Obesity The Perils of Portliness
Download
Report
Transcript Obesity The Perils of Portliness
Obesity
The Perils of Portliness
AIMGP Clinic
14 Jan 2003
Prepared by Damon Scales, M.D.
Updated by Tim Cook (8/1/3)
References
Periodic Health Examination, 1999: Detection,
prevention, and treatment of obesity. CMAJ
1999;160:513-25
Executive Summary of the Clinical Guidelines on
the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of
Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Arch Intern
Med 1998;158:1855-1867
Yanovsky et al. Obesity. NEJM 2002;346:591-602
Willett et al. Guidelines for Healthy Weight. NEJM
1999;341:427-434
References Cont’d
K.Fontaine, et al, Years of Life Lost Due to
Obesity, JAMA, 2003; 289 : 187-193
A.Peeters, et al, Obesity in Adulthood and
Its Consequences for Life Expectancy: A
Life-Table Analysis, Ann Intern Med. 2003;
138: 24-32
Health & Drug Alerts, Obesity drug
sibutramine (Meridia), CMAJ, 2002;
166(10) 1307
References
Lau,D. Call for action: preventing and managing the
expansive and expensive obesity epidemic. CMAJ
1999;160:503-505
Birmingham,CL et al.How much should Canadians eat?.
CMAJ 2002;166(6):767-770
Bray,G. Drug Therapy of Obesity. UpToDate 2002.
Davidson et al. Weight Control and Risk Factor Reduction
in Obese Subjects Treated for 2 Years with Orlistat. JAMA
1999;281:235-241
Sjostrom et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of
orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in
obese patients. Lancet 1998;352:167-172
The Case
34 year old man referred by family
physician for opinion regarding obesity
management
He states that he has been overweight for most
of his life
He lives by himself, and eats mostly pre-made
meals
He works as a long-haul truck driver, and
exercises infrequently
The Case
PMH
appendectomy
inguinal hernia repair
Family History
Father - MI age 54
Older brother - DM 2
Both of his parents have always been obese
No medications
The Case
Exam reveals:
moderate obesity
Weight 250 lbs (113.6 kg)
Height 5’ 10” (177.8 cm)
BMI 35.9
BP 130/76 HR 72 bpm RR 12
Cardiac Exam
JVP 3 cm
normal S1, S2, no murmurs
Remainder of examination normal
Questions:
How would you counsel this patient?
What other conditions are associated with
obesity?
Would you advise him to lose weight? How?
Why do people gain weight?
Beyond the scope of this seminar, but first law of
thermodynamics applies…
“The amount of stored energy equals the difference
between energy intake and work”
Amount of triglyceride in adipose tissue is the cumulative
sum over time of the difference between energy (food)
intake and energy expenditure
Current availability of highly palatable, calorically dense
foods and a sedentary lifestyle promote weight gain
NEJM, Aug. 7, 1997
Complex Interactions which Determine Relationship
Between Energy Intake and Expenditure
from NEJM, Aug. 7, 1997
Nature versus Nurture
Studies in twins suggest as much as 80% of
variance in BMI is attributable to genetic
factors
Certain single gene disorders may result in marked obesity
(Prader-Willi, Bardet-Biedl, Alstrom, etc.)
But, potent environmental influences on
adiposity...
inverse relation between obesity and social class
secular trend toward increasing obesity
Diagnosis and Definitions
Body Mass Index = weight (kg)
height (m)2
Greater reproducibility than skinfold thickness indices
Cannot distinguish between increased weight due to
adiposity or fluid retention
Body circumference indices
identify adults with a central (android) pattern of obesity who are at
higher risk of obesity-related problems, independent of BMI
Use of these indices limited by lack of established normal reference
ranges
Definitions
Much controversy in literature regarding
definitions of overweight and obesity
Canadian Periodic Health Examination, 1999
update:
obesity defined as BMI > 27
morbid obesity defined as BMI > 35
American Medical Association, 1998 Expert
Panel on Obesity
overweight defined as BMI between 25 and 29.9
obesity defined as BMI > 30
Scope of the Problem
Obesity Pandemic! 10-20% of all people in
“rich countries”
BMI > 27 (obesity):
35% of men, 27 % of women (Canada)
BMI > 35 (morbid obesity)
2% of men, 4% of women (Canada)
Total direct cost of obesity estimated > $1.8
billion (~2.4% of total direct medical costs)
CMAJ Feb. 23, 1999. The Cost of Obesity in
Canada
Scope of the Problem
Associated Conditions
Hypertension
Diabetes Mellitus
Hyperlipidemia
Coronary Artery
Disease
Obstructive Sleep
Apnea
Malignancies
Breast
Uterus
Prostate
Colon
Psychological Disorders
depression
anorexia nervosa
bulimia
The Evidence for Mortality
Annals Int Med 2003 Article
Framingham Data
Signif decreases in Life Expectancy
40 y.o.
