Transcript Document

Preparedness for Persons
with Mobility Impairments
By Catherine Rooney, Michael H. Fox,
Glen W. White, and Jennifer Rowland
Considerations in Emergency
Preparedness: A Two Track Conference
Mailman School of Public Health
Columbia University
Washington, D.C.
December 13-15, 2005
1
Intro: “I have Juvenile Rheumatoid
Arthritis and use a wheelchair. We
had a bomb threat at work…
Everyone evacuated, but I was still
left on the 3rd floor by the
stairwell for the firefighters to
come get me. But no one came.
Finally, I just struggled and I used
pure fear to get myself down the
stairs…” (From: Nobody Left Behind
On-line Consumer Survey, 2004).
Nobody Left Behind Findings
2
Disaster Preparedness for Persons
with Mobility Impairments
October, 2002 - September 2005
www.nobodyleftbehind2.org
3
CDC grant awarded to KU, RTC/IL, TS#
08040, Principle Investigators: Dr. Glen
White and Dr. Michael Fox.
Objectives: To determine if emergency
preparedness and response systems
 Meet the needs of persons with
mobility impairments;
 Use surveillance systems to identify
persons with mobility impairments;
 Have elements of emerging best
practices.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
4
Methods
 Identify
Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA)
declared disasters between 1998 –
2003.
 Select
a random sample of 30
counties or equivalent units
(boroughs, parishes, cities) across
each of the 10 federal regions.
 Interview
the county emergency
managers.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
5
Methods (Cont.)
 Evaluate
disaster plans and any
programs for persons with mobility
impairments.
 Identify
possible best practices.
 Administer
on-line consumer survey.
 Consult
with project advisors to
recommend changes.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
6
Nature of the Problem
Lack of empirical data on
the safe, efficient
evacuation of people with
disabilities, including
mobility impairments.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
7
Research on Disasters and
Persons with Mobility
Impairments
 Few
empirical research studies were
found.
 Two studies identified correlation
between disabilities and risk of death
from earthquakes (Chou, Y., Huang, N.,
& Lee, C., 2004; Osaki, Y. & Minowa, M.,
2001).
8
New Findings from Katrina
Survey of evacuees in Houston
shelters found:
 61% did not evacuate before the
storm.
 38% were either physically unable
to leave or caring for someone
who was physically unable to
leave (Kaiser, Harvard, Washington Post).
9
Nature of the Problem
Current evacuation systems
are designed for nondisabled persons where
walking or running is
required (survival of the
fittest mindset).
Nobody Left Behind Findings
10
Nature of the Problem
Restoration of accessible and
other post-disaster living
situations for persons with
mobility impairments are often
not addressed.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
11
Focus Areas of the Research
Emergency Managers Training
 Surveillance Systems
 Local Emergency Management Plan
Guidelines
 Inclusion of Persons with Mobility
Impairments Nobody Left Behind Findings

12
Findings on Emergency
Managers Training
63% of the emergency
managers had not taken the
FEMA, G197, or similar course
on “special needs
populations.”
Nobody Left Behind Findings
13
Elements of Best Practices in
Emergency Managers’ Training

Local emergency management
plan specifies that training and
exercises involve persons with
disabilities.
 Drills include evacuating
persons with mobility
impairments from different
situations.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
14
Findings on Surveillance
Systems
Among the emergency
managers, 57% do not know
how many people with mobility
impairments live within their
jurisdiction.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
15
Surveillance Findings (Cont.)
Among those who had
numbers on persons with
mobility impairments:
17% use database
systems.
17% use an estimate.
10% use census data.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
16
Elements of Best Practices
with Surveillance


Planning for Special ‘Medical’ Needs
Shelter (shelter for medical and
electricity/equipment needs)
Plan covers identifying
persons/needs, creating database,
shelter design and location,
consumer education. (Lamar
University, Department of Nursing, Pam
Moss, RN., Beaumont Emergency
Management, Sgt. Robert Smith).
Nobody Left Behind Findings
17
Response to Katrina
“Taking a lesson from New
Orleans, Kansas Gov. Sebelius
ordered state emergency
planners to identify residents
of Kansas’ major cities who
would be unable to evacuate …
whether due to a physical
disability or lack of
transportation.” (From: Lawernce
Journal-World, 9-8-05)
18
Consumer Survey
 Collected on-line personal disaster
experiences from persons with mobility
limitations.
 From participants’ recommendations two
disaster preparedness posters were created.
www.nobodyleftbehind2.org click on “Findings”
19
Findings on Emergency
Management Guidelines
Only 20% of the emergency
managers reported having
specific guidelines to assist
persons with mobility
impairments during disasters.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
20
Elements of Best Practices on
Plan Guidelines


Created Annex/Appendix on
Persons with Disabilities.
Made specific reference to
the needs of persons with
disabilities in the various
sections of the local
emergency plan.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
21
Findings on Inclusion
of Persons with Mobility
Impairments
Little to no representation of
persons with mobility impairments
in planning or revision stages.
No Best Practices Found
Nobody Left Behind Findings
22
Findings on Resources Needed
To develop guidelines for persons with
mobility impairments, emergency
managers need:
67% Financial resources.
33% Knowledgeable and trained
personnel.
25% A FEMA, State, or County
mandate.
17% Greater public education
efforts.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
23
Consumer Feedback
 No
evacuation plans in
multi-story buildings,
leaving people who are
unable to walk abandoned at
stairwells or at inoperable
elevators without
assistance.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
24
Consumer Feedback

The Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) has been in existence
for more than 15 years, yet
disaster-related or local services
still can be found to be
inaccessible and disasterrelated personnel uninformed of
the needs and how to assist
people with disabilities.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
25
Consumer Feedback
 Other
frightening and
sometimes life-threatening
situations occur when
infrastructures fail, including
electrical power outages and
non-accessible transportation.
Nobody Left Behind Findings
26
Questions After Katrina


Are there differences in
disaster preparedness
for persons who are
disabled, seniors, or
the seriously ill, and
within classes, races
and among states?
4 years after 9/11, when
will local emergency
management
infrastructures be
strengthened?
27
The Next Disaster: Avian &
Pandemic Influenza
Are You Prepared? Have You
Prepared Your community,
including Persons with
Disabilities?
28
For more Information:
www.nobodyleftbehind2.org
Nobody Left Behind Findings
29