Statistics for Business and Economics, 6/e
Download
Report
Transcript Statistics for Business and Economics, 6/e
EF 507
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR
ECONOMICS AND FINANCE
FALL 2008
Chapter 10
Hypothesis Testing
1/55
What is a Hypothesis?
A hypothesis is a claim
(assumption) about a
population parameter:
population mean
Example: The mean monthly cell phone bill
of this city is μ = 42 YTL
population proportion
Example: The proportion of adults in this
city with cell phones is p = 0.68
2/55
The Null Hypothesis, H0
States the assumption (numerical) to be
tested
Example: The average number of TV sets in
U.S. Homes is equal to three ( H0 : μ 3 )
Is always about a population parameter,
not about a sample statistic
H0 : μ 3
H0 : X 3
3/55
The Null Hypothesis, H0
(continued)
Begin with the assumption that the null
hypothesis is true
Similar to the notion of innocent until
proven guilty
Refers to the status quo
Always contains “=” , “≤” or “” sign
May or may not be rejected
4/55
The Alternative Hypothesis, H1
Is the opposite of the null hypothesis
e.g., The average number of TV sets in U.S.
homes is not equal to 3 ( H1: μ ≠ 3 )
Challenges the status quo
Never contains the “=” , “≤” or “” sign
May or may not be supported
Is generally the hypothesis that the
researcher is trying to support
5/55
Hypothesis Testing Process
Claim: the
population
mean age is 50.
(Null Hypothesis:
H0: μ = 50 )
Population
Is X 20 likely if μ = 50?
If not likely,
REJECT
Null Hypothesis
Suppose
the sample
mean age
is 20: X = 20
Now select a
random sample
Sample
Reason for Rejecting H0
Sampling Distribution of X
20
If it is unlikely that
we would get a
sample mean of
this value.
μ = 50
If H0 is true
... if in fact this were
the population mean…
X
... then we
reject the null
hypothesis that
μ = 50.
7/55
Level of Significance,
Defines the unlikely values of the sample
statistic if the null hypothesis is true
Defines rejection region of the sampling
distribution
Is designated by , (level of significance)
Typical values are 0.01, 0.05, or 0.10
Is selected by the researcher at the beginning
Provides the critical value(s) of the test
8/55
Level of Significance
and the Rejection Region
Level of significance =
H0: μ = 3
H1: μ ≠ 3
/2
Two-tail test
/2
Upper-tail test
H0: μ ≥ 3
H1: μ < 3
Rejection
region is
shaded
0
H0: μ ≤ 3
H1: μ > 3
Represents
critical value
0
Lower-tail test
0
9/55
Errors in Making Decisions-1
Type I Error
Reject a true null hypothesis
Considered a serious type of error
The probability of Type I Error is
Called level of significance of the test
Set by researcher in advance
10/55
Errors in Making Decisions- -2
(continued)
Type II Error
Fail to reject a false null hypothesis
The probability of Type II Error is β
11/55
Outcomes and Probabilities
Possible Hypothesis Test Outcomes
Decision
Key:
Outcome
(Probability)
Actual
Situation
H0 True
H0 False
Do Not
Reject
H0
No error
(1 - )
Type II Error
(β)
Reject
H0
Type I Error
()
No Error
(1-β)
12/55
Type I & II Error Relationship
Type I and Type II errors can not happen at
the same time
Type I error can only occur if H0 is true
Type II error can only occur if H0 is false
If Type I error probability ( )
, then
Type II error probability ( β )
13/55
Factors Affecting Type II Error
All else equal,
β
when the difference between
hypothesized parameter and its true value
β
when
β
when
σ
β
when
n
14/55
Power of the Test-3
The power of a test is the probability of rejecting
a null hypothesis that is false
i.e.,
Power = P(Reject H0 | H1 is true)
Power of the test increases as the sample size
increases
15/55
Hypothesis Tests for the Mean
Hypothesis
Tests for
Known
Unknown
16/55
Test of Hypothesis
for the Mean (σ Known)
Convert sample result ( x ) to a z value
Hypothesis
Tests for
σ Known
σ Unknown
Consider the test
H0 : μ μ0
The decision rule is:
x μ0
Reject H0 if z
zα
σ
(Assume the population is normal)
n
H1 : μ μ0
17/55
Decision Rule
x μ0
Reject H0 if z
zα
σ
n
H0: μ = μ0
H1: μ > μ0
