Transcript Slide 1

Lecture 6.1

ADVANCED PLASMA DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES

Presented by Dr Ian Falconer

[email protected]

Room 101

LANGMUIR PROBES

Selected ITER diagnostics

Diagnostic Measures

Magnetic diagnostics Spectroscopic & neutral particle analyser systems Neutron diagnostics Microwave diagnostics Plasma current, position, shape, waves .. Ion temperature, He & impurity density, ..........

Fusion power, ion temperature profile, ….

Plasma position, shape, electron density, profile, …..

Optical/IR(infra-red) systems Bolometric diagnostics Electron density (Line-average & profile, electron temperature profile, ….

Total radiated power, ….

Plasma-facing components & Temperature of, and particle flux operational diagnostics to First Wall, …..

Neutral beam diagnostics Various parameters

Selected low temperature plasma diagnostics

Diagnostic

Langmuir probes Magnetic diagnostics Spectroscopic Microwave diagnostics Mass / energy analyser Laser diagnostics

Measures

Plasma potential, electron temperature & density Plasma current, plasma waves, …. Plasma composition, ion temperature & drift velocity, …….

Plasma electron density, density profile, …..

Identifie sspecies of ions, and measures their charge state and energy Density

etc.

of various species in the plasma: density, distribution, and even in the plasma.

PLASMA DIAGNOSTICS

        Electrostatic probes (Langmuir probes) Magnetic probes Microwave and optical interferometry Spectroscopic techniques Particle analysis Thomson scattering Nuclear radiation detection Laser diagnostics of processing plasmas

General characteristics of a useful plasma diagnostic

• • The diagnostic must not perturb the plasma –

i.e.

it must not change the conditions within the plasma Plasma diagnostics generally do not give the parameters) directly. An understanding of the physics of the processes involved in interpreting diagnostic results is essential

Electrostatic probes (Langmuir probes)

A short length of wire, inserted in a plasma can give valuable information of the plasma properties

at a point

in the plasma.

A

Langmuir probe

consists of such a short , thin wire inserted into the plasma: the current to/from the probe is measured as its potential is changed.

A sheath forms around the probe of thickness ~ Debye length Current to sheath where

j r A S

  

j A r S

random current density surface area of sheath For a Maxwellian velocity distribution

j r

 1 4  1 2

n e

  2

kT e

m e

 1 2 

But this applies ONLY if the potential of the probe is the same as that of the plasma.

How will the current to a Langmuir probe change if we use an external voltage source to change the probe’s potential?

A “typical” Langmuir probe characteristic

Typical probe characteristic: 1

A.

V

S is the

space

or

plasma potential

(the potential of the plasma in the absence of a probe). There is no

E

. The current is due mainly to the random motion of electrons (the random motion of the ions is much slower).

B.

If the probe is more positive than the plasma, electrons are attracted towards the probe

X

An electron sheath is formed and

saturation electron current

is reached .

Typical probe characteristic: 2 C.

If the probe is more negative than the plasma, electrons are repelled (but the faster ones still reach the probe) and ions are attracted. The shape of this part of the curve depends on the electron velocity distribution. For a Maxwellian distribution with

T e

>

T i

, the slope of

ln I

p plotted against

V

s is

e kT e

D.

The

floating potential V

F (an insulated electrode would assume this potential) The ion flux = the electron flux so

I

p = 0.

Typical probe characteristic: 3 E.

All the electrons are repelled. An ion sheath is formed and

saturation ion current

is reached.

Sheath and presheath There is a region adjacent to the sheath – the

presheath

– where the plasma is imperfectly shielded from the probe potential. In region A ions are accelerated through the resulting small potential to reach a velocity comparable with the electrons’ thermal velocity. This must be taken into account when using this region of the probe’s characteristic to estimate ion density in the plasma.

Probe surface

Magnetic probes

A voltage is induced by the changing magnetic field through this coil

V

NA dB dt

Integrating this voltage gives

V

0 

NAB RC

Rogowski coil: measures plasma current Voltage induced in this toroidal coil by the magnetic field passing through area

A

V

NA

 0

dI dt

Integrating

V I

 

V dt

NA

 0

I

Voltage loop: typically used to give the voltage induced in the plasma by the Ohmic heating transformer A voltage is induced between the (open) ends of a (usually) single-turn loop adjacent to the plasma current. This voltage gives the voltage induced in the plasma by the transformer.

Measurement of induced voltage in plasma enable calculation of plasma conductivity – and hence temperature

Monitoring plasma position.

Coils inside and outside the plasma in a tokamak, and voltage loops above and below the plasma, give the position of the plasma within the toroidal vacuum vessel. Signals from these sensors are used for feedback control of the plasma position.

(But only for toroidal plasmas with a circulating current – tokamaks.)

Interferometry

Consider these two beams of electromagnetic radiation

E

1 

E

0 sin and

E

2 

E

0 sin  

E t

 2

E

0 sin  

t

   2  When these combine d beams fall on a square-law detector the output of the detector

V out

 2

E

0 2  1  cos    higher-order terms

The phase shift of a beam of EM radiation passing through a plasm a    0

k d

  0  

c d

where

k

 2   The phase difference measured by an interferometer     0 

k plasma

k

0 

d

  0    1  

c d

Now for a plasma  2  1  now for

n e e

2

p

2

m

0  1 

n e e

2  1

m

0 (usual case for this diagnostic)   1  1 2

n e e

2

m

0 so that    1 2

n e e

2

m

0

Thomson scattering

Thomson scattering is scattering off free electrons in the plasma. The electrons are set oscillating by the incoming laser beam, and then radiate as dipole radiators.

The intensity of the scattered radiation gives the electron density, the double-Doppler broadening of the scattered radiation gives the electron temperature.

The Thomson scattering cross-section for individual electrons is minute: 6.65 x 10 -29 m 2.

Thus for a plasma of density ~ 10 22 scattered from a

scattering volume

m -3 only ~ 6.65x10

-9 of 1 cm 3 of the incident radiation will be and only a small fraction of this will enter the spectrometer/detection system. (The electrons are dipole radiators.) Thus a powerful laser is required to obtain sufficient photons to detect the scattered radiation, and

stray light

from the laser and other sources presents difficulties in observing the scattered radiation.

(A 0.05 joule pulse from a frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm - a powerful laser pulse – contains ~10 17 photons, so that only ~10 9 photons will be scattered from this volume, and many fewer than 10% of these will enter the detection system.)

Layout of a typical Thomson scattering experiment

The ITER LIDAR Thomson scattering system Here the spectrum of the laser radiation scattered back along the laser beam is recorded as a function of time. The width of the spectrum gives the electron temperature at a point within the plasma, and time of arrival of the scattered radiation gives the position at which the temperature was measured.

As the Doppler shift for radiation that is backscattered through a very large angle is small this technique is only feasible for very hot plasmas. It is best suited fas a diagnostic for a large plasma, so that the incident laser pulse and the weak scattered beam are well-separated in time .

Conclusion

• • • An array of non-perturbing diagnostic techniques has been developed to probe both fusion and “processing” plasmas Selection of an appropriate diagnostic depends on the nature of the plasma – and the relative cost of the diagnostics available Effective use of a diagnostic technique depends on a thorough knowledge of the physics of both the plasma and the diagnostic technique adopted