Landslides and Road Deactivation

Download Report

Transcript Landslides and Road Deactivation

Landslides and Road
Deactivation
Terry Rollerson, Mike Wise,
Denis Collins, Wilson Muir,
Russ Wong, Tom Millard
Introduction
We have seen a number of landslides
associated with road deactivation
 We need to identify where this is occurring
 We need to prevent or minimize future
occurrences

Topics of Discussion
Study approach
 Types of road deactivation landslides
 Contributing factors
 Prevention
 Real Life Examples
 Conclusions

Study Approach
Compilation of road deactivation landslide
occurrences
 Site visits to a selected sample of the
landslides
 Compilation of data and analysis to
determine the most common relationships
between road deactivation and landslides

Landslide Inventory Approach
Document as many landslides as possible
 Visit a selected sample of landslides
 Link landslides to terrain types
 Link landslides to deactivation techniques
 Assess contributing factors where feasible
 Assess likelihood of prevention or nonprevention

Landslide Data - “on-site”







type of deactivation
type of landslide
slope position
slope gradient
terrain
soil type
slope morphology




down slope
environmental effects
contributing factors
preventable / not
preventable
signs of incipient
failure (slumping,
tensions cracks)
Types of road deactivation
related landslides
Fill slope failures in areas of no deactivation
 Failures below x-ditches (fill / native slope)
 Failures in partial pull back - residual fills
 Failures in partial pull back with x-ditches
 Failures in partial pull back at gullies
 Cut slope failure (all types of deactivation?)

Contributing Factors
Overloading of native slope by residual fills
 Oversteepening of fill materials
 Concentration of water by ditch lines and xditches
 Delivery of water from cut slope seepage
sites or gullies by x-ditches to residual fills
 Loss of toe support (cuts in deep materials)

Prevention
Deactivate the entire road system
 Full pull back (reconturing) on slopes >60%
 Outsloping rather than x-ditching where
slopes below the road are >50% to avoid
concentration of road drainage
 Trenching of x-ditches to native ground
when draining seepage sites or surface
stream channels (remove all residual fill)

Real Life - 1

Situation:
 Lower

roads deactivated but not the back end
Contributing factors
 Short-term
planning / decisions
 Oversteepening, overloading and drainage

Prevention
 Proper
planning / assessment and deactivation
from the back end out
Real Life - 2

Situation:
 Partial

pull back
Contributing factors
 Oversteepening
 Overloading

Prevention
 Full
pull back where safety is not compromised
 Blasting in isolated locations may be feasible
Real Life - 3

Situation:
 Partial

pull back with x-ditches
Contributing factors
 Oversteepening
and overloading
 Additional water

Prevention
 Full
pull back where safety permits
 Trench x-ditches to native ground
Real Life - 4

Situation:
 X-ditches
only, landslides on 50-60%+ slopes
below roads

Contributing factors
 Excess

water diverted onto slope
Prevention
 Outsloping
or very very frequent x-ditches
 Partial pull back &/or decompaction
Real Life - 5

Situation:
 Cut
slope failure above partial pull back
 Same as with no deactivation - fairly rare

Contributing factors
 loss

of toe support
Prevention
 Leveling
top of partial pull back
 In most cases not preventable
Real Life - 6
Full pull back
 No landslides but may get minor sediment
redistribution

Lesson learned: The right
technique in the right place
Always deactivate the back end, even if the
costs seem high
 Full pull back on slopes > 60% (50%?)
 Trench to native ground at seepage sites and
surface drainage channels on slopes > 50%?
 Disperse water when slopes below > 50%

Next Steps
If you feel the prescription is not right say
so, or do more
 If you see new landslides on or immediately
below deactivated roads take a closer look,
let us know
 If you see slumping or tensions cracks on a
section of deactivated road, do the same
 We will continue investigating these events

Contact us at:

Vancouver Forest Region
 2100
Labieux Road
 Nanaimo, B.C. , V9T 6E9
fax - 250-751-7198
 e-mail:

 [email protected][email protected]
Conceptual frequency plot of
deactivation landslide types
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
No deactivation
X-ditches
Partial pull back
Partial/x-ditch
Cut slope
Full pull back
Road / Slope Geometry
Road deactivation landslide report
Location
Deactivation type
Your name
Company/agency
Optional:
Initiation slope angle
Length
Width
Map
Date of slide
Fax/e-mail
Phone
Surficial Material
Terminus
Photos