Transcript SAI INDIA

SAI INDIA
COUNTRY REPORT
THE IInd MEETING OF 10 ARP
CURRENT LEVEL OF CORRUPTION
1
Current characteristic level
Serious and pervasive in most
or all sectors
2
Level now with past year
3
Transparency International-Corruption Perception Index No
About same as past years
rank reflect reality
4
Global Integrity Index rank reflect reality
No
5
Peoples' opposition
Weak
6
Governments' opposition
Weak
7
Corruption dealing
Highly predictable and visible from
certain pattern
8
Rank as per prevalence
1. Grand – misuse of entrusted power
of politicians and
Petty corruption – everyday at all levels
2. Enterprise Level
9
Main pattern in country
Both in public and private entities
10
Petty corruption
Serious
11
Main petty corruption
Medium management/Supervisors
12
Main patterns of petty
Bribes paid for expediting public services and to
corruption
avoid law.
13
Grand corruption
Serious
14
Main grand corruption
Elected officials and their personal favorites
15
Common types
1. Abuse of position/power; Bribery; Nepotism.
2. Influence peddling 3. Extortion 4. Kickback;
5. Criminal breach of trust
6. Embezzlement 7. Forgery
16
Most vulnerable sectors
Customs; Law enforcement/police; Public service delivery; Taxation; .
Education; Energy; Local Govt./Municipalities;. Judiciary; . State owned
enterprise Legislature; Environment; Agriculture.
17
18
Greatest probability of
Procurement of contracts; Revenue (Taxes) collection; Licensing and
occurrence in Govt. activity
franchising
Use of money/asset gained from Acquiring assets; Invest in real estate; Leisure/social activities
corruption
19
Root cause
Complicated and cumbersome administrative procedure; Unclear rules
and loopholes for manipulation; Culture, customs and habits of giving
bribes to get things done; Low salary; Lack comprehensive, effective and
failure in legal system; Rapid population and economic growth; To
become rich as quick as possible; Lack of rules and procedures; Absence
of regulatory and legal system to combat corruption.
20
Whether grand and petty
corruption is derived from
patronage-client system
Agree
21
Weak accounting practices
Agree
including lack of timely financial
management favor corruption
22
As an enforcement agency,
Not a priority
priority of monitoring corruption
23
As an enforcement agency,
High priority
priority of public complaints on
corruption
24
As an enforcement agency
Very important
emphasis on whistle blower in
corruption reporting
25
Could whistle blower support
complaints of corruption
Strongly support
26
Extent of damage to State Budget in terms of economic
Very serious
27
Extent of damage to firms in terms of economic
Serious
28
Extent of damage to citizens in terms of economic
Serious
29
“Corruption during budget formulation is primarily grand or Agree
political corruption and is influenced by the distribution of
budgetary powers between the executive and the
legislature.” (Quote by Martinez-Vazquez, Arze, and Boex
2004).
30
“Unchecked and excessive executive discretion in the
Strongly agree
budget process tends to create opportunities for political
corruption. Politician or senior level bureaucrats are able to
provide subsidies or favourable tax treatments to favoured
citizen groups or allocate budget resources to projects
areas based on political connection.” (Quote by MartinezVazquez, Arze, and Boex 2004)
31
“Public Financial Management System weakness during
budget formulation can increase the risk of administrative
corruption during budget execution.” (Quote by Dorotinsky
and Pradhan, 2007)
Neither agree nor disagree
CURRENT STATUS OF MONEY
LAUNDERING
1.
2.
4
Situation in the country
Tends to increase in recent
years
Is more sophisticated over the
years
Pattern in the country
5
6
Highest risk ranking
Common methods
3
Serious
Strongly agree
Corruptive practices through money laundering mostly
observed in private sectors
Real Estate ; Finance, Banking;
1. Business; Real Estate;2. Cash transaction;4. Stock
Market;5. Money exchange; Project;8. Casino
7.
Favorable environment
- Bank and financial institutions do not have suitable
supervision/control system to anti money laundering
- Use of cash and illegal money transfer is dominant
8.
Offences closely
associated
*
- Corruption;
- Production, buying and selling of illegal goods;
- Drugs
Evaluation of Money Laundering Situation
Methods
Experience level
Non experience level
Use of Corporate vehicles and
Trusts
Use of Gatekeepers
Use of Domestic Financial
Institution
Use of Offshore/Foreign
jurisdiction
Use of nominee
Often
Use of cash and its placement
into the financial system
Often
Reasons for criminals laundering
- Becoming legitimate - Evading taxes - Hiding illegally accumulated
wealth
Often
Sometimes
Often
Often
11.
12.
13.
14.
Consequences
- Increased crime and corruption
*
- Weakened financial institutions
Economic and social
consequences
Impact on national security,
international reputation and
economy
Significant incidences between
2007 – 2012
- Reduced government tax and
revenue and weakened
government control over the
economy
Serious
Very serious
Allocation of Coal Blocks;
Payment of Indian Officials by
ORACLE (FCPA)
Payments to Indian Officals by
DIEGO (FCPA)