Transcript Slide 1
with your host…. Dr. Hy, the rocket scientist guy AERO 426, Lecture #5 Spacecraft Dynamics- Questions Addressed How can we tell where our spacecraft is ? What are some simple ways to estimate the motion of spacecraft in the vicinity of a NEA? How can we plan space trajectories and estimate propulsion system requirements? Regarding available and future launch systems, what are the implications for cost versus payload size, weight, etc.? Suggested reading: L&W, Chap.5 intro or P&M, Sect. 3.3 (coordinate systems), L&W, Sect. 6.1.1 - 6.1.3 or P&M, Sect. 3.6 (Keplerian orbits), L&W, Sect. 6.3 (orbit maneuvering), L&W, Sect. 17.2 or P&M, Sect. 4.2.1 and 4.3 (rocket propulsion and motion), L&W, Sect. 17.3 (types of rockets), L&W, Sect. 18.2 (launch system data) What’s our coordinates? Use Nature’s Gyros! Jorbit ~ RESX MEVE ~ Const Orbit plane is fixed Jspin~ Constant RES VE So, we have two axes that are fixed: The perpendicular to the orbit plane and the axis of rotation of the Earth (which actually nutates once every 26,000 years) Actually, in the Ecliptic coordinate system; We use the normal to the orbit plane (called the Ecliptic Pole) as the Z-axis Y-axis In the position of the vernal equinox, the rotation axis vector is perpendicular to the SunEarth vector and Northern Hemisphere spring commences Ecliptic Pole, Z-axis X-axis Orbit Plane Coordinate systems used in space applications Coordinate Name Fixed with respect to Center Z-axis or Pole X-axis or Ref. Point Applications Celestial (Inertial) Inertial space Earth or spacecraft Celestial Pole Vernal equinox Orbit analysis, astronomy, inertial motion Earth-fixed Earth Earth Earth pole=celestial pole Greenwich meridian Geolocation, apparent satellite motion Spacecraftfixed Spacecraft Defined by engineering drawings Spacecraft axis toward nadir Spacecraft axis in direction of velocity vector Position and orientation of spacecraft instruments Ecliptic Inertial space Sun Ecliptic pole Vernal equinox Solar system orbits, lunar/solar ephemerides Lunar The Moon Moon Lunar North pole Average center of Lunar Disk Locating lunar features Locating Events in Time The Julian day or Julian day number (JDN) is the integer number of days that have elapsed since the initial epoch defined as noon Universal Time (UT) Monday, January 1, 4713 BC in the Julian calendar. The Julian date (JD) is a continuous count of days and fractions elapsed since the same initial epoch. The integral part gives the Julian day number. The fractional part gives the time of day since noon UT as a decimal fraction of one day with 0.5 representing midnight UT. Example: A Julian date of 2454115.05486 means that the date and Universal Time is Sunday 14 January 2007 at 13:18:59.9. The decimal parts of a Julian date: 0.1 = 2.4 hours or 144 minutes or 8640 seconds 0.01 = 0.24 hours or 14.4 minutes or 864 seconds 0.001 = 0.024 hours or 1.44 minutes or 86.4 seconds 0.0001 = 0.0024 hours or 0.144 minutes or 8.64 seconds 0.00001 = 0.00024 hours or 0.0144 minutes or 0.864 seconds. The Julian day system was introduced by astronomers to provide a single system of dates that could be used when working with different calendars. Also, the time separation between two events can be determined with simple subtraction. To make conversions, several handy web-sites are available; e.g., http://aa.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/aa_jdconv.pl Orbital Dynamics - Made Simple Most of the time (with many important exceptions) spacecraft orbital dynamics involves bodies that are either (1) very, very small relative to inter-body distances, or (2) are nearly spherically symmetric -- then: Bodies behave (attract and are attracted) as if they are point masses. Motion can be described by keeping track of the centers of mass. Also, most of the time (with many important exceptions) spacecraft orbital dynamics is a two-body problem (the s/c and the Earth, or the s/c and the sun, or, etc.) - so we have two gravitationally attracting point masses, and: Both bodies move in a plane (the same plane) Both trace out conic sections with one focus at the total center of mass. Each body moves periodically on its conic section, tracing and retracing the same curve forever. Finally, most of the time (with many important exceptions), one of the bodies is much more massive than the other ( the Earth versus a s/c, or the sun versus the Earth, etc.). Then in addition to the above: The smaller body moves on a conic section with a focus on the larger body's center of mass, which is also approximately the total center of mass. The motion of the smaller body does not depend on its