City of Cincinnati

Download Report

Transcript City of Cincinnati

Procurement and Construction Management
and Oversight
What Board Members Need to Know
Jerry Smiley, AICP
24 July 2013
Major Capital Projects
Alternative Contracting Approaches
Pre-Planning
and
Acquisition
Finance
RTD Union Station
Design
Construction
Operations
Maintenance
DART Orange Line
2
Major Capital Projects
Alternative Contracting Approaches – Risk Allocation
Contractor’s Risk /
Contractor’s Control
Owner’s Risk /
Owner’s Control
Design-BidBuild/CMGC
(DBB/CMGC)
Design-Build
(DB)
Design-BuildOperateMaintain
(DBOM)
Public Private
Partnerships
(DBOM+F/BOT/
BOO)
3
Design-Bid-Build
Project Structure and Approach
Owner
General
Contractor
Architect/
Engineer
Subcontractors and Suppliers
PD&E
$
PE
$
Final Design
$
Procurement
$
Construction
Contractor Selected
4
Design-Bid-Build
Overview
Pros
• Standard contracting approach
• Transparent procurement process
• Public acceptance
• Fairest to bidders, level playing field
Cons
• Slowest method
• Cost not established until bids received
• Design change impacts
• In some cases, fosters adversarial relationships and
increases probability of disputes
Owner retains greatest control,
but assumes greatest risk
5
Design-Build
Project Structure and Approach
Owner
Design-Builder
Architect/Engineer
Subcontractors and Suppliers
PD&E
$
PE
$
Procurement
$
Final Design
Contractor Selected Construction
6
Design-Build
Summary
Pros
• Project costs are determined earlier
• Constructability and value engineering benefits accrue to Owner
• Single point responsibility
• Reduced claims exposure
• Tends to be the fastest method
Cons
• More complex contracting approach
• Competition may be limited
• Requires earlier project definition
• Reduces design input by Owner
• Changes are more costly
Substantial risk is shifted to the contractor,
contractor assumes more control
7
Construction Manager/General Contractor
Project Structure and Approach
Owner
General
Contractor
Consultants
Subcontractors and Suppliers
PD&E
$
Procurement
$
PE
Contractor Selected
$
Final Design
Construction
8
CMGC
Overview
Pros
• CMGC participates in developing design, budget and schedule
• Design assistance reduces E&O
• Allows for fast-track (non-linear) construction
• Reduces uncertainties (change orders)
• Owner knows costs upfront
Cons
• No significant input by Owner in design
• Complex process requiring qualified staff
• CMGC’s role changes from CM to GC once construction starts
• Owner does not transfer E&O risk
• In some areas, relatively few true construction managers
Owner retains significant control,
owner retains significant risk
9
Public Private Partnerships
Project Structure and Approach
Owner
Concessionaire
Design-Builder
O&M
Contractors
Architect/Engineer
Subcontractors and Suppliers
PD&E
$
Procurement
$
Partner Selected
Design
Construction
and Testing
Revenue
Operations
Maintenance
10
PPP
Overview
Pros
• Advance infrastructure projects years in advance
• Value for money through optimal risk transfer and risk management
• Accountability through performance incentives
• Operational and project execution risk is transferred to the private
sector
Cons
• Contracts are much more complicated
• Difficult to anticipate all possible contingencies that could arise in
long-term contract
• Re-negotiation of contracts can be high
• Performance enforcement
Owner only controls what is negotiated,
risk depends on skill of negotiators
11
What Questions Should You Be
Asking?
Capacity
Capability
Risk
12
Risk Allocation Principles
• Risks are unavoidable
• Risk should be allocated to maximize probability of success
• Assessing who is best able to manage risk
• Optimum risk shifting should be the goal – not maximum risk
shifting
• Shifting unreasonable risk to the contractor
o Reduces competition
o Increases contingencies
o Increases project disputes
13
What Questions Should You Be
Asking?
• Why are we choosing the selected
procurement model?
• Would the project be able to move forward
using another model?
• Is this model in the agency’s best longterm financial interest?
• Do we have the staff to properly execute
this model?
14