www.navalengineers.org

Download Report

Transcript www.navalengineers.org

Open Systems Architecture for
Payloads and Platforms for
Flexible Modular Warships
Nickolas Guertin, PE
DASN RDT&E, Director for Transformation
ASNE Day 2015
CAPT Paul J. VanBenthem, USN
DASN RDT&E, Naval Open Architecture Implementation
Unlocking Potential
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release
1
Building on a Solid Foundation
• We have evolved the Naval Open Systems Architecture Strategy
• We are working on Open Technical Reference Architectures
• We have established an IP Strategy for acquiring systems
• The Navy has experience in building common combat systems
• Portfolio management of common and open product lines
Opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not
reflect official policy or position of the US Government
Unlocking Potential
2
Naval OSA Strategy
https://acc.dau.mil/osastrategy
Unlocking Potential
33
Goals of Naval OSA Strategy
Authorities Direct Change
Issue Guidance/Tools
Develop OSA Recommendations
TRF
Communications
Affordable Design/ Test
OSA
Working
Groups
Rewards/ Incentives
Tools / Guides
Training
Open Business Model
Unlocking Potential
4
The Naval Business Model – Top-Level Strategy
Procure Basic Platforms
•
Decouple the mission systems and integration from the platform
•
Able to quickly change modular components for future flexibility
•
Stabilize platform production – segregate from rapid change
Develop/ Maintain Capability Product Lines
•
Reduce and manage vendor-locked and stove-piped products
•
Improve core competencies across the force
•
Design for robust, affordable testing
•
Build in adaptability
Integrate and Deliver
•
Manage Platform-unique elements
•
Reduce acquisition cost and risk
•
Spur innovation and enhance warfighter capability
Unlocking Potential
T
B
D
Modular Spaces
Modular Capabilities
T
B
D
5
Speed of change for Shipboard Systems
Unlocking Potential
66
Common SWFTS Product Line
BEFORE
AFTER
Seawolf
FUTURE
Seawolf
BSY - 2
SWFTS
Los Angeles
CCS Mk-2
Los Angeles
Common
SWFTS
Processes &
Systems
SWFTS
Ohio (SSGN)
SWFTS
Virginia BLK IV
Virginia
Virginia
NPES
Ohio (SSBN)
Trident CCS
SWFTS
SWFTS
Ohio (SSBN)
Trident CCS
OR
SWFTS
Submarine Classes Contain the Same Basic Set of Subsystems and
Information Architecture; Variations are due to sensors and mission capabilities
Unlocking Potential
7
CNOs Challenge: Create Modularity
•
•
•
THINK Open Architecture
THINK Plug and Play
THINK Payloads over Platforms
The Navy’s future depends on vessels that use
common, open architectures, allowing individual
systems to be removed and new ones to be plugged in
as warfighting requirements change.
Payload
A
Payload
C
POWER
Payload
E
Payload
D
Payload
B
Payload
F
COOLING
VOLUME
BACKBONE REQUIREMENTS
PLATFORM
Unlocking Potential
88
Open Acquisition
Intellectual Property Strategy
• Government as Business Integrator
• Choose where to invoke generous license rights to design data
• Architecture and interfaces
• What the Government paid to develop
• Choose where to invoke innovation
• Where warfighting requirements change quickly
• Where the Commercial sector is investing
• Where there are multiple strong providers
Unlocking Potential
9
Learning from Industry
• DoD can learn from commercial industry's playbook
• Leverage their “lessons learned” based on product-line
success
• Industry has proven that investment in initial
product-line architecture reaps system life cycle
cost reductions due to:
• Integration
• Planning for obsolescence
• Technical refresh
• Common components and software across platforms
Unlocking Potential
10
Typical Industry Standard Practices
• Multi-use – multiple levels
• Architecture
• Hardware modules and structures
• Software
• Common core components
• Design
• Standardized interfaces
• Require use of standard interfaces between modules
• Multiple vendors able to produce modules meeting
form/fit/function requirements
Unlocking Potential
11
Renault
• “Automakers rapidly are moving toward a new era in
vehicle architectures that promises lower costs, turnon-a-dime manufacturing and shorter productdevelopment lead times” (WardsAuto, Oct 28, 2013)
The appearance of
products, services,
or corporate names
does not constitute
endorsement by
the Department of
Defense
Renault CMF architecture concept
Source: http://wardsauto.com/vehicles-amp-technology/big-rewards-hurdles-seen-next-gen-flexible-vehicle-architectures
Unlocking Potential
12
Volkswagen
•MQB architecture to
underpin 39+/- models
covering eight size and
market segments
•Allows for quicker
product development
as future vehicles are
derived from the
existing platform
Photo courtesy WardsAuto, Oct 28, 2013
The appearance of products,
services, or corporate names does
not constitute endorsement by the
Department of Defense
Source: http://wardsauto.com/vehicles-amp-technology/big-rewards-hurdles-seen-next-gen-flexible-vehicle-architectures
Unlocking Potential
13
General Motors
• Adopting a more flexible approach
• mixes and matches modules across product portfolio
• Modular architectures enable:
• quick reaction to changes in consumer preferences
• shorten vehicle development times
• Reduce architectures from 30 in 2010
• to 17 in 2018, core platforms from 39% to 96%
• to 99% on core architectures by 2020
• to 4 basic vehicle sets in 2025
• Consolidate lead engineering to one center
The appearance of
products, services,
or corporate names
does not constitute
endorsement by
the Department of
Defense
• drive inefficiency out of product-development process
Sources:
http://wardsauto.com/management-amp-strategy/gm-vehicle-platform-consolidation-accelerating-product-chief-says
http://wardsauto.com/auto-makers/gm-taking-new-approach-global-engineering-vehicle-architectures
http://wardsauto.com/auto-makers/new-management-team-lifts-veil-gm-strategy
Unlocking Potential
14
Modular and Open Warship Vision
•
•
•
Efficient and frequent capability insertion and technology refresh to
overcome obsolescence at the lowest possible cost
Greater mission adaptability and warfighting dominance via re-configuration
Increased efficiencies in ship design, construction, testing, sustainment, and
disposal achieve affordable relevance over the lifecycle
Flexible Ship =
Platform +
Payload +
Growth Margin
Top-level Objective: Affordable Relevance over the Life Cycle
Unlocking Potential
15
NEW Naval Business Model
Competition Across the
Lifecycle
• Competition for O-C
• Replacement for R-P
Module 1
O-C
Module 2
R-P
CONTRACTS
TECHNOLOGY
Integration O-C
REQUIREMENTS
WARFIGHTER
Unlocking Potential
Functional
Module 1
Functional
Module 2
O-C
R-P
…
Integration
O-C
The Open Business Model: Cross-Program Partnering
Vision: Open Acquisition Model
Relationship to Resourcing
Mission Design/ Warfighting Architecture
Common Capabilities
Platforms
Radar / EW
CVN
Networks & Comms
Surface
EO/ IR
Fast AIR
Navigation
Big AIR
Sonar
Submarines
Combat
Land
C2
Space
Intel Analysis
Air Weap.-UaV
MISSION
COMMON
CAPABILITIES
PLATFORMS
Undersea Wep.Us/uV
Built on Open Technical Reference Frameworks and Open Acquisition Strategies
Unlocking Potential
17