Transcript Slide 1
EU Research Funding, EC policies, tips how to prepare a comptetive proposal Krisztina Cziner, Dr. Advisor, Grant Writing, Aalto, Research Support Services, TTP Money through competition (”external sources”) 2009 Academy of Finland 16 % The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation 25 % Domestic Companies 20 % Other Domestic Income (state agencies, foundations…) 29 % EU 8% Foreign Companies 1% Other Foreign Income 1% How to find funding possibilities Research professional : http://www.researchprofessional.com/ Research funding database, available EU call, individual fellowships and exfunding possibilities. On national as well on international level. Acessable by whole Aalto staff. Campus registration (fast) way to access, individual registration is also possible. Funding calendar on TTP inside pages: https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/Calendar+for+research+ funding Aalto inside pages: https://into.aalto.fi/display/grants/Ilmoitukset%2C+uusimmat++Senaste+meddelanden+-+Recently+Updated RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL SEARCH/ KEY WORD BIOMEDICAL 5 Source http://www.eutrainingsite.com/download/QuickGuide.pdf Challenges for research in Europe Declining Critical Mass in certain research fields and rising gap between Europe and US Comparatively lower investment in R&D EU: 1.93% of GDP US: 2.59%, Japan: 3.15% (2005) industry tends to invest in R&D outside Europe Fragmentation of funding activities and research efforts duplication of research in many fields in Europe │6 Research in the European Integration Process JRC Creation ECSC Researc h 1951 55 57 First EU Research Programs 67 84 13 87 FP1 90 91 93 94 97 98 99 03 06 … FP2 FP3 Single Act │7 European Research Area (ERA) Maastricht Treaty Treaties fusion Euratom Treaty ECSC Treaty Amsterdam Treaty FP4 ERC FP5 FP6 FP7 HORIZON 2020 (2014-2020) Seventh Framework Programme EU FP7, 2007-2013 • FP7 is the short name for the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development. • This is the EU's main instrument for funding research in Europe and it will run from 20072013. • FP7 is also designed to respond to Europe's employment needs, competitiveness and quality of life. EU Framwork Program 7 (2007-2013) Cooperation 1. 2. 3. 4. Health Food, agriculture and biotechnology Information/communication technologies Nanosciences, nanotechnologies, materials and new production technologies 5. Energy 6. Environment and climate change 7. Transport 8. Socio-economic sciences and the humanities 9. Space 10. Security Ideas Frontier Research ERC People Marie Curie Fellowship Capacities Research Infrastructure SMEs Region of Knowledge Research Potential Science and Society Development of Policies International Cooperation Euratom 9 JRC The Indicative Budget Breakdown 10 Work Programmes Available for 2012 http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/wp2012_en.html l http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/ portal/page/people INFORMATION PACKAGE Motivation to Participate in a project and start to write a proposal • You need money • Invitation from a known research partner or a friend • Invitation from an unknow organisation sending general or targeted E-mail • Approaching deadline found by incident • You have a GREAT IDEA and you want to get funding from EU • Targeted partner search initiated by Aalto Answering the “who, what, why and how”question when you prepare a proposal Who? – Who are the researchers? Why are they the best people to carry out the research? What? – What are the project aims and objectives? What will the different tasks be? Why? – Why is it important that this research is carried out? Why must it be done now? – Why is this the right funder for the project? How? – How will the research be carried out? How will progress be monitored? How will the research make an impact, either within the research field or in wider society? Based on guidelines from the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK www.epsrc.ac.uk and Punch, Developing Effective Research Proposals, 2nd edn. (Sage Publications, 2006)/ Source: Luisa Louisa Gairn/English Lecturer/Aalto University Language Centre Mobility IMPORTANCE OF HIGH QULITY OF PUBLICATIONS AND CITATIONS ISI, WEB OF KNOWLEDGE: http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_in put.