No Slide Title

Download Report

Transcript No Slide Title

ATLSS SESI MODEL: Long-Legged and
Short-Legged Wading Birds: Foraging Indices
Louis J. Gross, University of Tennessee
ATLSS.org
Provides a relative estimate of quality of pixels as sites for nesting
colonies of wading birds during the breeding season
Wading Bird SESI Model: Foraging Index
Underlying ecological basis for model:
• The wading birds in a breeding colony exploit an area of
many square kilometers around the colony site. A colony
site, to be successful, should be surrounded by sufficient
foraging habitat.
• Wading birds can exploit fish from an area only when water
depths are within certain ranges.
Wading Bird SESI Model: Foraging Index
Underlying ecological basis for model:
•
Wading bird breeding can occur roughly between December and
July and wading birds require a continuous supply of available
food for the entire period they are caring for eggs and young.
This requires that a high enough fraction of their foraging area be
in the correct water depth range, with water depths continuously
decreasing, so that fish are concentrated. Reversals in water
depth in any pixels make them unsuitable foraging habitat.
•
Wading bird breeding success depends on the number of
continuous days during the breeding season in which foraging
conditions are suitable, as well as the percentage of pixels in their
foraging area that are appropriate habitat types.
Wading Bird SESI Model: Foraging Index
Using information from the
• FGAP vegetation map (30-m spatial resolution) and
• The South Florida Water Management Model 2 x 2 mile daily
water depth output, refined to 500-m spatial resolution (see
ATLSS’s High Resolution Hydrology)
A Wading Bird Foraging Index can be computed for any
500-m pixel in the area covered by the SFWMM.
Wading Bird Nesting Colony Suitability Is Determined by
Foraging Suitability of Pixels Surrounding the Colony
The Wading Bird
Foraging Index for a
given pixel (potential site
of a nesting colony) is
determined by the
‘collective foraging
suitability’ of the 500-m
pixels in the ‘core’ area
surrounding the colony
pixel.
The core foraging radius
for long-legged and
short-legged wading
birds, ForagRadius, is
currently 1.5 and 3.0 km,
respectively.
Black denotes Wading Bird colony
Wading Bird SESI Model: Foraging Index
The ‘collective foraging suitability’ used to calculate the
Wading Bird Foraging Index for any 500-m pixel is based on
the multiplication of two factors.
• One is a measure of the fraction of good habitat
surrounding a colony, Neighborhood_HSI.
• The other is a measure of net effect of variation of water
depth prior to and during the breeding season, Foraging
Potential Cycle.
Rule 1: Habitat Type Rule
The core or ‘neighborhood’ foraging area surrounding the
colony site must have the right type of habitat in sufficient
quantity.
A habitat suitability index, the Neighborhood_HSI of the
colony pixel, is determined based on the fractions of
preferred and avoided habitat that surround it.
Rule 1. Formulation of Habitat Type Rule
Step 1.
Each 500-m x 500-m
pixel in the core
foraging area of the
colony is assigned
an HSI value
computed from the
fraction of its
constituent 30-m
cells that are usable
habitat; i.e.,
•
•
•
•
•
•
Freshwater marsh
Muhlenbergia
Eleocharis
Typha
Spartina
Mangrove
A pixel with > 25%
urban area has value
0.
Rule 1. Calculating Fraction of Suitable Habitat
Pixels in Foraging Area Surrounding Colony
Step 2.
Next the colony pixel is assigned a ‘Neighborhood_HSI’
value computed as the mean of the HSI values of the
individual cells in its foraging area.
Neighborhood_HSI
= (Sum of 500-m pixel HSI values within foraging radius)/
(Number of pixels within the foraging area)
Only colony pixels that have a Neighborhood_HSI value of
> 0.50 are considered possible colony sites (i.e., non-zero
index). The index depends on hydrologic variables, as
discussed next.
Rule 2: Hydrology-Based Rule
The following rules are all based on the dynamics of
water depth in the core foraging area around the
colony pixel.
In particular, the dynamics of water depth in each
foraging pixel in the core area are examined over the
course of the breeding period and the time leading up
to it.
Rule 2 Construction: Condition a. Need Sufficient
Length of Preceding Hydroperiod in Each Foraging Pixel
60
Prior
Hydroperiod
50
WATER DEPTH
Only 500-m
pixels that were
flooded for at
least 120 days
prior to the
breeding season
are included in
the set of
surrounding
pixels in
calculating a
foraging index
for a wading
bird colony at
the central pixel.
40
30
Start of
Breeding
Period
20
10
0
0
50
100
150
200
DAY OF YEAR
250
300
350
Rule 2 Construction: Condition b. Water Depth
Requirements
60
WATER DEPTH IN CELL
At any given time
during the breeding
season, only pixels
that are in certain
water depth ranges
are usable and
contribute to the
foraging suitability
of the core area of
the colony.
WaterDepth
50
40
30
Range 5 to 35 cm
20
10
Long-legged wading
birds:
MINDEPTH to
MAXDEPTH:
Currently 5 to 35 cm
DAY OF REPRODUCTIVE SEASON
Short-legged wading birds:
MINDEPTH to MAXDEPTH:
Currently 1 to 20 cm
148
141
134
127
120
113
106
99
92
85
78
71
64
57
50
43
36
29
22
15
8
1
0
Rule 2 Construction. Assessing the Continuity of
Suitable Hydrologic Conditions Around Colony Pixel
The Foraging Cycle Potential is computed for colony pixels
that are suitable in terms of habitat.
The Foraging Cycle Potential is an indication of the continuity
of good hydrologic conditions within the core foraging area
