Transcript apir.wisc.edu

Diversity Update 2012
October 2012
Demographic Variables and Reporting
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on:
• Demographic variables and how they are
collected and reported
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Demographic Variables for Analysis
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This presentation is limited to variables for which we
have quantitative information, including:
 Race/ethnicity
 Income level
 First-generation in college
 Gender
 Geographic diversity
Information is not systematically available for all groups
that are important to inclusive excellence.
Race/Ethnic Categories: Students
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Students self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of application.
• Targeted Minorities include:
» African American
» Native American
» Hispanic/Latino/a
» Southeast Asian
(Cambodians, Laotians,
Vietnamese, and Hmong)
• Minorities include:
» Targeted Minority
categories
» Other Asians
» Native Hawaiians
 Continued terminology from
Plan 2008
 Includes all Asians, useful for
national peer comparisons.
International students are not counted in any of these collections, in keeping with
state/federal guidelines.
Race/Ethnicity Reporting
Reporting Methodologies for Race/Ethnicity Information
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
The relatively new ability to indicate multiple race/ethnic values results in a much richer picture of student diversity
but data reporting is more complicated. To deal with these complexities, methodology options for data reporting have
emerged . The method that is most appropriate depends on for what purpose the data will be used. The table below
describes the features of each method and shows how the methods are similar and different from each other.
Subsequent slides in this presentation use the Primary reporting methodology.
Reporting Feature
Results in single count of students
Primary
Federal
P
P
Prioritizes Hispanic/Latina(a) over other values
P
Creates new categories that are not reported by
students themselves
P
Displays race/ethnic values only for domestic
(non international) students
P
P
Displays ALL students who indicate a particular
race/ethnicity
Prioritizes some race/ethnicities over others
Used in external data reporting and rankings
Count All
P
P
P
P
P
Enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on:
• Enrollment
–
–
–
–
–
Undergraduate
Graduate
Professional
School/College
Peer comparisons
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Includes breakouts by race/ethnicity, gender, geography
Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of Minority
Undergraduate Students
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
16
Minority Students, 14.5%
From 2003 to 2012
 4.4 percentage
point increase
Targeted
Minority
in Minority
Students,
9.9%
Enrollment
 3.4 percentage
point increase
in Targeted
Revised
Race/Ethnic
Minority
Categories
Enrollment
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
Race/Ethnicity Collection Begins
Southeast Asian Collection Begins
0
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include
targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.
Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority
Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
12%
From 2003 to 2012:
 Increases in
% of Total Undergraduates
10%
8%
3.9%
4.3%
4.4%
0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
0.9%
3.3%
0.7%
0.7%
1.8%
1.8%
1.9%
1.9%
1.9%
1.8%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.7%
2.4%
2.4%
2.5%
2.7%
2.9%
2.9%
3.0%
2.8%
2.8%
2.7%
6%
2.4%
4%
3.8%
3.6%
0.5%
2.6%
0.6%
2.8%
0.6%
3.1%
0.6%
2%
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
undergraduate
Hispanic/ enrollment in all
Latino/a
race/ethnic
categories
Native  3.7 percentage
American point increase in
undergraduate
SE Asian
targeted minority
enrollment
African
American  International
Students: 6.8% of
Undergraduate
Enrollment
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 2 Detail: Percent Enrollment of First-Year
Targeted Minority Undergraduates, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
% of Total First Year Undergraduates
12%
From 2003 to 2012:
10%
4.7%
8%
3.7%
3.3%
6%
4%
0.6%
1.5%
1.9%
2.7%
2.7%
0.6%
1.9%
2%
2.9%
0.6%
2.0%
4.3%
1.2%
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
2.2%
2.0%
0.9%
2.2%
2.2%
1.6%
3.3%
5.2%
3.7%
4.2%
3.4%
2.6%
0.8%
3.7%
3.0%
2.6%
0.8%
1.6%
3.0%
2.6%
2.8%
 1.6 percentage
Hispanic/ point increase in
Latino/a first-year
undergraduate
targeted minority
enrollment
Native
American
SE Asian
2.3% African
American
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority
Undergraduates
12
10
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Undergraduates
8
6
4
6.5
7.1
7.5
8
8.6
9
9.7
9.5
9.9
9.9
• 9.9% of all
undergraduates
are targeted
minorities.
