Transcript Document

SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS:
ADDRESSING LONG-TERM BUILDING
ENVELOPE DURABILITY
Dr. James L. Hoff
Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing / TEGNOS Research, Inc.
Durability & Green Rating
Systems
Durability is a necessity to achieve
long-term sustainability …
… but many green building rating
systems provide little assurance that
durability is adequately addressed.
Durability & Green Rating
Systems
“The majority of green building assessment
systems focus on the design of the constructed
building, with little focus on the effect of the
building system’s life during operation. This
tendency has resulted in a failure of many rating
systems to properly consider durability, lifecycle
cost, and the effects of premature building
envelope failures.”
“Green Assessment Tools: The Integration of Building Envelope Durability. “ (McCay, 2008, p. 1)
Durability & Green Rating
Systems
Too much focus on design, too little
focus on operation…
... resulting in a failure to address:
– True life cycle cost
– Risk of premature failures
What is Durability?
What is Durability?
A dictionary definition:
“… the ability to exist for a
long time without significant
deterioration.”
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
What is Durability?
A building standards definition:
“… the ability of a building or any
of its components to perform its
required functions in its service
environment over a period of time
without unforeseen cost for
maintenance or repair.”
Canadian Standards Association “Guideline on Durability in Buildings”
(CSA S478-95, Rev. 2001)
What is Durability?
The ability of a building or any of
its components to:
– perform its required functions
– in its service environment
– over a period of time
– without unforeseen cost for
maintenance or repair
Roof Durability Characteristics
Perform Required Functions
• Resist and re-direct moisture
• Resist air & vapor movement
• Resist thermal transfer
• Resist fire, wind, hail, and other loads
• Serve as a working platform for:
– Rooftop mechanical equipment
– Solar / PV installations
– Garden roofing installations
Roof Durability Characteristics
In Its Service Environment
• Climatic Environment
–
–
–
–
High wind / wind-blown debris zones
Severe hail zones
Cold climates / severe freeze-thaw zones
Warm climates / high uv zones
• Operating Environment
– Frequency / density of use
– Occupant capabilities / attitudes
– Frequency / complexity of maintenance
Roof Durability Characteristics
Over a Period of Time
Period of Time =
Intended Service Life
… More to Follow
Roof Durability Characteristics
Without Unforeseen Cost…
Implies Some Level of Cost
Should Be Foreseen!
Implies Planning Is Be
Necessary!
Roof Durability Characteristics
Without Unforeseen Cost for..
• Maintenance
– Frequent & ongoing
– Includes inspection, assessment, service, &
minor repairs
• Repair
– Infrequent, but generally planned
– Includes renovation, retrofitting, component
replacement
Durability & Green Building Design
The Major Issues
• Justifying Vital Service Functions in
Green Design Assessment
• Incorporating Reliable Service Life
Expectations into Green Design
Durability & Green Building Design
Vital Service Functions
Example:
Installing a High Density Cover Board
over Low Density Roof Insulation
Environmental Benefits:
+ Reduced Damage
+ Longer Service Life
+ Lower Life Cycle Impact
Membrane
Cover Board
Insulation
Environmental Costs:
– Added Materials
– Added Energy
– Added Waste
Durability & Green Building Design
Vital Service Functions
Unless the benefits of the cover board are
recognized in the overall project assessment, the
cover board may be viewed only as adding to
environmental costs:
Environmental Benefits:
+ Reduced Damage
+ Longer Service Life
+ Lower Life Cycle Impact
Membrane
Cover Board
Insulation
Environmental Costs:
– Added Materials
– Added Energy
– Added Waste
Durability & Green Building Design
Vital Service Functions
Other Examples:
• Thicker roofing membranes
• Redundant flashing details
Will the project assessment recognize the
added value of such enhanced service
functions?
Durability & Green Building Design
Incorporating Vital Service
Functions
Performance Standards
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards
In order to incorporate vital service
functions, performance standards must…
• Prove Their Value through Research
– Drawing from the past
– Adding certainty to the future.
• Identify Their Value with Measurement
– Providing measurable and reproducible value
– Balancing environmental impact with added
