Transcript Document

Public-Private Dialogue
4th PPD Workshop
April 2009
Vienna
Benjamin Herzberg
Sr. Private Sector Development Specialist
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
What is it, what does it look like?
Why create or support PPDs?
How do PPDs work?
What is the impact of PPDs?
How to implement PPDs?
Ten practical tips to get results?
How to enter and exit?
How to share experiences, get good
practice material, tools?
2
What is it, what does it look like?
3
Definition
PPDs are structured mechanisms,
anchored at the highest level of
government, coordinated by a light
secretariat, and aimed at facilitating the
reform process by involving a balanced
range of public and private sector actors
in identifying, filtering, accelerating,
implementing, and measuring policy
reforms.
4
Different types of use
1- In blank field, to gather actors and define PSD agenda
2- On specific reform issues, if lack of consensus or political will
3- In post-conflict economies, with extra benefits of reconciliation
4- In context of FDI policies, as sounding board and aftercare mechanism
5- As a way to bridge institutional gaps, or to by-pass inefficient institutions
5
PPDs in pictures
6
7
Why create or support PPDs?
8
1- To discover priorities
Competitiveness
Labor Cost
Corruption
9
2- To buffer the effects of the financial crisis
10
3- To reduce regulatory burden
11
4- To increase opportunities for good policies
Learning about
good practice
Discovery
Institution
Capacity building
Reform management
Source: WDR05.
12
5- To ensure transparency and representativity
GOVERNMENT
+
STAKEHOLDERS
But how to
structure that
engagement?
13
6- To design and implement reforms
Structured dialogue  Workable reforms  Reforms that work
Diagnostic
Solution
Design
Monitoring &
Evaluation
Implementation
• Engagement
• Consensus building
• Ongoing support • Watchdog
• Definition
• Filtering
• Watchdog
• Empowerment
• Feedback loop
• Resources
PPD contributes to all steps of reform process
14
What is the impact of PPDs?
15
Evidence of development effectiveness
2005:
Independent evaluation of 5 Investors Advisory Councils in Africa
2007:
Independent evaluation of 3 Business Forums in Mekong
2009:
Independent evaluation of 30 WBG-sponsored PPDs
16
Economic impacts
Private Sector Savings from reforms
processed through PPDs in the Mekong
Area ($ Million)
$309.2
$237.9
$69.2
$2.7
Vietnam Cambodia
Laos
Total
17
Regulatory payoffs
Drop in Customs Clearance length as a result
of the Advisory Council in Ghana (Nb of days)
15
Cost Savings,
Efficiency and
Productivity
Improvement
5
Before
After
18
Regulatory payoffs
Country
Benefit
Bosnia
Slashed statutory capital
requirements when
registering a LLC
$ 6. 500
$ 1. 300
Increased number of registered
companies (doubled in some areas)
Ease labor restrictions
for expatriate employees
Decree 105 limited the number of
foreign employees to 3% of the
total staff, with cap at 50.
Circular 04 excluded management from
limitation, and removed cap under
special permissions.
Amend law on company
registration process
19 steps to register
2 and half month
1 step, 8 procedures to register
1 day process, 9 days total
Setting institutional
means for economic
empowerment
Public grant program with high
corruption, not investment
guarantee agency, poor VC
access.
Citizen Entrepreneur Dev. Agency
(CEDA). Direct link to Ministries of
Finance + Planning
Subsidized loans, VC, JV
50 applications/week
(Bulldozer)
Vietnam
(VBF)
Turkey
(YOIIK)
Botswana
(NACEE)
Before
After
19
How to implement PPDs?
20
Implementation framework: 12 key processes
1. Mandate and Institutional Alignment
2. Structure and participation
3. Champions
4. Facilitator
5. Outputs
6. Outreach and communications
7. Monitoring and evaluation
8. Sub national initiatives
9. Sector-specific programs
10. International role
11. Post-conflict / Crisis / Reconciliation
12. Development partners
A number of
options to
choose from
A number of
good and bad
practice to
learn from
A number of
decisions to
implement
21
Delivery modes
To Gov/PS
on
institutional
arrangements
Public-Private Initiative
To PPD
Secretariat
on process
improvements
Working group 1
Coordinating secretariat
Working group 2
Working group 3
Working group 4
To Working
Groups on
substantive
BEE/A2F/INF
refroms
Working group 5
Private sector advocates, associations, government representatives, donors
22
Ten practical tips
to get results
23
How to get results ?
-1A lot of work
Huge coordination and mediation business
24
How to get results ?
-2Design
consultations
for PPD
25
How to get results ?
-3Strong focus on
targeted,
measurable
refroms
26
Several types of outputs
Focusing on this
will bring the others
27
Breakdown per type of reforms, 2006
Clarification
17%
Enforcement
2%
Infrastructure
8%
Institution
2%
Regulation
69%
Law
2%
More than 1000 issues raised
28
How to get results ?
-4Simple, explicit organization
Public-Private Mandate
Coordinating secretariat
Working group 1
Working group 2
Working group 3
Working group 4
Working group 5
Private sector advocates, associations, government representatives, donors
29
How to get results ?
-5A unique,
transparent and
disciplined way
to collect reform
proposals
30
How to get results ?
-6A filtering
process that
ensures
quality of
proposed
reforms
31
How to get results ?
32
How to get results ?
