysis Pro-formas
Diagnostic Window
Evaluation Grids
Ideal / Actual Tables
Retrospective: Review in Practice

Where are we now?

How well are we doing?
In relation to the ARCs:
 national education policy requirements
 perceived expectations of the Inspectorate
 requirements of legal or quasi-legal
procedures
Pressure to produce…
Retrospective: Review in Practice
SDP process models: different starting points
 Foundational model
 MVA and key policies
 Structures and procedures

Early Action Planning model
 Louis & Miles: What works best in SDP is
“plenty of early action to create energy and
support learning…”
 Michael Fullan: “Ready, fire, aim…”
Retrospective: Review in Practice
Human nature and the nature of organisations!
Trond Alvik, CIDREE :
Often schools find it necessary to choose a nonsensitive focus in order to gain experience of the
processes involved…
At the beginning stage, the participants therefore
tend to choose objects or problems at a safe
distance from the classroom…
The challenge is to find issues that are “relevant but
not too risky” for those involved, to develop the
courage to approach the classroom…
Q:


Where do we want to be?
How do we get there?
A:


Design plans and policies
Implement plans and policies
Design
Action Plan Template:
Priority area
Target
Tasks
Timeframes
Remits
Resources
Success criteria
Monitoring procedures
Evaluation procedures
Policy Template:
Rationale
Objectives
Content (provisions)
Roles & responsibilities
Success criteria
Monitoring procedures
Review procedures
Timeframe
Implementation plan
Evaluation

How do we know we have got there?
At the end of the SDP cycle, evaluation is:
 a systematic examination by the school of the
outcomes its own agreed courses of action
 a comparison of how things are against how things
should be if the plans and policies worked as
intended
 judgement with a view to future action
Evaluation
Success criteria are statements of how things
should be, the desired outcomes. They are derived
from targets & tasks (action plan) or objectives &
provisions (policy). They focus the gathering of
evidence
Evidence is information as to how things are, the
reality on the ground, the actual outcomes
Evaluation tools (or instruments) are means of
gathering the information. The choice of tools is
guided by the nature of the information needed,
which is guided by the success criteria which are
being tested
Evaluation Tools
Quantitative
Qualitative
Desk Research
Closed Questionnaires
Checklists
Standard Forms
Logs, etc.
Evaluation Grids
SCOT Analysis
Open Questionnaires
Interviews
Force Field Analysis
Spot Check
Critical Incident Analysis
Self-evaluation Profile
Summative Evaluation Tool –
Links quantitative & qualitative information together
For a worked example of evaluation of an action plan, see
SDP: Draft Guidelines Unit 5: Approaches to Evaluation
Teacher & Meteorologist


Both try, to the best of their ability, to
predict the results of a forthcoming
interaction of forces
Both may experience growth in their
professional intuition as a result of
systematic reflection on why things
developed as they did under the given
circumstances…
“It is much more difficult to judge yourself
than to judge others. If you succeed in
judging well, you will have found true
wisdom”
The Little Prince
Post-LAOS:
SSE of Teaching & Learning
Quality of Teaching and Learning
(Area 4, Looking at Our School)
Methodology





Appropriate methodologies
Clarity of purpose
Pace and structure of
lesson
Variety of strategies
Use of resources
Classroom management



Discipline
Management of learning
activities
Challenge & motivation
Classroom atmosphere




Respect
Interactions
Environment
Affirmation
Learning





Engagement
Understanding
Knowledge and
competence
Collaborative/independent
learning
Communication
Quality of Teaching and Learning
(Area 4, Looking at Our School)
Aspect B:
Teaching and Learning
Component iv:
Learning
Theme:
“How actively and independently students engage in
learning, and how the quality of their
understanding is reflected in their questioning and
in their responses to questions”
Process of Self-Evaluation –key steps

Select an area to evaluate: focus

Determine what good practice is: indicators

Gather reliable data on actual practice

Collate, analyse & interpret the data – evidence


Compare actual practice with good practice
Reach valid conclusions that you can stand
over

Prioritise for planned improvement
How to select what to evaluate

Checklists
 Study the checklist developed from
Looking at our School, for example







WSE or SI reports
Suggestions from teachers
Feedback from students and parents
Influence of inservice or CPD courses
Implications of educational research
School factors that are causing concern
National factors
SSE in DEIS Planning
See www.sdpi.ie
Perspectives
Five wise men of Hindustan, who were all blind,
went to see an elephant.
The first approached the elephant and got on its
back. “The elephant is like a brush,” he cried.
The second felt the trunk and said: “The elephant is
like a snake.”
The third blind man reached out for the knees and
thought,
“The elephant is like a tree-trunk.”
Perspectives
The fourth seized its swinging tail and shouted,
“The elephant is like a rope.”
The fifth blind man yelled:
“The elephant is soft and mushy”