INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update

Programs

1.

Pavement Preservation Initiative (PPI) 2.

Bridge/ Culvert Preservation Initiative (BCPI)

Pavement Preservation Initiative

1.

Strategic, long term program of identifying, programming, budgeting, and completing pavement preservation projects.

2.

Improve the statewide condition of INDOT’s pavement network at the lowest possible cost . 3.

Part of INDOT’s overall Pavement Preservation Program, which includes elements of the Maintenance Work Program and District Pavement Program.

Available Treatments

HMA Treatments: 1. Asphalt Crack Seal (Activity 207, crack filling) 2. Rout and Seal (Activity 209, crack sealing) 3. Seal Coat 4. Microsurface 5. QC/QA HMA Surface 4.75mm (0.75 in. thickness) 6. UBWC

Available Treatments

PCCP Treatments: 1. PCCP Patching 2. PCCP Joint Sealing 3. PCCP Profiling/Retexturing 4. PCCP Dowel Bar Retrofit ADA requirements must be met as necessary.

See Indiana Design Manual (IDM) Chapter 52.11 and the INDOT Standard Specifications for specific details on each treatment.

Candidate Generation

Asphalt Surface Criteria*: List 1: Age between 8 and 12 years and IRI < 130 List 2: Rut > 3/8” List 3: Friction Number< 25 Additional screening criteria for Seal Coat: Rutting < ¼ Inch ADT < 5,000 (ADT level can be customized per District) PCCP Surface Criteria*: List 1: Age = between 8 and 12 years List 2: IRI > 130 List 3: Friction Number < 25

Pavement Preservation Initiative Van Trip Field Check Form District/Sub :_____ Road:____________ Desired Trtmt:______________ Field Check Date:________ Location:___________________________________ From RP:___________ To RP:____________ PMS Data Year:________ IRI:_________ Rut (given):________ (in.) Rut (measured):_______(mm) Year of Last Work:________ # Lanes:_____ Ln Width:________ Shldr Width:______ Total:__________ AADT:_______________________ District Priority:_______________ PCR ________ Attendees:_____________________________________________________________________________ 1.

Cracking – note severity and extent of Severity Extent Low Moderate High Longitudinal Cracks Low Moderate High Alligator Cracking Low Moderate High Other types of Cracking 2.

Crack seal prior to treatment to be done? Completed Needs Crack Treatment a.

Maintenance – plan well ahead of contract, minimize overband b.

Include in Contract (if not in-house Chip Seal) 3.

Patching – minimal, localized patching may be done. Estimate % patching. ________________ 4.

Pavement Markings (note types of lane lines and other special markings) a.

b.

Micro – ALL pavement markings should be removed with appropriate removal items. UBWC – THERMOPLASTIC markings should be removed with appropriate removal items. 5.

Other items of note (stripping concerns, RPM’s,

Underbody plow route

, etc). 6.

Final Treatment Selection:

Microsurface

Single / Multiple course Comments:______________________________________________

UBWC 4.75mm Thin HMA Chip Seal

Oil __AE90S________ Stone #11 #12 Other_________ Fog Seal? Yes / No

Concurrence of Candidate Pavement Engineering:

Yes/No Yes/No

Highway Operations: District:

Yes/No Yes/No

FY 11 Chip Seal Program

District

Crawfordsville*

Lane Miles Total Cost (excluding Shoulders) 177.1

$ 1,725,321.47

Life Extension Ln Mi Yrs

4 708.4

Cost/Ln Mi Yr

$2,435.52 Fort Wayne Greenfield

223.8

160.4

$ 1,752,094.22 $ 1,630,602.71 4 4 895.2

641.6

$1,957.21 $2,541.46 LaPorte Seymour * Vincennes *

193.2

254.4

224.5

$ 1,528,917.20 $ 2,614,762.65 $ 1,841,030.94 4 4 4 772.8

1017.6

898 $1,978.41 $2,569.54 $2,050.15

Totals: 1233.4

$ 11,092,729.19 4,933.60

$2,248.40

Chip Seal Accomplishments

Fiscal Year

2009 2010

Lane Miles

444 705

Total Cost

$3,645,879.52

$5,457,894.29

Cost Per Lane Mile

$8,207.37

$7,744.77

2011 1233 $11,092,729.20

$8,993.89

*Total costs: Labor, Material & Equipment * Includes Fog Seal costs 2011 average statewide cost /syd = $1.27

Seal Coat Design

INDOT is developing a seal coat design program 1.

With simple material inputs, will generate theoretical application rates 2.

Use as a starting point, field adjustments as required

Fog Seal Study

2.

3.

4.

5.

1.

Heritage Research Group (Asphalt Materials Inc.) Chip Seal on SR 43 Life Cycle of AE-F versus AE-F with SBR Additive Life Cycle of AE-F versus SS-1h Applicability of AE-F versus SS-1h for Fog Sealing Comparison of chip retention performance associated with each emulsion

Study Layout

AE-F (with SBR Additive) AE-F • • • Each section will consist of one distributor load emulsion AE-F will be delivered jobsite and applied AE-F SBR additive will be added and mixed onsite SS-1h will be diluted and terminal, and be picked up Diluted SS-1h = Section Break where Felt Paper will be used to provide an emulsion break

Field Performance Testing

   Monitored by HRG Visual inspections at specified intervals Identifying at least one designated area within each section and photographing it immediately after construction and after specific intervals of time in the range of 1 to 5 years.

