Non-additive variance in P. abies and its influence on
Download
Report
Transcript Non-additive variance in P. abies and its influence on
Non-additive variance in P. abies
and its influence on tree breeding.
By: Johan Weston
What is the level of additive
& non-additive variance for
early height growth in our
clonal tests?
Are clonal tests suitable for
a breeding strategy based
on general combining
ability?
Can we affect the level of
non-additive variance?
Forestry Research Institute
Sävar
Overview of Material & methods
Half-sib & full sib clones
Selection of ortets based on early height
growth in the nursery
Clonal field-tests – 2 series, 10 tests
Complete randomisation, single tree plots
Assessment of height growth (10-11 yrs)
Estimation of variance components - ASReml
Conclusions
Overall, non-additive variance was substantial
but smaller than additive variance
Non-additive variance was affected by
clonal origin and test environment (”frost”)
Clonal tests are suitable in a breeding strategy
based on general combining ability (GCA)
- if non-additive variance is moderate
To increase trait heritability and selection
accuracy a more distinct definition of the trait
”growth” is needed
Half-sib material
ºN
68
2 clones selected in
each family 66
clones divided in
64
southern and northern
origins
62
6 clonal field tests
60
assessment after 11
years
58
56
Selected plustrees
in natural stands
and field tests
Sävar
Full-sib material
ºN
68
partial diallel
Selected plustrees
in natural stands
66
3-7 ortets selected in
each family 64
4 clonal field tests
62
assessment after 10
60
years
58
56
Sävar
Test material
Hedge archive at Sävar
Rooting of cuttings in nursery
Field-tests
A newly established field-test (1991)
complete
randomisation
single-tree plots
ca.2 cuttings / clone
post-blocking
Statistics
ASReml [25 Jan 2001]
Model - half-sib clones
Y= µ +
Testsite + Block +
Stand + Parent + Clone
(Fixed)
(Random)
Model - full-sib clones
Y= µ +
Testsite + Block +
Parent + Fam + Clone
(Fixed)
(Random)
Estimation of additive and nonadditive variation – half sib clones
Parent (mother) component of variance, σp2
Clonal component of variance, σc2
σA2 = 4σp2
σNA2 = σc2 - 3σp2
Stand component of variance, not included in
σA2 , a ”provenance” effect
(Source: Snedden et al, 2000, In "Forest Genetics for the Next
Millenium ”, IUFRO 2.08.01)
Results half-sib clones
Overall
Southern
Northern
2 mid-tests
824
1603
441
854
383
749
824
1590
2
12
2
11
2
13
2
6
196,9
207,7
185,9
192,9
CVA
0,09
0,07
0,12
0,12
h2
H2
0,07
0,18
0,04
0,17
0,11
0,19
0,11
0,23
74
207
-1
24
Families
Clones
Clones/family
Cuttings/fam
Height, cm
VNA/VA%
VNA/VA as families are excluded (from south)
800
600
VNA / VA , %
Half-sib clones southern origins
400
200
0
VA and VNA variance levels as families are
excluded (from south)
-200
55
1000
56
57
59
60
61
Minimum latitude, °N
800
600
400
Average height and latitudinal origin
200
300
0
250
-200
55
56
57
58
59
Minimum latitude, °N
60
61
VA
62
VNA
Tree height, cm
Variance
58
200
150
100
50
0
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Latitude °N, (class bottom)
63
64
62
Estimation of non-additive
variance – full-sibs
Parent component of variance, GCA, σp2
Family component of variance, SCA, σf2
Clonal component of variance, σc2
Additive variance, σA2 = 4σp2
Total genetic variance, σG2 = 2σp2 + σf2 + σc2
VNA= Total genetic variance – additive var.
= σG2 - σA2
(Source: Mullin et al, Can J For Res, 1992 )
Results full-sib clones
Overall
"No frost"
"Frost"
141
642
140
635
141
631
5
31
5
16
4
15
133,4
147,9
118,5
h2
H2
0,06
0,10
0,09
0,11
0,06
0,11
CVA
0,10
0,12
0,09
51
17
95
Families
Clones
Clones/family
Cuttings/family
Height, cm
VNA/VA%
VNA/VA in the field-tests
Full-sib clones
1000
VNA/VA, %
800
Variance levels in the field-tests
600
400
200
1000
0
"No frost"
600
400
"Frost"
Average height in the field-test
VA
300
VNA
250
200
0
"No frost"
"Frost"
Tree height, cm
Variance
800
200
150
100
50
0
"No frost"
"Frost"
Hypothesis
NAV in height growth is influenced y genetic
variation in other traits i.e. hardiness
Buds are more frost sensitive in genetic
material with a long growth period
Genetic entries with a long growth period has a
high growth potential
Occasional bud damages due to frost may be
included in the trait ”height growth”
Conclusions
Overall, non-additive variance was substantial
but smaller than additive variance
Non-additive variance was affected by
clonal origin and test environment (”frost”)
Clonal tests are suitable in a breeding strategy
based on general combining ability (GCA)
- if non-additive variance is moderate
To increase trait heritability and selection
accuracy a more distinct definition of the trait
”growth” is needed
Estimation of VNA with half-sib clones
Family component of the variance,
σp2 = ¼ σA2
Clonal component of the variance = total genetic variance minus the family
component,
σc2 = σG2 - σp2
σc2 = (σA2 + σNA2) - σp2
σc2 = (σA2 + σNA2) - ¼ σA2
σc2 = ¾ σA2 + kσNA)
σc2 = ¾ σA2 + σNA
k = proportion of non-additive variance segregating within families, k=1 in
o.p. families (Park & Fowler, 1987)
σNA = σc2 - ¾ σA2
σNA = σc2 - ¾ (4σp2 )
σNA = σc2 – 3σp2
(Source: Snedden et al, 2000, In "Forest Genetics for the Next Millennium”,
IUFRO 2.08.01)
Estimation of dominance and
epistasis
Parent component of variance, GCA, σp2
Family component of variance, SCA, σf2
Clonal component of variance, σc2
Dominance variance, σD2 = 4σf2
Epistatic variance, σI2 = σc2 - 2σp2 - 3σf2
Total genetic variance, σG2 = 2σp2 + σf2 + σc2
NVA= Total genetic variance – additive var.
(Source: Mullin et al, Can J For Res, 1992 )
Litterature
Snedden, C.L., Verryn, S.D. & Roux, C.Z. 2000, Broad- and narrow sense heritabilites in a
cloned open pollinated Eucalyptus grandis breeding population, Proceedings In "Forest
Genetics for the Next Millenium ”, IUFRO Working Party 2.08.01, Durban, South Africa, p
214-220.
Mboyi, W.M. & Lee S.J., 1999, Incidence of autumn frost damage and lamma growth in a
4-year-old clonal trial of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) in Britain. Forestry vol 72, No 2 ,
1999
Mullin, T.J., Morgenstern, E.K., Park, Y.S & Fowler, D.P., 1992, Genetic parameters from a
clonally replicated test of black spruce (Picea mariana), Can. J. For. Res. 22 : 24-36.
Mullin, T.J. & Park, Y.S. 1992, Genetic parameters and age-age correlations in a clonally
replicated test of black spruce after 10 years, Can. J. For. Res. 24 : 2330-2341.
Samuel, C.J.A., 1991, The Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Growth and Stem-Form
over 15 years in a Diallel Cross of Sitka Spruce, Silvae Genetica 40, 2.
Park, Y.S & Fowler, D.P., 1987, Genetic variances among clonally propagated populations
of tamarack and the implications for clonal forestry, Can. J. For. Res. 17: 1175-1180