Transcript 2011 Staff Appreciation Luncheon

College of Engineering
Kansas State University
John R. English
Fall 2012 State of the College Address
1
Today
Linkages of the COE strategic plan (K-State
2025COE?) and K-State 2025
UEIA: congruency with K-State 2025COE and KState 2025
K-State 2025COE
•
Activities
•
Baseline data
Alignment of comprehensive campaign goals with
K-State 2025COE
2
Quotes
• U-T San Diego, Tuesday, June 26, 2012
– Andre Viterbi, Qualcomm co-founder
• “The biggest problem in technology is that we don’t train
enough young people and we don’t have enough respect and
interest in science and technology or as they call it today,
STEM.”
• Answering the question: “Who are the people who have most
inspired you? My professor and teachers.”
• Inspiring perspective for us today. We have an
unprecedented opportunity
– K-State 2025COE and K-State 2025
• UEIA: state is behind us, will be adding 93K ft2 and 30 new
faculty members
• Record breaking gifting
3
Vision
• K-State 2025: Kansas State University will be
recognized nationally as a top-50 public
research university
• K-State 2025COE : the Kansas State University
College of Engineering will be a highly ranked
college providing quality education within a
research environment that develops engineering
leaders to benefit society
4
Linkages of the K-State 2025COE
and K-State 2025
• Thanks to Gurdip Singh and task force for their
work to update our plan to align with K-State
2025
• Spring/Summer 2012, became clear I need to do
a better job in communicating our alignment and
progress
– Much of the data has been reported over the past five
years through Fall Convocations and DH/Department
reviews
– First attempt to consolidate and fill in the gaps
– Dr. Singh has agreed to reassemble the task force
and process this first shot at the data. Goal: develop
our first report on progress on K-State 2025COE
5
K-State 2025COE themes
•
theme 1: Recruit and retain diverse academic achievers from both inside and
outside Kansas to produce graduates who will take the lead in generating
technological solutions for and new knowledge about tomorrow's challenges.
•
theme 2: Provide outstanding and diverse faculty and technological facilities so
students receive quality teaching and advising, enabling them to become problem
solvers, leaders, and critical thinkers highly sought after by universities, industry,
and the government.
•
theme 3: Establish focused, high-impact, nationally recognized research
programs and build a prominent faculty that will enhance the college's national
and international reputation.
•
theme 4: Establish lifelong connections with alumni and capitalize on this
network, corporate partnerships, and related research/scholarship within the
college to strengthen the education experience, research/scholarship quality, and
financial support of the college
•
theme 5: Prepare students and faculty for the changing global environment to
create a culture of diversity, creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
•
theme 6: Disseminate new knowledge to a global society and the citizens of
Kansas to meet the land-grant mission.
6
K-State 2025 themes
• K-State 2025 Themes:
– T1: Research, scholarly, and creative activities, and
discovery (RSCAD)
– T2: Undergraduate educational experience
– T3: Graduate scholarly experience
– T4: Engagement, extension, outreach and service
– T5: Faculty and staff
– T6: Facilities and infrastructure
– T7: Athletics
• Considering the next five years …
7
Alignment: K-State 2025COE
themes
•
theme 1: Recruit and retain diverse academic achievers from both inside and
outside Kansas to produce graduates who will take the lead in generating
technological solutions for and new knowledge about tomorrow's challenges.
•
theme 2: Provide outstanding and diverse faculty and technological facilities so
students receive quality teaching and advising, enabling them to become problem
solvers, leaders, and critical thinkers highly sought after by universities, industry,
and the government.
•
theme 3: Establish focused, high-impact, nationally recognized research
programs and build a prominent faculty that will enhance the college's national
and international reputation.
•
theme 4: Establish lifelong connections with alumni and capitalize on this
network, corporate partnerships, and related research/scholarship within the
college to strengthen the education experience, research/scholarship quality, and
financial support of the college
•
theme 5: Prepare students and faculty for the changing global environment to
create a culture of diversity, creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
•
theme 6: Disseminate new knowledge to a global society and the citizens of
Kansas to meet the land-grant mission.