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID =P193Jekf1DPdhEeKl6J&preferencesSaved=&highlighted _tab=WOS Google Schoolar: http://code.google.com/p/citations-gadget/ WHERE TO FIND THE BEST PARTNERS Best Scientist Academic and R&D Networks Experts LEAD user of the results Strategic Parthers • Journals, Conferences, Patent database • EU R&D Associations and Networks • Exisiting R&D Projets • Evaluators, Advisory Groups etc. • Enterprises, Test laboratories, Regulatory Bodies, Standards Groups • New Member States, Third Countries Hyperion Ltd. 2008, Sean McCharity Criteria Used to Select the Best Partners Friends before funds (already known by the coordinator) REPUTATION: Scientific Excellence in niche (Capability) Resources (people facilities) available to deliver (Capacity) Professional and Timely Delivery of Documents and results Understanding and respect the burocratic rules Willing to work in a team, willing to share information Good personality-easy to work with over the project Hyperion Ltd. 2008, Sean McCharity European Research Council Grant FP7 budget € 50.5 billion ERC budget € 7.5 billion; Increase by € 250 M/year JRC nonnuclear (3 %) Co-operation (65 %) Capacities (8 %) People (9 %) Ideas (15 %) ERC DEADLINES ERC Starting Grant, for Post-docs and young Professors (2-12 years from Graduation), size 1.5-2 Million, Deadline 12.10.2011 (gone), new call expected in 2012 JULY https://inside.aalto.fi/display/tutkimuksentukipalvelut/ERC+Starting+Grant ERC Advanced Grant for Professors and advanced researchers, size up to 3.5 Million Euros, Deadline, 16.02.2012 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/tutkimuksentukipalvelut/ERC+Advanced+Grant ERC Synergy Grant , for 2-4 researchers, duration: 6 years, size 15 million Euros Deadline: 25.01.2012 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/tutkimuksentukipalvelut/ERC+Synergy+Grant ERC Proof of Concept (for those who already have an ERC), size 150 000 Euros First deadline: 03.05.2012, Final deadline: 03.10.2012 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/tutkimuksentukipalvelut/ERC+Proof+of+Concept ERC Granting schemes Starting Grants • • • • Attract/retain next-generation leaders Address funding gap early in independent career Establish independent research team & program up to € 2.0 Mio for 5 years • • • StG 2010 60 of grantees Number Number of grantees Advanced Grants Attract/retain current world-leaders Stimulate investigator-driven, breakthrough research up to € 3.5 Mio for 5 years AdG 2010 50 40 30 20 10 0 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 Age of the grantees 55 Age of grantees 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 24 Finnish Universities Participation in 7PO Projects 91 AALTO= 53 Projects (2009 statistics) 49 32 29 20 20 17 15 14 10 7 7 4 3 1 0 0 0 Statistics on EU FP7 Applications Applications Work Program HEALTH KBBE ICT NMP ENERGY ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT SSH SECURITY SPACE ERC PEOPLE INFRASTRUCTURES SME REGIONS SCIENCE IN SOCIETY INCO FISSION TOTAL Column1 Column2 Column3 Column4 Column5 Applications Funded Projects Success Rate Applied Received 4 2 50 % 1 867 104 1 592 773 1 1 100 % 131 873 131 873 98 19 19 % 41 498 619 7 715 254 30 8 27 % 15 708 823 2 216 356 7 0 0% 1 958 315 0 4 0 0% 617 943 0 17 4 24 % 4 774 952 2 137 513 12 0 0% 3 096 483 0 6 1 17 % 1 489 129 176 280 2 0 0% 341 773 0 49 5 10 % 66 927 310 8 049 698 49 5 10 % 0 0 4 2 50 % 1 745 049 1 494 603 3 0 0% 46 320 0 1 1 100 % 51 641 51 641 2 0 0% 138 924 0 1 0 0% 50 400 0 1 1 100 % 56 000 56 000 291* 49 17 % 140 500 658 23 621 991 (TKK - June, 2009) *82 coordinated application, 15 funded 13 ICT coordinated application, 4 funded EIT 2 Applications in 2009, 1 funded 27 Eligibility criteria A proposal is only considered eligible in EU FP7 if it meets all of the following conditions: • It is received by the Commission before the deadline given in the call text. • It involves at least the minimum number of participants for the distinct funding scheme as given in the call text. • It is complete (both the requested administrative forms (Part A) and scientific proposal description (Part B) are present); • The content of the proposal is clearly related to the topic and the right funding scheme has been used, taking into account including any special conditions 28 Evaluation process • The evaluation process is a peer review and will be carried out by a panel of external independent experts (each proposal will be reviewed by at least 3 experts). • Following the evaluation, applicants will be informed of the outcome. Applicants of highly ranked proposals may be invited by the Commission to negotiate a grant agreement providing for an EU financial contribution, depending on the budget. 