Alternate rule:
Reject H0 if X μ0 Zασ/ n
Z
x
Do not reject H0
0
μ0
zα
μ0 z α
Reject H0
σ
n
Critical value
18/55
p-Value Approach to Testing
p-value: Probability of obtaining a test
statistic more extreme ( ≤ or ) than the
observed sample value given H0 is true
Also called observed level of significance
Smallest value of for which H0 can be
rejected
19/55
p-Value Approach to Testing
(continued)
Convert sample result (e.g., x ) to test statistic (e.g., z
statistic )
Obtain the p-value
x - μ0
p - value P(Z
, given that H0 is true)
For an upper
σ/ n
tail test:
x - μ0
P(Z
| μ μ0 )
σ/ n
Decision rule: compare the p-value to
If p-value < , reject H0
If p-value , do not reject H0
20/55
Example: Upper-Tail Z Test
for Mean ( Known)
A phone industry manager thinks that customer
monthly cell phone bill have increased, and now
average over 52 YTL per month. The company
wishes to test this claim. (Assume = 10 is
known)
Form hypothesis test:
H0: μ ≤ 52 the average is not over $52 per month
H1: μ > 52
the average is greater than $52 per month
(i.e., sufficient evidence exists to support the
manager’s claim)
21/55
Example: Find Rejection Region
(continued)
Suppose that = 0.10 is chosen for this test
Find the rejection region:
Reject H0
= 0.10
Do not reject H0
0
1.28
Reject H0
x μ0
Reject H0 if z
1.28
σ/ n
22/55
Example: Sample Results
(continued)
Obtain sample and compute the test statistic
Suppose a sample is taken with the following
results: n = 64, x = 53.1 (=10 was assumed known)
Using the sample results,
x μ0
53.1 52
z
0.88
σ
10
n
64
23/55
Example: Decision
(continued)
Reach a decision and interpret the result:
Reject H0
= 0.10
Do not reject H0
1.28
0
z = 0.88
Reject H0
Do not reject H0 since z = 0.88 < 1.28
i.e.: there is not sufficient evidence that the
mean bill is over 52 YTL
24/55
Example: p-Value Solution
Calculate the p-value and compare to
(continued)
(assuming that μ = 52.0)
p-value = 0.1894
Reject H0
= 0.10
0
Do not reject H0
1.28
Z = .88
Reject H0
P(x 53.1 | μ 52.0)
53.1 52.0
Pz
10/ 64
P(z 0.88) 1 0.8106
0.1894
Do not reject H0 since p-value = 0.1894 > = 0.10
25/55
One-Tail Tests
In many cases, the alternative hypothesis
focuses on one particular direction
H0: μ ≤ 3
H1: μ > 3
H0: μ ≥ 3
H1: μ < 3
This is an upper-tail test since the
alternative hypothesis is focused on
the upper tail above the mean of 3
This is a lower-tail test since the
alternative hypothesis is focused on
the lower tail below the mean of 3
26/55
Upper-Tail Tests
There is only one
critical value, since
the rejection area is
in only one tail
H0: μ ≤ 3
H1: μ > 3
Do not reject H0
Z
0
x
μ
zα
Reject H0
Critical value
27/55
Lower-Tail Tests
H0: μ ≥ 3
There is only one
critical value, since
the rejection area is
in only one tail
H1: μ < 3
Reject H0
-z
Do not reject H0
0
Z
μ
x
Critical value
28/55
Two-Tail Tests
In some settings, the
alternative hypothesis does
not specify a unique direction
There are two
critical values,
defining the two
regions of
rejection
H0: μ = 3
H1: μ 3
/2
/2
x
3
Reject H0
Do not reject H0
-z/2
Lower
critical value
0
Reject H0
+z/2
z
Upper
critical value
29/55
Hypothesis Testing Example
Test the claim that the true mean # of TV
sets in US homes is equal to 3.
(Assume σ = 0.8)
1- State the appropriate null and alternative
hypotheses
H0: μ = 3 , H1: μ ≠ 3
(This is a two tailed test)
Specify the desired level of significance
Suppose that =0 .05 is chosen for this test
Choose a sample size
Suppose a sample of size n = 100 is selected
30/55
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)
2- Determine the appropriate technique
σ is known so this is a z test
Set up the critical values
For = 0.05 the critical z values are ±1.96
3- Collect the data and compute the test statistic
Suppose the sample results are
n = 100, x = 2.84 (σ = 0.8 is assumed known)
So the test statistic is:
z
X μ0
2.84 3
0.16
2.0
σ
0.8
0.08
n
100
31/55
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)
Is the test statistic in the rejection region?
