No Slide Title
Download
Report
Transcript No Slide Title
Geotechnical Investigation
Report
July 2008
Hadi J. Yap, PhD, PE, GE
1
Table of Contents
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Introduction
Scope of Services
Field Investigation
Laboratory Testing
Geology and Seismicity
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
regional geology
regional seismicity and faulting
geologic hazards
site conditions
subsurface conditions
Discussions and Conclusions
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
foundation support
groundwater
excavation
dewatering
shoring and underpinning
Recommendations
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.9
8.10
8.11
8.12
8.13
Site Conditions
6.1
6.2
7.0
8.0
mat foundation
pile foundation
below-grade walls
basement floors
seismic design
site preparation
excavation
dewatering
shoring
earthwork
utilities
construction monitoring
site drainage
9.0
Additional Geotechnical
Services
10.0 Limitations
2
Introduction
Present our understanding of the project:
Site: location, size, conditions
building type, number of stories and
basements, column loads
Site grading/fill to be placed
additional elements of the project (retaining
walls, parking areas, etc.)
3
Scope of Services
Field
exploration
Laboratory
testing
Engineering
Develop
analysis
conclusions and recommendations regarding:
soil and groundwater conditions at the site
the most appropriate foundation type(s) for the structure
estimates of foundation settlement
lateral earth pressures for the design of permanent and temporary below-grade walls
site seismicity and seismic hazards, including ground rupture, liquefaction, lateral
spreading and differential compaction
San Francisco Building Code seismic design parameters
subgrade preparation
criteria for fill, quality, placement and compaction
pavement design
construction considerations
4
Field Investigation
Evaluate existing data
T&R database
city records
geologic maps
historic maps
Perform site reconnaissance
Develop field investigation program:
test pits
dynamic cone penetrometer tests
test borings
Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs)
5
United States Coast Survey Map - February 1852
6
7
Laboratory Testing
Geotechnical parameters
index testing for classification
shear strength
compressibility
R-value (for pavement design)
Corrosivity
8
Site Conditions
Describe site history, if known
reclamation history
past development
previous grading
Describe existing conditions
surface conditions
existing site use
known obstructions
9
Subsurface Conditions
Describe soil encountered
thickness
density/strength
compressibility
Groundwater conditions
10
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Fill
Dune Sand
Bay Mud
Colma Formation
Old Bay Clay
Franciscan Complex Bedrock
11
12
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Fill
Heterogeneous soil consisting of: sands,
clays, silts, gravels, construction debris
Engineered fill or not?
If not-engineered fill, can not be relied
upon for foundation support
13
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Dune Sand
clean fine-grained sand, wind-blown deposit
covers the majority of San Francisco
Typically loose in upper 10’
Typically medium dense, 10’ to 30’
Typically dense below 30’
14
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Bay Mud
consists of clay and silt with occasional
sand lenses and organic material
relatively low strength material
relatively compressible material
If underlain by new fill, it could settle,
causing downdrag on piles
15
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Colma Formation
consists predominantly of sands with
occasional clay lenses
typically contains between 0 to 20%
silt/clay
relatively strong material
relatively incompressible material
excellent foundation support
16
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Old Bay Clay
consists of stiff to hard overconsolidated
clay
may contain sand and gravel lenses
relatively strong
moderately compressible
17
Typical Stratigraphic Layers
Franciscan Complex bedrock
deformed bedding planes and shear zones
due to seismic activity
highly variable hardness & strength
moderately to highly weathered
Relatively strong and incompressible
excellent foundation support
18
Geology and Seismicity
Regional Geology
Seismicity & Faulting
distance to faults
Geologic Hazards
