Transcript Slide 1

Source Rivers Trial
Applications Review
Source…the taste test
Purpose of Trial Applications
• Assess Source Rivers in an application for a target river system to
determine:
• Source meets eWater Partners modelling requirements for water resource planning
and management (ie, “Fit for Purpose”) – a complete integrated package
• How well Source performs against existing modelling tool – comparisons to IQQM,
REALM, BIGMOD
• influence the software development process itself - direct link between model testing
& ongoing model construction
• Wide variety of different river systems to test the usefulness of
Source – good coverage
Locations of Source Rivers Trial
Applications
Trial applications established in
2008/2009
Namoi River
Goulburn-Broken-Loddon-Campaspe
Macintyre Brook
Murray River: Lower Lakes to Colignan
Murray River: Upstream of Lock 9
ACT
Melbourne metropolitan catchments
Pioneer
Murrumbidgee
Goulburn river
Macintyre Brook, Qld
Namoi, NSW
GBCL, Vic
Murray River, SA &
MDBA
IQQM
IQQM
REALM
MSM BIGMOD




Minimum Flow Requirement



Maximum Order Constraint





Source Rivers Feature
Comparison model platform
Confluence, inflow, gauge, loss, splitters
Storage


Weir




Wetlands
Water User > Demand models


Water User > On-farm storages

Link flow routing

GSWIT Groundwater





Constituent routing
Ownership
in development
Resource Assessment Systems

Continuous Sharing

Continuous Accounting
Annual Accounting
in development
Murray-style accounting
in development

Off allocation
Ordering systems
Rules-based Ordering system
Network Linear Programming (NetLP)



Monthly model
Trial Application
involvement in Source
• Feedback to development
• Producing content for User
Documentation – SRG and User
Guide
• Development and delivery of
Source Rivers training
• Trial Application workshops
– Forster a community of practice
– Progress updates on each trial
application
– Feature demos
– “How to build plugins” workshop
• Reporting on outcomes of trial
applications and assessing
Source capabilities
• Formal reporting requirements for
SEWPAC/NWC funding agreement
• “fitness for purpose” report
Outcomes of Trial Applications
• All were successful in configuring Source Rivers to simulate their
target systems.
• In general, all reported that Source Rivers compared well to the
outputs of the existing modelling platform,
– most differences explainable or an improvement due to enhancements in
functionality.
• Modelling complex interactions of target system highlighted:
– Areas where Source improves upon existing modelling platforms
– areas that require usability improvements and documentations/guidance
for converting to Source
– Innovative approaches to modelling aspects of river system if functionality
was unavailable
Outcomes of Trial Applications
• Some discrepancies were reported and still require investigation
– Critical defects preventing testing resolved in latest release
– On-going process of testing and review
• Problems with performance of load and runtimes; stability
• Beneficial features
– Expression editor: widely used, flexible, powerful tool
– Chart tool: visualisation, first-cut analysis of scenario results
– Outputs: easy export of required results; great variety of outputs
– Plugins: customised functionality, extensibility (although steep learning
curve)
Summary of recommendations
• Improving the performance and stability of Source.
• Continue testing existing and new features within the current trial
application project.
– Continued investigation of differences in outputs between Source Rivers
and existing modelling platform
– Continued testing of existing functionality as defects and issues are fixed
by the Source development team (ie, Source Rivers version 2.17 & 2.18)
– Testing required functionality not available this year
– Expansion of trial application beyond agreed requirements
Summary of recommendations
• Continue Source Rivers code development to provide
functionality that has been identified as essential to
complete the trial applications.
• User Interface & tools improvements
– Chart tool functionality – more features
– expression editor – improve usability & docs
– recording outputs – descriptions, improved selection
So…Yum or Yuck?
• Yum, but needs cream and sprinkles!
• Full reports and feedback from other trial applications collated into
Summary report at end of Nov – endorsed by Rivers URG
• Inform work plan for 2012 and beyond
• Final workshop next week – take stock of past few years
Thanks to all involved in the Rivers Trial
Applications!