Transcript Document
Resonance Dynamics in Heavy Ion Collisions 22nd Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics 17.03.2006, La Jolla, California Sascha Vogel, Marcus Bleicher UrQMD group (Mohammed Abdel-Aziz, Marcus Bleicher, Stephane Haussler, Quingfeng Li, Hannah Petersen, Diana Schumacher, Sascha Vogel, Xianglei Zhu) Outline Outline Introduction and motivation (more or less a reminder) Model Rescattering of resonances Rapidity, transverse momentum, mass spectra Re-feeding of resonances Average cross sections Collision rates Center of mass energies Summary Motivation Motivation We want to … learn something about freeze-out dynamics of heavy ion collisions understand why statistical models cannot describe resonance data understand quantitatively the effect of rescattering and regeneration of daughter particles in order to understand the data already measured learn something about in-medium properties of hadrons Thanks to Christina Markert, STAR Collaboration Motivation Statistical model fitting • Particle ratios well reproduced • Resonance ratios not reproduced (Braun-Munzinger, Schweda QM 2004) • D++/p too low • K*/K too high Braun-Munzinger et al. Motivation Motivation p+p p+p interactions: • No extended initial medium • Chemical freeze-out (no thermalisation) • Kinetic freeze-out close to the chemical freeze-out Hot and dense medium A+A Particle yields Particle spectra A+A interactions: • Extended hot and dense phase • Kinetic freeze-out separated from chemical freeze-out • in medium effects • Rescattering effects • Regeneration effects time Thanks to Christina Markert, STAR Collaboration Quick reminder on resonances Resonances in a hadronic medium Since they are unstable (decaying) particles with a cross section, they can scatter decay Decay products (or daughter particles) can How does the experiment (reconstruct) the resonance? Invariant mass reconstruction of decay products counts/(10 MeV/c2) escape the collision zone (re-)scatter build another resonance (“regenerate“) Au+Au sNN = 200 GeV 40% to 80% 0 ρ STAR Preliminary f0 1.2 pT 1.4 GeV/c K0S |y| 0.5 ω K*0 Statistical error only Quick reminder on resonances Resonances in a hadronic medium Since hadronic decay products interact with the surrounding medium the experiment cannot reconstruct all resonances The consequence is, that all spectra one observes by reconstructing hadronic decay products are altered by the hadronic medium Interesting effect for resonances which have a hadronic and a dileptonic decay channel! (e.g. r0 p+p- , r0 e+e-) hadronic decay channel dileptonic decay channel + ππ- ρ0 ρ0 - π+ π- π+ - ρ0 π+ ρ0 + ρ0 + Quick reminder on resonances Resonances in a hadronic medium Differences in observables between the different decay channels depend on various factors, e.g: system (p+p, Au+Au?) centrality life time of the resonance (see below) freeze-out mechanism life time of the medium density of the medium etc… r0(770) D++(1232) f 0(980) K*0±(892) S (1385) L (1520) F (1020) p+ pp p+ p+ ppK Lp pK K+ K- B.R. ~1 B.R. ~1 B.R. ~ 2/3 B.R. ~ 2/3 B.R. ~ 0.88 B.R. ~ 0.45 B.R. ~ 0.49 = 1.3 fm = 1.6 fm = 2.6 fm = 4 fm = 5.5 fm = 12.6 fm = 44 fm Models Models What kind of model do we need for our study of resonance rescattering and refeeding? Transport model, since we need to keep track of the particles throughout the whole collision. initial final thermodynamical models hydrodynamical models transport models Model UrQMD Ultra Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics Non equilibrium transport model All hadrons and resonances up to 2.2 GeV included String excitation and fragmentation pQCD hard scattering at high energies with PYTHIA Bratkovskaya, Bleicher et al., Phys.Rev.C69:054907,2004 Model Fochler, Vogel et al, Physical Review C, in print (arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0601062) UrQMD Model Cross sections are fitted to available experimental data or calculated by the principle of detailed balance and the additive quark model Does dynamically account for canonical suppression Generates full space-time dynamics of hadrons and strings Bleicher et al., J.Phys.G25:1859-1896,1999 Rescattering Baryon resonances in central AuAu collisions at RHIC Experimental signal loss due to rescattering of decay products. All decayed particles Reconstructable particles Rescattering Meson resonances in central AuAu collisions at RHIC Note: L.h.s. would be visible in a dilepton analysis (multiplied with the corresponding branching ratio). All decayed particles Reconstructable particles Rescattering pT spectra Stronger suppression towards lower transverse momenta apparent ‚heating‘ of the spectra Open symbols: reconstructable particles, filled symbols: all decayed r meson mass Mass spectrum of the r meson AuAu Ecm=200AGeV • mass drops towards central reactions Note: C+C collisions at 2AGeV AuAu Ecm=200AGeV • mass drops towards low pT S.Vogel, M. Bleicher, Physical Review C, in print (arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0509105) Motivation Some data from STAR • Increase of the F/Kratio from pp to central AuAu • Decrease of the K*/Kand L*/Lratio from pp to central AuAu Preliminary • Rescattering and Regeneration effects are to be considered! Thanks to Christina Markert, STAR Collaboration Re-feeding of resonances Rough estimate of the re-feeding probability Tch freeze-out • Strong decrease in kinetic freeze-out temperature from central to peripheral collisions • Kinetic freeze-out as low as 80 - 90 MeV Tkin freeze-out • Consequences for resonance re-feeding Blast Wave Fit by Olga Barranikova, STAR Re-feeding of resonances Rough estimate of the re-feeding probability Tkin Estimate of available energy for re-feeding at different reaction stages with a simple thermal ansatz: 3 s m1 + m2 + 2 T 2 D • baryons can re-created until end of the reaction • r meson re-creation is only possible near chemical freezeout Decay time analysis Decay time analysis r mesons are emitted earlier than D baryons Peak emission times: D ~ 22 fm/c r ~ 15 fm/c Cross sections and collision rates Cross sections and collision rates Production channel for measured resonances: S+p L(1520) N+K L(1520) L+p S(1385) K+p K* L+X Y K+X Y S+X Y K* and L* show rescattering S* shows regeneration Regeneration/Rescattering cross section: s(L+p) > s (K+p) > s (S+p) ? S* K* L* Mean center of mass energy Mean center of mass energy Blue: Collision rate of the corresponding reactions Red: Average center of mass energy Green: Probability to form a resonance pp pp Kp Mean center of mass energy Mean center of mass energy (in linear scale) pp Kp pp -> D pp -> r pp Kp Kp -> K* Summary Summary Resonances provide additional information compared to stable hadrons and HBT measurements Thermal models do not describe all resonance yields When trying to understand resonance data one has to consider both effects, rescattering and refeeding The effect of rescattering is huge and can be measured for example with the r meson The probability to regenerate a r or K* meson is lower than the chance to regenerate a D baryon The cross section for L* production is lower than for S* production Thank you! Backup slides Backup slides Model UrQMD - correlations Correlations are well described except for most central reactions Q. Li, M.Bleicher, H. Stoecker, nucl-th/0602032; Data: STAR