Community Involvement Some Lessons from Southern India
Download
Report
Transcript Community Involvement Some Lessons from Southern India
Community Involvement
Some Lessons from Southern India
Hari
and Prem John
Deenabandu &
People’s Health Movement
India
1
Community Health
Community involvement in health or
development is not value neutral. It is
not a mere methodology to implement a
project.
It is an intensely political involvement
where one identifies victims and
oppressors, takes sides, goes behind
the barricades with the people against
ruling structures that oppress them.
2
“Health
is politics on a social scale
- Halfdan Mahler
“The Sole purpose of life is to
serve humanity”
- Leo Tolstoy
3
those who were seen
dancing were thought to be
insane by those who could not
hear the music" (Nietzche)
The medical professionals look down
upon other medical professionals working
at the community level. Call them quacks.
“and
4
The Analysis
The
very basis of community
involvement in health lies in sociopolitical analysis
a
Class Analysis and Approach
(Marx).
Clearly
defined class enemies,
therefore entirely pro-poor
5
The Blocks
Ignorance
Class, Caste, Ethnicity, Gender, Religion
Cultural factors such as dress, food habits
Preconceived notions
Rigidity
Arrogance
Haste/Impatience
Long history of insensitivity/oppression
6
Therefore, the Need
Humility
Open mind
Ability to transcend class, caste,
education factors
Willingness to deschool
Willingness to learn
Ability to go beyond the boundaries
Capacity in integrate into the community
7
That would lead to
Participation
as an internalised
value
Participation as a methodology
Where the community
participates from the stage of
conception to data collection, to
collation, analysis, planning,
implementation, monitoring,
evaluation, course correction
8
Community Organisation
Communities
divided along any lines
(caste, class, ethnicity, religion)
cannot work together
Therefore, the necessity for
‘organising’ the community, to build
unity (Ivan Illich)
The biggest investment is in terms of
time – to bring the community under
the same tree for discussions and
agreement on joint action
9
Methods Used
Participatory
Strategic Planning
(PSP)
Participatory Action Research (PAR)
Participatory Vulnerability Analysis
(PVA)
Participatory Training Methodologies
(PTM)
10
PSP
PSP is a derivative of Strategic Planning. It
comes from the military and corporate
sectors and has been specially adapted
for communities
The Process affirms the belief that any
one, even illiterate, down trodden
communities have the capacity to look
back, take stock of their present situation
and state what they aspire for
11
PSP
Simply
stated, it means:
* What we want to be
* Where we want to be
* What is the path to take
* How do we want to reach there
on a specific time frame
12
PSP
Communities
and the organisations
that work with them learn to look at it
under three circles
The
Context Circle (Community and
Organisation)
The Vision Circle
The Organisation Strengths Circle
(Community and Organisation)
13
The Context Circle
The
Critical Issues
The Challenges
Opportunities and Threats
Key Players
14
The Vision Circle
* Vision
* Mission
* Objectives
* Strategies
* Program
15
The Third Circle
Strengths
Weaknesses
Capabalities
Potential
Resources
16
The Three Circles
Context
Critical Issues
Challenges
Opportunities
Threats
Key Players
Vision
Mission
Strategies
Objectives
Programs
Role Models
Strengths
Weaknesses
Capabilities
Potential Resources
17
The “F I T”
FIT
18
The Fit
The
three circles converge and the area
of convergence is called as the “FIT”
The more they converge, the larger is the
fit
When the “FIT” keeps getting larger, over
time, then the aspirations and
capabilities of the community and the
organisation and the goals and
objectives of the organisation are
congruent
19
The Methods
The Community uses many
participatory techniques. One of
them is Village Mapping
The Older people map the village as it
was 10 years ago using available
materials
The younger people map it as it is
today
The community looks at it and sees
what changes have taken place over
time
20
Then
Our
role is only facilitatory
The community then looks at the
reasons for change
We help them to reason out why
these changes have taken place
and what can be done about
these changes eg water,
deforestation
21
Changes
The Community looks at:
the reasons for change
the trends
If trends remain the same what would be
the scenario 5 years from now,
if trends become better what would be the
scenario and
if the trends worsen, what would be the
scenario
22
The Probable Scenario
Then
they pick from each of the
scenarios and come up with a probable
scenario, look at what problems would
be faced and how the scenario can be
improved
23
Joint Action
The
Community then gets to know
what
needs to be done,
what resources they have,
what outside resources are needed,
how they can go about it,
what the blocks are,
who the obstacles are and at what level –
local, national and international, and finally
how to overcome those obstacles
24
PAR
It
is a methodology where the
community participates fully in getting
to know their situation
Strengths
and weaknesses
Resources
Problems
Opportunities
Threats
25
PAR
Regenerate
and build upon existing
knowledge
Regenerate and build upon existing
skills
Regenerate, refine and build upon
existing practices
26
From Day One
The
community participates fully in:
Investigation
Analysis
Planning
Appropriate and Joint Action
Implementing the Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
Mid-course Corrections
27
Goals of PAR
To release
To restore
To renew
To empower and finally
Transform
PAR empowers,
achieves collective
power,
Makes them realize
their collective worth
and
Builds Self Reliance
28
PAR
Is
committed to the Marginalised and
the Poor. Is biased in favour of the
poor.
Believes that everyone has
intelligence, create knowledge, the
right to make history.
Develops critical understanding
Insists on democratic interactions
29
PAR
Is an Action-Reflection-Action Process and
therefore is basic to community organisation
Build inter-personal and intra-community
relationships, bonds
Re-energises and fosters social capital such as
trust, confidence, sharing, care of the poor etc.,
Helps breakdown barriers
30
Participatory Vulnerability Analysis
(PVA)
PVA is a systematic process that involves
communities and other stakeholders in an
in-depth examination of their vulnerability,
and at the same time empowers or
motivates them to take appropriate actions.
The overall aim of PVA is to link disaster
preparedness (droughts, floods, state
oppression on a large scale) and
responses to long-term development.
31
PVA-Community Level
PVA enables communities to play a dual role,
as informants, but also analysts, by breaking
down vulnerability to a point where they can
begin to take action to reduce their own
vulnerability.
The analysis itself has no value unless it is
followed by action: people can
take action themselves
32
PVA Means
Community meetings
Discussion sessions and analysis
Training of local facilitators
Participatory and reflection approaches
Stakeholders and focal group meetings
Local level advocacy and lobbying
Documentation and liaison
Studies on selected issues
33
Participatory Training Methods
(PTM)
Is
an enabling experience
Best method for adult learning
Learning by doing
No one comes as empty vessels and
that even the illiterate have
experiential knowledge
Equality between trainer-trainee
34
PTM
Treats trainees as adults
Shared responsibility for learning
Is a confidence-building process
Mutually enriching
Builds on what they know
Respects cultures, values and life
experience
Translates scientific knowledge to real life
Leads to behavioural changes
35
Rights-based Approach
Participatory Approaches empower communities
to stand up to ruling structures
Communities know what their rights are:
Human rights
Women’s rights
Peasants’ rights
Rights of outcastes, indigenous people
Children’s rights
And have the knowledge, skills and capacities to
fight their own battles
36