ground shaking
liquefaction
lateral spreading
landsliding
tsunami
19
Discussion, Conclusions &
Recommendations
Discussion & Conclusions
discuss issues, alternatives, implications
conclude foundations type and settlement,
shoring, soil improvement
Recommendations
provide recommendations regarding the
geotechnical aspects of the project
20
Settlement
Consolidation
Liquefaction
Temporary loss of shear strength in loose sand due to
a rise in excess pore water pressure generated by
strong seismic shaking
Seismic Densification
A slow process of squeezing water out in soft clay,
resulting in denser packing of soil particles, when
overlain by new fill
Densification of loose sand above the water table due
to ground shaking
Foundation Settlement
21
Groundwater
Depth groundwater encountered
Likely fluctuations
Design
22
Ground Improvement
Stone columns
Compaction grouting
Chemical grouting
Jet grouting
Dynamic compaction
23
Foundations
The most appropriate foundation type depends on:
Subsurface conditions
Building type and size
Site constraints
loading conditions
basement levels
noise
vibrations
proximity to existing improvements
proximity to bay, channel
Economics
24
Shallow Foundations
Footings
isolated
continuous
grid (waffle)
Mat
25
Shallow Foundations
suitable where competent material is
encountered at subgrade elevation
can be used in fill where it is improved and
building is small and light
mat can be used to span localized areas of nonsupport
mat can be used on softer soil in excavation
where weight of structure is equal to or less
than weight of soil removed
26
Deep Foundations
Piers
Piles
27
Piers
Efficient – can use one large diameter pier in
lieu of several piles
Lengths can be adjusted in the field – reduce
waste
Derive capacity mainly from friction
Use casing and/or drilling fluid if groundwater
and/or loose soil is present
28
Driven Pile
Concrete piles are economical in Bay Area
Use where soft soil or un-documented fill is
present
Can be used at sites with high groundwater table
or thick Bay Mud
Fabricated at yard (concrete) – good quality
control
Moderately high capacity
29
Retaining Walls
Restrained vs. Unrestrained Walls
Drained vs. Undrained Walls
undrained walls are designed to resist hydrostatic
pressure
Drainage
Design wall pressure is higher for restrained walls
drainage panels
gravel drain
weep holes/pipes
Waterproofing
where moisture transmission is unacceptable
30
Floor Slabs
Slab-on-grade
supported on ground
less expensive
will lose support and settle/crack if settlement
occurs beneath slab
Structural slab
supported on foundations
more expensive
can span areas of non-support due to
liquefaction and/or settlement
31
Floor Slabs
Vapor Barrier
typically included beneath floor slabs above the water
table
consists of:
alternatives include Griffolyn T65-G
4” crushed rock
10+ mil visqueen
2” sand
easier to install
takes less space
more expensive
perform moisture emission testing prior to placement of
floor covering
32
Seismic Design
Provide site class (A through F)
Provide spectral acceleration values for
Maximum Considered Earthquake
(MCE) and Design Earthquake (DE)
33
Seismic Design
Site Class
A
B
C
D
E
F
hard rock
rock
very dense soil and soft rock
stiff soil profile
soft soil profile
liquefiable
more than 10 feet of peat
more than 25 feet of very high plasticity clays (PI>75)
more than 120 feet of soft/medium stiff clay (Bay Mud)
34
Excavation
Allowable slopes
Shoring
Dewatering
35
Site Preparation & Earthwork
Site preparation
remove pavements, organics
abandon utilities
abandon/remove old foundations
overexcavation
Earthwork
compaction requirements
acceptable fill materials
36
Utilities
Settlement
hangers
flexible connections
sleeved connections
37
Pavements
Flexible
Rigid
Pavers
pedestrian
vehicular
38
Site Drainage
Keep water away from building
Collect all downspouts and surface water
All water should be directed to storm drain
39
Additional Geotechnical Services
Review geotechnical aspects of plans
and specifications
Observation geotechnical aspects of
construction
confirm subsurface conditions are as
expected
contractor performs work in accordance
with plans and specifications
40
Limitations
Conclusions and recommendations are
based on limited subsurface exploration
We should provide observation services to
check work is completed per plans, specs,
and our recommendations
41