performance.
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards
Research examples & options:
• Failure Analysis (e.g. Bailey & Bradford field studies)
• Destructive Testing (e.g. Koontz et al. hail testing)
• Performance Testing (e.g. ORNL thermal testing)
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards
Benefits Needing Definition:
(Examples)
What is the measurable value (benefit less impact) of:
– Multiple & staggered insulation layers?
– Cover boards?
– Increased membrane thicknesses?
– Redundant flashing details?
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards and the
Roofing Industry
By definition, sustainable buildings must be
buildings that perform: so performance
standards are more important than ever …
… but without credible roofing industry
performance standards, others may
establish the standards for us.
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards and the
Roofing Industry
A spirit of industry cooperation is emerging
that could foster expanded performance
standards activities …
… but credible roofing industry standards
may require a much higher level of
research activity and funding.
Durability & Green Building Design
Performance Standards and the Roofing Industry
What The Industry Needs:
• An Up-To-Date & Active Research Agenda
– To identify & address the critical “gaps”
– To identify resources & funding
– To monitor & measure progress
• A Research-Driven Standards Process
– A consensus process …
– Using research results to validate industry practice
Durability & Green Building Design
Service Life Expectations
How do we identify
service life today?
Durability & Green Building Design
Service Life Expectations
How can we identify service life today?
• Anecdotal field reports
• Opinion surveys
• Historical end-of-service studies
• Agency approval reports
• Manufacturer warranty offerings
Durability & Green Building Design
Service Life Estimates for Low-Slope Roofing Systems
(Years)
Data Source
System Type
Opinion
Survey1
Historical
Study3
Agency
Report4
Warranty
Offering5
Asphalt BUR
16.6
13.6
20
20
SBS Modified
16.6
17.3
20
20
PVC
N/A2
N/A2
35
15
EPDM
14.1
16.8 – 18.4
20
30
No Data
No Data
20
30
TPO
1Mean
service life from Cash (1997), based on an opinion survey of industry participants.
from the Cash & Schneider studies involved discontinued formulations of PVC that do not allow the data to be meaningful.
3Mean service life from Schneider & Keenan (1997), based on end-of-service field reports.
4Estimated service life from British Board of Agrément Technical Approvals (BBA, 2008):
5Published warranty offerings from NRCA Low Slope Roofing Materials Guide, 2006-07, Vol. 2, Section 5 Roof Membrane Warranties.
2Data
Durability & Green Building Design
Service Life Estimates
Different Estimates – Different Assumptions:
• Time Assumptions
– Backward looking
– Forward looking
• Quality Assumptions
– Uncontrolled sample: Assuming the worst
– Controlled sample: Assuming the best
Durability & Green Building Design
Service Life Assumptions:
Going Forward
• Time Assumptions:
Roofs perform in the future, not the past …
… but the future is never certain.
• Quality Assumptions:
Assuming the best may be overly optimistic …
… but assuming the worst understates the value
of good design, installation and maintenance.
• Mixed Assumptions:
Only increase marketplace confusion.
Durability & Green Building Design
Incorporating Service Life
Expectations
Durability Planning
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning
• Emphasis on Process
– A management system
– Similar to ISO 9000 & ISO 14000
• Emphasis on Shared Responsibility
– Identifies stakeholders
– Identifies roles
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning and
Canadian Standard S478-95
Three Basic Steps:
1. Identify Durability Determinants
2. Identify Durability Interventions
3. Develop Action Plan & Timetable
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning
1. Identify Durability Determinants:
•
Provide the Required Functions
•
In the Service Environment
•
By Key System Element
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning
2. Identify Durability Countermeasures:
•
During Design
•
During Material Selection
•
During Application & Commissioning
•
During Service Life
•
At End of Service
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning
3. Develop Action Plan & Timetable
•
Periodic & Ongoing
•
At Specified Times
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning
A Suggested Durability Planning Matrix
(See Appendix A)
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning Matrix




