Transcript Slide 1
Presentation of Survey Results for the Jurupa Unified School District July 28, 2014 July 2014 Survey Methodology • Jurupa Unified School District Survey among 300 Likely November 2014 Voters; • Fielding conducted July 15-22, 2014, using live telephone interviewers calling both landlines and cell phones. o Interviews conducted in English and Spanish • Overall Margin of Error is ± 5.6%. Slide 2 July 2014 Language of Bond Measure Tested Local Schools 21st Century Readiness Job Training, Upgrade and Repair Measure: Shall Jurupa Unified School District upgrade career training and instructional technology, repair aging classrooms, roofs, restrooms, electrical systems, improve school safety and security, construct vocational facilities and science and computer labs to meet current academic standards, by issuing $144 million of bonds, at legal interest rates, with annual financial audits, and an independent Citizen’s Oversight Committee, with all funds staying local and no money for administrators’ salaries or pensions? Slide 3 July 2014 Solid Majority Supports Bonds to Improve Local Schools 31% Definitely yes 62% 31% Probably yes 4% Lean yes 1%% Lean no 8% Probably no 24% 16% Definitely no 9% Don't Know/NA 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Slide 4 July 2014 Lower Bond Amount Increases Chances for Success $98/Year or $8/Month ($176,300 Median AV) $56/Year ($100K PV) Definitely yes 40% 37% Probably yes Lean yes $55/Year or $4.5/Month ($176,300 Median AV) $31/Year ($100K PV) 22% 0% Lean no 2% Probably no 7% 23% Total Yes: 59% 1% Total No: 33% Total No: 30% 1% 3% 26% Definitely no 27% 5% 7% Undecided 0% 10% Total Yes: 63% 20% 30% 40% 0% 20% 40% 60% Slide 5 July 2014 Top Priorities for a Bond – Train Students for Good-Paying Jobs Dominates Now I am going to read you some elements that may be included in a bond measure for the Jurupa Unified School District. On a scale of ONE to TEN, please tell me how important the element is, with a TEN being VERY important and a ONE being NOT AT ALL important. You can use any number from ONE to TEN. (READ AND RANDOMIZE) %10 Make sure schools have the facilities to train students for careers in good-paying jobs of the future. 8.26 Construct vocational labs and technology to train students in skilled trades. 7.80 Improve security and safety in every school, including upgrading fire systems, lighting, fencing and alarms and adding cameras. 35% 7.65 Update science labs and improve classroom instructional technology. 41% 7.55 6.50 7.00 7.50 50% 34% 8.00 Slide 6 July 2014 Preparation for the Future, Keeping Funds Local and Accountability Messages Resonate with Voters Now, I’d like to read you some statements made by SUPPORTERS of the proposed bond measure in the Jurupa Unified School District. After you hear each one, please tell me how convincing each statement is as a reason to vote for the measure. Do you find the reason to be very convincing, somewhat convincing, a little convincing, or not at all a convincing reason to vote for the measure? (PREPARE) We need to give our students the resources they need to make sure they graduate high school and are prepared for college and good-paying jobs. This measure will invest in science, technology and other areas to ensure our students can compete for 21st century jobs. (LOCAL FUNDS) This measure makes sure that our tax dollars will go directly to helping local schools. Every penny from this measure will stay local and benefit local students. And all spending decisions will be made by our local community and Sacramento will have no say in how our money is spent. 50% (GET WORSE) It will be less expensive to upgrade and repair aging school buildings and classrooms now than in the future. If we don’t do something now, the problems will only get worse and the repairs will be even more expensive to complete. 76% 76% 45% (ACCOUNTABILITY) This measure has tough accountability requirements. By law, no money from this measure can be used for administrator salaries. And mandatory independent audits and a citizens’ oversight committee will ensure the money is spent as intended. 74% 41% 10% Very Convincing 79% 49% 30% 50% Somewhat Convincing 70% 90% Slide 7 July 2014 Initial Vote to Final Vote Comparison After Information Suggests Opposition Can Have Impact Final Vote ($144 Million Bond) Initial Vote ($144 Million Bond) 31% Definitely yes 33% 57% 62% 31% Probably yes Lean yes 24% 4% 3% 1% Lean no 1% 8% Probably no 10% 24% Definitely no 16% Don't know/NA 9% 0% 10% 22% 32% 7% 20% 30% 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Slide 8 July 2014 Support For School Bond by Gender & Age Age Gender +30 +45 +69 +23 +36 +38 80% 80% 70% 65% 60% 55% 59% 60% 57% 50% 55% 40% 34% 30% 29% 31% 20% 22% 20% 10% 11% 0% Men Women 18-39 Yes 40-49 No 50-64 65+ Slide 9 July 2014 Support For School Bond by Party & Ethnicity Party +63 70% +8 Ethnicity +45 +28 +57 77% 73% 60% 61% 55% 56% 50% 47% 40% 39% 30% 28% 20% 10% 14% 16% 16% 0% Democrats Republicans White Ind. Yes No Latino Slide 10 July 2014 Support for School Bond by Parents and Homeownership Parents of Children Under 18 +47 Homeownership +34 +28 +57 80% 74% 70% 69% 60% 59% 55% 56% 50% 40% 30% 20% 22% 28% 25% 17% 10% 0% Parents Non-parents Own Yes No Rent Slide 11 July 2014 Recommendations and Next Steps • Recommendation: Move forward with a school bond for the November 2014 ballot o A 55% supermajority needed to pass, bond measure currently polling at 62%. o Good support at $144 million dollar amount, but a lower dollar amount (i.e. $85 million bond) increases chance of success, especially if there is opposition to a measure. • Finish remaining focus group presentations to key stakeholders and leaders to ensure all concerns and questions related to the bond measure are addressed • Finalize project list, authorization amount, tax rate and 75 word ballot statement • Board votes to place measure on the ballot prior to August 8th deadline. Slide 12 July 2014 For More Information About This Poll, Contact: Ben Tulchin and Corey O’Neil (415) 874-7441 [email protected] [email protected] www.tulchinresearch.com 182 Second Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Follow us on Facebook and Twitter www.twitter.com/TulchinResearch www.facebook.com/TulchinR Slide 13