Comparative of japanese and polish planning system

Download Report

Transcript Comparative of japanese and polish planning system

Smart Highrising Guideline
Joanna Bach Głowińska
Senior Town Planner
Gdańsk Development Agency
Gdańsk, 10th of September 2009
Outline:
1. Introduction to Planning System in Poland
2. Urban Containment Policies
3. Smart Highrising Guideline as city practice
4. Public involvement in planning
5. Public participation in Smart Highrising
Guidelines
Planning systems in Japan and Poland,
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
Planning
System
NATIONAL
REGIONAL
MUNICIPAL
LOCAL
Planning systems in Japan and Poland,
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
Planning System
in Poland
Spatial Planning Law (2003) regulates all aspects
of urban planning
at every level – municipality, region, state.
Local Area Plan (LAP) should be in compliance
with Development Plan(DP), DP with Regional
Development Plan (RDP) and RDP with National
Development Strategy.
Development Plan (DP) is the longer term strategic
plan of every municipality.
Local Area Plans (LAP) and Development Brief (DB)
should be in compliance with DP.
Plans (DP, LAP) are not reviewed, but they could
be the subject of change at any time.
Local Area Plans control
development by:
 Specifying the designated function of
area
 Allocating necessary public
investments
 Detailing development restrictions
Planning systems in Japan and Poland,
B.PUJDAK,
A.RODZIEWICZ
Smart Highrising,
4th
of July 2009
Urban Containment Policy
Urban Containment Policy
in Poland
The same regulations for urban and rural areas,
development control only at the municipality level
No development boundary line, within which municipal water and
sewage system will be extended
No kind of green belt surrounding cities to be protected from
development
Planning systems in Japan and Poland, 4th of July 2009
Polish Local Authority faces :
 Unpredictability of planning system,
 interpretation changes in law,
 A must of giving Development Brief in case of no Local
Area Plan,
 Unpredictable interpretation of Ownership Right,
 Unpredictable public involvement in planning
procedure
 Special laws
Planning systems in Japan and Poland, 4th of July 2009
Smart Highrising Guideline
as city practice to control or
mitigate development impacts
on local environment with the
list of necessary contribution in
case of development
Planning systems in Japan and Poland, 4th of July 2009
Smart Highrising Guideline
SKŁAD ZESPOŁU SLOW:
•MAREK PISKORSKI
•BARBARA PUJDAK
•JOANNA BACH – GŁOWIŃSKA
•ANNA KOSTKA
•DOROTA KUCHARCZAK
•MAŁGORZATA MOMONT
•AGNIESZKA OSTRZYCKA
•AGATA PISZCZEK
•JUSTYNA PRZYBECKA
•MONIKA ROŚCISZEWSKA
•AGNIESZKA RÓZGA – MICEWICZ
•MAŁGORZATA WALICKA – PODOLSKA
•ADAM RODZIEWICZ
CITY GOALS IN SMART HIGHRISING GUIDELINE:
 Areas of excluded, inappropriate, appropriate,
recommended and designated places for
locating Highrise Development
 Procedures in case of highrise development
proposals (development impacts on local
environment, the list of necessary contribution in case
of development)
 Public participation procedures in local area
plans, which are to deal with highrise
development proposals
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
HIGHRISE BUILDING DEFINITION
55m
BUILDING OVER 40m HIGH,
WITH ELEVATION
40m
30m
FROM 5m TO 50m
0,7%
THE RECOMMENDED
AREAS
12%
THE APPROPRIATE
AREAS
46%
THE INAPPROPRIATE
AREAS
42% THE
EXCLUDED
AREAS
Greater Gdańsk:
Built Up Area and
Smart Highrising Guidelines
Area
Appropriate Area for
Highrise Development
WYŁĄCZONE
NIEWSKAZANE
DOPUSZCZONE
Recommended Area for
Highrise Development
Important place
City gateway
Seaside location
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
Public involvement in planning
Public Interest in Poland
Public interest is considered as a shared interest of the community or society as
a whole
Citizen participation is secured by law regulations
Interest shared by the general public is perceived and protected as legal
interest
Public participation is regarded as the privilege of democracy
„I CAN PROTEST”
Planning
Planning
systems
systems
in Japan
in Japan
and and
Poland,
Poland,
4th of
4th
July
of 2009
July 2009
Additional elements of public participation
reaching further than statutory requirements:
• the draft of the plan in accessible graphic form on the website,
• submitting comments by the general public, and submitting the
control points of local importance by members of the public
• preparing visualisations of a high-rise building from Landscape
Control Points
• assessment of the impact of a high-rise building on sustainable
environment
• approval of the impact by the City’s Commission for Architecture
and the Built Environment (MKUA),
• the visualisations and impact on sustainable environment for public
viewing together with the plan draft and statutory forecasts.
LANDSCAPE CONTROL POINTS
STRATEGIC POINTS
City
viewed by the sea
Lower Terace
viewed by mountain
MainTown
viewed by Vistula river
INNERCITY POINTS
1. In the historical main town context
Viewed by Zulawy
Viewed by Bastions: Św. Gertrudy,
Żubr, Wilk
Biskupia Górka
Góra Gradowa
2. In the historical Wrzeszcz context
Viewed by Upper Terace (Ślimak w
Jaśkowym Lesie)
3. In the historical Oliwa context
Viewed by Upper Terace (Pachołek)
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
MORZA
STRATEGIC LANDSCAPE PANORAMA
CONTROLZPOINT
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
INNERCITY LANDSCAPE CONTROL POINT
City’s Commission for Architecture
and the Built Environment (MKUA)
Smart Highrising, 4th of July 2009
Thank you for your attention