Transcript Slide 1
AEESP Meeting, Blacksburg VA July 28-Aug 1, 2007 Synopsis: Workshop on Frontiers in Environmental Engineering Education James (Chip ) Kilduff Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Acknowledgments Sponsors NSF, AEESP, AAEE, ASU (SoE, John Crittenden) Planning Committee Michael Aitken, Patrick Brezonik (ex-officio), Michael Butkus, Chip Kilduff, Nicholas Clesceri, Raymond Hozalski, Loring Nies, Susan Powers Participants Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ January 8-10, 2007 60 Attendees Academia Range of sizes and missions Government (NSF, EPA) Professional societies (AAEE, ASEE, NSPE, ASCE, AEESP) Water and wastewater utilities Consulting engineers Workshop Objectives Identify “Body of Knowledge” outcomes Identify ways to transform curricula In response to Body of Knowledge In response to new science and technology To bridge environmental literacy gap To improve recruitment Identify ways to interact with practicing engineers As input to curriculum change As participants in the educational process As “customers” Nomenclature Body of Knowledge (e.g., ASCE) Alternative: Competencies Knowledge Evaluation Skills Synthesis Ways of thinking Analysis Attitudes Application Understanding Experience Knowledge Judgment Creativity May be taught, encouraged, nurtured, illustrated by example, etc. Purpose of BOK - ASCE ASCE recognizes that changes in how (Civil) engineering is practiced must occur. That change is necessitated by: Globalization; sustainability; emerging technology; increased complexity, interdisciplinarity Development of an “aspirational” global vision Develop policies to move toward realizing this vision ASCE Policy 465: MS degree or equivalent is a prerequisite for licensure and professional practice Implement such policies in part by defining the BOK, which defines what is required to enter the practice of civil engineering at the professional level (licensure) Combines education and experience ASCE Vision Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine, the built environment; stewards of the natural environment and its resources; innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public, private, and academic sectors; managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural events, accidents, and other threats; and leaders in discussions and decisions shaping public environmental and infrastructure policy. Purpose of BOK Provide a strong foundation for further development A guide for curriculum development and reform Create strong identity A guide for employers, future students, society Define needs for BS degree Licensure Lifelong learning A mechanism to call for specific attributes, e.g., creativity and innovation Enhance recruitment Potential Pitfalls Is a BOK really necessary? Should a more in depth discussion of who we are and where we are going precede BOK development? Much progress has been made in the absence of an explicit BOK; it should not move us backwards Resource constraints Faculty Faculty workload Support for new courses New evaluation criteria Perceived risk of constraining faculty and program creativity, independence of too prescriptive Uniqueness of EnvEng Serve public welfare, health, and safety directly Objectives: human and ecosystem health Prevention, improvement, remediation Systems perspectives – interactions and interfaces Engineered system “Systems of systems” Natural systems processes Human systems and processes Multi-media and their interfaces & interactions Complex multi-scale systems Global perspective Environmental ethics Risk: environmental, reliability BOK Attributes Reflect our responsibility to address grand societal challenges for compelling intellectual and practical reasons Prepare students for an unknown future Provide strong fundamentals Promote ability to apply principles to new problems Promote ability to exploit new opportunities Must build on a body of knowledge appropriate for all engineers May be achieved through some combination of BS degree, advanced degrees, experience, life-long learning Flexibility Allow for multiple pathways to achieve BOK BOK should allow for future growth in the field in ways that we can not imagine at this time Promote expansion into new areas BOK should provide a good foundation allowing career flexibility outside the field Breadth vs Depth Provide an appropriate balance between breadth and depth In science, among engineering disciplines, and within environmental engineering To enable determination of impacts of solutions to engineering problems in a variety of domains Economy, public livelihood, human health, ecosystems, and function of the earth’s life support systems Professional Practice BOK should address competencies beyond those required to enter practice or pass PE exam Professional practice one of but not the only “next step” in professional development Sustainability Framework Human (Social) System Goods & Services Natural (Eco) System Culture/behavior Policies, politics, law Industry/agriculture Economics Historical context Impacts Atmosphere Hydrosphere Lithosphere Biosphere Resource Interactions and Feedback Social Sciences & Humanities (Environmental Studies) Natural Sciences (Environmental Science) Social Capital Natural Capital Financial Capital Economics Technological Capital Engineering & Applied Sciences (Environmental Engineering) Will Focht, Oklahoma State University Systems Perspective and Analysis impacts Human Systems Culture/behavior Policies, politics, law Industry/agriculture Economics Historical context Basic Math/Science • Biology/Ecology • Chemistry • Physics • Earth Science • Stats/prob uses Technical Environmental Engineering Systems Tools • Fate and transport • Risk / exposure • Impacts/benefits analysis • Industrial ecology • Env. Chemistry Natural Systems Atmosphere Hydrosphere Lithosphere Biosphere Basic Engrg. Science • Mass/energy/momentum • Fluid mechanics • Thermodynamics • Computation Beyond the Foundation Ways of Thinking Skills Attitudes systems thinking communication role of technology in society problem solving experimentation ethics design computation respect for diversity critical analysis teamwork respect for democratic critical evaluation project mgmt public service information mgmt professional service sustainability Importance of Creativity Tough Choices or Tough Times, NCEE Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce Education vs. Training Training How to do Develop contextual skill for enhancing immediate productivity Education How to think and create Develop conceptual skill for thinking beyond the prevailing paradigm Courtesy of Dom Grasso, J. Bordogna, NSF Importance of a University Education Provides basis for creativity Introduces students to Major kinds of knowledge Major forms of inquiry to develop new knowledge Different means of analysis Provides intellectual power Critical thinking Reasoned judgment Ability to engage in the great debates that define our times Necessary for analysis and solution of complex problems Conclusions Change drivers include globalization; sustainability; emerging technology; increased complexity, interdisciplinarity BOK should Provide a sustainability framework Promote systems thinking Promote creativity Provide a strong technical background while recognizing the importance of a university education