2
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
New Undergraduates
6.9
8.1
8.1
8.8
9.3
8.9
10.2
10.7
9.1
8.8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
• 8.8% of new
students (new
freshmen + new
transfers) are
targeted
minorities.
2012 data is preliminary.
Percent Targeted Minority Enrollment
by School/College: Undergraduates, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
18%
•
N=120
16%
16%
% of Undergraduate Enrollment
14%
12%
10%
10%
11%
10%
N=278
9%
8%
N=1,790
N=196
N=2,871
N=73
•
10%
N=309
8%
N=104
6%
6%
4%
N=1
2%
2%
In 2012, the College of
Letters and Science has
the largest number of
undergraduate
targeted minority
students enrolled.
The School of Human
Ecology has the largest
percentage of
undergraduate
targeted minority
students enrolled, with
16 percent of SoHE
students identifying as
targeted minorities.
0%
TOTAL
CALS
Business
Education Engineering
SoHE
L&S
Nursing
Pharmacy
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
80%
N = 15,396
N = 15,180
N = 15,024
N = 14,160
N = 14,089
N = 13,892
N = 8,720
N = 16,673
N = 6,468
N = 11,040
N = 9,963
N = 11,891
N = 10,197
N = 5,366
N = 8,745
N = 4,108
N = 10,125
N = 6,473
N = 4,053
N = 6,110
N = 3,456
N = 6,109
N = 4,371
N = 2,904
N = 6,559
N = 5,870
N = 3,050
N = 4,137
N = 3,360
N = 4,365
N = 4,102
N = 2,328
N = 1,917
N = 2,228
Percent of Undergraduates
who are Minorities at AAU
Public Institutions, Fall 2010
UC-Irvine
UC-San Diego
UCLA
UC-Davis
UC-Berkeley
Rutgers
UC-Santa Barbara
Texas
Stony Brook
Washington
Average Percent Minority for
Maryland
Florida
AAU Public Institutions: 29%
Arizona
North Carolina
Illinois
6 AAU Public Institutions have
Virginia
Texas A & M
a lower percent of minority
Michigan
Buffalo
students than UW-Madison.
Minnesota
Oregon
Michigan State
10 AAU Public Institutions
Colorado
Pittsburgh
have a smaller number of
Ohio State
Penn State
minority students than UWKansas
Madison.
Wisconsin
Missouri
Indiana
Purdue
Iowa State
Nebraska
Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010
Iowa State
0%
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
20%
40%
60%
Percent of Undergraduates
80%
Peer
Enrollments
by Minority
Status
Undergraduate Enrollment
Comparisons
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison educates relatively large numbers of minority students
• UW-Madison enrolled 2,750 targeted minority
undergraduates (Fall 2009)
• There are 2,731 institutions in the United States that grant
bachelor’s degrees. Of these, only 873 (32%) have more total
undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted
minority undergraduates enrolled
• There are 61 institutions in Wisconsin that grant bachelor’s
degrees. Of these, only 20 (33%) have more total
undergraduates enrolled than UW-Madison has targeted
minority students enrolled
Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
12%
% of Total Graduate Student Enrollment
From 2003 to 2012:
10%
8%
6%
2.8%
4%
2%
2.5%
2.5%
2.9%
0.4%
0.3%
0.5%
0.5%
2.1%
2.2%
2.1%
4.0%
3.2%
3.5%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.7% 0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
1.0%
2.7%
2.6%
2.7%
2.8%
2.9%
2.7%
0.5%
0.5%
3.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.7%
0.7%
0.8%
2.3%
2.5%
2.7%
0%
 Increases in
graduate student
enrollment in all
race/ethnic
Hispanic/ categories
Latino/a 3.2 percentage
point increase in
graduate targeted
Native
minority
American
enrollment
SE Asian
 International
Students make up
African
American 25.6% of graduate
enrollment
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted
Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
% of Total professional Student Enrollment
12%
• From 2003 to
2012:
10%
3.7%
3.7%
8%
4.0% 4.1%
6%
4%
2%
3.5%
3.4%
3.6%
1.2%
3.4% 3.3%
Hispanic/
2.9% Latino/a
1.3%
1.2% 1.0%
1.0% 1.0%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3% 1.6% 1.6% 1.3% 1.2%
0.7%
1.1% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9%
0.3% 0.4%
4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3%
3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0%
0%
Constant percent
of professional
targeted minority
Native
enrollment
American
SE Asian  International
Students make
up 3.9% of
African
American professional
student
enrollment
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Targeted Minority Enrollment by School/College:
Graduate/Professional Programs, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
18%
Fall 2012
N=182
16%
16%
% of Total Grad/Prof College Enrollment
N=10
14%
N=111
7%
15%
N=11
12%
10%
8%
3%
N=146
N=1,060
8% N=72
6%
6%
8%
N=43
8%
N=326
N=46
7%
8%
N=88
6%
N=6
4%
• The School of
Education has
the largest
percentage of
targeted
minority
graduate
students
N=19
(16%).