mass. The smaller body's motion depends on the gravitational constant, G, and the larger body's mass only through the combination: = "The Gravitational Parameter" = GM G = 6.673 x 10-11 m3/ kg-s2 M = Mass of the larger body Euler Angle Description of the Orbit Plane ˆi z i Orbit Plane i h Longit ude of t he ascending node Inclinat ion angle Argument of t he perihelion f T rue anomaly r Equitorial Ecliptic plane ˆi p f ˆi h ˆi e i Periapsis ˆi x ˆi y h angular moment um vect or ˆi h Unit vect or along h ˆi e Unit vect or point ing t o perihelion ˆi p ˆi ˆi h e Orbital Dynamics - Briefly Summarized d Parabola: parabola vmax = (2e)1/2 =vescape E=0 v0 hyperbola v0 = vf d d(v0)2/ Hyperbola: vmax = v0 [ 1 + (1 + d2)1/2] / d, rmin = dv0 / vmax sin() = d /(1 + d2 )1/2 E0 rmax vf ellipse hyperbola Ellipse: rmax = rmin (vmax)2 / (2 e - (vmax)2) 0 E E0 circle Circle: v = vmax = e1/2 E = E0 = - e /2 For all orbits: e = / rmin E = v2/2 - / r = - / 2a a = (rmax + rmin)/ 2 rmin For bound orbits: P 2 vmax a3 Location of a Body in its Orbit as a Function of Time K epler 's Equat ion : M E - e sin E E K e, M M Mean anomaly M 0 n t - t 0 M 0, 2 b n mean angular mot ion P Orbit period 2 r F2 E r a f h2 1 e cos f F1 ae a3 1e E f 2 t an -1 t an 2 1 - e p r 1 e cos f p a 1 - e2 2 P Getting from Earth to a NEA - Patched Conics Method When S/C crosses asteroid’s activity sphere boundary, subtract the asteroid’s velocity relative to the sun.This gives initial conditions for the asteroiddominated portion of the rendezvous Asteroid Sphere of Influence of the asteroid: S/C acceleration due to asteroid > Perturbing acceleration due to the Earth. SI radius given by: RSI RA-E (Masteroid /MEarth)2/5 (Masteroid = 4.6X1010 kg MEarth=5.9737X1024 kg ) (Masteroid /MEarth)2/5= 2.2626X10-6 Within SI and ref. frame moving with the asteroid, S/C approx. interacts only with the asteroid. Sun Earth When outside the Earth’s activity sphere, calculate only the S/C orbit around the Sun. (which follows a conic section). V (km/s) Topography Mars Sun Low Mars orbit Phobos 0.5 4.1 0.9 Phobos transfer 0.3 Deimos transfer 0.7 0.2 30 Mars C3 Deimos 0.9 Mars transfer 0.6 Optional Aerobrake Earth C3 0.7 Orbital location GTO 2.5 1.6 1.6 0.7 GEO LEO 3.8 4.1 1.7 L4/5 9.3 - 10 0.7 Earth Lunar orbit 1.6 Moon Low Thrust Transfer Maneuvers Suppose we have a very low thrust engine that provides constant acceleration , A. It's most efficient to direct the thrust along the velocity vector of an initially circular orbit. In this case, the orbit semimajor axis is slowly varying and approximately satisfies: da 2 A 3 2 a dt Then : 1 1 A t - t 0 , a a0 a0 a 1- 4 a 02 So the time required to go from the initial semimajor axis to the final one is: t - t0 A a -1 2 0 - a -1 2 Low Thrust Transfer Maneuvers - Continued In the previous chart we considered the case of constant acceleration. Now considering constant thrust, we use the relation between mass flow rate and thrust (see next two charts): dm F , m t 0 m0 dt gI sp where m is the vehicle mass, and F is the constant thrust. Also, substituting A F m into the previous equation for the semimajor axis, we get: da 2F 3 2 a dt m These two equations can be integrated to obtain: t - t0 1 gI sp m 0 1 1 - exp F gI a 0 sp a F m0 - m t - t 0 gI sp Planar Circular Restricted 3-Body Problem (PCR3BP) • “Restricted” = Gravitational field is determined by two massive bodies (The “primaries”). The third body is too small to affect the primaries. • “Circular” = The primaries are in circular orbits about the total center of mass • “Planar” = All three bodies move in the same plane. • Normalized Units: – – – – Unit of mass = m1+m2 Unit of length = constant separation between m1and m2 Unit of time: Orbital period of m1and m2 is 2 (G = 1) The only parameter in the system is = m1/(m1+m2) Unit of distance: L = distance between m1 and m2 (km) Unit of Velocity: V = orbital velocity of m2 (km/s) Unit of time = orbital period of the primaries (s) Equations of Motion (In the rotating frame) U px p y - x x U p y - px - y y x px y , y p y - x, where: 1- U - x y r1 r2 1 2 2 2 r x y , r x -1 y2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 m2 m1 m2 Energy Integral: E= 12 x 2 y 2 U , C -2 E Jacobi Integral Planar Circular Restricted Three Body Problem (PCR3BP) Effective Potential: The Open Realms and the Forbidden Zone Five Cases of Possible Motions Types of Orbits in the “Neck” Region Tangled Trajectories in the Neck Region Structure of the Neck Region Global Orbit Structure: Homoclinic/Heteroclinic Chains Patched 3-Body Method: The Interplanetary Super Highway Patched 3-Body Method: LL1 to EL2 in 40 days with a single 