Transcript Slide 1

CENTRE Region - France
Towards a RIS3 strategy
Brussels, September, 27th,
2012
Jonathan Nussbaumer
(State Administration)
Alban Marché
(Regional Government)
Nathalie Boulanger
(Regional Innovation Agency)
Also known as
“Region of the Loire
valley Castles”
Outline










Regional profile
Centre region innovation policy : overview
From RIS to RIS3
Key challenges
RIS3 Process
Governance
Identification of priorities
Implementation
Measuring the progress
Conclusion and next steps
Regional profile
2.53 million of inhabitants, with a low density
A population growing slightly, and ageing
GDP : €65.2 billion, with a growth rate of +0.4%
Economy driven by agriculture and industry
▫ 1st French and European region for cereal
▫ 2nd for cosmetics/pharmaceutical and rubber’s production;
▫ 3rd for graphic arts, computer & electronics, and mechanical
industry;
▫ plus automotive industry, weapons & defense equipment;
 RIS ranking: 85th European region (8th out of 26 French regions)
 4th French rank in R&D private expenditure;
 56 000 students




Our region works on RIS

Since mid-2009 (and after a 2-year process), our Regional
Innovation Strategy is implemented along axes …..
 promoting innovation by encouraging entrepreneurship;
 developing partnerships in innovation;
 reinforcing the human capital and the qualification of the
workforce.
▫ … and two main cross-sectoral ambitions:
 Power-efficiency
 Innovation through service
▫ Implementation plan : 11 measures
Energy efficiency
Innovation through
services
Develop
innovation
in
companies
Innovate by
partnership
Consolidate
the human
capital
Our Region works on RIS

Since the beginning of the process, regional governance
structure includes public stakeholders, universities, companies
and civic society in order to “promote growth and jobs through
our assets, especially in power efficiency and innovation by
service systems”.
Introduction
Regional Innovation Strategy organization
Co-leadership by President of
Regional government and by
the head of local state autority
Constituted by the main
innovation actors of the
territory : University,
Economic and Industrial
Chamber of Commerce and
Industry, Clusters (Pole de
compétivité, Research
Institution)
DRRT
DIRECCTE
Regional Council
Oseo
CCIR
ARITT cretary)
acted in consultation with
socio-economic actors &
institutions (annual regional
conference of Innovation)
Regional Steering
Committee for
Innovation
Operational
Committee for
Innovation
In relation to other
innovation strategies (PO
FEDER, CPER, SRDES)
State of the art of
innovation
From RIS to RIS3

The goal is to evolve our SRI to SRI- SI (RIS3) . So we
need process RIS3 from work already done:
▫ 1 capitalize on the three axes which structure the regional
ecosystem of innovation (innovation in business, collaborative
innovation, strengthening of human capital)
▫ 2. Identify what could be potential areas of specialisation in two
cross-cutting themes which had been approached (energy
efficiency and innovation by related services)
▫ 3. Detect beyond these two thematic areas that were also an
economic and social impact
▫ 4. Continue to structure the innovation ecosystem
Key challenges issues




Diversified economy without strong leadership ... so no
specialisation in high tech fields
Cooperation between public research centers and companies is
still insufficent and weak
Many subcontractors in regional industry essentially in med-tech
or low-tech
Maybe too many clusters...
RIS3 Process

▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
Main steps of the RIS3 design
and implementation
Understand the needs of
economics players and respond
to the EC requirements
Analyse the regional assets in
the international context
Identify priorities by
entrepreneurship discovery
process and with consultation
the players involved in
innovation
Elaborate and implement the
RIS3 strategy
Monitor and assess this strategy
Priorities : our roadmap
Priorities




RIS3 priorities are going to be based on workshop results (20
entrepreneurs selected in each workshop). Regional Innovation
Conference audience is fully involved.
The Steering Committee will validate ultimate choices because it
is public policy.
Choice criteria : “4C”, focus on impacts on the region, and
ecosystem acceptance.
A third workshop is organized to investigate other potential
specialisation area(s).
Measured in the
international
context
Governance





State administration and regional government are really working
together supported by the regional innovation Agency who is
their common “child”.
A real consensus on innovation as a key issue of economic
development in Centre Region has been built for 5 years.
The national and regional governments are aware that they will
have to make choices and sometimes hard choices.
Even if specialisation areas are going to be suggested by the
business community, the final choice is theirs.
Decisions will be based on potential results for the region to
provide growth and job... But this process may still need some
flexibility. This will depend on innovation ecosystem
professionalisation (which was the main aim of our first RIS).
Entrepreneurial dynamics





The business community is totally involved in RIS3 process, from
the start and with constant dialogue.
It is at the heart of the workshop debates, for it is
knowledgeable.
But organizations like clusters are very apprehensive.
Most of the research and academic institutions face a dilemma:
how can one be a part of the strategy being answerable to
results ?
Flexibility mechanisms lie in the ecosystem support and the ongoing assessment in order to reallocate funds.
Implementation and
Budget

Concrete action plans and roadmaps had been designed for our
first RIS with a limited number of actions (11) – We will follow
the same process
▫ for each selected potential specialisation area and
▫ for efficiency of non-financial support services to carry on the
structuration of the innovation ecosystem


Strong coordination between ERDF, CPER (State & regional
Government Plan Agreement) to allow budgets for 2014-2020.
Policy Mix fully integrated and reinforced by the close
governance.
Our RIS3 is supposed to stimulate private R&D+I investments,
first (note that private RDI is an asset to the region Centre).
Measuring the progress

RIA is in charge of following the indicators of the action plans.

Our dashboard will include outcome indicators : number of
companies involved ; business impact ; jobs created,...

Evaluation each year to adapt the RIS3 – validation by Regional
Innovation Strategy Committee and Regional Innovation
Conference.
Conclusion and next
steps
We are going to finalise the process (mid-November) to identify
the potential specialisation areas among our cross-sectoral
activities.
 RIS3 challenges :
▫ academic research lobbying
▫ adhesion of the regional organizations which are not involved in
the new RIS3 priorities
 We need a real support to identify and settle cooperation beyond
our frontiers.
 Total awareness due to long term process to explain how S3 is
essential.