of a colony pixel. It depends on how many pixels within the
foraging area are ‘active’; i.e., have appropriate water
conditions.
Rule 2 Construction. Assessing the Continuity of
Suitable Hydrologic Conditions Around Colony Pixel
Step 1
The status of each 500-m cell, in terms of hydrology, is tracked
daily during the breeding season. It is ‘active’ unless:
• Water depth is < MINDEPTH (currently 1 and 5 cm)
• Water depth is > MAXDEPTH (currently 20 and 35 cm)
• A 1-day rise in water depth is > PULSELIMIT
The last of these refers to the occurrence of a reversal in
the decline of water depths.
Rule 2 Construction. Assessing the Continuity of
Suitable Hydrologic Conditions Around Colony Pixel
Step 2
The hydrologic conditions of the core foraging area of a
colony pixel are considered ‘suitable’ if the fraction of
pixels in that area that are ‘active’ is > ActivityThreshold.
The number of continuous days the colony pixel is suitable
is tracked. When a value Cyclelen is reached the Foraging
Cycle Potential is incremented by 1. If the fraction of pixels
falls below the Activity Threshold, the count stops and
must be restarted at 0.
•
Currently ActivityThreshold = 0.20 and Cyclelen = 54 and 31
days for long-legged and short-legged wading birds,
respectively. (Note this is not the same as breeding cycle.)
Total Wading Bird Foraging Index
The total Wading Bird Foraging Index is calculated as the
product of the habitat suitability of pixels in the core area
surrounding the colony pixel and the number of foraging
cycles that are completed under suitable hydrologic
conditions in the core area (normalized by the total possible
number of cycles):
Wading Bird Foraging Index for Colony
= (Neighborhood_HSI)
*(Foraging Cycle Potential/Maximum Foraging Cycles)
Applications of Wading Bird Foraging Index
The Wading Bird Foraging Index provides a tool for
comparing the effects of different hydrologic scenarios on
potential colony sites for wading birds.
The next few slides show comparisons of 2050FutureBase
with AltD13R for:
•
•
•
Particular years over the whole landscape
Particular subregions
Index values averaged over subregions
SESI Output for Long-Legged Wading Birds in N. Taylor Slough: For 1993
Long-Legged Wading Bird SESI Index - N. Taylor Slough Subregion,
Comparing F2050 (blue) with D13R (red)
0.6
0.5
D13R
Foraging Index
0.4
0.3
0.2
F2050
0.1
0
1 2
3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Years (from 1965)
Long-Legged Wading Bird SESI Index - WCA-2B Subregion,
Comparing F2050 (blue) with D13R (red)
0.3500
D13R
0.2500
0.2000
0.1500
0.1000
0.0500
F2050
Year (from 1965)
33
31
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
13
11
9
7
5
3
0.0000
1
Foraging Index
0.3000
Caveats on the Use of SESI Models
How well SESI models reflect the true breeding/feeding potential
for the modeled species depends on a number of factors,
including:
•
The degree to which the life-cycle needs of the species and rates
of reproduction and survivorship are driven by the specific
hydrologic factors modeled within the study area. For example,
SESI models do not reflect effects of hunting, habitat
enhancement, disease, migrations into and out of the model area,
water quality, fire or other sources of disturbances, or invasion of
exotic plants or animals.
•
How accurately the models incorporate the known relationship of
the species to hydrologic factors. (this should improve with
successive rounds of monitoring/calibration/model revision.)
Caveats on the Use of SESI Models
•
Cumulative effects on population size of sequences of high or low
water years (e.g. long-term depression of population numbers
associated with slow recovery of small populations, or ability of
larger populations to recover from bad years more quickly). The
extreme example would be inability of SESI outputs to predict
extinction events.
•
The spatial and temporal accuracy with which the District
hydrology model simulates both (a) Cal/Val water depths and
hydroperiods and (b) hydrologic characteristics of base and
scenario cases (timing of periods of innundation and dry-downs
as well as depths and overall hydroperiod in areas critical to the
species).
Future Plans with Model
Testing and modification:
Testing of the model against empirical data is in progress.
This testing against SRF data on wading birds will intensify
when the Calibration/Validation output from the
SFWMM2000 are available.
Model rules and parameters will be reevaluated based on
new information from SRF data and research reports.
Uncertainty analysis with regard to alternative future
rainfall regimes has been done in a preliminary manner to
evaluate effects on ranking of scenarios, but needs to be
extended to model parameter uncertainty.
ATLSS SESI Uncertainty Evaluation – Hydrology Effects
Wading Bird Index Values
Restudy Area
Short-legged Wading Birds
0.2
Restudy Area
Long-legged Wading Birds
0.15
A
A
0.1
D
A
A
W
W
W
D
D
W
Hydrology
Types
D - Dry
W - Wet
A - Average
- Base
D
0.05
0.0
F2050
Alt D 13R
F2050
Alt D 13R
Future Plans with Model
Providing more information for users:
The SESI models are composed of several map layers or
components that reflect the influence of different ecological
factors on foraging suitability. Currently, only the sum of
these components is available to viewers.
In the future the individual map layers will be made
available to users to enable a better understanding of what
are the factors most influencing the index at a given time
and place.
Historical Rookery Sites