Transcript www.cigionline.org
Reforming The Architecture of the International Monetary System: Managing The Impossible Trinity
Rakesh Mohan Michael Debabrata Patra Muneesh Kapur Conference of the The BRICS & Asia, Currency Internationalization, and International Monetary Reform Hong Kong 10-11 December 2012 1
Presentation Outline
IMS – Performance Evaluation IMS Early Warning: Review and Reform Managing Capital Flows: Country-centric or Multilateral Issues in reserve management Stylized facts Dominant Reserve Currency – Risks to IMS; Demand-Supply Dynamics Currency Internationalization: the Way Forward?
Costs and Benefits IMS and Central Banks Central Bank Mandate(s) – Rethink?
Key Takeaways 2
What is the IMS?
Set of official arrangements comprising:
◦ exchange arrangements and exchange rates ◦ international payments and transfers relating ◦ international capital movements; and ◦ international reserves
What it is not Mission creep Shifting channels of contagion- This time will be different
3
IMS Performance – Evaluation Increasing incidence of crises Period Gold Standard (1870-1913) Inter-War Period (1925-1939) Bretton Woods (1948-1972) a.1948-1958 b.1959-1972 Post Bretton Woods (1973 2010) a.1973-1989 b.1990-2010 Banking Crisis Currency Crisis 1.3
0.6
2.1
1.7
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.7
1.4
1.9
2.6
2.2
3.0
3.7
5.4
2.4
External Default 0.9
1.5
0.7
0.3
1.1
1.3
1.8
0.8
Source: Bush, Farrant and Wright (2011) [Table A, p,7].
4
IMS Performance Evaluation: Higher Exchange Rate Volatility
Period
1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09
Variability in Major Exchange Rates (coefficient of variation in percent) Yen/ US Dollar
16.47
Pound / US Dollar
13.91
Swiss Franc/ US Dollar
30.62
Euro/ US Dollar
21.91
26.05
13.55
8.63
13.46
6.91
14.72
2000-12 12.96
24.49
Note: Data for Euro/US Dollar prior to 1999 pertain to Deutsche Mark/US Dollar.
Source: International Financial Statistics, IMF.
18.90
8.46
17.90
27.92
21.69
15.07
18.32
18.18
5
IMS Performance Evaluation: Exchange and Payment Arrangements Intermediate Solutions – managed floats; soft pegs Current restrictions ebbing; capital restrictions well in evidence
Exchange Arrangements : Current and Capital Transactions
1970 1980 1990 2000 Article VIII Status (no restrictions on payments/transfers for current international transactions 37 No. of Countries 54 72 152 Article XIV Status (Transitional restrictions) Bilateral Payments Agreements Controls on Payments for Invisible Transactions and Current Transfers Repatriation/Surrender Requirements for Exports and/or Invisibles Controls on Capital Transactions Total number of countries covered Source: AREAER (various issues), IMF.
80 60 80 100 99 119 86 42 73 114 110 141 83 47 87 124 123 155 34 60 98 107 182 186 2010 171 19 67 95 89 186 190 6
IMS Performance : Evaluation High flux in Capital Flows 9 8 7 6 1 0 -1 5 4 3 2 Debt flows-Short term Debt flows-Long term Portfolio equity flows FDI flows Total capital Recycling petro dollars Debt crisis US easy monetary policy Asian crisis Greenspan put 2008 crisis 7
High Flux for AEs too
1 Total Assets (Outflows) (2+3+4)
2 International Organizations 3 AEs 4 EDEs (5 to 10) 5 Dev. Asia
Capital Inflows and Outflows: Advanced, Emerging and Developing Economies
6 Central and eastern Europe 7 CIS 8 Mid. East and north Africa 9 Sub-Saharan Africa 10 Western Hemisphere 2003
2881
62 2676 142 24 11 34 75 14 -16 2004
4838
31 4528 279 20 32 63 112 16 36 2005
6137
61 5634 442 137 20 77 113 17 78 2006
7461
-2 6667 796 234 72 102 236 35 117 2007
10293
97 9104 1093 250 119 164 358 39 162 2008
279
85 -623 817 173 88 286 154 23 94
(US $ billion)
2009
213
2010
3723
88 -196 321 145 2841 737 125 2 62 46 15 71 294 -36 125 149 32 174
11 Total Liabilities (Inflows) (12 to 14)
12 International Organizations 13 AEs 14 EDEs (15 to 21)
3458
55 3168 235
5299
29 4847 423
6703
60 5992 651
8160
29 7222 909
11231
103 9384 1744 15 Dev. Asia 16 Central and eastern Europe 17 CIS 18 Mid. East and north Africa 86 54 41 36 159 93 61 54 265 125 85 73 324 195 126 150 471 298 286 346 19 Sub-Saharan Africa 20 Western Hemisphere 9 8 15 41 17 86 7 106 65 278
21 Net (11-1) 577 462 566 699 938 Note:
Both inflows and outflows are exclusive of movements in foreign exchange reserves.