INDOT Crack Seal/ Fill

Total Lane miles = 27,693.78

Crack Filling - $755/LM in FY 10 Crack Sealing - $893/LM in FY 10

Fiscal Year

FY 08

Crack Fill – Lane Miles

4283.8

Crack Seal – Lane Miles

548.8

FY 09 FY 10 4732.0

5249.5

660.2

661.9

FY 11 PPI Contract Surface Treatment District

Crawfordsville

Actual Lane Miles Actual Cost 39.4

$ 1,923,706.71

Life Extension Ln Mi Yrs

8 315.2

Cost/Ln Mi Yr

$6,103.13 Fort Wayne Greenfield

72.78

55.52

$ 2,584,370.93 $ 1,794,556.98 8 8 582.24

444.16

$4,438.67 $4040.34 LaPorte Seymour Vincennes

54 55.8

53.32

$ 2,485,743.28 $ 2,298,935.35 $ 2,542,792.40 8 8 8 432 446.4

426.56

$5,754.04 $5,149.94 $5,961.16 Totals:

330.82

$ 13,630,105.65 *Let to date: 232 lane miles @ $9,658,799.55

2646.56

$5,150.12

PPI Surface Treatment Breakdown

Microsurface

2009 2010 *2011

UBWC

2009 2010 2011

4.75mm Thin HMA

2010 *2011

Average Treatment Cost/ SYS

$ 3.44

$ 3.32

$ 3.02

Lane Miles

84.2

136.7

108.5

$ 6.28

$ 7.47

$ 3.49

$3.53

$ 3.21

7.8

43.4

23.9

30.1

59.0

1 2 3 2 3

# Of Contracts

6 8 8

INDOT Treatment Guidelines for Pavement Preservation INDOT manual Includes descriptions of all preservation treatments in INDOT’s toolbox 1.

Specification References 2.

3.

4.

Construction Procedure Applicable Distresses Corrected Special Considerations

http://www.in.gov/indot/3220.htm

Bridge/Culvert Preservation Initiative

The BCPI will be subdivided into 3 categories, due to differing inspection and management practices. Also listed is INDOT’s approximate inventory of each category: 1.

Bridges (Span > 20’) = 5,200 2.

Large Culverts (Span between 4’ and 20’) = 9,000 3.

Small Culverts (Span < 4’) = 90,000 

Benefits

The long-term benefits of the BCPI will be: 1.

An overall improvement in network bridge and culvert condition 2.

An overall reduction in spending required to maintain INDOT bridges and structures, compared to traditional rehabilitation practices.

Expectation of Program

• Bridge – Wearing Surface, Deck, Joint Reduction in # bridges with ratings falling below 5 (<4) • Bridge – Superstructure and Substructure Reduction in # bridges falling below 5 (<4) • Bridges Under Fill – Culvert Rating Reduction in # bridges falling below 5 (<4) • Culverts – Overall Rating (Type I, Type II and Small Culverts) Reduction in # culverts falling below 5 (<4)

Treatment Categories

Qualified BCPI treatments may be considered as: 1.

Preventive Maintenance – Specific activities that are scheduled on a fixed cycle that are intended to maintain a structure at its current level, and prevent deterioration. 2.

Corrective Maintenance – Specific activities are not scheduled and are reactive in nature, intended to correct more extensive damage and prevent further deterioration but limited to localized areas of a specific structural element.

PM Activities

Bridge preventive maintenance activities include: 1.

Cleaning/flushing bridge decks 2.

3.

Substructure/superstructure washing Cleaning deck drains 4.

5.

Cleaning/lubricating bearings Cleaning joints 6.

Deck sealing

Corrective Maintenance

Bridge corrective maintenance activities include: 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Sliplining (bridge culverts only) Deck patching (shallow/deep) – Maximum 10% deck area Approach slab restoration Joint restoration/replacement Mudwall patching Thin deck overlay (e.g. Flexogrid) Spot coating Substructure patching/sealing Concrete Superstructure crack mitigation Erosion mitigation Debris removal/channel cleaning Brush Cutting/Herbicide Application* Railing repair* Relief joint repairs* Attenuator upgrades*

Candidate Selection

Bridge Candidate Triggers Preventive Treatments

Cleaning/flushing bridge decks Substructure/superst ructure washing Clean Deck Drains

Maintenance Activity

241/244 241/244 241/244

Inspection Element

Cleaning/lubricating bearings Clean Joints 241/244 241/244 Deck Sealing Item 58.01 & 58.02

Element Rating

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 6-8

Cycle (years)

1 1 1 1 1 5

Project Selection

The Division of Maintenance Management and District Support in conjunction with the Division of Asset Management and Program Engineering will prepare a candidate list of BCPI projects from the appropriate databases. The District Systems Assessment Manager will review the candidate projects and develop a list of proposed structures and treatments. This list will be ranked according to priority and the method of performing the work (INDOT work forces or contract). The District will propose BCPI qualifying projects into SPMS. Projects will be defined as “maintenance and preservation” and scored according to BAMT scoring rule D-1. Preservation projects should not typically be considered if future rehabilitation work is programmed within the life of the preservation treatment.

Once approved by the BAMT, the identified list of BCPI projects will be finalized as detailed in Section 4 to allow adequate contract development time (contract) or procurement of materials and scheduling of resources (District work forces

Questions???

Bill Tompkins : 317-233-3345 [email protected]