8
K-State 2025COE (theme 1)
– Theme 1 outcomes
• T1, T3: Tuition waivers for all GRAs
• T1, T3: Competitive compensation and support available to
GRAs, GTAs and GAs
• T2: Successful recruitment and retention strategies that
address our entire student population
• T2: Excellent, customized academic advising and services
available to all students to support their success and degree
completion
• T2: Improved six-year graduation and retention ratios
• T3: Outstanding mentoring of graduate students
9
K-State 2025COE (theme 2)
– Theme 2 outcomes
• T2: Improved six-year graduation rates and retention ratios
• T2: Excellent, customized academic advising and services available to all
students to support their success and degree completion
• T2: Effective evaluation practices that recognize and reward teaching,
advising, and life-long learning/professional development
• T2: Effective system in place that supports and promotes teaching
excellence
• T5: Effective evaluation processes that result in accountable faculty and staff
with a clear understanding of their job expectations and how they contribute
to the University’s mission
• T5: Career-long learning recognized by the university and its employees as
a shared value and responsibility
• T6: Robust and reliable information technology ensuring business continuity
and consistent with the achievement of the highest quality levels of support
for research, instruction, student services, and administration
10
K-State 2025COE (theme 3)
– Theme 3 outcomes
• T1: Increased intellectual and financial capital to support RSCAD
• T1: More clusters/centers of collaborative RSCAD focus
• T1: Increased funding for investigator-based research, research
centers and graduate training grants
• T1: Successful recruitment, retention, evaluation, compensation,
and rewards strategies in place to support RSCAD needs
• T1: Increased visibility, and appreciation for research, discovery and
scholarly and creative activities
• T3: Expectation of excellence for the graduate scholarly experience
• T3: Increased capacity to secure funding for graduate research and
teaching
11
K-State 2025COE (theme 4)
– Theme 4 outcomes
• T1: Increased intellectual and financial capital to
support RSCAD
• T4: Increased number and diversity of faculty and
staff participating in engagement
• T5: Total compensation competitive with aspirant
university and regional employers for faculty and
staff in high priority areas
12
K-State 2025COE (theme 5)
– Theme 5 outcomes
• T2: Engaged students benefitting from high impact
educational practices used by excellent faculty and staff
across the university
• T3: Expanded partnerships industry and government to
provide high level learning and experimental training
opportunities for graduate students
• T4: Increased participation by undergraduates in expanded
opportunities for meaningful engagement experiences
• T4: Enhanced visibility and appreciation of engagement and
its interconnectedness with research and education within
our university community
13
K-State 2025COE (theme 6)
– Theme 6 outcomes
• T4: Increased recognition of our services as a
source of expertise, information, and tools for
disciplines worldwide
• T4: Increased extramural funding for engagement
initiatives at the local, state, national, and
international level
• T4: Recognition as leaders in engagement within
our state and nation
14
K-State 2025COE linkages with
K-State 2025
• K-State 2025COE with K-State 2025 is
strong
– Very good grade from Anderson Hall!
– If you want to read more:
• http://www.engg.ksu.edu/files/engg/documents/CO
E_K-State2025_Allignment.pdf
15
UEIA Congruency with K-State 2025COE
16
K-State 2025COE
• We have restructured convocation
reporting of data to align with K-State
2025COE
– Improve the communication of progress
– Slides will be posted under strategic plan on
web site
– Will be developing a progress report on KState 2025COE
17
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 1: Undergraduate Students
•
(1) Provide comprehensive scholarships for legacy and top students.
–
–
•
(2) Develop programs to retain students with emphasis on students who are highperforming and/or from underrepresented groups
–
–
–
•
Increased investment in MAPS, expanded SAS, 1st generation to college program, Alternative
spring break
New retention task force: Assistant Dean Bette Grauer
Campaign priority
(3) Develop comprehensive advising programs and provide support at both College
and Department levels
–
•
GAC has restructured scholarship programs, priority in fundraising: fit into two categories:
premiere scholarships and COE scholarships
Campaign priority
Task force ?
(4) Increase undergraduate enrollment and number of engineering graduates
–
Under contract with Noel Levitz working in conjunction with the K-State VP for Student Life
18
$$ in Scholarships (T)
$2,000,000
40%
$1,800,000
30%
$1,600,000
$ Scholarships
$1,200,000
10%
$1,000,000
0%
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
Percent Change
20%
$1,400,000
-10%
T2!
