Transcript Document

Intellectual Property and Licensing at
RIT
Varda N. Main
Director, Technology Licensing Office
PI Institute – January 16, 2003
Agenda

IP at RIT Processes
–
–





RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Inventor’s/Author’s Role
Students and IP Ownership
Protecting Intellectual Property
Bringing Technology to the Marketplace
Federal Funding and University IP
IP Considerations When Working With External
Sponsors
Resources
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AT
RIT
Intellectual Property at RIT

Purpose of RIT IP Policy (C3.0)
–
–
–

Anticipated Outcomes of RIT IP Policy
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Support educational mission of RIT
Enhance reputation of RIT and its faculty
Leverage RIT IP to benefit faculty, staff, students
and the Institute
Encourage faculty and staff to engage in
scholarship, research, and special projects
Benefit creators and the Institute
What IP has RIT Created?

Educational materials and tools
–
–
–
–
–

Inventions
–
–

Devices
Methods or processes
Recent product launches
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Videotapes
Software
Instructional guides
Training programs
Plays, artistic works
–
ASL Video Dictionary and Inflection Guide
C-Print® Pro
The Inventor’s/Author’s Role



To promptly and completely disclose creations
to RIT
To be a team member in assessing the
commercial potential of the creation and then
in the marketing and actual commercialization
To share in resulting licensing fees and
royalties
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
50% after deducting allowable expenses
You’ve Created Something…..Now
What?

Disclose it to RIT in a timely manner
–
–
–
–
There may be requirements to disclose to your funding
agency/sponsor
Submit completed Invention Disclosure Form to GCIP
If possible make your disclosure to RIT before making any
public disclosures
For copyrighted material mark with © 2003 Rochester Institute
of Technology

–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
For greater protection also register with US Copyright Office
(through TLO)
For trademarks register through Candy Fischbach, Bus Svces
How to Determine Who Owns the
IP?




RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Was the work in your annual Plan of Work?
Was the work a commissioned work?
Did you use RIT facilities and resources?
Did RIT or other sponsors fund the work?
Does Bringing Something to the
Marketplace Mean I Can’t Publish?


NO
You can publish research results and protect
the IP
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
It’s a matter of timing and balance
TLO can help you with this
Students and IP Ownership

RIT does not own student IP unless:
–
The student was paid by RIT to perform the work
that led to the IP


RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
As part of RIT employment
Through grant or contract funding secured through RIT
PROTECTING IP
Forms of Intellectual Property



Copyrights
Trade Secrets
Trademarks
–
–
–

Trademark
Service Marks
Trade Name
Patents
–
United States


–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Provisional
Full application
International
Trade Secrets

Definition
–

Factors in determining if it is a trade secret
–
–
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Confidential, unpatented information that is
protected by keeping the information secret
Extent information is known in industry
Extent measures taken to safeguard secrecy
Value of information to owner and competitors
Ease/difficulty in independent development
Trade Secrets

Advantages
–
–
–
–

Easy to control
Easy and inexpensive (relatively) to protect
Indefinite term (determined by degree of protection)
No patentability requirements to qualify
Disadvantages
–
Limited ability to exploit information

–
–

No protection against independent development
No statute law protecting trade secrets
Remedy
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Reverse engineering
–
Injunction or damages
Onus is on owner to establish case
Patents

What is patentable?
–
–

Key elements:
–
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Any new and useful art, process, machine,
manufacture or composition of matter or any new
and useful improvement
Includes software and mask works
Novelty
Utility
Non-obviousness
U.S. Patents




RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
First to invent vs. first to file in rest of world
Term is 20 years from date of application
One year grace period for prior disclosure
Application published 18 months after filing
Software Patents


Software-based inventions
Patentability criteria evolving and include:
–
–
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Produces new/useful data interpretation
Controls device performing new/useful function
Solves computer-related problem
Improves existing computerized process
What Can One Copyright?