Service
Environment


Required
Function






Special wind / storm considerations?
Hail zone?
Exposure to contaminants?
Extent of expected roof traffic?
o Pre-commissioning
o Post-commissioning
Interior environment?
o Humidity
o Pressure
o Special (pool, cold storage, etc.)
Building features?
o Large openings
o Deck type/condition
o Deck capacity (Deal Load / Live Load)
Protect building interior from moisture
Support maintenance of the desired interior environmental conditions
Provide fire rated system: Class xx
Finished roof shall have positive drainage
Roof system shall be removable and recyclable.
Building importance factor (critical services facility?)
Roof System
Element
Required Functions
Design Criteria
Materials Criteria
Application Criteria
Commissioning Criteria
 None
 None
 None
 If slope for drainage is not part of the structure,
include tapered insulation with crickets and
saddles designed to provide at least ¼ in per
foot slope.
 Field applied tape seams
 All T-joints shall be overlaid at least 5 inches in
all directions
 None

08. Membrane
Securement
 10 lb/sf
 ASTM xxxx, #4, smooth, rounded, water worn
gravel

07. Membrane
06. Insulation
Overlayment
(incl fastening)
 Nominal .060 inch thick
 Criteria assume project is not prone to hail or
frequent traffic
 Overlayment should be included (staggered
joints) when the project is prone to hail or
frequent traffic, to avoid insulation damage and
loss of R
 Hard surface overlayments (e.g., DensDeck,
OSB, gypsum, etc.) are not acceptable directly
beneath a ballasted membrane.
 Polyisocyanurate foam insulation
 Half the desired R value
 Polyisocyanurate foam insulation
 Half the desired R value
 None
 None
 Criteria assume condensation will not occur in
the roofing system
 Vapor retarder (by designer) should be included
when justified by building environment to avoid
condensation within the roofing system
 Steel
 Criteria assume deck is suitable for loads.
 ASTM D4637, Type I
 None
 Membrane terminations on a vertical wall shall
be counterflashed
 Roof edge metal installation shall be installed
according to SPRI-ES-1
 Fabricate seams per manufacturer’s
specifications
 Adhere T-joint overlay with primer/100% solids,
cured tape
 Secure membrane to the building at
penetrations and the perimeter of roof sections
 Attachment detail shall not penetrate the
membrane when such an option is sanctioned
by the membrane system manufacturer

 None
 ASTM xxxx
 loose laid, staggered joints

 ASTM xxxx
 loose laid

 None
 None
 None
 None
 None
 None



11. Field Applied
Coating
10. Membrane
System
Upgrade
Roof System
Elements
The Service
Environment
09. Membrane
Seaming
05. Insulation (incl
fastening)
04. Insulation (incl
fastening)
03. Underlayment
02. Vapor control
01. Deck
L
PRE
 Primer/100% solids, cured seam tape, 3in wide
 T-joint cover shall be field curing EPDM
membrane
RY
A
N
IMI
AFT
R
D
ATA
D
–
 None
OM
INC
TE
E
L
P
 Seams to be left uncovered until inspected
 Verify ballast gradation and application rate
 Check membrane labeling
 None
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning Matrix (cont.)




Service
Environment


Required
Function






Special wind / storm considerations?
Hail zone?
Exposure to contaminants?
Extent of expected roof traffic?
o Pre-commissioning
o Post-commissioning
Interior environment?
o Humidity
o Pressure
o Special (pool, cold storage, etc.)
Building features?
o Large openings
o Deck type/condition
o Deck capacity (Deal Load / Live Load)
Protect building interior from moisture
Support maintenance of the desired interior environmental conditions
Provide fire rated system: Class xx
Finished roof shall have positive drainage
Roof system shall be removable and recyclable.
Building importance factor (critical services facility?)
The Service
Environment
Roof System
Element
Materials Criteria
Application Criteria
Commissioning Criteria
 None
 None
 None
 If slope for drainage is not part of the structure,
include tapered insulation with crickets and
saddles designed to provide at least ¼ in per
foot slope.
 Field applied tape seams
 All T-joints shall be overlaid at least 5 inches in
all directions
 None