-20%
$200,000
$0
-30%
2007
2008
2009
$ Scholarships
2010
2011
2012
Percent Change
19
Overall retention and graduation (2)
Freshm an to Sophom ore Retention Ratios
6 Year Graduation Rate
90.00
Percentage Graduated within 6 Years
70.00
85.00
80.00
Percentage Retained
75.00
70.00
65.00
60.00
60.00
55.00
50.00
45.00
40.00
55.00
50.00
2002
65.00
2003
2004
Start in University
2005
2006
Start in Engr
2007
2008
2009
2010
Start & End in Engr
35.00
2005
All University
T2!
2006
2006
2008
Start in Engr
2009
2010
2011
Start & End in Engr
20
Retention (2)
350
600
300
+18.9%
400
250
200
300
150
+7.4%
200
100
100
50
0
0
2008
2009
2010
Cohort Year
Freshman Cohort
12.0%
450
10.0%
400
8.0%
350
6.0%
300
4.0%
250
2.0%
200
0.0%
150
100
-2.0%
50
-4.0%
0
-6.0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
# Female Students
Percent Change
Number High Achieving Students
400
0.4
350
0.35
0.3
300
0.25
250
0.2
200
0.15
150
0.1
0.05
100
0
50
Percent Change
500
500
T2!
-0.05
-
-0.1
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
# Minority Students
% Change
Common elements: diversity
21
Percent Change
700
# Female Undergraduate Students
400
High Achieving Freshman
800
# Minority Undergraduate Students
Freshman Cohort
High Achieving Freshman (> 28 ACT)
3,200
5.0%
3,100
4.0%
3,000
3.0%
2,900
2.0%
2,800
1.0%
2,700
0.0%
2,600
-1.0%
2,500
-2.0%
2,400
Percent Change
T2!
-3.0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Percent Change
600
15.0%
500
10.0%
400
5.0%
300
0.0%
200
-5.0%
100
0
-10.0%
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
# Degrees Granted
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Percent Change
22
Percent Change
# Students
# of UG Degrees Granted
# Undergraduate Students
U/G Enrollment (4)
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 1: Undergraduate Students (continued)
•
(5) Conduct workshops for high school science teachers to provide them
with material on engineering applications
–
•
(6) Develop programs that expose middle school students to engineering
concepts and applications
–
•
Will start 9th grade workshops next summer
(7) Expand recruitment programs and incentives for recruiting high-quality
students
–
•
E3 started this summer: one session in Olathe and one session in Manhattan,
will start 9th grade workshops next summer
Under contract with Noel Levitz working in conjunction with K-State student
services
(8) Provide opportunities for undergraduate research
–
–
Have established first funded endowment for two U/G research fellowships (Raj
and Dianna Nathan)
Priority of campaign
23
160
35%
140
30%
120
25%
20%
100
15%
80
10%
60
5%
40
0%
20
-5%
0
-10%
2009
2010
# Undergrads Supported by Research
Percent Change
# of Undergrads
U/Gs engaged in research (8)
2011
Percent Change
T1! T2! T3!
24
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 1: Graduate Students (b)
•
1. Supplement GRA stipends to attract top-notch graduate students
–
•
2. Provide Ph.D. tuition scholarships
–
–
•
Some departments are considering
4. Provide first year academic scholarships or fellowships (other than
GRAs on specific projects) for graduate students: great idea!
–
•
Started a very small program through EES
Priority of campaign
3. Focus on integrated B.S.-M.S. programs to promote graduate programs
–
•
Priority of campaign
Priority of campaign
5. Provide funds for graduate student recruiting
–
NS in conjunction with DHs are considering restructuring funding model
25
PhD students (T)
200
30.0%
180
25.0%
160
20.0%
15.0%
100
10.0%
80
5.0%
T1! T3!
Percent Change
120
60
0.0%
40
-5.0%
20
-
-10.0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Percent Change
35
100.0%
30
80.0%
60.0%
25
40.0%
20
20.0%
15
0.0%
10
-20.0%
5
-40.0%
26
-60.0%
0
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
# PhDs Graduated
2007
2008
2009
2010
Percent Change
2011
2012
Percent Change
# PhD Students
# Ph.D. Graduated
# PhD Students
140
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 2: Outstanding & diverse faculty and facilities supporting students
