Transcript Slide 1

Kitsap County
Department of Community Development
Updating Kitsap County’s
Shoreline Master Program (SMP)
– process overview, public outreach, involvement
Patty Charnas, Environmental Programs Manager
Kitsap County Department of Community Development
Background
 1971 – State Shoreline Management Act
 Mid 1970s – Kitsap County adopts its first Shoreline
Management Program (SMP)
 1999 – Most recent update of County SMP (currently
in effect)
 2003 – State Adopts New Shoreline Guidelines
 2009 – County initiates a comprehensive SMP update
as required by the State
Where does SMP Apply?
Land 200’ from ordinary
high water mark
Marine Shorelines
Floodways and
floodplains
Associated wetlands and
river deltas
Where does SMP Apply?
Lakes greater than
20 acres
Stream segments with
mean annual flow of
20 c.f.s. or greater
Lands 200’ from ordinary
high water mark
Floodways and
floodplains
Associated wetlands and
river deltas
Applied to shore
segments based on:
•Ecological condition
•Existing land use
•Geographic
character
Provides system for
determining allowed
uses
Background
What is subject to this update?
Development of a planning document that defines goals and
policies for shoreline use and development
serves as a Comprehensive Plan for the
management of shoreline areas
A set of regulations that governs shoreline use consistent with
state law
A framework for future shoreline use, protection and restoration
over time
Plan + use regulations + restoration framework = PROGRAM
Background
Kitsap County Shoreline
186 miles of saltwater shoreline
Lake shoreline = 33.75 miles; stream miles = 9.48 miles
WAC 173-26 requires a substantial update effort
To include demonstration of no net loss
To include cumulative impact assessment
To include restoration plan
All Cities in Kitsap County are doing SMP updates
SMP updates to consider Puget Sound Action
Agenda and new Stormwater Policies
Vision Statement
Comply with legislative mandates including requirements
for no net loss of shoreline ecological functions
Protect private individual property rights consistent with
the public interest
Create a shoreline stewardship program that fosters
reasonable and appropriate shoreline uses while protecting
valuable and fragile natural resources
Engage a wide variety of stakeholders, citizens and
interests in developing goals and policies
Integrate and support County plans, policies, and regulations
Ensure predictability, accountability, and efficiency
Have a strong scientific basis
Why are we doing this….
 Want local citizens to be part of SMP update
 Mandated by RCW 90.58
 Funded by State legislature through Ecology grant
 Department of Ecology rules must be met or State will write
local plan
 Want local citizens to implement state program
Who is involved….
 Governments; e.g., County, Tribes, Cities, Ports, State
Agencies, others
 Business and Industry
 Educational institutions
 Citizen Groups; e.g., shoreline neighborhood residents,
private property owners, County Citizen Advisory Councils
 Environmental Groups
 Department of Ecology – Approving Authority
How will it get done….
 Create Task Force
 Policy advice
 Best management practices advice
 Assist regulation framing





Conduct Gap Analysis
Organize Task Force
Prioritize efforts
Conduct continuous public outreach
Focus on topics rather than whole code at once
East Kitsap Nearshore Salmon Habitat
Assessment – restoration prioritization framework
DRIFT CELL NUMBER
COLORED BY SCORE
SITE CONTROLLING
FACTOR SCORE
SITE NUMBER
SITE DOMINANT
PROCESS SCORE
When is this being done….
 September – December 2009
 Task Force creation/training
 Citizen participation plan approved/implemented
 January 2010 – January 2012
 Goals and Policies
 Shoreline uses
 January 2012 – June 2012
 Final decision making
 Adoptions and approvals
 Briefed throughout process
 Citizens and the public
 Planning Commission
 Board of Commissioners
 State for approval
Innovative Approaches
Alternative Techniques
 City of Kirkland: Shoreline dimension and lot
characteristics determine development standards
 Whatcom County: Performance-based watershed
assessment and mitigation planning supplant prescriptive
CAO buffers
 City of Issaquah: Synthesizing existing watershed
information (stormwater plans; salmon recovery plans)
for SMP characterization
Who did we miss?
 Other stakeholders
 Shoreline users
 Other entities
Shoreline Update will request stakeholders’
 Time
 Thought and discussion
 Work products
Read up on this: www.kitsapshoreline.org