Transcript Document
Case Study 4
New York State Alternate Route 7
Key Issues to Explore:
Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7
Adequacy of the weaving sections
Performance of the interchange ramps
Queuing
Speed changes
After Working Through this Case Study You
Should be able to:
Determine the appropriate analyses required to address a similar
problem.
Understand what input data are required and the assumptions that are
commonly made.
Understand when and how to apply the methodologies.
Understand the limitations of the HCM procedures.
Reasonably interpret the results from an HCM analysis.
Network to be Studied
US-9
Exit
7
North
Alternate Rte. 7
I-87 / NY 7 Interchange
I-87
Exit
6
I-787
NY-2
NY 7: Basic Freeway Section
23rd Street
Observations?
I-787 / NY 7 Interchange
Problem 1: Basic Freeway Sections
1a: Traffic Flow Patterns
Variation in volumes
Variations in the PHF
Speed-flow relationship
Flow-Occupancy
1b: Basic Freeway Section Analysis (EB)
Selection of Appropriate Data
Basic Freeway Analysis
1c: Analysis of WB Freeway Section
Number of Travel Lanes
Truck Climbing Lanes
Effect of Grades on Analyses
Peak Hour Volumes
EB
WB
Observations?
AM
PM
AADT
3250
2400
2400
3500
29700
30000
Length of basic freeway section = 3 miles
What time periods should be selected?
What are the most important characteristics of this
subarea?
Do the defining characteristics differ by direction?
How is the configuration of each basic freeway
section likely to affect downstream system elements?
Sub-problem 1a
Determining traffic flow patterns using
atypical conditions, where traffic data along
the study roadway has been monitored for
years.
How many volume studies would
need to be completed for the
same degree of confidence?
Observations?
How else to account for the
variability between data samples
and typical roadway conditions?
Flow Patterns
Eastbound Volumes in 2001
4000
Hourly Volume (vph)
3500
3000
2500
AM Peak: 7-8
PM Peak: 4-5
EB ~3500 vph
EB ~2900 vph
WB ~ 2500 vph
WB ~ 4000 vph
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
5
10
15
20
W e s tbound V olum e s in 2 0 0 1
25
Hour of the Day (0-23)
4500
Min flow between 2-3 am
Hour ly V olum e (vph)
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
Observations?
5
10
15
Ho u r o f t h e Da y ( 0 - 2 3 )
20
25
Peak Hour Factor (PHF)
What is the relationship
between hourly
volumes and the peak
hour factors?
W e s tbound P HF
We s tbound PHF
1 .2
1
When is there more
0 .8
variation in the PHF?
0 .6
0 .4
0 .2
0
0
1000
2000
3000
W e s tb o u n d V o lu m e (vp h )
4000
5000
Speed Flow
What is the typical
Observations?
mean speed?
Speed-Flow, EB-First Lane
the flow
increases?
80
15-Minute Mean Speed (mph)
What happens as
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
500
1000
1500
15-Minute Flow (vph)
2000
2500
Flow Occupancy
Is this what should be
expected?
F l o w -O c c u p a n c y , E B -F i r st L a n e
What volume should
15-M inute M e an Flow (ve h/hr )
2500
we select as being
“typical” for the peak
period analysis?
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0
20
40
60
1 5 - M in u t e M e a n O c c u p a n c y ( % i)
80
100
Trends in the
Traffic Volume
Which value is the Let’s say 90th
right one to pick? percentile
15-Minute Peak Hour Flow Rate Distribution
1.200
95th Percentile = 3,385 vph
Observations?
Cumulative Probability
1.000
90th Percentile = 3,340 vph
0.800
0.600
50th Percentile = 3,096 vph
0.400
Mean = 2,916 vph
0.200
0.000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
15-Minute Peak Hour Flow Rate (veh/hr)
3500
4000
Sub-problem 1b
Perform basic freeway analysis of the eastbound section of
Alternate Route 7.
Basic Freeway Section
Analysis Methodology
Observations?
What inputs are
required?
Geometric Data
Free-flow Speed
(FFS)
Volume Information
EB Segment Characteristics
The EB section has 2 lanes & is divided into 3 segments:
a one-mile segment with a 1-2% upgrade to the vicinity of
Miller Road
a one-mile segment with a 1-2% downgrade
a final one-mile segment with a 5-7% downgrade ending at
the I-787 interchange.
Which segment should be chosen to do the
analysis?
The HCM says: use the section that will produce
the most conservative estimate of the LOS. That
is, worst case governs.
Obtaining the Free-Flow Speed
FFS can be obtained from:
Field measurements
Estimate from Chapter 23 of HCM
Obtaining FFS using Field Data
From Sub-problem 1a we have:
Speed-Flow, EB-First Lane
What is a good choice
for the FFS?
15-Minute Mean Speed (mph)
80
70
60
say ~55 MPH
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
500
1000
1500
15-Minute Flow (vph)
2000
2500
Observations?
Obtaining FFS Chapter 23 of HCM
The basic free flow speed (BFFS) is how fast vehicles are
traveling when the volumes are light.
The HCM assumes the BFFS is 70 / 75 mph in urban / rural
settings. (Field data shows that these values are too high)
The HCM allows us to use a local value rather than the
defaults. Therefore use BFFS = 60 mph.
After using the HCM method in Chapter 23 what is
the FFS?
55.5 MPH
Free Flow Speed
FFS from Field Observations = 55 MPH
FFS from HCM Chapter 23 = 55.5 MPH
Conclusion: Both methods provide similar
results
Additional Data
V = 3,340 veh/hr (HCM Eqn
23-2)
PHF = 0.90
N=2
PT = 0.05 (field observations)
PR = 0 (field observations)
ET = 1.5
ER = 1.2
fp = 1.0
What is the average 15-
minute passenger-car
equivalent flow rate?
vp = 1,902 passenger cars /
hour / lane
What additional data is
needed to compute the LOS
of this segment?
