Transcript Gulf Ports infrastructure compatibility with International

Responsible Care®
An Introduction - Performance Metrics
PIC Executive Team Briefing
February 13th, 2012
Al Biggs
GM, Operational Excellence/ GPCA RCC Member – Sipchem
Introduction – Topics of the Presentation
 What is Responsible Care®
 Responsible Care® Codes of Management Practices
 Performance Monitoring and Metrics –
Development and Implementation Phases
Responsible Care- An Introduction
2
What is Responsible Care®
1. Chemical industry’s unique Global Initiative that drives continuous improvement
in environmental, health, safety and security (EHS&S) performance.
2. Transparent communication with interested parties (i.e. stakeholders) about its
activities to improve perception and respond to concerns of the industry.
3. Embraces the development and application of sustainable chemistry, helping our
industry contribute to sustainable development while allowing us to meet the
world’s growing need for essential chemicals and the products those chemicals
make possible.
4. First developed in Canada by the Canadian Chemical Producers Association in
1985.
5. International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) provides oversight for the
program globally.
6. Today it is implemented by chemical federations and their member companies in
54 nations.
7. Not a one-time activity. It will evolve over time to meet the changing
expectations of the industry and its stakeholders . No end point!
Responsible Care- An Introduction
3
Responsible Care® Global Charter
1
• ADOPT GLOBAL RESPONSIBLE Care® CORE PRINCIPLES
2
• IMPLEMENT FUNDAMENTAL FEATURES OF NATIONAL
RESPONSIBLE Care® PROGRAMMES
3
• COMMIT TO ADVANCING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
4
• CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVE AND REPORT PERFORMANCE
5
• ENHANCE THE MANAGEMENT OF CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
WORLDWIDE – PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP
6
• CHAMPION AND FACILITATE THE EXTENSION OF RESPONSIBLE
Care® ALONG THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY’S VALUE CHAIN
7
• ACTIVELY SUPPORT NATIONAL AND GLOBAL RESPONSIBLE Care®
GOVERNANCE PROCESSES
8
• ADDRESS STAKEHOLDER EXPECTATIONS ABOUT CHEMICAL
INDUSTRY ACTIVITIES AND PRODUCTS
9
• PROVIDE APPROPRIATE RESOURCES TO EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENT
RESPONSIBLE Care®
Responsible Care- An Introduction
Global
Charter
4
Responsible Care® Family of Nations
54 Worldwide National Associations
Responsible Care- An Introduction
5
GPCA Responsible Care® Program
1. GPCA adopted Responsible Care® in December 2009 to improve regional
EHS&S performance and general perception of the chemical industry both in the
Gulf and globally.
2. Initiative run by Responsible Care® Committee:
 15 Members representing a blend of Full and Associate Members
 Chaired by a Board Member
 Quarterly Meetings Held/Task Force Solutions
3. Main objective is to secure and maintain the ICCA Membership and develop
programs for the implementation of Responsible Care® in Member Companies.
4. Programs being developed with the cooperation of American Chemistry Council
(ACC).
ACC
Signed MOU
Responsible Care- An Introduction
6
GPCA’s RC Implementation Timeline – RC 2011 Plan
Mandatory
by Dec
2013
CEOs’
Declaration
of Support
Phase I
Phase II
ICCA Membership
Program Implementation
Only 23