4%
7%
2%
0%
Total
CALS
Business Educ.
Eng.
SoHE
Nelson
L&S
Law
SMPH
Nurs.
Pharm. Vet Med
2012 data is preliminary.
Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.
Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant
Recipients (Undergraduates)
20
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Undergraduates
17.0
15
10
12.6 12.8
14.7
11.6 11.5 12.2 11.7
• 14.3% of all
undergraduates
16.0
14.3
are Pell Grant
recipients.
5
0
20
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
New Undergraduates
15
10
12
5
• 13.7% of new
students (new
16.0 16.5
14.1
13.7
freshmen + new
12.5
11.7
11.1
10.7 11.4
transfers) are Pell
Grant recipients.
0
2003
2004
2005
2012 data is preliminary.
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
50%
N = 10,910
N = 10,207
N = 8,051
N = 6,842
N = 9,417
N = 5,774
N = 8,798
N = 9,679
N = 5,971
N = 9,857
N = 8,679
N = 11,854
N = 10,236
N = 9,250
N = 7,406
N = 4,977
N = 5,741
N = 8,090
N = 5,374
N = 4,482
N = 8,434
N = 7,183
N = 4,046
N = 3,775
N = 5,302
N = 6,437
N = 6,487
N = 3,504
N = 4,086
N = 7,405
N = 4,695
N = 4,921
N = 4,436
N = 1,956
Percent of Undergraduates
who Pell Recipients at AAU
Public Institutions, 2010-11
UC-San Diego
UC-Davis
UC-Irvine
UC-Santa…
UCLA
Stony Brook
UC-Berkeley
Arizona
Pell Grants are federally funded grants for
Buffalo
students with high financial need. This indicator Florida
Rutgers
is a proxy for low income student enrollments. Ohio State
Texas
Michigan State
Washington
Oregon
Iowa State
Minnesota
Missouri
Kansas
Texas A & M
Purdue
Nebraska
North Carolina
Maryland
Illinois
Indiana
Pittsburgh
Iowa
Penn State
Colorado
Wisconsin
Michigan
Virginia
Average percent pell recipients
for AAU public institutions: 26%
2 AAU public institutions have a
lower or equal percent of Pell
recipients than UW-Madison.
8 AAU public institutions have a
lower number of Pell recipients
than UW-Madison.
Source: IPEDS Student Financial Aid Data, 2010-11
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
0
10
20
30
40
Percent of Undergraduates
50
Peer
Enrollments
of Pell
Grant
Recipients
Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of FirstGeneration Students (Undergraduates)
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
15
10
5
0
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
All Undergraduates
20.8
17.6
22.3
22.1
21.8
20.8 • Data on first-
generation status
13.3
is collected at the
8.1 Accumulating Data
time of
application.
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 • Question first
New Undergraduates
asked in 2005.
21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.9
• 18.9% of New
18.9
Students (New
Freshmen + New
Transfers) are
first-generation
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
students.
2012 data is preliminary.