–
1. Recruit and retain outstanding faculty with teaching and scholastic excellence.
•
•
•
•
–
2. Invest in upgrading classroom technology, classroom expansions, and new
construction
•
•
–
In past five years, we have hired 17 professors
Theede Chair, Ice Professorship, Snell Professorship, Neff Professorship, Paulson
Faculty Award, Johnson Chair (planned)
2013 searches: Theede chair, MNE, engines; ChE, energy; Ice professorship; MNE,
lecturer; ECE, embedded systems; BAE, off-road vehicles (Ag funded); CE,
geotechnical; ARE/CNS, general; ARE/CNS, DH; opportunity
Priority of campaign
Phase IV, remodel of vacated space
Priority of campaign
3. Employ teaching assistants (e.g., graders, lab assistants) to enhance
teaching experience, especially for large classes
•
New student fees
–
–
–
Placed new TAs in large classes in MNE and CE
Provide one time funds to CE, MNE and CIS
4. Hire additional faculty members to improve student-faculty ratio
•
•
Hired 17 new professors, 30 new faculty coming from UEIA
A great concern
27
Number of faculty (T)
T1! T5!
Tenured & Tenure Track Women Faculty
Tenured & Tenure Track Faculty
19.5
131
Had all positions been filled
130
19
18.5
129
18
128
17.5
127
17
126
16.5
125
16
124
15.5
123
15
14.5
122
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2007
2008
Total T & TT Faculty
2009
2010
2011
2012
Female T&TT Faculty
Unfilled searches: ChE, MNE, Ice, Theede, opportunity
28
9
60%
8
40%
7
20%
6
0%
5
-20%
4
-40%
3
Percent Change
# of National Teaching Awards
Faculty focus in teaching (1)
-60%
2
1
-80%
0
-100%
2009
2010
# of National Teaching Awards
2011
Percent Change
25 Grant & Contracts with an
Education Component in 2011
T2!
29
27.5
6.0%
27.0
5.0%
T2!
4.0%
26.5
3.0%
26.0
2.0%
25.5
1.0%
25.0
Percent Change
Student To Faculty Ratio
Student faculty ratio (4)
0.0%
24.5
-1.0%
24.0
-2.0%
2007
2008
2009
Student to Faculty Ratio
2010
2011
2012
Percent Change
Unfilled searches: ChE, MNE, Ice, Theede, opportunity
30
K-State 2025COE activities/data
• Theme 2 (Continued):
– Provide incentives and opportunities for continuous
development of faculty
• Priority of campaign
– Develop comprehensive advising programs with adequate
support at the department level
• Task force ?
– Work with the university to provide tuition remission for faculty
children and spouses to attract new faculty.
• Deans council?
– Pursue recruitment of NAE members (or equivalent) as faculty
in the college.
• Department Heads
31
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 3: Research building prominent faculty
–
–
1. Establish and promote high-impact research programs by
building on existing strengths and hire faculty whose expertise
complements these strengths
2. Allocate resources to invest in high-impact research areas
•
–
3. Secure substantial number of tenure-track faculty positions
to embark upon proactive searches for nationally prominent
faculty; attract them with high salaries (e.g., through endowed
chairs), competitive start-up packages, and other
inducements.
•
–
Strategic hiring plans submitted by DHs
UEIA
4. Provide funds and other inducements to retain top-quality
faculty
•
Focus of campaign
32
Scholarly publications (1)
300
20.0%
T1! T5!
250
15.0%
200
5.0%
150
0.0%
-5.0%
100
Percent Change
# of Journal Articles Published
10.0%
-10.0%
50
-15.0%
0
-20.0%
2007
2008
2009
# Articles Published
2010
Percent Change
2011
33
Research: expenditures, PhD students,
college support, collaborative projects (1)
0.12
200
0.1
180
0.08
160
30.0%
25.0%
$25,000,000
20.0%
$15,000,000
0.02
$10,000,000
# PhD Students
0.04
0
120
15.0%
100
10.0%
80
5.0%
60
0.0%
40
-0.02
$5,000,000
-5.0%
20
-0.04
$0
-0.06
2004
2005
2006
2007
$ of College Funded PhD Students
$ Research Expenditures
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
# PhD Students
Percent Change
$500,000
45%
$450,000
40%
$400,000
35%
$350,000
30%
$300,000
25%
$250,000
20%
$200,000
15%
$150,000
$100,000
10%
$50,000
5%
$-
0%
2009
2010
$ of College Funded PhD Students
Percent Change
410
12%
10%
400
8%
# of Collaborative Projects
2003
-10.0%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Percent Change
2002
Percent Change
140
0.06
Percent Change
$ Research Expenditures
$20,000,000
390
6%
380
4%
370
2%
Percent Change
$30,000,000
0%
360
-2%
350
-4%
340
-6%
2009
2011
2010
# of Collaborative Projects
Percent Change
T1!
