Transcript Slide 1

How to Prepare for a Federal
Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP)
Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq.
[email protected]
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Fall Forum 2012
AGENDA
• SASA
• OSEP
• Preparing for a Monitoring Visit
• Common Findings
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Overview of the Monitoring Process
2
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
OVERVIEW OF THE
MONITORING PROCESS
3
• Title I, Part A
• Title I, Part D (Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk)
• Title X, Part C (McKinney-Vento Act/Homeless
Program)
• Section 1003(g) School Improvement Grants (SIG)
• Title III, Part A
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
SASA Monitoring Covers…
4
OSEP ‘Monitoring’ Covers…
• Continuous Improvement Visits
State Performance Plan (SPP) / Annual
Performance Report (APR) Review
• Determinations.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=36&folder_n
ame=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits
• Results Component
http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/rda/index.html
• Stakeholder Input Process
• Verification Component
http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=61&folde
r_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B
5
Prior to Visit
• State contact gathers and analyzes data and information
• Information collected primarily through Web-based searches and
document analysis
• Specific documentation requested from SEA
• Selection of LEAs
• Receipt of Agenda and List of ED Participants
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Desk monitoring of each State
6
The Visit Itself
• HOW LONG?
• WHAT WILL ED BE DOING DURING THE VISIT?
• Review documentation not available prior to the trip
• Interview SEA and LEA staff, principals, teachers, parents, and other
stakeholders
• Exit Conference
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Typically one full week
7
Post-Visit – SASA-specific
DRAFT comprehensive monitoring report issued
FINAL report issued
SEA Response
 SEA has 30 business days to respond to any required actions
 SASA sends a letter approving proposed
actions or requiring revision/further action
 May require close collaboration (e.g., CAPs)
and/or follow-up visits
Significant compliance findings can lead
to special conditions
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
 To be issued within 35 business days of the on-site visit
 SEA has 5 business days to review and provide technical edits and corrections
8
TOP 10 WAYS TO PREPARE FOR A
MONITORING VISIT
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Preparation is the Key!
9
1. Organizational Meeting
• Meet with Key Personnel
• All about Communication!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Discuss program and areas that will be reviewed
10
2. Select Main Visit Contact
•
•
•
•
Schedule meetings
Ensure lead personnel schedules clear
Organize travel requests / information (as requested by SASA)
Schedule visits to schools (as requested by SASA)
• Schedule conference calls with SASA prior to visit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• 1 Main Visit Contact
11
3. Select Main Interview Contacts
•
•
•
•
•
•
Title I, Part A
Title I, Part D – Neglected, Delinquent or At-Risk
Title X, C - McKinney-Vento
Title III, Part A
SIG
IDEA Results
• These representatives must know who should be
present for each indicator and where all
documentation is located!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• A representative should be appointed as lead
interviewer for each program (and topic) as
appropriate
12
4. Select Meeting Place
• Want meeting place separate from main offices so that all
parties can remain focused
• All personnel should have cleared scheduled and be ready to
participate as necessary
• Organized by the applicable lead contact
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Don’t completely isolate
13
• Complete the Actual Monitoring Document the Monitors will be
using!
• Put your best foot forward
• Narrative Form
• How?
• Answer the Question Being Asked!
• Respond to correct fiscal year!
• Include Specific Citations as appropriate.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
5. Complete Monitoring
Documents
14
5. Complete Monitoring
Documents (cont.)
• OSEP: Critical Elements Analysis Guide (CrEAG) Part B
• SASA Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs
• SIG: Application Process, Implementation, Fiscal, Technical
Assistance, Monitoring, Data Collection
• Title I Team
• Title I-A Fiduciary
• Title I-D
• McKinney-Vento
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Gen. Supervision
• Fiscal Systems
15
• Title III-A: Monitoring of Subgrantees; Standards, Assessments &
Accountability, Instructional Support, Fiduciary
Critical Element General Supervision (GS)-1: Does the State have a general supervision system that
is reasonably designed to identify noncompliance in a timely manner using its different components?
Related Question
Response
A. Describe the components and data sources
of the State’s general supervision system
and how they are used to identify
Notes:
noncompliance (e.g., database, selfassessments, desk audits, on-site
monitoring, dispute resolution, etc.).
Document Review
Notes:
• OSEP’s CrEAG Format
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
5. Complete Monitoring
Documents (cont.)
State Monitoring Manual
Monitoring Reports
Training Calendar
Database Reports
APR Indicator 15
Customer Service Info.
Notes:
OGC Comments
Notes:
Interview Info.
Interview Summary
16
Related Requirements
34 CFR §300.100 [Eligibility for assistance]
34 CFR §300.149(a)&(b)[SEA responsibility for general supervision]
34 CFR §300.149(a)&(b)[SEA responsibility for general supervision]
34 CFR §300.200 [Condition of assistance]
5. Complete Monitoring Documents
(cont.)
• Title I & Title III Team Format
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• SIG Format
17
6. Organize Documentation
•
•
•
•
Tabbed!
Organized!
Complete Examples!
Connect-the-Dots!
• Copies for yourself
• Include any additional documents given to
SASA during the visit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Corresponding Binders
18
• Practice Makes Perfect! (sort of)
• Take the monitoring instrument and review the current system
in place
• Interview selected personnel (“test”)
• CONDUCT PRIOR TO VISIT
• Chance to change systems as needed!