Indicator 7: Percent Undergraduate
Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
56%
54%
52%
Women
50%
48%
46%
Women have
comprised more
51.6%
than half of
undergraduate
enrollment since
1996.
48.4%
Men
44%
42%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Women as a Percentage of Total Undergraduate
Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
100%
Fall 2012
90%
89%
80%
81%
70%
72%
60%
60%
50%
54%
52%
40%
52%
43%
30%
20%
20%
10%
0%
TOTAL
CALS
2012 data is preliminary.
Business
Education Engineering
SoHE
L&S
Nursing
Pharmacy
• Nursing has the
highest percent
of women
undergraduates
enrolled (89%)
and Engineering
has the lowest
percent (20%)
Indicator 8: Percent Graduate/Professional
Enrollment by Gender, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
56%
54%
52%
Women
50%
48%
Men
Women have
comprised more
than half of
graduate/
50.2%
professional
enrollment since
49.8% 2003
46%
44%
42%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2012 data is preliminary.
Women as a Percentage of Total Grad/Professional
Enrollment, by School/College, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
100%
Fall 2011
95%
90%
•
80%
83%
70%
73%
69%
65%
60%
58%
50%
50%
53%
52%
52%
43%
40%
35%
30%
20%
21%
10%
0%
Total
CALS
Business
2012 data is preliminary.
Educ.
Eng.
SoHE
Nelson
L&S
Law
SMPH
Nurs.
Pharm. Vet Med
Nursing has the
highest percent of
women enrolled in
a graduate or
professional
program, while
Engineering has
the lowest percent
of women
enrolled.
Enrollments by WI County
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Home County of UW-Madison Undergraduate Students (Wisconsin Residents)
Among the 72 Wisconsin counties, each is
represented by at least 5 undergraduate students in
Fall 2012.
Red: More than 4% of resident undergraduates from county
Black: Between 2% and 4% of resident undergraduates from
county
Light Gray: Less than 2% (but at least five students) of
resident undergraduates from county
Undergraduate Access and Pipeline
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on:
• Undergraduate Pipeline and Access
• Diversity Programs
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Undergraduate Enrollment Pipeline
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Pipeline
The population in high school serves as a major pool for UWMadison undergraduates
• We can estimate the pipeline for several groups
–
–
–
–
Minority Students
Low-Income (Pell or Free/Reduced Lunch)
First-Generation Students
Rural students
Pipeline: First Generation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Wisconsin's First-Generation College-Going Recruiting Pool
Population 13-17
"Potential"* First
Generation Students
(291,312 of 386,920)
An estimated 75% of 13-17
year old Wisconsin residents
live in households where no
parent/guardian holds a
bachelor’s degree.
No data available on graduation rates or
academic achievement by parental
education levels within Wisconsin
UW-Madison
Applicants
0%
UW-Madison
Admits
(1,229 of 5,740)
UW-Madison
Enrolled
(782 of 3,515)
10%
Approximately 22% of UWMadison Resident New
Freshman are firstgeneration students.
(2,187 of 8,441)
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent of Group Total
60%
70%
80%
We do not have a reliable
data source on high school
graduation or college
preparedness by parental
education levels for
Wisconsin residents.
*“Potential” First Generation Students does not imply any level of academic achievement, school enrollment, or preparedness. This estimate reflects the
population 13-17 with no parent/guardian in the household with a Bachelor’s Degree.
Sources: Overall WI Population (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2005-2007 Estimates), Potential First Generation Students (“Parental
Education and College Participation Rates in Wisconsin”, Sara Lazenby, August 2009), 2010 US Census Data, Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls for 2012-13
School Year
Pipeline: Low Income
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool
Economically Disadvantaged High
School Public School Students
Economically
Disadvantaged Public
High School Graduates
(90,991 of 264,206)
•34% of Public K-12 students
in Wisconsin are
Economically Disadvantaged
(2011-12)
(14,504 of 64,687)
•23% of Public High School
Graduates are Economically
Disadvantaged (2010)
No Data Available on
Low-Income Status of
UW-Madison Applicants
or Admits
UW-Madison
Enrolled
0%
10%
•We have no reliable
information on income of
applicant students, all data
based on financial aid
applications
(591 of 3,515)
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent of Group Total
60%
“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.
Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student Group
UW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13
70%
•17% of Resident New
Freshmen are Pell Grant
80% Recipients
Pipeline: Minority
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool
Minority Public High
School Students
Minority Public High
School Graduates
(56,519 of 264,206)
•21% of Public High School
students in Wisconsin are
minority students(2011-12)
(290,550 of 385,907)
(11,568 of 64,687)
"Well-Prepared"
Minority Public High
School Graduates
•18% of Public High School
Graduates are minority
students (2009-10)
(753 of 14,943)
•14% of Resident New
Freshmen are minority
students (2012)
UW-Madison
(1,335 of 8441)
Applicants
UW-Madison
Admits
UW-Madison
Enrolled
0%
10%
(729 of 5,740)
(483 of 3,515)
20%
30%
40%
50%
Percent of Group Total
60%
70%
80%
“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT
score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.
Pipeline: Rural
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
•
Percent Rural, by Pipeline Step
Not Rural
Rural
50
50
Percent of High Schools
Percent of Freshmen Applicants
Percent of Freshmen Admits
Percent of Enrolled Freshmen
•
70
Percent of 12th Graders
30
79
•
21
77
23
77
23
Source: High School Characteristics and Early Academic Performance at UW-Madison, Clare Huhn,
APIR.
While over half of
WI high schools are
considered rural,
only 30% of 12th
graders attend a
rural high school.
Rural high school
students apply at
lower rates than
other students
Once they apply,
rural students are
admitted and
enroll at rates
proportional to
their application
rate.
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,
New Freshmen, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total
%
% Enrolled/
Applicants Admitted Yield Rate
Overall 29,034
54.6
39.6
Male
Female
14,235
14,799
51.0
57.9
40.4
39.0
Resident
Domestic Non-Res.
International
8,441
12,581
4,770
68.0
50.7
41.3
61.2
22.1
30.6
Targeted Minorties
Total Minority
3,305
5,418
44.5
49.2
38.3
33.3
First Generation
4,790
45.8
47.1
•Wisconsin residents
are the most likely
applicants to be
admitted and are most
likely to enroll
compared to other
groups.
Applicants, Admits, and Enrolls,
Transfer Students, Fall 2012
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Total
%
% Enrolled/
Applicants Admitted Yield Rate
Overall 4,367
45.9
61.0
Male
Female
2,252
43.4
62.2
2,115
48.6
59.9
Resident
Domestic Non-Res.
International
2,265
55.1
72.6
1,068
40.6
37.8
743
24.8
40.2
Targeted Minorties
Total Minority
460
34.4
52.7
662
36.7
54.4
1,319
44.4
61.6
First Generation
•One reason for low admit
rates for transfer applicants
is that many applicants do
not meet the minimum
requirements for admission
•Wisconsin residents are
the most likely applicants
to be admitted and are
most likely to enroll
compared to other groups.
Diversity Programs
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Academic Excellence Communities
Programs that increase access and success for underrepresented
populations on campus and are centrally coordinated.
• Programs with a Pre-College Component
– PEOPLE
– POSSE
• Student Support Programs
– CEO (formerly TRIO)
– Academic Advancement Program
– Pathways
• Scholarship Programs
– Chancellor’s Scholars
– Powers/Knapp
– First Wave
Fall 2012 Undergraduate Participation
in Academic Excellence Communities
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Academic Excellence
Community
Total
Participants
Targeted
Minority*
Male
Wisconsin
Resident
First
Generation
Pell Grant
Eligible
Academic
Advancement Program
(AAP)
282
95%
45%
73%
29%
43%
Center for Educational
Opportunity (CEO)
440
88%
40%
72%
92%
79%
PEOPLE
325
86%
46%
96%
56%
58%
Posse
157
83%
48%
0%
62%
51%
First Wave
61
77%
43%
20%
59%
54%
Chancellor’s Scholar
Program
203
99%
37%
62%
30%
23%
Powers/Knapp
Program
174
99%
40%
84%
52%
46%
Pathways
79
91%
59%
61%
19%
23%
*Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong).
