Transcript CA*net II

Question 3
Impact of “application
empowered” networks
> The semi-conductor revolution reduced CAPEX and OPEX costs
for main frame computer
> But its biggest impact was not on main frame computer but
allowing the creation of mini-computers, PCs, mobile phones, etc
> In the 1960’s computing was a “service” like telecom is today
– Large mainframes leased by companies like IBM
– It was inconceivable that an individual could own a computer
> The same revolution may be about to happen to optical networking
as with semi-conductor because of low cost optics
– Yes it will make networks cheaper for carriers to operate
– But the real revolution is in allowing us to think of new network
models and architectures e.g
– Application empowered networks, customer controlled networks,
overlay networks, etc
Question 3
CA*net 4 is NOT an optical
network
> CA*net 4 is made up of many parallel application empowered or
customer empowered specific networks eg:
– Computer back planes (Westgrid)
– High energy physics network
> It extends the Internet 2 architecture of GigaPOPs connecting a
small number of R&E institutions to a much finer scale with many
parallel “application empowered” Internet 2 like networks
connecting individual researchers and/or applications
– With added feature that the application or user can dynamically manage
their own IP network topology
– Application empowered networks peer with each other at GigaPOPs and at
optical switches which provides for greater reliability
> The CA*net 4 wavelengths and switches are partitioned such that
application empowered networks can control their own partition
and incorporate alarms, topology and discovery into their IP
network
– New ITU draft standard – Y.1312 - Layer 1 VPNs
Question 1
Drivers for application
empowered networks -1
> Distributed back planes between HPC Grid centers
– Westgrid 1 GbE moving to 10 GbE
– SHARCnet 10 GbE
> Distributed Single Mount file systems – Yotta, Yotta - SGI
– Needs very consistent performance and throughput to truly act as a
back plane
– Frequent topology changes to meet needs of specific applications
> Canada ATLAS – 980 Gbytes FCAL data once a month from CERN
to Carleton U, UoAlberta, UoArizona, etc
– Will significantly increase to Terabytes when production runs start
– Would take over 80 days on IP R&E network
Drivers for application
empowered networks - 2
> CERN Low level trigger data to UoAlberta with GARDEN
– Initially streaming data rates 1 Gbps moving to 10Gbps later in
the year
> Canadian virtual observatory
– .5 Tbyte per day to UoToronto and UoHawaii
– 250 Mbps continuous streaming from CCD devices
> Neptune – Canada (and US?) under sea laboratory – multiple
HDTV cameras and sensors on sea floor
> Canada Light Source Synchrotron – remote streaming of data
acquisition to UoAlberta
– 2 to 5 Gbps continuously
> Canadian remote Nano and micro electronics
laboratories
Question 3
A VPN alternative to GMPLS
Layer 1 VPNs
>
>
>
>
>
Allows customer to create “customer owned and managed”
networks with resource heterogeneity
Integration of wavelengths and dark fiber from different carriers
Customers can manage their own restoral and protection schemes
Customer can create daughter VPNs and offer to other users
Customer can autonomously connect VPNs with other third
parties
Question 3
>
>
>
>
Enables new network
architectures
Eliminate expensive high end routers and replace them with
partial mesh of lightpaths between edge routers and servers
– But circuits are NOT intended to replace packet networks
Extend the Internet end to end principle to the topology layer
– The success of the Internet is largely attributable to the classic e2e
principle where control is at the edge
– Users can now control topology as well as applications
– Allowed development of exciting new applications or services
Many exciting new overlay networks
– Knowledgeplane
– Oceanstore, Chord
– PlanetLab
Application empowered networks allow overlay network to
optimized “underlay” topology
Question 3
The GigaPOP concept
University
University
University
Commodity
Internet
GigaPOP
GigaPOP
Abilen
e
University
vBNS
University
University
Question 3
Question 4
CA*net 4 == Internet 3?
University
Dept
UltraLight
CERN
Commodity
Internet
University
University
Abilen
e
GigaPOP
vBNS
GigaPOP
University
eVBLI
University
Question 3
Hypothetical UltraLight
Config
CERN
User controlled topology
UltraLight
GigaPOP
GigaPOP
Caltech
Question 4
Gov’t Funding
> Governments are increasingly unlikely to fund general
purpose IP research networks
– General purpose IP research networks are large vectors for DOS
attacks and music/video file sharing
> They want to see a stronger coupling between the
network and specific research activity
> Many new research applications have data flows that
dwarf the general purpose IP R&E network
> Application empowered networks will be discipline or
application specific e.g. Ultralight, e-VBLI