• Chance to create corrective action plans and begin
implementation as needed!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
7. Mock SASA Visit
19
8. Be Prepared to Address
Noncompliance
• If no corrective action plan then attempt to create a plan prior
to SASA’s arrival.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Be prepared to address any corrective action plan already
created or implemented.
20
9. Review Findings From Your State
• Did you complete everything you said you would?
• Review audits
• Including A-133 Single Audit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Review old monitoring reports
• Special Conditions
• State Plans
21
10. Review Monitoring Findings In
Other States
• Title I & Title III Reports (2011-2012):
• SIG Reports:
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/monitoring/index.html
• OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters:
http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbvvltr/chron
date.html
• Review reports to identify focus areas,
trends in findings.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/report
s12/index.html
22
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
COMMON FINDINGS
ACROSS THE BOARD
23
Written Policies and
Procedures
 If you have to explain how something is done without
being able to point to a clear and current written policy or
procedure, you probably have some work to do!!!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Conflicting policies
• Out-of-date policies
• Non-existent policies
24
• Timeliness
• Required Items
• Public Reporting
• Examples:
• Title I-A: Annual LEA Report Card, HQT Status Letter,
School Improvement Status, SES and Choice Notice
• Title III: Student Identification, AMAO Determination
• IDEA: Procedural Safeguards, Stakeholder Input for
SPP/APR
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Notification Requirements
25
•
•
•
•
•
Timely review and approval of LEA applications
Timely allocation of subgrants
Period of availability of funds to LEAs
Process for Reallocating Funds
Timely Obligation and Liquidation
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Fiduciary
26
Fiduciary
•
•
•
•
•
•
Consistent with Federal Cost Principles?
Consistent with EDGAR?
Consistent with program-specific rules?
How does SEA/LEA ensure and document allowability?
Program-specific Fiscal Rules
•
•
•
MOE
Supplement not Supplant
Caps
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Ensuring Funds are Used for Allowable Uses
27
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Fiduciary – High Dollar Areas of
Concern
• Procurement
• Property / Inventory Management
• Time Distribution
28
EDGAR Procurement Rules
• Must have written code of conduct for all employees engaged in
contract award and administration
• Must have protest procedures to handle disputes
• Follow Procurement Rules!!!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Section 80.36 of EDGAR
• All procurement transactions must be conducted with full and open
competition
• Conflict of Interest:
29
• Determining between “equipment” and
“supply”
• Determining level of control over item
• Tracking non-equipment items
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Inventory Management:
Common Problems
30
Equipment Rules
• Location of equipment
• Custody of equipment
• Security of equipment
• Property records
•
Description, serial number or other ID, title information, acquisition date,
cost, percent of federal participation, location, use and condition, and
disposition (if applicable)
• Physical inventory
•
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Section 80.32 of EDGAR
• Must have adequate controls in place to account for:
Must be performed at least every 2 years
• Control system to prevent loss, damage and theft
•
All incidents must be investigated
31
Equipment Rules (cont.)
• Must protect against unauthorized use
• When property is no longer needed, must follow
disposition rules:
• Transfer to another federal program
• Over $5,000 – Keep or sell, but must pay a share based
on the percentage of federal ED participation at initial
acquisition
• Under $5,000 – May keep, sell, or dispose of it with no
obligation to ED
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• May use for other projects as long as use is incidental
and does not interfere with authorized use
32
Supplies
• Do not cost much money
• Used fairly quickly
• Examples: pens, paper, toner, laptops
• EDGAR does not set out any specific tracking
requirements
• As a practical matter, ED expects subgrantees to
track all property purchased with federal funds,
in order to prove there has been an allocable
benefit to the federal program
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Section 80.33 of EDGAR
• Supplies are everything else
33
Time Distribution
• Selected Items of Cost: Salaries and Wages
• Time Distribution Records must be maintained for all
employees whose salaries are:
• Paid in whole or in part with federal funds
• Used to meet a match/cost share requirement
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Allowable if proper time distribution records
34
Time Distribution – Common
Problems
•
•
•
•
•
PAR vs. Semi-annual Certification
Correct Signatory?
Correct Time Period?
Time reported add up to 100% time worked?
Signed after-the-fact?
• Quarterly Reconciliations
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Proper Identification of “Cost Objective(s)”
• Completion of Required Documentation
35
Equitable Services
• Program
• Funds—no reimbursement!
• Property—tags, inventory
• Evaluation of Services
• Identification of Eligible Students
• Administration Costs NOT Charged Against Equitable Services
Set-Aside
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Timely and Meaningful Consultation
• LEA Maintaining Control
36
Subrecipient Monitoring
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
• Comprehensive Monitoring Protocol
• Follow-up procedures to ensure corrective actions taken to
address compliance issues
• Linking Monitoring Findings with Technical Assistance
37
RESOURCES
2011-2012 SASA Monitoring Protocol
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/indicators1112.pdf
Continuous Improvement Visit Page
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Title I & Title III Reports (2011-2012):
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/reports12/index.html
SIG Reports:
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/monitoring/index.html
http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=36&folder
_name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits
OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters:
http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbvvltr/chrondate.html
Part B SPP and APR Determination Letters:
http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbspap/allyears.html
38
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Questions?
39
This presentation is intended solely to provide general
information and does not constitute legal
advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of
these printed materials does not create an attorney-client
relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should
not take any action based upon any information in this
presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar
with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Disclaimer
40