AllInternational
Undergraduates
10%categories.
students are not counted29,119
within the targeted minority
48%
62%
21%
15%
Impact of PEOPLE and POSSE on Freshmen
Enrollment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Targeted Minority New Freshmen Fall 2011 / Fall 2001
2011 New Freshmen (644)
Non-Residents
(256)
Illinois
(96)
POSSE (9)
Other (87)
Minnesota
(59)
California
(18)
DC/Maryland/VA
(18)
POSSE (8)
Other (10)
POSSE (11)
Other (7)
Other States
(65)
•The first PEOPLE/POSSE
students entered college
in 2002
2001 New Freshmen (389)
WI Residents
(388)
Milwaukee
(105)
PEOPLE (22)
Dane
(68)
PEOPLE (37)
Waukesha
(29)
PEOPLE (2)
Racine
(11)
PEOPLE (2)
Other (83)
Other (31)
Other (27)
Other (9)
Marathon
(19)
Kenosha
(17)
PEOPLE (8)
Other Counties
(139)
PEOPLE (7)
Other (9)
Other (132)
Non-Residents
(143)
WI Residents
(246)
Illinois
(42)
Milwaukee
(76)
Minnesota
(36)
Dane
(54)
California
(9)
Waukesha
(16)
New York (7)
Brown
(12)
Other States
(49)
Outagamie
(10)
Kenosha
(7)
Other Counties
(71)
Undergraduate Progress to Degree
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on
progress to degree measures
including
• Retention and graduation rates
• Time to degree (PERHAPS ADD A
SLIDE ON TTD?)
• Peer comparisons
Retention
and
Graduation
Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year)
Percent Retained
100
All Students: 94%
Targeted Minority
Students: 92%
90
80
2 percentage point First-Year
Retention Rate gap
70
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Percent Graduated
100
Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years)
90
All Students: 83%
80
70
Targeted Minority Students: 69%
60
14 percentage point
Graduation Rate gap
50
40
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Year of Cohort Entrance
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Summary of Retention and Graduation
Rates by Student Group
All New Freshmen
Women
Men
Targeted Minority
Non-Targeted
African American
Native American
Hispanic/Latino/a
South East Asian
Non-Targeted Asian
International
Wisconsin Residents
Non-Residents
First-Generation College Students
Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid
Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants
FIGs
Targeted Minority in FIGs
1-Year Retention Rate
% Difference
93.9
93.7
94.1
91.7
94.2
92.9
89.5
92.3
89.9
95.9
88.7
95.0
92.4
93.1
93.2
91.7
95.0
93.8
-.2
0.2
-2.2
0.3
-1.0
-4.4
-1.6
-4.0
2.0
-5.2
1.1
-1.5
-0.8
-0.7
-2.2
1.1
-0.1
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
6-Year Graduation
% Difference
Rate
82.8
83.4
0.6
81.9
-0.9
68.8
-14.0
84.1
1.3
61.9
-20.9
68.6
-14.2
74.9
-7.9
68.4
-14.4
81.7
-1.1
70.5
-12.3
83.4
0.6
Equity
in
80.7
-2.1
Educational
75.8
-7.0
76.4
-6.4
Outcomes
69.7
-13.1
79.1
-3.7
64.7
-18.1
Summary of Retention and Graduation
Rates by Student Group
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by
Student Group
1-Year Retention
6-Year Graduation
% Difference
% Difference
Rate
Rate
All New Freshmen
Targeted Minority
PEOPLE
POSSE
Chancellor's Scholars
Powers/Knapp Scholars
AAP Participants
First Wave*
CEO*
Pathways*
93.9
91.7
94.8
100
95.9
94.7
94.2
100
-3.5
0.9
6.1
2.0
0.8
0.3
6.1
82.8
68.8
70.7
68.2
92.8in
Equity
83.9
Educational
65.2
Outcomes
-17.1
-12.2
-14.6
10.1
1.1
-17.6
Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort
*Retention/Graduation Rates not yet available for CEO and Pathways; Graduation rates not yet available for First
Wave
Graduation Rates of Targeted Minorities by
Participation in an Academic Excellence Program
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
100
90
All Students
80
70
Targeted Minorities
in an Academic
Equity inExcellence Program
Educational
All Targeted Minorities
Outcomes
Targeted Minorities
not in an Academic
Excellence Program
60
50
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