29 Evaluation Scores 30 Evaluation Criteria for ERC • Excellence is the sole criterion Scientific Proposal Principle Investigator & A Step 1: A= Sufficient quality B=High quality but not sufficient C=no sufficient quality │ 31 A Step 2: A= Sufficient quality Funding if sufficient funds are available B=notmeeting all elements of the ERC excellence criterion UPCOMING TRAININGS THIS AUTUMN EU FP7 for Beginners, Basic Course in English 9.11.2011 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/EU+FP7+for+Beginners%2C+Basic+Course+in+En glish+9.11.2011 ERC ADVANCED GRANT (for professors) 12.12.2011 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/ERC+Advanced+Grant+Training+12.12.2011 Course material available from our earlier courses Academy of Finland funding info 14.9.2011 https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/Academy+of+Finland+funding+info+14.9.2011 Properties of good proposals https://inside.aalto.fi/download/attachments/15368627/Properties+of+a+good+proposal?version= 1&modificationDate=1317019701000 Good video How to take risks in research, failieurs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-phYo9tcMj8 Good material available from earlier courses Academy of Finland funding info (2 calls per year/Sept.- April ) https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/Academy+of+Finl and+funding+info+14.9.2011 Properties of good proposals https://inside.aalto.fi/download/attachments/15368627/Properties+of+ a+good+proposal?version=1&modificationDate=1317019701000 Good video How to take risks in research, failieurs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-phYo9tcMj8 TEKES info https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/Tekes-info+17.8.2011 Research Support services for BECS • Advisor, Grant Writing (new) – Krisztina Cziner (started 1.9.2011), Research Liaision Officer background since 2008. • Research Liaison Officers of SCI school- note the division of departments: – Dmitri Chicherin – Departments BECS, Low Temp Lab., HIIT (+ external services) – Vuokko Lepistö-Kirsilä – Departments CSE, DIEM, HIIT, ICS, ME, MSA • Grant Advisor : Elise Kovanen • Lawyers: Mervi Malinen ja Anna Markkanen • Archiving services: Heidi Ndansi (whole Aalto) Research Support Services Core services to researchers and research groups • Tutkijoiden ja tutkimusryhmien avustaminen • Grant scouting (proactive and targeted information about research funding possibilities) rahoitusmahdollisuuksien löytämisessä and grant writing services (helping research ja rahoittajille laadittavien hakemusten groups to get funding; more and better funding laatimisessa (grant scouting ja grant writing) applications) • Tutkimushankkeisiin liittyvä juridinen tuki ja • Legal counselling on research projects, negotiation of research agreements, counselling neuvonta, erityisesti sopimusasiat ja tutkimustulosten hyödyntämiseen liittyvät on intellectual property right matters and exploitation of results, contract writing services asiat • Turvataan yliopistolle ja tutkimusryhmille • Risk management: ensuring the right to oikeus jatkotutkimukseen ja julkaisemiseen publish and further develop research results tutkimusprojektien aiheista sekä varmistaa and avoiding uncontrolled financial että projekteista ei aiheudu hallitsemattomia consequenses in research projects. taloudellisia seuraamuksia • Assisting research groups with the • Avustaminen projektien hallinnollisessa administrational implementation of toteuttamisessa research projects. • Hankesuunnitteluun ja tutkimussopimuksiin • Information services concerning research liittyvät tietopalvelut projects. Chart of authorised signatories/ Allekirjoitusmatriisi • https://inside.aalto.fi/display/ResearchSupport/Chart+of+ authorised+signatories+at+Aalto • Suomeksi: https://inside.aalto.fi/display/tutkimuksentukip alvelut/Allekirjoitusmatriisi Thank you for your attention! Krisztina Cziner, Dr. Advisor/Grant Writing Research Support Services [email protected] Tel. 050 3161028 INSTRUMENTARIUMIN TIEDESÄÄTIÖN APURAHAT 2011 Instrumentariumin Tiedesäätiö jakoi 23. maaliskuuta 2011 apurahoja 30. kerran Tiedesäätiö jakaa vuosittain apurahoja lääketieteen ja lääketieteen tekniikan sekä niihin liittyvään luonnontieteeliseen ja taloustieteelliseen tutkimukseen. Nyt myönnettiin apurahoja 30 tutkijalle/tutkijaryhmälle yhteensä 650.000 euroa. Summa sisältää neljä vähintään yhden vuoden mittaista ulkomailla tapahtuvaa tutkimustyötä varten myönnettyä henkilökohtaista post-docapurahaa, sekä yhden Instrufoundation Fellow- apurahan, joka on tarkoitettu 1 vuoden mittaista Suomessa tapahtuvaa tutkimusta varten. http://www.instrufoundation.fi/index.php?k=18077 Size 8000- 100 000 euros Hallitus Hallituksen kokoonpano vuonna 2011 on: • • • • • • • • • • • • Professori Jaakko Karvonen, puheenjohtaja Professori Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, varapuheenjohtaja Professori Risto Ilmoniemi (Aalto, BECS) Professori Markku Jalkanen Professori Tatu Juvonen Professori Leena Lindgren Professori Risto Nieminen (Aalto, Prof. In Physics) Dosentti Markku Mäkijärvi Professori Mikko Paalanen (retired Aalto prof., former head of LowTemp. Lab) Dosentti Eija Pääkkö Dipl.ins. Olli Riikkala Professori Hannu Seristö (Aalto, Vice President)