1061
74 4 984 256 264 167 90 42 164
782 1102
84 277 741 344 78 43 61 56 159
889 4555
134 3132 1289 640 75 101 89 58 325
832
8
Reserve Accumulation by EMEs and AEs
12,0
Stock of International Reserves
10,0 8,0 EDEs AEs 6,0 4,0 2,0 0,0 мар-2000 июн-2012 Other; 1,5
Composition in Percent (March 2000)
Euro; 17,5 Swiss Franc; 0,3 Yen; 6,3 Other; 5,3
Composition in Percent (June 2012)
Euro; 25,1 Swiss Franc; 0,1 Pound; 2,9 US Dollar; 71,5 Yen; 3,8 Pound; 3,8 US Dollar; 61,9 9
AEs share in global reserves are coming down End of World AEs EMDCs Sub-Saharan Africa Developing Asia Emerging Europe Middle East& North Africa Western Hemisphere
IMS: International Reserves@ (US $ billion)
1970 97.6
72.6
20.6
3.0
3.5
0.6 4.7
5.5
1980 461.2
273.6
162.2
14.8
27.7 5.4 74.0 40.3
1990 990.0
628.7
201.5
13.3
68.1
19.3
51.7
49.0
2000 2070.3
1325.8
739.4
36.1
324.5
104.1
117.5
157.2
2011 10705.1 3744.9
6954.6 178.1 4058.0 870.6
1108.1 740.1
Memo: World Reserves with Gold at Market Prices 100.1
1089.0
1373.5
2314.3
@: comprising foreign exchange, reserve position in the IMF, SDR holdings and gold valued at SDR 35 per ounce.
Source
: International Financial Statistics, IMF.
12186.3
10
IMF Surveillance –Review and Reform
Gaps in Surveillance – Response ◦ Enhancing integration of multilateral macro-financial analysis: WEO & GFSR ◦ introduction of Early Warning Exercise, Fiscal Monitor, Spillover Report, Pilot External Sector Report, and the G-20 Mutual Assessment Process ◦ Improvements in bilateral surveillance – multi-country perspective: timeliness and readability ◦ The Financial Sector Stability Assessment (FSSA, a major component of FSAP) made mandatory for 25 key countries An Alternative approach: an India example ◦ Ensured compatibility with best practices and enhanced the skill-sets within the financial sector, leading to significant capacity building ◦ ◦ 4 independent advisory panels Reports peer reviewed ◦ ◦ ◦ Integrated Surveillance Decision ◦ Why not amend Articles?
More multilateral less bilateral Dealing with spillovers – dialogue; encouragement?
Flawed governance, flawed surveillance 11
Managing Capital Flows • • • • • • • Five challenges for collective action Empirical evidence on beneficial effects of CAL weak Danger of one-size-fits-all approach Capital account management does not mean less openness – fully open capital account may not be desirable Policies needed to counter externalities associated with cross-border flows Even-handed treatment?
◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Advisory role for the IMF is the best option for now Analysis of push and pull factors Cross fertilisation of country experiences Improve mapping Capital controls legitimate part of policy toolkit 12
Issues in Reserve Management Massive Reserve Accumulation Reserve Accumulation vis-à-vis Other Metrics Months of Imports Percent of GDP Percent of Gross capital Formation Percent of Short-term Debt Months of Imports Percent of GDP
Table : Reserves in Relation to Selected Metrics
1990 2000
Global
4.4
5.2 @ 5.2
6.9
23.4 @ n.a.
30.9
n.a.
Low and Middle Income Countries
5.6
6.2
6.6 @ 11.3
Percent of Gross capital Formation Percent of Short-term Debt 25.7 @ 107.5 @ 47.1
229.5
Months of Imports Percent of GDP Percent of Gross capital Formation Percent of Short-term Debt
Note:
@: Data pertain to 1992;
High Income Countries
4.2
4.8
5.0 @ 5.9
22.9 @ n.a.
n.a. = not available 26.9
n.a.
2010 13.5
17.1
75.2
n.a
16.3
28.7
89.1
556.5
10.2
11.6
62.8
n.a.