*Academic Excellence Programs do not include programs coordinated by Schools/Colleges
Retention and Graduation Rates,
by Gender and Race/Ethnicity
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
120
UW-Madison Retention and Graduation Rates
By Gender and Race/Ethnicity
All Students
White
Asian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
Black
American Indian/Alaskan Native
100
80
60
40
20
0
Retained to Second Year (Men)
Retained to Second Year
(Women)
Graduated in Six Years (Men) Graduated in Six Years (Women)
Source: UW-Madison CSRDE Submission; 3-Year Average of Rates from 2003-2005 SL, APIR, September
Retention and Graduation Rates,
among Student Athletes
Graduation Rates Among Student-Athletes
(Average of 2001-2005 Entering Cohorts)
100
N=9
90
70
Student-Athletes
N = 22
N=19,221
N=22,708
80
All Students
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
N=1,250
N=275
N =621
N=385
N=8
N = 674
N=584
60
50
N=68
40
30
20
10
0
Total
Asian
White
Black
Hispanic
International
Source: 2011 NCAA Graduation Rates Report. Data represents those groups with at least 5 student athletes in the four-cohort average. SL, APIR, July 2012
Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005
Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions
10.0
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
5.0
-5.0
-10.0
Arizona
Kansas
SUNY-Buffalo
Nebraska
SUNY-Stony Brook
Colorado
Oregon
Missouri
Iowa State
Purdue
Minnesota
Iowa
Indiana
Rutgers
Ohio State
Weighted Average
Pittsburgh
Michigan State
Georgia Tech
UC Santa Barbara
Case Western
Texas A&M
Washington
Texas
UC Davis
Maryland
Syracuse
UC Irvine
Wisconsin
Illinois
Florida
Penn State
Caltech
Michigan
UCLA
UC Berkeley
Vanderbilt
MIT
Columbia
Cornell
Virginia
Brown
Northwestern
Percentage Point Gap
0.0
-15.0
-20.0
•Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004
cohorts)
•Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts.
Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall
graduation rates.
Bachelor’s Degree Holders
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on
• Participation in the Wisconsin
Experience
• Student’s perception of their
learning experience
Wisconsin Experience
• “Wisconsin Experience” captures four
inquiry-based high-impact practices
and includes:
– Substantial research experiences that
generate knowledge and analytical
skills
– Global and cultural competencies and
engagement
– Leadership and activism opportunities
– Application of knowledge in the “real
world”
• In 2010-11, 88% of bachelor’s degree
recipients participated in at least one
Wisconsin Experience Program
• Targeted minority graduates were
slightly more likely to have completed
at least one Wisconsin Experience
activity.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Graduates with at Least
One Wisconsin Experience Activity
100
80
60
40
20
0
All Graduates
88%
Equity in
Educational
Outcomes
Targeted Minority Graduates
92%
Wisconsin Experience
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• In 2010-11 targeted minority students were slightly more likely to
have completed a Wisconsin Experience activity.
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2010-11
by Targeted Minority Status
Number of Graduates
ALS
BUS
EDU
EGR
HEC
L&S
MPH
NUR
PHM
Total
Non-Targeted
590
563
328
643
274
3,437
46
160
12
6,053
Targeted*
39
21
30
30
37
336
5
16
0
514
Percent of Graduates with at Least One
Wisconsin Experience Activity
Non-Targeted Equity inTargeted*
100
Educational 100
81
Outcomes 81
97
97
86
87
96
100
86
90
100
100
100
100
100
--88
92
Wisconsin Experience
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• Transfer-start graduates participated in Wisconsin Experience
activities at lower rates (80%) than freshman-start graduates (91%).