Use the HCM to compute
the average passenger car
speed
HCM Equations for Speed-Flow Relationship
If (55 ≤ FFS ≤ 75 mph) & (vp ≤ 3,400 –
30*FFS), then
(from HCM Exhibit 23-3)
S = FFS
If (55 ≤ FFS ≤ 70 mph) & (3,400 – 30*FFS <vp≤
1,700 + 10*FFS), then
(from HCM Exhibit 23-3)
And if (70 < FFS ≤ 75 mph) & (3,400 – 30*FFS)
< vp ≤ 2,400, then
(from HCM Exhibit 23-3)
Then what
does S equal?
S = 54.8 MPH
Level of Service
LOS defined by the HCM
for passenger cars
/mile/lane:
A: 0-11
B: 11-18
C: 18-26
D: 26-35
E: 35-45
Above 45 is LOS F
Observations?
Calculating the average
density:
D = vp / S
D = 1,902 pcphpl / 54.8 mph
D = 34.7 pcpmpl
What does this mean using the
90th percentile to evaluate?
- 10% of the time in the peak
hour the EB LOS is D or worse
- 90% of the time it is better
than D during the peak hour
What is the performance
of this facility like during
a reasonably heavy AM
peak hour?
Do these match the field
observations?
Distribution of AM Eastbound Peak 15-Minute Density
1.200
Exhibit 4-13. Peak Hour LOS
Distribution
Max D
A
11
7
2.70%
B
18
7
2.70%
C
26
17
6.60%
D
35
208
81.30%
E
45
13
5.10%
F
-
4
1.60%
1.000
# Hours Percent
Cumulative Probability
LOS
0.800
0.600
Range between
the bars = LOS D
(~80%)
0.400
0.200
Mainly LOS D
0.000
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
Eastbound AM Peak 15-Minute Density
Yes, field data matches!!!
90.00
Sub-problem 1c
Perform basic freeway analysis of the westbound section of
Alternate Route 7.
This sub-problem is similar to 1b.
Observations?
Think about why conditions on the westbound section would
be different than those on the eastbound section?
Consider roadway users, physical conditions, and heavy
vehicle needs.
WB Segment Characteristics
The WB section has 3 lanes and is divided into 3 segments:
6-7% upgrade
1-2% upgrade
1-2% downgrade
Which segment should be chosen to do the
analysis?
The HCM says: use the section that will produce
the most conservative estimate of the LOS. That
is, worst case governs.
Additional Data
V = 3,240 veh/hr PHF = 0.90
N=3
FFS = 55 MPH (calculated
similar to sub-problem 1b)
PT = 0.05 (field observations)
PR = 0 (field observations)
ET = 1.5
ER = 1.2
fp = 1.0
What is the average 15-
minute passenger-car
equivalent flow rate?
vp = 1,440 passenger cars /
hour / lane
What is the average
passenger car speed?
S = 55 MPH
Level of Service
LOS defined by the HCM
for passenger cars per
mile per lane (pcpmpl):
A: 0-11
B: 11-18
C: 18-26
D: 26-35
E: 35-45
Above 45 is LOS F
Calculating the average
density:
D = vp / S
D = 1,440 pcphpl / 55.0
mph
D = 26 pcpmpl
LOS = D
Observations?
Is the 3rd Lane Needed?
How would the system perform if only 2 lanes
were available?
Vp = 2,160 pcphpl
D = 42 pcpmpl
S = 52 MPH
LOS = E
The 3rd lane has a huge impact!!!
Truck Climbing Lane
What is the effect of the climbing lane?
5% trucks = 162 trucks/hr
From HCM Exhibit 23-9:
162 trucks/hr = 810 passenger cars/hr
What does this mean?
~ ½ lane worth of passenger car
capacity is devoted to the trucks
Should it be enforced that trucks can only use
the climbing lane?
Truck Lane:
V=810 pcph * 2 = 1,620 pcph
D=16.4 pcpmpl
LOS = B Good
Other 2 Lanes (no trucks):
vp = 1,711 pcphpl, D= 31.1
pcpmpl, & LOS = D
Observations?
If all lanes used by all the
traffic:
D= 26.2 pcpmpl
If trucks separated into
climbing lane:
Dtruck = 26.2 pcpmpl
Dpass = 31.1 pcpmpl
What does this mean?
Enforcing a truck only lane
is not a good idea!!!
Questions
What if the truck percentage
increased to 10%?
ET would drop from 5 to 3.5
Why?
When there are more trucks
they begin to fill in the voids
other trucks create
The density would increase to
27.3 pcpmpl
LOS for the 256 peak hours of the year
(weekdays only)
What is the
predominate LOS for
the peak hour?
Westbound PM Peak Level of Service Distribution
Number of Peak Hours
250
200
Is this reasonable?
LOS = C
150
100
50
Observations?
0
A
B
C
Level of Service
D
E
Level of Service
What effect would “regular
drivers” vs. “vacationers” have
on the system?
Regular drivers
mainly provide a
LOS = C and
Vacationers
mainly provide a
LOS = D.
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
MaxD
11
18
26
35
45
>45
Observations?
RegDriv
NHr
Pct
8
3.1%
7
2.7%
195
76.2%
37
14.5%
4
1.6%
5
2.0%
Vacation
NHr
Pct
7
2.7%
2
0.8%
20
7.8%
210
82.0%
11
4.3%
6
2.3%
How likely are these situations? Neither exactly describes
the facility, probably
somewhere in between