appointed
so far
RC Coordinators
Appointment
RC Logo
Registration
Reg in 6
GCC
Countries
Issued
2011-2013
1Q 2012
Guiding
Principles
RC Program
Document
GPCA’s Codes on
RC
Self
Assessments &
Action Plans
Gap
Closures
Reporting
Metrics
Initiation of
Verification
Process
Start with
2010 data
2012-2013
Issued
To be complete by
all Signatory
members
December 2010
Responsible Care- An Introduction
7
Responsible Care® Codes of Management Practices
CAER
Process
Safety
Environment
Employee
Health & Safety
Product
Stewardship
Distribution
Security
RCMS
Responsible Care- An Introduction
8
Responsible Care® GPCA – Guiding Principles
Responsible Care® is the global chemical industry’s health, safety, security and environment initiative that drives continuous
improvement in performance. Responsible Care® is both an ethic and a commitment seeking to build confidence and trust in an
industry that is essential for sustainability. These objectives are achieved by implementing the following guiding principles:
1. To lead our companies in ethical ways that increases the benefits to society by protecting our people, environment and community.
2. To design and operate our facilities in a safe, secure and environmentally sound manner.
3. To instill a culture throughout all levels of our organizations to continually identify, reduce and manage occupational and process
safety risks.
4. To steward our products and services through each life cycle stages in order to protect people and the environment.
5. To promote pollution prevention, minimization of wastes and conservation of energy and other critical resources.
6. To counsel customers and stakeholders on the safe use, transportation and disposal of chemical products.
7. To work with Governments, Agencies and Associations at all levels in the development of effective and efficient health, safety,
security and environmental laws and industry standards.
8. To recognize, respect and respond to community concerns about our products and operations.
9. To extend knowledge by conducting or supporting research on the health, safety and environmental effects of our products and
waste material management.
10.To measure performance, openly report and make continual progress towards our goal of eliminating accidents,
injuries or harm to human health and the environment from our products and operations.
11. To seek continual improvement in our integrated Responsible Care Management System® to address health, safety, security and
environment performance.
12. To promote the principles and practices of Responsible Care by sharing experiences and offering assistance to others who produce,
handle, use, transport or dispose of chemicals.
H.E. Mohammed Al-Mady
Chairman-GPCA
Dr. Abdulwahab Al-Sadoun
Secretary General-GPCA
Responsible Care- An Introduction
Mr. Abdulrahman Al-Jawahery
Chairman Responsible Care
Committee-GPCA
9
Responsible Care Performance Metrics
Development Phase – Key Accomplishments
• Task Force (TF) approach adopted by Responsible Care
Committee (RCC) - December 2010
• Vision, Strategy, Objectives and Action Plan defined by TF –
February 2011
• TF completed performance metrics survey and study.
Recommendations on metrics adopted by RCC – March 2011
• Guidance document / roll-out strategy approved by RCC and
Workshop held – May / June 2011
10
Responsible CARE – Task Force (08)
Performance Metrics
Task Force Members










