Transcript Document

Semenov Institute of
Chemical Physics, RAS
New results in applications of p-adic pseudodifferential equations to the protein dynamics
Vladik Avetisov
Albert Bikulov
Sergey Kozyrev
Vladimir Osipov
Alexander Zubarev
in cooperation with
Viktor Ivanov and Alexander Chertovich
What is a protein?
“Protein? It is very simple” biologist will say. - Protein is
a well folded polymeric
chain of a few hundreds
amino aside residues.
Proteins looks like “nonopocket devices” constructed
from helixes and sheets.
They are fabricated in a cell
to provide all biochemical
reactions including the
protein fabrication too.”
“Nothing of the kind!” –
physicist will rejoin.- “Protein
looks like an amorphous
“nono-drop” consisting of a few
thousands closely interacting
atoms. There is no symmetry
here. O-o-o…! Protein is too
complex to be described by a
simple way.”
 - C carbon atoms,
 - O oxygen atoms,
 - N nitrogen atoms,
 - hydrogen atoms
are not shown
Hans Frauenfelder
was first who drown
ultrametric tree for
the protein states to
underline the protein
complexity.
“The results sketched so far suggest two
significant properties of substates and
motions of proteins, nonergodicity and
ultrametricity.”
Hans Frauenfelder,
in Protein Structure (N-Y.:Springer Verlag, 1987)
p.258.
Figure 5. Hierarchical arrangement of the
conformational substates in myoglobin. (a)
Schematized energy landscape. (b) Tree diagram. G
is Gibbs’ energy of the protein, CC(1-4) are
conformational coordinates.
Hans Frauenfelder,
in Protein Structure (N-Y.:Springer Verlag, 1987)
p.258.
“What does ultrametricity mean physically in
protein dynamics?”
«In <…> proteins, for example, where individual states
are
usually
clustered
in
“basins”,
the
interesting
kinetics involves basin-to-basin transitions. The internal
distribution within a basin is expected to approach
equilibrium on a relatively short time scale, while the
slower
basin-to-basin
kinetics,
which
involves
the
crossing of higher barriers, governs the intermediate and
long time behavior of the system.”
O.M.Becker and M.Karplus.
J.Chem.Phys. 106, 1495 (1997)
This means that the protein dynamics is
characterized by a hierarchy of time scales.
Given such picture, we will take an
interest to Frauenfelder’s question,
“Are proteins ultrametric?”
p-Adic mathematics gives us natural tools to try to
find an answer.
Historically, at the beginning, we have suggested
that the protein dynamics can be modeled by a
random walk over a hierarchy of embedded basins of
states…,
w3
w2
w1
w3
w2
w4
w3
w1
w2
w1
w1  w2  w3  w4  ... are thetransitions rates
and so, the protein dynamics can be described by the рadic pseudo-differential equation of ultrametric diffusion
f ( x, t )
 A  | x  y |p 1  f ( y, t )  f ( x, t )d ( y)
t
Qp
Q p is an ultrametric space of theproteinstates;
f x, t  is a populationdensityin a statex at instantt ;
A | x  y |p 1 is a transition ratebetween statesx and y;
 ~ T0 / T (T - temperature, T0 is a scale unit for masuringof activation
barrierson theenargylandscape).
In protein dynamic applications, this equation
is interpreted as the muster equation for the
transitions between the protein states.
Assuming all this, we have tried to show
that our approach is relevant to observable
features of the protein dynamics.
<If you said “A”, do not be “B”>.
Vitalii Goldanskii
experiment: kinetics of CO rebinding to myoglobine
(H. Frauenfelder group, since the 1970s)
Measured quantity :.
strained
conformational
state
The total concentration of the Mb unbounded to CO.
Mb*
Mb1
CO
breaking
of
chemical
bound
Mb-CO
Mb
Mb-CO
h
CO
laser
pulse
active
conformational
state
rebinding CO
to Mb
Mb-CO
p-adic model of CO rebinding kinetics
Protein “diffuses”
over unbounded
states
ultrametric
diffusion
Zp
Br
reaction
sink
Initial
distribution
reaction sink due to CO
binding to Mb
ultrametric space
of the protein
undounded states
measured quantity:
S t  
 f x, t d x 
Br
protein leaves
unbounded
states
experiment and theory
O
O
T1>T2>T3
Good agreement between ultrametric model and
experiment certainly supports an idea that
protein dynamics possesses ultrametricity (!)
This was a pioneer experience in
applications of p-adic pseudo-differential
equation to the protein dynamics: it was
presented on the First Conference on p-Adic
Mathematical Physic (Moscow, 2003)
Now, I will present new experience in
applications of the same p-adic equation to
drastically different phenomenon related to
the protein dynamics.
This is the spectral diffusion in proteins.
Spectral diffusion in proteins
a chromophore
marker
1. A chromophore marker is injected
into a protein, then the protein is frozen
up to a few degrees of Kelvin, and the
adsorption spectrum is measured.
At low temperature this spectrum is
very wide, due to different
arrangements of the protein atoms
around a chromophore in individual
protein molecules.
2. Then, a set of chromophore markers
are burned using short light impulse at
a particular absorption frequency, and a
narrow hole is arisen in the absorption
spectrum.
3. Then, the hole wide is monitored
during the time. Because proteins with
unburned markers “diffuse” over the
protein state space, the hole is
broadening and covering with time.
protein
Thus, spectral diffusion phenomenon is
directly coupled with the protein
dynamics.
Spectral diffusion features
“Weighting time” experiments:
The “weighting time”, tw , starts immediately after
the burning of a hole, i.e. it is the current time for
spectral diffusion:
 tw    t w  
2
2
1/ 2
~ t w0, 27
Spectral diffusion broadening obeys the
power law with an exponent drastically
smaller then in familiar diffusion.
“Aging time” experiments:
The “aging time”, tag , is the time interval between
protein freezing and hole burning.
 tag , tw  104 min ~ tag0.07
The aging time, tag, grows, spectral
diffusion broadening becomes slower .
How protein dynamics is coupled with spectral diffusion
(tw )
tw
A marker absorption frequency changes randomly
only at those instants when protein gets very
peculiar area of the protein state space. This
area relates to a few degrees of freedom of the
closest neighbors of the chromophore marker.
Description of spectral diffusion in proteins
f  x, t 
f  y , t   f  x, t 
 
d  y 


1
t
| x  y |p
Qp
1. Calculation of the distribution
of the first passage (first reaching)
time P() for ultrametric diffusion
2. Construction of the random
walk on a “frequency line”,
which has random delays  with
the distribution P()
p-adic equation for the
protein dynamics
Ptag ,  ~ tag 

1

2 1

,  1
note, that the first reaching time 
depends on the aging time tag
 1
2  2 1
 t ag , t w   t ag

 1
2
 tw
,  1
Spectral diffusion broadening:
(analytical description and computer simulation)
  2,2
 tw  ~ tw0,27
f  x, t 
f  y , t   f  x, t 
 
d  y 


1
t
| x  y |p
Qp
Spectral diffusion aging:
(analytical description and computer simulation)
  2,2
 tag   tag0,07
  2,0
w
The exponents in the power laws of spectral diffusion
broadening and aging are determined only by a degree 
of Vladimirov’s pseudo-differential operators (2) (!)
Conclusion:
Protein is a complex object.
However, the protein dynamics is described by
simple p-adic equation.
f  x, t 
f  y , t   f  x, t 
 
d  y 


1
t
| x  y |p
Qp
Probably, p-adic pseudo-differential
equations will be as much important to
keep paradoxical union of order and
randomness in the “biological mechanics”,
as Newton’s equations are in classical
mechanics.