4- Reject H0 if
= 0.05/2
= 0.05/2
z < -1.96 or
z > 1.96;
otherwise do
not reject H0
Reject H0
-z = -1.96
Do not reject H0
0
Reject H0
+z = +1.96
Here, z = -2.0 < -1.96, so the
test statistic is in the rejection
region
32/55
Hypothesis Testing Example
(continued)
Reach a decision and interpret the result
= 0.05/2
= 0.05/2
Reject H0
-z = -1.96
Do not reject H0
0
Reject H0
+z = +1.96
-2.0
Since z = -2.0 < -1.96, we reject the null hypothesis
and conclude that there is sufficient evidence that the
mean number of TVs in US homes is not equal to 3
33/55
Example: p-Value
Example: How likely is it to see a sample mean of
2.84 (or something further from the mean, in either
direction) if the true mean is = 3.0?
x = 2.84 is translated to
a z score of z = -2.0
P(z 2.0) 0.0228
P(z 2.0) 0.0228
/2 =0 .025
/2 = 0.025
0.0228
0.0228
p-value
0=0.0228 + 0.0228 = 0.0456
-1.96
-2.0
0
1.96
2.0
Z
34/55
Example: p-Value
Compare the p-value with
If p-value < , reject H0
If p-value , do not reject H0
Here: p-value = 0.0456
= 0.05
Since 0.0456 < 0.05,
we reject the null
hypothesis
(continued)
/2 = 0.025
/2 = 0.025
0.0228
0.0228
-1.96
-2.0
0
1.96
2.0
Z
35/55
t Test of Hypothesis for the Mean
(σ Unknown)
Convert sample result ( x ) to a t test statistic
Hypothesis
Tests for
σ Known
σ Unknown
Consider the test
H0 : μ μ0
The decision rule is:
x μ0
Reject H0 if t
t n-1, α
H1 : μ μ0
s
n
(Assume the population is normal)
36/55
t Test of Hypothesis for the Mean
(σ Unknown)
(continued)
For a two-tailed test:
Consider the test
H0 : μ μ0
H1 : μ μ0
(Assume the population is normal,
and the population variance is
unknown)
The decision rule is:
Reject H0 if t
x μ0
x μ0
t n-1, α/2 or if t
t n-1, α/2
s
s
n
n
37/55
Example: Two-Tail Test
( Unknown)
The average cost of a
hotel room in New York
is said to be $168 per
night. A random sample
of 25 hotels resulted in
x = $172.50 and
s = $15.40 Test at the
= 0.05 level.
H0: μ = 168
H1: μ 168
(Assume the population distribution is normal)
38/55
Example Solution:
Two-Tail Test
H0: μ = 168
H1: μ 168
= 0.05
/2=0.025
Reject H0
-t n-1,α/2
-2.0639
n = 25
is unknown, so
use a t statistic
Critical Value:
t24 , 0.025 = ± 2.0639
/2=0.025
t n1
Do not reject H0
0
1.46
Reject H0
t n-1,α/2
2.0639
x μ
172.50 168
1.46
s
15.40
n
25
Do not reject H0: not sufficient evidence that
true mean cost is different than $168
39/55
Tests of the Population Proportion
Involves categorical variables
Two possible outcomes
“Success” (a certain characteristic is present)
“Failure” (the characteristic is not present)
Fraction or proportion of the population in the
“success” category is denoted by P
Assume sample size is large
40/55
Proportions
(continued)
Sample proportion in the success category is
denoted by pˆ
ˆp x number of successesin sample
n
sample size
When nP(1 – P) > 9, pˆ can be approximated
by a normal distribution with mean and
standard deviation
P(1 P)
μpˆ P
σ pˆ
n
41/55
Hypothesis Tests for Proportions
The sampling
distribution of pˆ is
Hypothesis
approximately
Tests for P
normal, so the test
statistic is a z
nP(1 – P) < 9
nP(1 – P) > 9
value:
z
pˆ P0
P0 (1 P0 )
n
Not discussed
in this chapter
42/55
Example: Z Test for Proportion
A marketing company
claims that it receives
8% responses from its
mailing. To test this
claim, a random sample
of 500 were surveyed
with 25 responses. Test
at the =0.05
significance level.