14m/s V Patched 3-Body Method: Space Mission Application Rotational Dynamics of Axisymmetric Rigid Bodies H angular momentum spin rate Z axis inertia = C z precession angle T kinetic energy C C 2 1 cos A A C-A Precession rate A H2 2C For C A we have a problem. When there are any moveable bodies within the interior, x y x and y axes moment of inertia = A H C cos constant the precession will excite their motion, and the rigid body kinetic energy will be drained. continually. A state of steady axial spin, 0 is actually unstable. Rotational Dynamics of Axisymmetric Rigid Bodies If we start with a pure z-axis spin ( 0). then T t 0 H 2 2C . Since H remains constant: sin 2 2C 1 T 0 - T t 2 H 1- C A Thus as T t decreases, increases. Ultimately, 2 and the system moves in a flat tumble. z x y This does not happen when C >A Propulsion Function Comments/ Typical Requirements Launch and injection into LEO Really in the domain of "Launch Systems" - which we discuss separately below DV for raising the orbit from LEO to a higher orbit 60 to 1500 m/s, Use kick motor Acceleration to escape velocity from LEO parking orbit 3600 to 4000 m/s for injection into an interplanetary trajectory Interplanetary trajectory - From Earth escape to in-mission parking orbit. Depends heavily on the trajectory design - Have a wide choice among min energy maneuvers, swing-by maneuvers, etc. In-Mission Operations Orbit correction V 15 to 75 m/s per year, for Earth orbits Stationkeeping V Up to 45 to 55 m/s per year, Earth orbits "Formation Flying" V's Could be relevant to stand-off mode of operation. Attitude control Acquisition of Sun, Earth, Star - for navigational and target acquisition purposes < 5000 N-s total impulse, 1K to 10K pulses, 0.01 to 5.0 s pulse width In-mission pointing control, 3-axis stabilization 100K to 200K pulses, min impulse bit of 0.01N-s, 0.01 to 0.25s pulse width. Propulsion Systems - Key Parameters Oxidizer Fuel dm/dt F Thrust Ve (dm/dt) Ve =exhaust velocity Combustion Chamber F Nozzle dm/dt = propellant and oxidizer mass flow rate Isp Specific Impulse = F / (g dm/dt) -- depends on propulsion type (liquid, solid, chemical, electric, Ve etc.) , energetics of chemical reactions, etc. Key Propulsion Parameters Related to Important Trajectory Parameters Suppose we have a thruster burn event with constant thrust (maybe to inject the spacecraft into a higher orbit, etc.). Define: m0 Total mass of vehicle before burn event mp Mass of propellant (& oxidizer) used in burn event Trajectory Parameters/ Propulsion System Relations: ΔV = Total change in vehicle speed = g Isp ln (m0/( m0 - mp)) Δt = Time elapsed during burn event = g Isp mp/ F •Trajectory Requirements Needed V and t •Use above relations to estimate total mass of propellant •Select propulsion system (F & Isp) and design trajectory to minimize total propulsion system mass Determining Propulsion System Requirements - For Transport of S/C to its Mission Station Lay out the entire trajectory and itemize the V maneuvers. Start from the last V maneuver and use the V/ mp equation to determine mp (where here, m0 - mp = the final S/C mass), for several values of Isp From considerations of the t desired, or other practical constraints, determine any thrust level requirements. Now narrow the selection of propulsion systems to those consistent with required thrust levels. Now, carry out the above process for all the V maneuvers, working back along the trajectory. Get a range of values for mp and F. Finally, obtain the total propulsion system masses corresponding to different propulsion system options. Select option with smallest cost and/or launch weight. Launch Systems Key Parameters are: Mass of payload that can be injected into LEO or GTO or GEO Fairing diameter and length Data for Systems with Fairing Diameters >3.0 m Fairing Envelopes Launch System Upper Stage (if any) LEO (kg) GTO (kg) GEO (kg) Diam (m) Length (m) ATLAS II Cent-2 6395 2680 570 4.2 SHUTTLE IUS TOS PAM-D 24,400 ---- -5900 5900 1300 -2360 --- 4.6 18.3 TITAN III NUS PAM-D2 TRAN TOS 14,400 ---- -1850 4310 5000 -1360 1360 -- 3.6 12.4 15.5 16.0 TITAN IV NUS Cent IUS 17,700 --- -5760 6350 -4540 2380 4.5 17.0 20.0 23.0,26.0 ARIANE 40 (France) 42P 42L 44P 44LP 44L H-10 H-10 H-10 H-10 H-10 H-10 EPS 4900 6100 7400 6900 8300 9600 18,000 at 550 1900 2600 3200 3000 3700 4200 6800 -------- 3.6 8.6 to 12.4 km H-2 (Japan) -- 10,500 4000 2200 3.7 10.0 LONG MARCH (China) Star 63F 9265 3370 1500 3.8 7.5 D1 D1e EUS, RCS Block D 20,000 90,000 13,740 -5500 -4300 -2200 18,000 4100 3.3 4.1 5.5 3.3 4.2-7.5 19-37 5.8-9 CZ2E PROTON (Russia) ENERGIA ZENIT 2 and watch out for those irate Romulans!