Bader Al- Adwani
Manoel Fernandes
Mortaza K Al-Yousef
Naved Khan
Ahmed Al-Hazmi
Qasim Yunus
Asrar Mohammed
Jassim Darwish
Tariq Alauddin
Albert E. Biggs
- PIC
- Borouge
- Tasnee
- QAPCO
- Sabic
- Sabic
- Equate
- GPIC
- Sipchem
- Sipchem
11
Responsible CARE
Task Force 08 – Performance Metrics
Vision
“To measure performance, openly report, make
continual progress towards our goal of eliminating
accidents, injuries or harm to human health and the
environment from our products and operations”
GPCA Guiding Principle
12
Responsible CARE
Task Force 08 – Performance Metrics
Strategy
•
Keep it simple by building on commonly reported
performance metrics
•
Where applicable, align with global trade associations
•
Phase in new “value added” metrics over time
•
Use data for bench marking, targeting areas for
improvement and sharing of best practices
13
Responsible CARE
Task Force 08 – Performance Metrics
Task Force Objectives
 Establish a standard template including definition and
formulas for metrics.
 Develop a guideline document for measuring and reporting
performance metrics.
 Ensure effective communication and understanding of
performance reporting.
 Over time, realize value added benefits and industry
performance improvements.
14
Performance Metrics
Study and Survey Results
 Most member companies are reporting or have data
available that align with reporting requirements of ACC
and CEFIC for:
 Occupational Safety
 Process Safety
 Waste Disposal
 Resource Utilization
 Gaseous emission data is scattered
 No data being collected and reported on distribution
incidents
15
Responsible CARE
Task Force 08 – Performance Metrics
Governance
 Member company data is to be posted on the GPCA web site.
 For the first three years (2010, 2011 and 2012) data is to be
published without company names.
 A sub-committee recently chartered to support implementation
of the Guidance document and provide governance surrounding
management of data
 The Performance Metrics Task Force has transitioned to form
the first sub-committee of the GPCA Responsible Care
Committee
16
GPCA Publication Plans
• Targeting to publish the first data set and a consolidated report
covering 2010 on the GPCA website the 1st quarter 2012
• Subsequent annual reports to be posted by GPCA the 2nd or 3rd
quarter of each year for the previous year data sets (e.g. 2011,
2012 data etc.)
• Member Company data sets are due no later than March 31st for
the previous year.
17
PERFORMANCE METRICS / SUB-COMMITTEE CHARTER
Committee Chairman: Al Biggs
Vice Chairman: Jassim Darwish
Date Developed : December 2011
Vision/Destination
 To measure performance, openly report, make
continual progress towards our goal of
eliminating accidents, injuries or harm to human
health and the environment from our products
and operations
2012 Objectives
Team Members: Bader Al-Adwani, Dr. Ahmed Al-Hazmi, Mortaza Al-Yousef,
Naveed Khan, Qasim Yunus, Asrar Mohammad, Manoel Fernandes, Tariq
Alauddin, Tahir Qadir
* Extended Team Member(s): David Sandige (ACC)
Key Deliverables / Milestones
Date
In Scope
 Complete sub-committee work
process, procedure development and
obtain RC Committee / GPCA
endorsement.
2nd Qtr.
 Lead and influence the
development of value added
metrics and alignment with ICCA
 Complete 2010 performance data
analysis and provide
recommendations on presenting data
for GPCA posting by March 31st.
 Develop sub-committee work flows, processes and
procedures for dealing with incomplete / inconsistent
data, evaluating technical queries and updating of the
guidance document.
 Complete 2011 performance data
analysis and provide
recommendations on presenting data
for GPCA posting by October 1st
 Finalize our recommendations about 2010 and 2011
Member Company Performance Data.
 Review and update Distribution
Incident metrics and guidance
document if needed
 Review and refine metric requirements and guidelines  Outline path forward and provide a
communication package for members
for Distribution Incidents and provide
about GHG reporting
recommendations for developing greenhouse gas
metrics
 Present summary of recommendations in a RC
workshop
Committee - Key Performance Indicators
 On time delivery of recommendations and solutions
 Positive feedback from member companies
 Regional EHS&S performance improvements
Charter Template
 Present recommendations and
program updates during RC
Workshop
1st Qtr.
3rd Qtr.
1st Qtr.
2nd Qtr.
2nd Half
Key Dependencies & Interfaces




