Transcript Chapter 5 - International and Regional Transportation
Transport Geography
Chapter 5 – International and Regional Transportation
Methods
Copyright 1999-2002, Jean-Paul Rodrigue, Dept. of Economics & Geography, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY, 11549 USA.
You may use the figures within for educational purposes only. No modification or redistribution permitted.
For more information: http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans
Method 1
Spatial Interactions
Conditions for the Realization of a Spatial Interaction
Complementarity Demand Supply A Alternative Opportunity A C B Supply B Demand Transferability A B
Representation of a Movement as a Spatial Interaction
i j
Movement Spatial Interaction Centroid
i j
Centroid
Constructing an O/D Matrix
A D Spatial Interactions B C E A B C D E Tj A
0 0 0 20 0 20 0 0
B
0 0 0 0
O/D Matrix C
50 60 0 80 90 280
D
0 0 30 0 10 40
E
0 30 0 20 0 50
Ti
50 90 30 120 100
390
Relationship between Distance and Interactions
T(B-A)
A
T(C-A)
A
T(D-A)
A B C D A B C D Distance (friction of)
• The basic assumption concerning many spatial interaction models is that spatial interactions are a function of the attributes of the places of origin, the attributes of the places of destination and the friction of distance interaction model is as follows: between the origins and the destinations. The general formulation of the spatial
T ij
f
V i
,
W j
,
S ij
• Tij = Interaction between location i (origin) and location j (destination). Its units of measurement are varied and can involve people, tons of freight, traffic volume, etc. It also concerns a time period such as interactions by the hour, day, month, or year. • Vi = Attributes of the location of origin i. Variables often used to express these attributes are socio-economic in nature, such as population, number of jobs available, industrial output or gross domestic product. • Wj = Attributes of the location of destination j. • Sij = Attributes of separation between the location of origin i and the location of destination j. Also known as transport friction. Variables often used to express these attributes are distance, transport costs, or travel time. • The attributes of V and W tend to be paired to express complementarity in the best possible way. For instance, measuring commuting flows (work-related movements) between different locations would likely consider a variable such as working age population as V and total employment as W.
• From this general formulation, three basic types of interaction models can be constructed: – Gravity model. Measures interactions between all the possible location pairs. – Potential model. Measures interactions between one location and every other locations. – Retail model. Measure the boundary of the market areas between two locations competing over the same market.
Three Basic Types of Interaction Models
General Formulation:
T ij
V i
S ij
2
W j
T ij = 10.9
i 35 T ji = 10.9
S ij = 8 j 20
Gravity Model
T ij
f
V i
,
W j
,
S ij
T i
j W S ij
2
j
k 35 T i = 3.8
1.0
6 2.2
i j 20 3 0.6
5 l 15
Potential Model
V i T ij S ij j W
B ij
S ij
1
W j V i
B ij = 4.9
j 15 7 i 35 B ik = 2.8
6 k 40
Retail Model
Method 2
The Gravity Model
Application of an Elementary Spatial Interaction Equation 2,000,000
X
400 km
W
2,000,000
Centroid (i) Weight (P)
k = 0.00001
(people per week)
Distance (D) Constant (k) Z
1,000,000
Interaction (T)
2,000,000
Y W X Y Z Tj W Elementary Formulation
T ij
k P i
P j D ij
X Y Z Ti
100,000 100,000 50,000 25,000 100,000 175,000 50,000 25,000 100,000 175,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 25,000 350,000
Application of a Simple Spatial Interaction Equation 2,000,000 = 0.95
= 1.05
X
2,000,000
Y
= 1.03
= 0.96
W
400 km = 1.0
= 0.95
2,000,000 k = 0.00001
(people per week)
Centroid (i) Weight (P) Distance (D) Constant (k) Z
1,000,000 = 1.2
= 0.4
Interaction (T) Exponent W X Y Z Tj W
6,059
Simple Formulation
T ij
k P i
D ij
P j
X Y Z
71,378 2,203 1 6,059 19,420 153,893 244,692 2,203 1
Ti
71,378 8,263 19,420 153,893 252,954
Effects of beta, alpha and lambda on Spatial Interactions
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 Beta 5 10 Distance 15 0.25
0.5
1 1.5
2 20 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 60 50 0 Alpha and Lambda 0.25
0.5
1 1.5
2 5 10 Population 15 20
Chicago’s beta values for air transportation, 1949 1989 0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990