08. Membrane
Securement
 10 lb/sf
 ASTM xxxx, #4, smooth, rounded, water worn
gravel

07. Membrane
06. Insulation
Overlayment
(incl fastening)
 Nominal .060 inch thick
 Criteria assume project is not prone to hail or
frequent traffic
 Overlayment should be included (staggered
joints) when the project is prone to hail or
frequent traffic, to avoid insulation damage and
loss of R
 Hard surface overlayments (e.g., DensDeck,
OSB, gypsum, etc.) are not acceptable directly
beneath a ballasted membrane.
 Polyisocyanurate foam insulation
 Half the desired R value
 Polyisocyanurate foam insulation
 Half the desired R value
 None
 None
 Criteria assume condensation will not occur in
the roofing system
 Vapor retarder (by designer) should be included
when justified by building environment to avoid
condensation within the roofing system
 Steel
 Criteria assume deck is suitable for loads.
 ASTM D4637, Type I
 None
 Membrane terminations on a vertical wall shall
be counterflashed
 Roof edge metal installation shall be installed
according to SPRI-ES-1
 Fabricate seams per manufacturer’s
specifications
 Adhere T-joint overlay with primer/100% solids,
cured tape
 Secure membrane to the building at
penetrations and the perimeter of roof sections
 Attachment detail shall not penetrate the
membrane when such an option is sanctioned
by the membrane system manufacturer

 None
 ASTM xxxx
 loose laid, staggered joints

 ASTM xxxx
 loose laid

 None
 None
 None
 None
 None
 None



11. Field Applied
Coating
10. Membrane
System
Upgrade
Roof System
Elements
Design Criteria
Required Functions
09. Membrane
Seaming
05. Insulation (incl
fastening)
04. Insulation (incl
fastening)
03. Underlayment
02. Vapor control
01. Deck
L
PRE
 Primer/100% solids, cured seam tape, 3in wide
 T-joint cover shall be field curing EPDM
membrane
RY
A
N
IMI
Design
Criteria
AFT
R
D
ATA
D
–
Material
Criteria
 None
OM
INC
TE
E
L
P
Application
Criteria
 Seams to be left uncovered until inspected
 Verify ballast gradation and application rate
 Check membrane labeling
 None
Commissioning
Criteria
Durability & Green Building Design
Durability Planning Matrix (cont.)
Operating / Maintenance Criteria
Management
Beginning with
Commissioning
Service
Environment
Required
Function
 Control roof access; maintain access log;
 Inspect roof every spring/fall, after
threatening activities on, above or near
the roof, after new equipment or
penetrations are installed, and after any
activity that may have jeopardized the
roof
 Log leak reports along with related
conditions
 Confirm clean drains and good roof
drainage
 Any new rooftop installation shall be
reviewed with the roofing contractor for
its impact on the roof system
Roof
System
Element
11. Field Applied
Coating
10. Membrane
System
Upgrade
At 20 Years




Beginning with
Commissioning
At 20 Years


 Review roof traffic patterns and add
walkway pads where needed




 Peel up walk pads; recycle (similar
to tires)
 Cut seams out of membrane (6” per
30-50 ft width); recycle as energy
source or into application to be
developed
 Vacuum ballast; stockpile for re-use















 No fasteners; inspect boards for reuse or route to existing recycling
applications
 No fasteners; inspect boards for reuse or route to existing recycling
applications
 None



 None



 Do not remove unless necessary
ballast for points of scour and evenly
redistribute ballast to original coverage

02. Vapor
control
 None
ATA
–D

T
RAF
D
Y
Removal/Recycling
E
LET
P
M
O
INC
At 40 Years

R
INA
 After a high wind event inspect roof
07. Membrane
06. Overlayment
(incl
fastening)
05. Insulation
(incl
fastening)
04. Insulation
(incl
fastening)
03.
Underlay
ment
At 60 Years

09. Membrane
Seaming
08. Membrane
Securement
At 40 Years


IM
REL
P
 Route to processor for grinding and
incorporation into walk pads or other
application to be developed
 None
01. Deck
Ongoing &
Periodic
At X
Years
At X+
Years
At End of
Service
Durability & Green Building Design
Recommendations Going Forward
• Establish and an Up-To-Date and Active Industry
Research Agenda
• Increase Research Activity, Emphasizing Key
Roofing Components & Details
• Re-Invigorate Consensus Standards Activity with
New Research & New Commitment
• Start Incorporating Durability Planning in Roofing
Specifications
• Continue to Advocate the Importance of Roof
Durability
SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS:
ADDRESSING LONG-TERM BUILDING
ENVELOPE DURABILITY
Dr. James L. Hoff
Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing / TEGNOS Research, Inc.