2011
Percent Change
34
40
0.2
35
0.18
0.16
30
0.14
25
0.12
20
0.1
15
0.08
0.06
10
0.04
5
0.02
0
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
# of Current and Future Endowed Chairs and Professorships
T1! T5!
2011
2012
Percent Change
35
Percent Change
# of Current and Future Endowed Chairs and
Professorships
# Endowed chairs (3)
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 3: Research building prominent faculty
(continued)
–
5. Pursue recruitment of NAE members (or equivalent) as
faculty in the college.
•
–
6. Establish and maintain a diverse faculty
•
–
–
Opportunity hire
7. Establish efforts for faculty to gain national honors and to
contribute national service to government agencies and
professional societies.
8. Fund faculty visits/collaborations with other campuses
•
•
–
Department heads
Campaign
NS focus
9. Provide opportunities for undergraduate research
•
Focus of campaign (funded two and added some from Dean’s
excellence)
36
290
15.0%
280
10.0%
270
5.0%
260
0.0%
250
-5.0%
240
230
-10.0%
220
-15.0%
2007
2008
2009
# of National/International Positions
2010
Percent Change
# of National/International Positions
National/International activity
of our faculty (7)
T1! T5!
2011
Percent Change
37
U/Gs involved in research (9)
160
35%
140
30%
120
25%
20%
100
15%
80
10%
60
5%
40
0%
20
-5%
0
-10%
2009
2010
# Undergrads Supported by Research
Percent Change
# of Undergrads
T1! T2! T3!
2011
Percent Change
38
K-State 2025COE activities/data
•
Theme 4: Lifelong connections
–
1. Establish and maintain an alumni email system, a list of alumni contacts by company, and engage via
social media (Facebook, LinkedIn, etc)
•
•
–
COE Face book, limited twitter
WIP
2. Encourage faculty involvement that establish ties to industry, state agencies and alumni for the
purpose of developing research, scholarship, and educational experiences for students and faculty
•
•
–
WIP
NS priority
3. Work with the College Development staff to strengthen ties with alumni and industries to garner
funding
•
–
WIP
4. Schedule more alumni events such as reunions, scholarship recognition banquets, invitations to
student events, etc., and use Open House to establish strong bonds with alumni.
•
•
–
State fair: K-State day
Departmental academies are being formed
5. Encourage department to send newsletters and reports to its alumni.
•
•
–
WIP
Annual reports
6. Promote student connections with the college that foster long-term relationships after graduation via
student clubs, events, and competitions
•
–
WIP
7. Implement and maintain a comprehensive marketing and communication plan.
•
WIP
39
Scholarships and student
engagement (T)
$2,000,000
40%
$1,800,000
30%
T2! T4!
$1,600,000
10%
$1,000,000
0%
$800,000
$600,000
-10%
$400,000
-20%
$200,000
$0
-30%
2007
2008
2009
$ Scholarships
2010
2011
2012
500
Percent Change
16.00%
450
14.00%
400
12.00%
Common elements: external
constituents, funding
10.00%
300
250
8.00%
200
6.00%
150
4.00%
100
2.00%
50
-
0.00%
2009
2010
# of Students Who are Members of National Orgs & Competition
2011
Percent Change
40
Percent Change
350
# of Students
$ Scholarships
$1,200,000
Percent Change
20%
$1,400,000
$6.0
$8.0
$4.0
$2.0
$0.0
$5.0
$5.5
FY02
FY03
$7.7
$7.6
FY04
FY05
FY06
Fiscal Year
FY07
FY08
FY09
Common elements: external
constituents, funding
FY10
T1! - T6!