Overweight female
Overweight male
Obese
female
Obese
male
Non-smoker
3.3 y
3.1 y
7.1 y
5.8 y
Smoker
7.2 y
6.7 y
13.3 y
13.7 y
BMI at 30-49 y predicted mortality at ages 50-69
EVEN after adjustment for BMI at 50 -69 y
JAMA 2003 Article
Data from US Life Tables and NHANES I-III
(Nat’l Health & Nutrition Exam. Survey)
Derive YLL (Yrs Life Lost) for ages 18-85
based on BMI
Marked race and sex differences
For any degree of overweight, younger adults
had greater YLL than older
20-30 yo w.m. BMI>45 = 13 YLL (22%
20-30 yo w.f. BMI>45 = 8 YLL
Prevention
Several studies of community-based
interventions
seminars
mailed educational packages
mass media participation
Several methodological problems, but no
significant weight reductions achieved
Therapy
Aim of weight reduction should be to
decrease morbidity rather than meet
cosmetic standards of thinness
Set reasonable short-term goals
Recognize that any lifestyle alterations will
need to be continued indefinitely if lower
body weight is to be maintained
2/3 of persons who lose weight will regain it within one
year
almost all persons who lose weight will regain it within
5 years
Goals
Initial goal - reduce body weight by 10%
within ~ 6 months
For BMI 27 - 35: deficits of ~ 300-500 kcal/d will lead to
weight loss of ~ 0.23 - 0.45 kg/wk (10% in 6 mos)
For BMI > 35: deficits of ~ 500-1000 kcal/d will lead to
weight loss of ~ 0.45 - 0.9 kg/wk (10% in 6 mos)
Further weight loss can be attempted (if
indicated) after this goal is achieved
Dietary Therapy
Weight reducing diets that consist of
drastically altered proportions of nutrients
may be dangerous and no more effective than
more well-balanced diets
Dietary Therapy
Two main strategies have included
low-calorie diet (800 - 1500 kcal/d)
very-low-calorie diet (<800 kcal/d)
8 RCT’s/6prospective studies:
consistent pattern of initial weight loss (mean -2.6 kg)
followed by gradual weight gain
the diet should be consistent with the NCEP Step I
or Step II diet
Reducing fat alone will not produce
weight loss unless total energy intake
is also reduced
Dietary Therapy
Reduction of weight most effective during
period of supervision, but across studies a
pattern of gradual weight regain occurred in
unsupervised period
Underestimation of caloric intake welldocumented in obesity… portion size is main
problem
REFER to a Dietician!
They are much better at this intervention than we
are...
Exercise
Increases caloric
expenditure and also may
promote dietary compliance
intermittent exercise (high
intensity followed by low
intensity) results in greater
reduction in weight and fat
than continuous exercise of
low-medium intensity with
the same caloric
expenditure
Exercise
Most weight loss occurs because of decreased intake,
and exercise will not lead to substantially greater
weight loss over 6 months
BUT… Sustained physical activity is most helpful
in the prevention of weight regain
Intensity of exercise should be increased gradually
Example: start walking 30 min/day, 3 days per week and
build to 45 minutes of more intense walking at least 5 days
per week
Behavior Modification Therapy
Involves analyzing the meaning of eating for
a person and the circumstances in which a
person tends to eat
May be helpful
May not be
5 RCT’s, 4 prospective cohort studies
modest weight reduction (1 - 5kg) with gradual weight regain
during follow-up period
Back to the Case
He returns 3 months later
He lost 2 kg in the first month, but has since
regained 1 kg
He is now exercising 3 times per week (walks 30
minutes)
He asks you, “Look Doc, Can’t I just take a
pill to lose weight? Or should I just have that
stomach-stapling operation?”
What do you tell him?
Anorectic Drug Therapy
Dexfenfluramine and fenfluramine
serotonin-reuptake inhibitors
effective as appetite suppressants
result in weight loss when used for 6 months to 1 year
THESE DRUGS WORK!! But...
