National report of LITHUANIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic

Download Report

Transcript National report of LITHUANIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic

National report of LITHUANIA

Transition to European Vertical Reference System – EVRS:

Status of the geodetic vertical control of Lithuania and further movements Eimuntas Parseliunas

Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University [email protected]

THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM

, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA

Outline

General ideasWorld Geodetic Vertical Datum and SystemLocal (European) Vertical Reference SystemNational Geodetic Vertical NetworkFurther movements

General ideas

Approaches for the construction and unification of Geodetic Vertical Reference Systems and Frames:

Spirit leveling

Gravity field

Marker of the vertical reference frame

Benchmark Tide gauge

Physical height difference Ellipsoidal height difference and geoid model

GNSS Precise levelings and gravimetric observations (leveling approach) Oceanographic model (gravity field approach) Satellite altimetry

General ideas

Ellipsoidal height, orthometric height, local geoid, vertical datum...

General ideas

m 2 s -2

Geopotential number

Dynamic height Nominal value of gravity at mid-latitude Orthometric height Average value of gravity along the plumb line Normal height Average value of normal gravity along the normal plumb line

General ideas

L. E. Sjöberg.

The geoid or quasigeoid – which reference surface should be preferred for a national height system?

Journal of Geodetic Science, 3(2), 2013, 103-109 As there is a similar problem for the uncertainty in the topographic density distribution in determining orthometric heights (but not for normal heights), we

conclude that a normal height system is the best choice for a future height system

.

Once the normal gravity field is defined, the normal heights and the quasigeoid can be determined without any error stemming from the topographic mass distribution, and the

quasigeoid can be estimated more precisely than the geoid as the reference surface

.

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System

Different teams computed W 0 using the same input data, but their own methodologies:

Input data

Mean sea surface models (MSS): CLS11 (Schaeffer et al. 2012) DTU10 (Andersen 2010) Global gravity models (GGM): EGM2008 (Pavlis et al, 2012) EIGEN6C (Förste et al. 2011) GOCO3S (Mayer Gürr et al. 2012)

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System Some examples of W 0 estimates

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System Remarks on W 0

The reference level W 0 for potential differences

can arbitrarily be appointed

. However, to get the worldwide consistency desired within a global vertical reference system, the selected

W 0 value must be realisable

with

high-precision at any time and anywhere

around the world. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate it from

real observations

of the Earth's gravity field and surface. The

uniqueness

,

reliability

and

repeatability

of the global reference level W 0 (or global geoid) can only be guaranteed by introducing

specific conventions

(like any other reference system!). On the contrary, there will exist as many height systems as W 0 computations.

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System

All the computations are delivering very close results (

around 62 636 854 m 2 s -2

), but there are still differences of about

0,5 m 2 s -2

(~ 5 cm). It is necessary to start defining the standards and conventions for a formal recommendation on W 0 .

Final recommendation (till the end of 2013):

62 636 854,0 +/- 0,2

m 2 s -2

But...

Canada

: November 2013, CGVD2013 with

62 636 856,0 m 2 s -2 USA

till 2020 also with

62 636 856,0 m 2 s -2

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System

(

EGM96

)

World Geodetic Vertical Datum and System

Project „

Investigations of the requirements for a future 5 mm (quasi)geoid model “

has recently been started within the

Nordic Geodetic Commission

(NKG).

The NKG gravity database will soon be updated in connection with the NKG-project „

Computation of the NKG2014 geoid model“

.

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Spirit leveling Approach EVRF2007

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Spirit leveling approach Transformation parameter Estimation of 3 parameters (plane) as transformation parameters between the national vertical reference frames and EVRF2007 http://www.crs-geo.eu

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

Local (European) Vertical Reference System

National Geodetic Vertical Network (1)

Lithuanian vertical (height) system is still not adopted .

The project of

The Resolution of the Government of Lithuania is prepared!

It is based on EVRS Conventions 2007.

National Geodetic Vertical Network (1)

10 datum points

National Geodetic Vertical Network (1) Data of datum points

National Geodetic Vertical Network (1)

National Geodetic Vertical Network (3)

National Geodetic Vertical Network (11)

National Geodetic Vertical Network (12)

National Geodetic Vertical Network (13)

National Geodetic Vertical Network (14) Differences between some height systems

National Geodetic Vertical Network (14)

Precise levelling in 2009-2011 (in green) and near future plans (in red)

Vertical network (1st and 2nd order) 6250000 6200000 6150000 6100000 6050000 6000000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000 550000 600000 650000

Vertical network (1st and 2nd order) Red lines – foreseen 2nd order lines

Vertical network - numbers Characteristics of projected 2nd order Network Total lenght of lines – 3100 km: Ready - 300 km (in 2007) + 300 km (in 2012)

Foreseen – 2200 km (in 2013-2015)

Total number of points - 3300 (new –2800)

Conclusions

•Lithuanian state geodetic vertival network fits to the requirements of the modern society •It necessary to speed up the adoption of the Vertical (height) and Gravity systems in Lithuania •The densification of the first order vertical network should be executed to fulfill the all needs of the geodesy science

Future plans

•Adoption of vertical (height) and gravity systems – 2013 •Quasigeoid model (2 cm) - 2014 •NKG GNSS campaign – 2013 •LitPOS modernization – 2013-2015 •Second order vertical network – 2013-2015 •Absolute gravity measurements at Vilnius, Panevezys and Klaipeda – 2013 •Gravity survey – 2016-2018 •GNSS campaign at vertical network points - 2019 •Quasigeoid model (5mm) - 2020

Thanks…

Thank you for your attention!