RC Committee
ICCA
Regulatory agencies
Member Companies
 Review, consolidate , analyze
and provide recommendations to
RC Committee about RC
performance data
 Promote and Share Best
Practices
 Clarify and communicate with key
stakeholders related to
Performance Measurements
 Respond to Technical queries
from Stakeholders
Out of Scope
 Compliance with legal
requirements
 Technical problem solving for
specific company performance
issues
18
Back-Up Slides
Task Force Workshop
Survey Conclusions
19
Responsible CARE Metrics
Task Force 08 – Performance Metrics
Workshop
Date: February 23, 2011
Al-Jubail, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
20
INDEX

Work Shop Agenda

Current Situation, Objectives, Strategy and Summary of Survey Results

Individual Member Survey Results:
• Equate
• GPIC
• SABIC
• Tasnee
• Borouge
• Sipchem
• Qapco

Metrics Definitions and Formulas
21
Responsible CARE – Task Force (08)
Performance Metrics
Proposed Workshop Agenda
 Introductions (10 min.)
 Review Agenda and Desired Outcomes (15 min.)
 Responsible Care Committee Objectives and Task Force Approach (10 min.)
 Metrics – Objectives and Task Force Strategy (15 min.)
 Results of TF survey – Proposal Development, Discussion and Alignment (180 min.)
 Next Steps (30 min.)
 Wrap up / Action Items (15 min.)
 Meeting Pluses and Deltas (5 min.)
22
Results of Task Force Survey
Survey Design
• Surveyed Task Force Members
• Survey sent to 9 companies
• Response from 7 companies / 5 Countries
Qatar
UAE
Kuwait
Bahrain
Saudi Arabia
23
Survey Responses
 Occupational Safety
– 70% of Companies polled Recording & reporting
– Fatalities
– Lost Time Injuries & Incidence Rates
– OSHA Recordable Injuries & Incidence rates
 For Employees and Contractors.
– 30 % Companies not reporting this data for contractor employees.
– Polled companies generally in alignment with ACC & CEFIC reporting
requirements.
24
Survey Responses
 Process Safety
– 70 % companies reporting Process Safety Incidents
– 33 % companies reporting Process Safety Total Incident Rate
– No company reporting Process Safety Total Incident Severity
Rate
– Definitions of Process Safety Incident not aligned with the CCPS
definition for all reporting companies.
25
Survey Responses
• Waste
– All Companies reporting waste generated and disposed.
– 30 % companies not segregating waste into Hazardous and non
hazardous.
• Waste Water Discharge
– 70 % companies reporting TOC in waste water
26
Survey Responses
 Gaseous Emissions
 90 % companies reporting NOx emissions in PPM
 33 % companies reporting SO2
 22 % Reporting CO2 emissions & CO2 Intensity
 22 % Companies reporting Total Green House Gases Emissions
 1 Company reporting total Emissions
 Significant gap from ACC & CEFIC Metrics
27
Survey Responses
 Resource Utilization
–
–
–
–
100 % companies reporting energy consumption
78 % reporting specific energy consumption
78 % reporting water consumption
Alignment with ACC & CEFIC
 Distribution Incidents
– No Company Reporting
28
Conclusions
 Most companies are reporting or have data available for ACC/CEFIC
metrics in.
– Occupational Safety
– Process Safety
– Waste Disposal
– Resource Utilization
 Gaseous emission data is scattered.
 No data on distribution Incidents.
29
Back-Up Slides
Task Force Workshop
Survey Results
30
Responsible Care – Performance Metrics Task Force (08)
CEFIC and ACC Comparison
Metric Name
A.
CEFIC
ACC
Occupational Safety
1.
Employee Fatalities


2.
Lost Time Injury Incident Rate for Employees


3.
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence Rate for Employees
4.
Contractor Employee Fatalities


Lost Time Injury Incidence Rate for Contract Employees


5.
6.
B.
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence Rate for Contract Employees


Process Safety
1.
Process Safety Incidents

2.
Process Safety Total Incident Rate (PSTIR)

3.
Process Safety Total Incident Severity Rate (PSTIR)

 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / definitions could be different.
31
Responsible Care – Performance Metrics Task Force (08)
CEFIC and ACC Comparison
Metric Name
C.
CEFIC
ACC
Emissions / Discharges to Environment

2.
Non-Hazardous Waste for Disposal

3.
Discharges to Water – Chemical Oxygen Demand

4.
Sulfur Dioxide


5.
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)


6.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

7.
Hydro fluorocarbons / Per Chlorofloro Carbons

8.
Methane

9.
Surfur Hexaflouride

10.
Total Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions
11.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Intensity

Total Green House Gases
Hazardous Waste for Disposal
1.
** On Discretion of National Associations to publish if relevant / necessary
 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / definitions could be different.
32
Responsible Care – Performance Metrics Task Force (08)
CEFIC and ACC Comparison
Metric Name
D.
CEFIC
ACC
Resource Utilization
1.
Use of Energy (Tonnes of Fuel oil Equivilant; TOE)

2.
Specific Energy Consumption


3.
Water Consumption




E.
1.
Product Distribution
Distribution Incidents and Severity Level
 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / definitions could be different.
33
Task Force – Survey Results
Metric
Name
Metric
Name
CEFIC
CEFI
CEFI
ACC
ACC
ACC
A
A
BB
CC
DD
EE
FF
GG
C
A
Occupational Safety
1.
Employee Fatalities








2.
Lost Time Injury Incident Rate for
Employees









3.
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence
Rate for Employees








4.
Contractor Employee Fatalities







5.
Lost Time Injury Incidence Rate for
Contract Employees







6.
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence
Rate for Contract Employees






B
Process Safety
Process Safety Incidents





2.
Process Safety Total Incident Rate
(PSTIR)




3.
Process Safety Total Incident Severity
Rate (PSTIR)

1.
 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / definitions could be different.