Protects manner of expression; not the idea, process
or concept
Precludes actual copying
Exists automatically on creation of work
–

Term
–
–

RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Legal registration enhances protection
author’s life + 70 years;
lesser of 95 years from first publication or 120 years from
creation for works for hire
Creations and works of art
drawings/prints
architectural plans
multimedia works
musical works
text
motion pictures
software
internet-distributed content
Copyright




RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Owned by RIT as “work for hire” of RIT
employee
RIT policy gives ownership to authors for
scholarly articles
CREATE by authorship
DESTROY only by express dedication to public
Trademarks

Definition
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Identifying mark, word, logo or symbol used by
someone in commerce to identify or distinguish their
goods and services from all others
Sometimes confused with “tradename” which is the
company name under which business is conducted.
BRINGING TECHNOLOGY TO THE
MARKETPLACE
When is the Right Time to Bring a
Product to Market?



RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
When it is ready for use in the marketplace
When we have done as much development as
makes sense for us to do ourselves
When is the window of opportunity for the
product or service?
How Does RIT Decide What to
Bring to the Marketplace?


RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Invention Disclosure/patenting review process
Marketability assessments performed by TLO
with the inventor
Options for Commercializing
Technologies





RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
License
Distributor
Publisher
Direct sales
Start-up company
Licensing: The View on the
Other Side of the Table






RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Perception of business risk.
Who’s bringing what to the table?
What are the 3 points of difference for the
technology/opportunity?
What would make a user switch to this
product/process/service?
What is needed to bring this to the commercial
marketplace?
Price to purchase vs. cost to develop
FEDERAL FUNDING AND
UNIVERSITY IP
Universities and the Bayh-Dole Act

Stipulates that all IP developed by a university
using federal funding is owned by the
university
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Includes flow through funds
US Government and Use of Federally-Funded
Technologies

The Government funds technology development
–
–
–
To meet government needs for a technology solution to a
problem
To assist in economic development by helping bring new
technologies to the marketplace
To provide a return to the US taxpayer from the technology
through:



RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Job creation in the US
Substantial manufacturing in the US
Net economic benefit to the US
US Government and Use of Federally-Funded
Technologies

The government wants to encourage use of
new technologies in the marketplace
–

The government wants to encourage further
R&D
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Agreement terms encourage/expect technology
owners to bring technologies to the marketplace
IP protection (e.g. patents and copyright) permit
technology owners to disclose their technologies
without losing value in the marketplace
Required Terms in US Grants

Government Use Rights
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
The government gets a non-exclusive, royalty-free
right to use technologies developed with federal
funds for all government purposes
This includes the ability of the government to grant
licenses to government contractors to use the
technology when doing work for the government
Required Terms in US Grants

Government March-In Rights
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
As the government wants to see technologies
brought to the marketplace it can require the owner
of a technology funded with federal dollars to
license out that technology if the owner is not
actively bringing the technology to the marketplace
IP CONSIDERATIONS WHEN
WORKING WITH EXTERNAL
SPONSORS
IP Considerations When Working
with External Sponsors

What does the sponsor need?
–
–
–
–
Rights to use IP?
Ownership of IP?
Limitations on RIT publications and presentations?
Limitations on types of personnel who can work on
project?

Students allowed?
–

RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Undergraduates? Graduates?
Citizenship and export control considerations?
IP Considerations When Working
with External Sponsors

Will the sponsor sign a NDA?
–

Can involved students sign a NDA?
–

Employment contracts take precedence
Can you do future work in this area?
–
–
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Contamination considerations
RIT by itself?
With other sponsors?
“To share an asset, usually it must first be
divided. But knowledge is one of the few assets
that multiplies as it is shared.”
. . . . . Indian proverb
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office
Resources

US Patent and Trademark Office
–

US Copyright Office
–

www.loc.gov/copyright/
Good IP Site
–

www.uspto.gov
www.ipmall.fplc.edu
Technology Licensing Office
Varda N. Main, Director
2011 Louise M. Slaughter Building (Bldg. 78)
475-2986
[email protected]
www.research.rit.edu
RIT
Technology
Licensing
Office