Transcript LHCb
Accelerator Physics Aspects LHCb [email protected] CERN SL/AP Layout Crossing Scheme Luminosity Collision Scheme Electron Cloud Impedances Official Schedule 1 Layout of the LHC 2 Layout of IR8 Dispersion Suppressor Matching Triplet 3 A few definitions Longitudinal emittance: l 4 E t Transverse emittance: T ,n ( T 2 / T ) Luminosity: Beam-Beam Parameter: r N p 4 T , n N 2 kfrev 1 N N L 4 T2 4 T T ,n t Proportional to the beam current Beam transverse density, proportional to the beam-beam parameter Inversely proportional to * 4 A few definitions Beam-Beam Tune Shift Parameter: rp N 4 T , n Head-on + Long range Spread of the transverse oscillation frequencies High order transverse resonances and a tune shift It is limited by the space between dangerous resonances Difficult to compensate for: all particles do not have the same tune shift Independent of * Its nominal value is 0.0035 5 Crossing Angle Crossing angle: n n ,T * Beam envelope defined at n Avoid unwanted bunch collisions Must be larger than the divergence of the beam envelope Limited by the excursions of the beam trajectories (aperture limitations in the triplet) In the expression for the luminosity there is a reduction factor for the crossing angle (0.1) 6 Beam Separation and crossing scheme End of triplet Spectrometer Spectrometer magnet compensation: 3 correction magnets to make local bump IP Correctors Horizontal crossing Vertical separation when not in collision Correctors D1 D2 7 Beam Separation and crossing scheme Limitations by Aperture Accomodate spectrometer -> 11.22m shift towards IP7 Beam Separation 2 mm atot= aspec + aext atot=345 mrad / 75 mrad depending on spectrometer polarity aspec=135 mrad positive or negative aext =210 mrad constant Crossing scheme only one direction Ramping of spectrometer magnet important to permit both polarities of spectrometer (limitations at injection) 8 Beam Separation and crossing scheme 10mm 0.5mm 10mm 1mm =1m 9 Optics IR8 =400mm =70mm, =10m =160mm, =50 Beam Size =Sqrt (*/gamma) 10 Luminosity vs * 78 Limited to 35m Wanted luminosity range for LHCb 1-5 1032 cm-2 s-1 Tunability 1m < * < 35m 77 5 1032 76 75 Luminosity requirements fulfilled dynamically by varying * Nominal 74 1 1032 50% of Nominal 73 10 20 30 40 50 10 % of Nominal 11 Luminosity Lifetime Initial Beam Intensity Lifetime from the collisions N 0 Lk x Total cross section (10-25 cm2) Number of Interaction points Scattering from residual gas ignored (10-12 torr) The beam-beam effect and the intrabeam scattering produce emittance increase but this is compensated by synchrotron radiation damping. The net result is a decrease of emittance. We are left with the formula above giving a lifetime of 26 hours Beam-gas induced lost rate into the pipe at the triplet under study 12 Luminosity Life Time No Beam-Beam Blow up No synchrotron radiation damping decreases L = 11hours Synchrotron radiation (theory) constant L = 25hours Synchrotron radiation (theory) decreases because of beam blow up (SppS Collider) L = 10hours Run on Beam-beam limit 13 Collision scheme Distance between IPs = 891 half buckets: collision scheme has to repeat from one IP to the other “Holes” (empty buckets) due to injection kickers SPS and LHC, dump Kicker LHC There are 2808 filled buckets out of 3564 according to following scheme: {[(72b+8e)*3+30e]*2+[(72b+8e)*4+31e]}*3{[(72b+8e)*3+30e]*3+81e} “Pacman” bunches: do not encounter bunches of the other beam in one or several parasitic collision points “Superpacman” bunches: as “pacman” but not even at the collision point 14 Filling scheme (72b+8e)*3+30e (72b+8e)*3+30e+81e (72b+8e)*4+31e 15 Horizontal orbit offsets Zooming up Horizontal offset at IP1, in IP8 the situation is similar, need to scale so that the spread 1/10 of the beam size Effects coming from the very start of train where there is a “big hole” Effects coming from the “small holes” 16 Collision scheme IP8 shifted by 3 half buckets which means 124 extra superpacman bunches in IP8 Double bunch spacing no encounters in IP8 IP8 Triple spacing means less luminosity (bunch current has to be increased by 31/2 to keep luminosity constant) Bunch offsets within +-0.1 at collision point, small effects 17 Longitudinal Impedance Longitudinal impedance can cause longitudinal instabilities of the beam The geometry of an element is crucial All elements in the machine are optimized to give a minimum contribution to the impedance budget. Longitudinal impedance budget is very tight No feedback system in the LHC for longitudinal instabilities A longitudinal feedback system is technically very difficult and expensive The evaluation of the LHCb experimental beam pipe longitudinal impedance is done by Nikhef. Has to fit into total budget of the LHC! Examples of critical geometries Sharp edges not good 18 Transverse Impedance A transverse feedback system is required in the LHC to cure the effect of transverse impedance (resistive wall instability). Aluminum, copper and beryllium are good materials (stainless steel not so good). Transverse impedance should not exceed budget because of emittance conservation (feedback capabilities are limited) 19 Higher Order Modes Depends on the geometry of the object Frequencey spectrum of loss factor should not overlap, bunch spectrum Different positioning of the vertex detector gives different resonance conditions All positions of the detector have to be evaluated Heating up change resonance conditions, cooling down etc. Pumping effect. Different situations should be carefully evaluated 20 Electron Cloud Photons, protons, electrons from gas ionization Critical dimensions of chamber Heat Load Vacuum 21 Electron Cloud Scale different SEY=1.2 Boxes open, xb=12cm, yb=3cm SEY=2.8 Boxes closed, xb=6mm, yb=6mm 22 Official Schedule First Beam 01/02/2006 First Collisions 01/04/2006 Shut Down 01/05-31/07/2006 L *=0.5=5 1032cm -2 s-1 Physics Run 01/08/2006-28/02/2007 L *=0.5>= 2 1033cm -2 s-1 23 People who Contributed Optics: Oliver Brüning Crossing Scheme: Werner Herr, Oliver Brüning Electron Cloud: Frank Zimmermann, Oliver Brüning Impedance: Daniel Brandt, Oliver Brüning Lattice files: Elena Wildner Aperture: Bernard Jeanneret Beam-Beam: H.Grote 24 LHC general parameters Energy at collision Energy at injection Dist. aperture axes (1.9 K) Luminosity Beam beam parameter DC beam current Bunch spacing Bunch separation Number of particles per bunch Norm. transv. emittance (r.m.s.) Total crossing angle Luminosity lifetime Energy loss per turn Critical photon energy Total radiated power per beam Stored energy per beam Filling time per ring 7 450 194 1 3.6 0.56 7.48 24.95 1.1 3.75 300 10 7 44.1 3.8 350 4.3 TeV GeV mm E34 cm-²s-¹ E-3 A m ns E11 µm µrad h keV eV kW MJ min 25 Transverse Parameters Parameter Injection Collision Unit Energy Relativistic factor (gamma) Magnetic rigidity Dipole field Transverse physical emittance Norm. transv. emittance (r.m.s.) Maximum beta value in arc (H/V) Max. beam size, arc (H/V) (r.m.s.) Beam size at IP1 and IP5 (r.m.s.) Maximum beta value in insertions Transv. intrabeam scattering growth time 0.450 479.6 1501 0.535 7.82 3.75 ~180 1.20 45 7 7460.6 23349 8.33 0.503 3.75 ~180 0.303 15.9 4705 100 TeV Tm T nm µm m mm µm m h 26 Longitudinal Parameters Parameter Injection Collision Unit Energy Revolution frequency RF frequency RF harmonic number RF tuning range RF voltage Frequency slip factor (eta) Energy gain/turn (20 min. ramping) RF power per beam Synchrotron frequency Bucket area Longitudinal emittance (2 r.m.s.) Energy spread (r.m.s.) Bunch duration (r.m.s.) Bunch separation Stored energy per beam Long. intrabeam scattering growth time Synchrotron radiation energy loss per turn Longitudinal damping time RF component of batch current DC beam current 0.450 11.2455 200.395 (*) 17820 10 3 3.43 29 2.38 1 0.285 0.62 24.95 33 1.20 0.56 7 11.2455 400.790 35640 10 16 3.47 485 (**) 257 (**) 24 7.63 2.5 0.105 0.28 24.95 350 60 7 25.8 1.25 0.56 TeV kHz MHz kHz MV E-4 keV kW Hz eVs eVs E-3 ns ns MJ h keV h A A (*) At injection the 400MHz RF system is used as a second harmonic system in addition with v=0.75MV 27 (**) During acceleration