2011 13.2
17.0
n.a.
n.a
15.7
26.9
82.0
n.a.
10.6
12.0
n.a
n.a.
13
Dominance of US Dollar in International Reserve Currency
US Dollar in International Finance
Foreign exchange transactions International reserves Debt securities Share of banknotes held overseas Cross-border bank deposits Cross-border bank loans
Source:
IMF (2010b).
0 86 64 46 52 59 65 50
Percent to World Total
100 14
Demand for Reserve Assets continues to rise…
Country Brazil Hong Kong China
India
Korea Russia Saudi Arabia Total
Net Foreign Assets: Requirements of Major EMEs
US $ billion 2011 Actual Scenario A 2017 Scenario B Scenario C 349 280 3776 883 479 9510 591 329 6483 470 305 5129
286
309 491 547 6036
665
500 1456 1393 14886
460
330 755 592 9540
373
319 623 569 7788 Source: Authors’ Calculations (see text for methodology) based on IFS, IMF data.
Demand likely to outstrip supply of reserve currencies
15
Underlying Risks
Threats to IMS Stability
◦ US debt sustainability and Triffin dilemma ◦ Underpricing all Risks ◦ Risks from policies towards domestic orientation in the US
Ability of US Dollar to meet future reserve currency demand?
16
Trends and composition of GDP
Sectoral Contribution to GDP growth
2 0 -2 12 10 8 6 4 Agriculture Industry Services GDP Growth has moderated over last six quarters ◦ Sluggish industry growth ◦ Services has also shown moderation in last 3 quarters 17
Inflation Persistence
WPI YoY Inflation
12 11 10 9 8 0 -1 -2 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 February 2010 to November 2011 – Highly elevated inflation ◦ Average Inflation 9.6 per cent February 2012 to October 2012 - Sticky Inflation ◦ Average Inflation around 7.6 per cent 18
Movement of Indian rupee vis-à-vis US dollar
30 20 10 0 60 50 40
Market-determined-movements two ways
19
Financial openness of India increasing
40 30 20 10 0 90 80 70 60 50 Intenational Assets International Liabilities Source: Lane and Milessi-Feretti Database Total Assets + Liabilities 20
India’s Currency Invoicing
Currency Pound Sterling
Currency-wise Pattern of Invoicing of India’s Mercandise Trade
1990-91 Export 4.5
Import 3.1
1999-2000 Export 3.9
Import 1.7
2005-06 Export 2.9
Import 2.0
(Per cent) 2008-09 Export 2.8
Import 0.9
US Dollar Japenese Yen Euro Indian Rupee Others 57.2
0.1
27.7
10.5
59.7
4.4
7.7
25.1
87.0
0.3
3.0
0.3
5.5
85.8
3.8
3.3
0.0
5.4
87.4
0.5
7.7
1.6
78.2
4.2
12.5
3.2
84.1
0.5
10.9
1.8
86.3
2.3
9.5
1.0
US Dollar is also the major currency for invoicing software exports with 76% share, followed by Pound Sterling (10%) and Euro (7%) in 2009-10.
21
2 0 6 4 16 14 12 10 8
Share in World GDP- PPP based
1980 1990 2000 2011 EMEs account for 49% of global GDP in 2011; India: 5.6 % 22
Currency Internationalization
Growing scope for EME Currency Internationalization…
Selected Macro and Financial indicators of Select Currencies with Internationalization Potential
Indicator
Macroeconomic Indicators
GDP share Economic growth 3.6
4.2
Inflation 4.9
Sovereign ratings BBB 10.9
9.5
2.6
AA 0.4
4.4
3.4
AAA 2.8
8.1
5.2
BBB 1.3
6.7
4.8
BB+ 3.2
4.2
3.3
A 1.7
3.6
3.1
BBB 1.7
4.3
7.2
BBB 0.4
4.4
2.5
AAA 0.6
4.2
5.0
BBB+ 1.2
4.2
5.2
BBB Capital account openness Total trade 0.4
1.3
Exchange rate flexibility
Financial Indicators
Financial depth Intl. debt securities FX market turnover FX bid-ask spreads Floating 1.6
0.1
0.3
8.6
-1.1
11.0
Crawl like 7.2
0.1
0.4
1.7
2.5
2.7
Currency board -1.1
2.3
1.1
0.9
0.4
3.1
1.1
1.8
Floating Floating Floating Floating 0.2
2.3
Other managed 2.5
-1.1
0.1
2.6
Other 0.5
1.0
managed Floating Floating 1.6
0.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
0.0
0.5
6.7
0.3
0.0
… … 1.2
… 0.8
11.6
0.5
0.1
0.6
7.2
0.8
0.1
0.5
7.9
0.5
0.1
0.7
6.7
0.5
0.1
0.4
31.2
0.4
0.1
0.4
23.6
23
EMEs’ share in global trade is rising but…
Country Euro area
Exports of Goods, Services and Financial Flows: Share of Top 20 Countries(%)
Exports of goods and Exports of goods and services and services 2001-2005 2006-2010 24.1
23.6
financial flows 2001-2005 25.3
2006-2010 24.6
US China UK Japan Canada Korea Singapore Russia Switzerland Mexico
India
Sweden Saudi Arabia Australia Malaysia UAE Norway Brazil Thailand Total
Source:
IMF (2011c). 18.5
8.8
9.1
8.3
4.7
3.2
2.9
2.3
2.8
2.5
1.3
2.0
1.5
1.4
1.6
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.3
100.0
16.8
12.0
7.7
6.9
3.7
3.4
3.2
3.2
2.7
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
100.0
22.4
7.5
12.7
7.2
3.8
2.5
2.3
1.9
2.4
2.0
1.1
1.7
1.1
1.6
1.2
n.a.