34
Task Force – Survey Results
CEFIC
ACC
A
C
Emissions / Discharges to Environment
1.
Hazardous Waste for Disposal


2.
Non-Hazardous Waste for Disposal


3.
Discharges to Water – Chemical
Oxygen Demand

4.
Sulfur Dioxide


5.
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)


6.
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)

7.
Hydro fluorocarbons / Per
Chlorofloro Carbons


B

Total Green House Gases

8.
Methane


9.
Surfur Hexaflouride


10.
Total Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions


11.
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Intensity

Total Emissions Gases


C
D
E









Total Green House Gases
Metric Name




G











F


* Reported as Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
** On Discretion of National Associations to publish if relevant / necessary
 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / Definitions could be different.
35
Task Force – Survey Results
Metric Name
D
CEFIC
ACC
A
B
C
D
E
F
G







Resource Utilization
1.
Use of Energy (Tonnes of Fuel oil Equivilant; TOE)

2.
Specific Energy Consumption








3.
Water Consumption










E
1.
Product Distribution
Distribution Incidents and Severity Level
 - Data on the metric being gathered and reported. Units / definitions could be different .
Legend:
A - Equate
B - GPIC
C - SABIC
D - Tasnee
E - Borouge
F - Sipchem
G- QAPCO
36
GPCA
Responsible Care Performance Metric Annual Report
GPCA Company Name :
S.No
Report for the Year :
Metric Name
Metric Formula / Definition
A.
Occupational Safety
1
Employee Fatalities
# of Fatalities
2
Lost Time Injury Incident rate for Employees
(# of days away from work cases X 200,000) / Employee man-hours worked
3
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence Rate for
Employees
(# of Injuries X 200,000) / Employee man-hours worked
4
Contractor Employee Fatalities
# of Fatalities
5
Lost Time Injury Incidence Rate for Contract
Employees
(# of Injuries X 200,000) / Contractor man-hours worked
6
OSHA Recordable Cases Incidence Rate for
Contract Employees
(# of Injuries X 200,000) / Contractor man-hours worked
B.
Process Safety
1
Process Safety Incidents
(# of Incidents that meet the Process safety Incident Criteria
2
Process Safety Total Incident Rate (PSTIR)
(# of Process Safety Incidents x 200,000) / (Employee + Contractor Employee
man-hours)
3
Process Safety Total Incident Severity Rate
(PSTIR)
(Total Severity Score x 200,000) / (Employee + Contractor employee manhours)
GPCA Member Company
Annual Report
37
GPCA
Responsible Care Performance Metric Annual Report
S.No
Metric Name
Metric Formula / Definition
C.
Emissions / Discharges to Environment
1
Hazardous Waste for Disposal
Metric tons / Year
2
Non-Hazardous Waste for Disposal
Metric tons / Year
3
Quantity of Waster Water discharged to
Environment
Cubic Meters / Year
4
Discharges to Water - Chemical Oxygen
Demand
Metric tons of O2 / Year
5
Sulfur Dioxide
Metric tons / Year
6
Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)
Metric tons / Year
7
Total Green House Gas Emissions (GHG)
Metric tons CO2 Equivalent (See Appendix C & D & E)
8
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Intensity
Million Metric tons emitted per year / Million Metric tons of
production
GPCA Member Company
Annual Report
38
GPCA
Responsible Care Performance Metric Annual Report
S.No
Metric Name
Metric Formula / Definition
D.
Resource Utilization
1
Use of Energy (Tons of Fuel oil Equivilant; TOE)
Energy from Fossil Fuels + Net Energy Purchased + Self Generated
Renewable Energy
2
Specific Energy Consumption
TOE / Metric tons of production
3
Process Water Consumption
Millions of Cubic Meters
E.
Product Distribution
1
No of Distribution Incidents
GPCA Member Company
Annual Report
Total # of Incidents classified by means of transport
Legend:
Phase I - 2010 Data to be reported by September 2011
Phase II - 2011 Data to be reported by March 2012
Phase III - 2012 Data to be reported by March 2013
Phase IV - Potential Metric for 2014
39