Check:
Our approximation for P is
pˆ = 25/500 = 0.05
nP(1 - P) =
(500)(0.05)(0.95)
= 23.75 > 9
43/55
Z Test for Proportion: Solution
Test Statistic:
H0: P =0 .08
H1: P 0.08
= 0.05
n = 500,
pˆ
pˆ P0
P0 (1 P0 )
n
z
= 0.05
Decision:
Critical Values: ± 1.96
Reject
0.05 0.08
2.47
0.08(1 0.08)
500
Reject
Reject H0 at = 0.05
Conclusion:
0.025
0.025
-1.96
-2.47
0
1.96
z
There is sufficient
evidence to reject the
company’s claim of 8%
response rate.
44/55
p-Value Solution
(continued)
Calculate the p-value and compare to
(For a two sided test the p-value is always two sided)
Reject H0
Do not reject H0
/2 =0.025
Reject H0
p-value = 0.0136:
/2 = 0.025
0.0068
0.0068
-1.96
Z = -2.47
0
P(Z 2.47) P(Z 2.47)
2(0.0068) 0.0136
1.96
Z = 2.47
Reject H0 since p-value =0.0136 < = 0.05
45/55
Using PHStat
Options
46/55
Sample PHStat Output
Input
Output
47/55
Power of the Test-4
Recall the possible hypothesis test outcomes:
Actual Situation
Key:
Outcome
(Probability)
Decision
H0 True
H0 False
Do Not
Reject H0
No error
(1 - )
Type II Error
(β)
Reject H0
Type I Error
( )
No Error
(1-β)
β denotes the probability of Type II Error
1 – β is defined as the power of the test
Power = 1 – β = the probability that a false null
hypothesis is rejected
48/55
Type II Error
Assume the population is normal and the population
variance is known. Consider the test
H0 : μ μ0
H1 : μ μ0
The decision rule is:
x μ0
Reject H0 if z
z α or Reject H0 if x xc μ0 Zασ/ n
σ/ n
If the null hypothesis is false and the true mean is μ*,
then the probability of type II error is
xc μ *
β P(x x c | μ μ*) P z
σ
/
n
49/55
Type II Error Example
Type II error is the probability of failing
to reject a false H0
Suppose we fail to reject H0: μ 52
when in fact the true
xc mean is μ* = 50
50
Reject
H0: μ 52
52
xc
Do not reject
H0 : μ 52
50/55
Type II Error Example
(continued)
Suppose we do not reject H0: μ 52 when in fact
the true mean is μ* = 50
This is the range of x where
H0 is not rejected
This is the true
distribution of x if μ = 50
50
52
Reject
H0: μ 52
Do not reject
H0 : μ 52
xc
51/55
Type II Error Example
(continued)
Suppose we do not reject H0: μ 52 when
in fact the true mean is μ* = 50
Here, β = P( x x c ) if μ* = 50
β
50
52
Reject
H0: μ 52
Do not reject
H0 : μ 52
xc
52/55
Calculating β
Suppose n = 64 , σ = 6 , and =0 .05
σ
6
x c μ0 z α
52 1.645
50.766
n
64
(for H0 : μ 52)
So β = P( x 50.766 ) if μ* = 50
50
50.766
Reject
H0: μ 52
xc
52
Do not reject
H0 : μ 52
53/55
Calculating β
(continued)
Suppose n = 64 , σ = 6 , and = 0.05
50.766 50
P( x 50.766|μ* 50) P z
P(z 1.02) 0.5 0.3461 0.1539
6
64
Probability of
type II error:
β =0.1539
50
52
Reject
H0: μ 52
Do not reject
H0 : μ 52
xc
54/55
Power of the Test Example
If the true mean is μ* = 50,
The probability of Type II Error = β = 0.1539
The power of the test = 1 – β = 1 – 0.1539 = 0.8461
Actual Situation
Key:
Outcome
(Probability)
Decision
H0 True
Do Not
Reject H0
No error
1 - = 0.95
Reject H0
Type I Error
= 0.05
H0 False
Type II Error
β = 0.1539
No Error
1 - β = 0.8461
(The value of β and the power will be different for each μ*)
55/55