Transcript Slide 1

Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
Bologna Process: the next steps
Ligia DECA
Head of the 2010 – 2012 Bologna Secretariat
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
The Bologna Secretariat
Main role:
“...to provide neutral support to further the consolidation of the
European Higher Education Area under the exclusive authority of the
BFUG and its Chairs and Vice-Chairs.”
Functions:
•
•
•
•
Administrative and operational support for BFUG, its sub-structures (WG and
networks) and the Board (minute-taking, background documents drafting,
assisting chairs in planning the meeting, communication etc.);
Create and maintain the EHEA permanent website and electronic archives;
Act as an internal and external contact point for the EHEA, while ensuring
external representation on behalf of the Chairs or based on direct requests;
Organise the 2012 Ministerial Conference and Bologna Policy Forum.
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
2
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
The EHEA unfolded
Bologna action lines
EHEA Objectives/ HE
priorities
Pre-Leuven (as listed in the 2007-2009
Work Plan)
Post-Leuven (as listed in the 2009 – 2012 Work
Plan)
Mobility
Degree structure (?)
Employability
Recognition (?)
Qualifications frameworks (?)
Lifelong Learning
Quality Assurance (?)
Third cycle
Social dimension
Global dimension
Stocktaking
Beyond 2010 (?)
Social dimension: equitable access and completion
Lifelong Learning
Employability
Student centered learning and the teaching mission of
higher education
Education, research and innovation
International openness
Mobility
Data collection
Multidimensional transparency tools
Funding
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
3
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
BFUG Workplan
Working groups:







International openness: The European Higher Education Area in a Global Context
Mobility
Qualification frameworks
Recognition
Reporting on the implementation of the Bologna Process
Social dimension
Transparency tools
Networks:




EHEA Information and Promotion Network
Network of NQF Correspondents
NESSIE (Network for Experts of Student Support in Europe)
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) network
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
4
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
Current BFUG debates
Alden Biesen BFUG meeting (25-26th of August 2010) - highlights:







Reporting on the implementation of the Bologna Process – questionnaire feedback
Additional working methods within the EHEA
Language regime of the ministerial conferences
Permanent EHEA website, more interactive and an electronic archive
Possible themes of the next Bologna Policy Forum
The EHEA mobility benchmark and its links with the similar EU initiatives
Progress towards implementation of national qualifications frameworks (NQF) in
all EHEA countries (with 2012 as a deadline for NQFs to be in place and ready for
self certification)
 ECTS and DS label – report from the European Commission
 Accession criteria (postponed)
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
5
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
The 2012 Bucharest Ministerial Conference and
Bologna Policy Forum (27-28th of April)
Q: What do we know so far?
A: TETT (Too Early To Tell…)
Safe guesses or ongoing discussions:
 the two events might be intertwined, both in terms of schedule and
content;
 there will be only one!
One Report regarding the implementation of the Bologna Process
(EUROSTAT, EURYDICE, EUROSTUDENT) to be complemented by a special
WG report for Transparency Mechanisms and by the EHEA Mobility
Strategy;
 possible input from the research community doing work on the Bologna
Process (tbc).
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
6
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
Policy trends as perceived by the speaker
 Move from policy making at the European level to focus on implementation at the
institutional level;
 More attention given to composite priorities (SCL, RPL, LLL), that need a certain level of
“structural” Bologna changes in place.
 “Flirting” with previously off-limits areas such as funding and transparency
mechanisms;
 A certain political realisation of the fact that the implementation process has not been
perfect over the past decade and that things might need to be rethought or reimplemented:
“While much has been achieved in implementing the Bologna reforms, the reports also illustrate that EHEA action lines such
as degree and curriculum reform, quality assurance, recognition, mobility and the social dimension are implemented to
varying degrees. Recent protests in some countries, partly directed against developments and measures not related to the
Bologna Process, have reminded us that some of the Bologna aims and reforms have not been properly implemented and
explained. We acknowledge and will listen to the critical voices raised among staff and students. We note that adjustments
and further work, involving staff and students, are necessary at European, national, and especially institutional levels to
achieve the European Higher Education Area as we envisage it.” (Budapest and Vienna Statement 2010)
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
7
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
Ireland and institutional implementation
 Current areas of activity for the Irish Bologna Experts:
•
•
•
•
Dissemination of the relevance of the Bologna Process and related Irish policy developments to Irish
higher education institutions;
Promotion of quality assurance;
Promotion of knowledge and understanding of qualifications frameworks;
Promotion of ECTS and Diploma Supplement.
Relevant questions:
1.
What is the focus of the Irish institutional level implementation?
•
•
Is it related mainly to the EHEA priority areas in which there was already a degree of progress within the Irish
context (QF, QA, recognition with its underpinning tools: ECTS, DS)?
What about social dimension for example? Or mobility in the frame of the internationalisation debate? Or the
overarching concept of student centered learning in an era of financial and demograhic challenges?
2.
Would it be necessary to have additional support structures for both the national level and the
European level Bologna Process 2nd phase?
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
8
Bologna Secretariat
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.ehea.info
Thank you!
14th of October 2010
www.ehea.info
9