Withdrawn from market after association
noted with use of these drugs and
valvular heart disease
primary pulmonary hypertension
Sympathomimetic Drugs
Increase brain concentrations of
catecholamines leading to decreased appetite
or increased expenditure
Examples: phenteramine, mazindol
phenylpropanolamine removed from OTC market by FDA
after recent demonstration of risk of hemorrhagic stroke
unsuitable for obese persons with evidence of
cardiovascular disease
Few small studies involving these agents:
Modest benefit (-3kg in small RCT involving
Mazindol) in short term; long term effectiveness
(after 1 year of F/U) has not been studied
Sympathomimetic Drugs
These drugs have only modest benefit in
promoting weight loss, and should be used
with extreme caution in patients with cardiac
disease, hypertension, or history of stroke
AMA recommendation: consider these agents as
adjunctive to dietary therapy for:
patients with BMI > 30
patients with BMI > 27 and any of
CAD, HTN, DM, Sleep apnea
CMA Periodic Health Exam:
insufficient evidence to recommend in favor of or
against
Sibutramine
Approved in Canada late 2001(but taken off
market in Italy d/t 2 CV deaths)
Drug with both catecholaminergic and serotonergic
agonist effects ---> enhances satiety, incr metab rate
modestly enhances weight loss and can help facilitate
weight loss maintenance
increases in blood pressure and heart rate with use
Contraindicated in patients with CAD, HTN, CHF, stroke
2 small RCTs (1 year F/U) - suggest modest weight loss
(mean 5.2 kg in one trial) but high drop-out rates (up to 44%)
Sibutramine
Risk:benefit & Cost:benefit profile must be
discussed before prescribing
Check HR, BP before Rx, q2/52 X 3/12 then
q1-3/12
Consider D/C ing Rx IF HR incr 10 beats/min
or BP incr 10 mm Hg (either syst or diast) in 2
consecutive visits.
Orlistat
Only drug available that alters fat metabolism
inhibits pancreatic lipases resulting in incomplete
breakdown of ingested fat
fecal fat excretion increased (peaks at ~30% of
ingested fat)
Orlistat
Lancet 1998 - RCT, 743 patients, 2 years
at 1 year: -10.3 kg in orlistat group vs. -6.1 kg
at year 2: regain of weight when orlistat stopped (though
less regain than in placebo group)
63% completed trial
Side effects: (orlistat vs placebo)
fatty stool - 31% vs. 5%
increased defecation 20% vs. 7%
“oily spotting” - 18% vs. 1%
fecal urgency - 10% vs. 3%
fecal incontinence 7% vs. 0%
flatus with discharge 7% vs. 0%
Orlistat
JAMA 1999 - RCT of 1187 patients
at 1 year: -8.8 kg (orlistat) vs - 5.8kg
again, weight regain when orlistat stopped
45% completed 2 year trial
Reduction in LDL also seen (mean -0.22 mmol)
adverse event rate and profile similar to previous Lancet
trial
Bottom Line: Orlistat may result in weight
loss, but…
weight regain may occur once it is stopped
bothersome GI effects are likely to be unacceptable to
many patients
Surgery
Bariatric or weight-reduction surgery
gastric bypass (complete gastric partitioning with
anastomosis of proximal gastric segment to a
jejunal loop)
gastroplasty (partial gastric partitioning at the
proximal gastric segment with placement of a
gastric outlet stoma of fixed diameter)
Both methods intended to create an upper gastric
pouch that reduces gastric luminal capacity and
causes early satiety
Surgical Interventions
4 RCTs, 1 prospective study
long-term success in sustaining initial weight
reduction which occurred in first 3-6 months
magnitude of weight loss greater than that
observed with dietary/drug treatments
Post-operative mortality low (1 death in 707
patients)
Perioperative morbidity < 5%
Surgical Interventions
Reserved for patients
in whom efforts at medical therapy have failed
who are suffering from complications of extreme
obesity
AMA recommendation:
May consider bariatric surgery in patients
with clinically severe obesity (BMI > 40)
with BMI > 35 with comorbid conditions
Summary
Weight loss for obese patients is desirable
to help control diseases worsened by obesity
(diabetes, coronary artery disease, etc.)
to help decrease the likelihood of developing the
associated diseases
Summary
The initial strategy should include
dietary therapy with a low-calorie diet
exercise (especially to help prevent weight regain)
Pharmacologic therapy provides only modest
benefit, and often has unacceptable side effects
Dexfenfluramine and fenfluramine are no longer available because of
risk of severe adverse events
Sympathomimetic drugs are only marginally effective and should not
be recommended to most patients
Orlistat provides modest incremental benefit in promoting weight loss,
but often has intolerable GI side effects
Bariatric surgery may be effective for some patients, but should be
reserved for patients with severe obesity (BMI > 40) in whom other
strategies fail
Summary
CMA Periodic Health Exam:
a) community-based obesity prevention methods
are ineffective
b) obesity treatment methods are ineffective over
the long term (beyond 2 years) except
in small proportion of people who receive dietary or
surgical treatments
in patients with selected obesity-related diseases
weight loss may reduce need for drug therapy for the
related diseases
c) insufficient evidence to recommend in favor of
our against inclusion of BMI as part of periodic
health exam
Back to the Case
You decide with your patient to embark on a
trial of orlistat
Initially, he finds the flatulence he develops to be
quite bothersome (no oily stools!), but over time
learns that this can be minimized by avoiding
foods which are high in fat-content
At the next 3 month follow-up appointment he
has been successful at maintaining his low-calorie
diet and exercise regimen, and he reports with
great pride that he has lost a further 3 kg!
The End