1.3
1.1
1.0
100.0
19.1
10.4
11.7
6.0
3.3
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.8
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.2
n.a.
1.5
1.5
1.1
100.0
24
…..Share of EME currencies in Fx turnover still negligible...
Currency US dollar Euro Japanese yen
Global Foreign Exchange Market Average Daily Turnover: Currency-wise
(Per cent)
2001 44.9
19 11.8
Share in Global Turnover 2004 2007 44 44.9
18.7
10.4
19 11.8
Pound sterling Australian dollar Swiss franc Canadian dollar Hong Kong dollar Swedish krona New Zealand dollar Korean won Singapore dollar
Indian rupee
6.5
2.2
3 2.2
1.1
1.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
8.2
3 3 2.1
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.2
6.5
2.2
3 2.2
1.1
1.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.1
Russain rouble Chinese renminbi South African rand Brazilian real Others
Memo:
Global turnover (all currencies, US$ bn)
Source: BIS
0.2
0 0.5
0.2
5.9
1239 0.3
0 0.4
0.1
6 1934 0.2
0 0.5
0.2
5.9
3324 2010 42.4
19.5
9.5
6.4
3.8
3.2
2.6
1.2
1.1
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
5.9
3981 25
…US Dollar and Euro continue to dominate in Global Fx Derivatives Market…
Global Forex Derivatives Market Turnover(Share in %)
US dollar Euro Japanese yen Pound sterling Australian dollar Swiss franc Canadian dollar Hong Kong dollar Swedish krona New Zealand dollar Korean won Singapore dollar Indian rupee Russain rouble Chinese renminbi South African rand Brazilian real Others 26
…Rising presence of some EMEs..
Currency
International Bond Issuance in Emerging Market Currencies
(Per cent)
Share in Total EM Issuance in 2010 Hong Kong dollar Brazilian real South African rand Singapore dollar Chinese renminbi Russian rouble Korean won
Indian rupee Total
18.0
10.9
10.8
10.2
5.8
4.5
0.5
0.4
61.1
Source
: IMF (2011e).
27
Prerequisites…
Acceptability is key, comprising
◦ Deep and liquid financial and foreign exchange markets ◦ Full currency convertibility and an open capital account ◦ Wide use in international transactions ◦ Macroeconomic and Political stability 28
Cost and Benefits of Currency Internationalization
Reduces transaction costs Reduces exchange rate risks Access to international debt securities markets –domestic deepening Complicates monetary management Can hurt export competitiveness Could make exchange rate more volatile Exorbitant privilege or exorbitant risk Systematic consequences
Rush into currency internationalisation – repent at length
29
Key Takeaways
Enlightened IMS Governance is key ◦ More representative legitimate and effective IMF ◦ Regional arrangement and national reserves integral part of global safety net Domestic stability, external stability and global stability – new impossible trinity ◦ Dealing with spillovers critical Managing Capital Flows – One size fits all or customised to country context?
Central banks mandate in reformed IMS – financial stability; self FSAP Future demand-supply mismatches in reserve currencies –recipe for future shocks?
Currency internationalisation ◦ EMEs in a still nascent continuum ◦ ◦ Managed internationalisation is flawed and dangerous Economic size, financial depth, openness, credibility, usability, - set a high bar Blending fundamentals with country experience will balance desirable with feasible 30
Thank You!
31