-7A lot of work (again)
Simple criterias to ensure quick processing and transparency of process
Propositions
collectees par
les GT
Propositions
preselectionees
par les GT
Propositions
finalisees par
les GT et
presentees au
secretariat
Propositions
correspondan
tes aux
criteres de
fesabilite
Propositions
correspondan
tes aux
standards
internationnau
x
Propositions votees
en séance pleniere
Proposition
s retenues
pour plus
tard
Groupe de
travail 1
40
16
6
4
3
2
1
Groupe de
travail 2
40
16
6
4
3
2
1
Groupe de
travail 3
40
16
6
4
3
2
1
Groupe de
travail 4
40
16
6
4
3
2
1
Total
160
64
24
16
12
8
4
Ratio
 100%
40%
15%
10%
7.5%
5%
Forum
33
How to get results ?
Phase I timeline
-8Good planning
Bulldozer Committee
1st Plenary Session
Vetting 8 reforms
Bulldozer Committee
2nd Plenary Session
Vetting 15 reforms
BC
Public meeting
MOSTAR
BC
Public meeting
BRCKO
BC
Public meeting
BANJA LUKA
3 Govts
give their
amendments
package
to PAs
under
“urgent
procedure”
BC
Public meeting
ORASJE
HR meeting Young
Entrepreneurs
TRAVNIK
Dec 17 Jan 16
50
Reform
Enactment
by
3
Parliaments
Joint
Parliament
Meeting in
National
Theatre
with BC
BC presents
50 reforms to
CoM, RS, FBiH
in JOINT
GOVERNMENT
SESSION
BC
Public meeting
ZENICA
BC
Public meeting
TUZLA
Nov 12
Bulldozer Committee
50 REFORMS
PUBLISHED
IN PRESS
Bulldozer Committee
3rd Plenary Session
Vetting 27 reforms
Jan 27
Jan 29
Feb 07
E C O N O M I C
HR Press Conf.
To Present BC
50 reforms
Feb 12 Feb 13
Feb 20
Feb 25
R E F O R M S
Mar 03
I N
Mar 12
150
Mar 24
Mar 25
Apr 3
Apr 22
D A Y S
34
How to get results ?
-9Strong convincing power
35
How to get results ?
36
How to get results ?
37
How to get results ?
-10Monitoring
process and
evaluating
impacts
Issue
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Average
1.0
-
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.3
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.8
4.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.7
5.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.3
6.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
2.2
7.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.5
8.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.6
9.0
10.0
1.0
2.0
0.6
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
11.0
2.0
-
12.0
2.0
2.0
0.4
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
13.0
1.0
1.0
0.3
Average
1.5
0.5
1.4
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.1
38
Tools and techniques for monitoring + evaluation
39
Software for issue tracking
40
How to start and
exit?
41
PPDs are risky business but risk is manageable
Reinforcing vested interest
(e.g. Mongolia)
Be open and transparent – Publicize quality control – Broad based
Over and under representation
(e.g. Tanzania, 18%)
Strengthening BMOS – Equal representation – Periodic review
Sustainability issues
(e.g. Bolivia)
Clear agenda and proposals – Manage expectations – Live and let die
One man shows
(e.g. Botswana)
Foster bottom-up support – Secure written commitment – Prepare transition
Political risks
(e.g. Bosnia)
Depoliticize through outreach – Woo parliamentarians – Go local
Institutional misalignments
(e.g. Uganda NF)
embrace institutions – Use technical ministerial staff – Transfer competencies
42
Initiative or institution?
Public authorities
Private sector
43
Life and death of a PPD
Phase 1
Results
Trust
Education
Discovering what
works / What
doesn’t
Setting up
production
process
Phase 2
Phase 3
HIGH
IMPACT
RESULTS
Institutions
BMOs
Exit
More capacity
Permanent brokering
Better production
Better product
EARLY
RESULTS
More conflict
Ownership without capacity
Time
1 to 3 years
1 to 3 years
44
Linking the PPD to other reforms processes
SEZ
Clusters
Value
chain
Reform Unit
Regulatory
simplification
RIA and regulation review process
Process Mapping: An Illustration
Office No. 1
Applicant
Clerk 1
Clerk 2
Files request
for approval
Reviews
application
and
documents
Receives
application
and
documents
Clerk 4
Clerk 5
Pays
fee
Provides
copy of
Receipt
Receives
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Municipal
Official
Signs &
Returns
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Office No. 2
Office No. 3
Clerk No. 3
Inspector
Accepts fee
Assigns
Inspector
Issues Receipt
Forwards fee
for deposit to
municipal
account
Receives
and reviews
Inspection
Report
Prepares &
Transmits
Request for
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Receives
Request for
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Contacts
Applicant
Conducts
Inspection
Prepares
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Transmits
Signed
Approval or
Deficiency
Letter
Mails
Approval
or
Deficiency
Letter
Prepares
Report
Sends copy to
Clerk 2
45
How to share
experiences, get
good practice
material, tools?
46
KM: Knowledge development and sharing
Community of practice
KM Website
Charter of good practice
Lessons learned papers
Interactive PPD handbook
50 case studies
Operational documents
Templates
M&e Tools
Workshop materials
Workshops
Donor partnerships
2006 PPD Workshop
(Paris, 30 countries represented)
2007 PPD Workshop
(Douala, 7 countries represented)
2008 PPD Workshop
(Dakar, 8 countries represented)
2009 PPD Workshop
(Vienna, 20 countries to be
represented)
OECD
(on implementation guidelines)
DFID
(co-funding of KM and projects)
GTZ
(co-implementation of PPD projects)
EBRD
(our M&E + training for their PPDs)
USAID
(our PPD training to their PSD staff)
Tools
Implementation
guidelines
Diagnostic tool
M&E Tools for PPD secretariats
47
Thank you!
Benjamin Herzberg
World Bank Group
[email protected]
48