FY11
FY12
2007
2008
2009
2010
# of Current and Future Endowed Chairs and Professorships
2011
Continuing Education
Graduate School
K-State Olathe
Unrestricted - to University
General Scholarships - Restricted
$8.5
Library
$11.2
KSU Foundation
$12.0
Designation Pending
$12.8
Architecture, Planning & Design
$14.0
Education
$14.5
K-State Salina
$16.0
Alumni Association
$18.0
Agriculture
$20.0
Veterinary Medicine
General University - NonScholarship
Human Ecology
Presidential & General Sch Unrestricted
Business Administration
$21.3
Engineering
$20.1
Arts & Sciences
$22.0
$22.4
40
0.2
35
0.18
30
25
0.14
0.12
20
0.1
15
0.08
10
0.06
5
0
Percent Change
$10.0
Intercollegiate Athletics
$24.0
# of Current and Future Endowed Chairs and
Professorships
In Millions
Philanthropic giving (3)
40000000
35000000
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
Total Cash & Pledged Giving
0.16
0.04
0.02
2012
0
Percent Change
41
College endowments (3)
$50,000,000
30%
$45,000,000
20%
$40,000,000
10%
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
0%
$20,000,000
Percent Change
$ Endowments
$35,000,000
-10%
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
T1! - T6!
$5,000,000
$0
-20%
-30%
2007
2008
2009
$ Endowments
2010
2011
2012
Percent Change
Common elements: external
constituents, funding
42
K-State 2025COE activities/data
• Theme 5: Globality
– 1. Promote international experience for undergraduates through the
Study Abroad Scholarship Program.
• Small amount of seed funds from the college
• Priority of campaign
– 2. Facilitate a path for high-quality international students to come to KState.
• WIP
– 3. Promote international research and scholarly collaborations, and
attendance at international meetings.
• Priority of campaign
– 4. Conduct college-wide multicultural competency training.
• WIP
– 5. Promote internships that allow students to work in Kansas industry
settings, gaining real-world experience
• UEIA focus, data being collected for # of students with internship
experiences, # companies having at least one intern
• DOC scorecard
43
Number of students with
international experience (1)
30
45.00%
40.00%
25
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
15
20.00%
10
Percent Change
# of Students
20
15.00%
10.00%
5
-
T2! T3! T4! T5!
2009
2010
# of Students with International Experience
5.00%
0.00%
2011
Percent Change
Common elements: international, diversity
44
# faculty with international
experiences (3)
70
15.00%
10.00%
60
5.00%
0.00%
-5.00%
40
-10.00%
30
-15.00%
Percent Change
# of Faculty
50
-20.00%
20
-25.00%
10
-
T2! T3! T4! T5!
2009
2010
# of Faculty with International Experience
-30.00%
-35.00%
2011
Percent Change
Common elements: international, diversity
45
DOC scorecard (5)
46
K-State 2025COE activities/data
• Theme 6: dissemination
– Identify and respond to critical needs for technical assistance and
educational outreach that complement research and scholarly activities
within the college and have a direct impact on government
organizations/agencies and the private sector in Kansas.
• To date: focus of engineering extension
• Can be expanded
– Identify and tap into state and national funding sources, both public and
private, which will be sustainable and will complement existing
university funding.
• Two earmarks, UEIA
– Know the latest techniques utilized by other land-grant institutions for
conducting large-scale information dissemination in order to increase
the efficiency of delivering and receiving information.
• WIP
– Network with selected state-level public and private entities to determine
their short- and medium-term needs for data and information
• DOC scorecard
47
Requests for technical assistance (1)
19,000
4.00%
18,500
2.00%
0.00%
-4.00%
17,000
-6.00%
16,500
Percent Change
-2.00%
17,500
-8.00%
16,000
-10.00%
15,500
-12.00%
15,000
-14.00%
2010
# of Requests for Technical Assistance
2011
Percent Change
8,450
0.50%
8,400
T4!
0.00%
8,350
-0.50%
8,300
-1.00%
8,250
-1.50%
8,200
-2.00%
8,150
48
-2.50%
8,100
2009
2010
# of Responses to Technical Assistance
2011
Percent Change
Percent Change
2009
# of Responses
# of Requests
18,000
Alignment of comprehensive campaign
goals with K-State 2025COE
• Overarching theme 4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Scholarships: (theme 1)
Faculty endowments: (themes 2 & 3)
Facilities: (theme 2)
U/G research: (themes 1 & 3)
PhD fellowships: (themes 1 & 3)
Grad scholarships: (themes 1 & 3)
Facility renovations: (theme 2)
Faculty development: (themes 2, 3, & 5)
URM retention: (theme 1)
Study abroad: (theme 5)
NAE lecture series: (themes 2 & 3)
• Total tentative campaign goal: $XYZM
49
Questions ?
50