Bachelor's Degree Recipients in 2010-11
by Type of Entrance to UW-Madison (Freshman or Transfer)
Number of Graduates
Freshman-Start
ALS
BUS
EDU
EGR
HEC
L&S
MPH
NUR
PHM
Total
499
472
255
542
239
2,958
29
102
10
5,106
TransferStart
130
112
103
131
72
815
22
74
2
1,172
Percent of Graduates with at Least One
Wisconsin Experience Activity
TransferFreshman-Start Equity in
EducationalStart
100
Outcomes 100
85
67
98
93
88
82
96
96
90
73
100
100
100
100
100
100
91
80
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation
“How able were/are you to …”
(Targeted Minorities and Non-Targeted Students)
Targeted Minority
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Non-Targeted
Learn on your own
Communicate in a language other
than English
Appreciate the arts such as
literature, music, and fine arts
5
4
Understand cultures and societies
outside of the United States
3
2
Contribute to the welfare of others
Apply skills and knowledge of your
chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate
information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing
evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics
and values
1
Empathize w/ind. differences based
on culture, ethnicity, disability or
sexual orientation
Understand culture and society
within the United States
Speak Effectively
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real
world settings
Work collaboratively in groups
Use computers and electronic
technology
Understand that science is relevant
to everyday life
Lead others effectively
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation
“How able were/are you to …”
(First-Generation and Continuing Generation)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
First Generation
Continuing Generation
Learn on your own
Communicate in a language other than
English
Appreciate the arts such as literature,
music, and fine arts
5
4
Understand cultures and societies
outside of the United States
3
2
Contribute to the welfare of others
Apply skills and knowledge of your
chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate
information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing
evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics and
values
1
Empathize w/ind. differences based on
culture, ethnicity, disability or sexual
orientation
Understand culture and society within
the United States
Speak Effectively
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real
world settings
Work collaboratively in groups
Use computers and electronic
technology
Understand that science is relevant to
everyday life
Lead others effectively
Post-Graduation Plans – at Graduation
“How able were/are you to …”
(Males and Females)
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Female
Male
Learn on your own
Communicate in a language other
than English
Appreciate the arts such as
literature, music, and fine arts
5
4
Understand cultures and societies
outside of the United States
3
2
Contribute to the welfare of others
Apply skills and knowledge of your
chosen major(s)
Find, organize, and evaluate
information from multiple sources
Draw conclusions after weighing
evidence, facts, and ideas
Develop a personal code of ethics
and values
1
Empathize w/ind. differences based
on culture, ethnicity, disability or
sexual orientation
Understand culture and society
within the United States
Speak Effectively
Write Effectively
Apply knowledge and skills in real
world settings
Work collaboratively in groups
Use computers and electronic
technology
Understand that science is relevant
to everyday life
Lead others effectively
Faculty and Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on
• Faculty and Staff by gender and by
race/ethnicity
Indicator 10: Women as a
Percentage of all Faculty
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
2,500
35
31%
•In Fall 2011
31% of
Faculty were
women.
30
2,000
1,500
20
15
1,000
10
500
5
0
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
2012 data available in December 2012
Percent of Faculty
Number of Faculty
25
•25.9% of Full
Professors,
37.7% of
Associate
Professors,
and 40.4% of
Assistant
Professors
were women.
Women as a Percentage of
Faculty and Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional Acad. Other Acad. Staff
Staff
•Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.
•A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)
2012 data available in December 2012
Classified
Employee Race/Ethnicity Data
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Employees self-report their race/ethnicity at the time of hire.
Employees may choose any of the following designations,
and may select two or more races as of 2009:
•
•
•
•
•
•
White
Black
Asian
American Indian
Hispanic/ Latino/a
Hawaiian
Due to challenges arising from the conversion to HRS,
Faculty/Staff Head Counts are not updated from the prior
year.
Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status
35
Minority Faculty
Non-Asian Minority Faculty
30
Percent
25
Madison Plan
20
15
Strategic Hires
SHI - 2
10
5
0
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Year of Hire
2010-11 Data is preliminary.
•Increases in
the percent of
faculty hires
that are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
Disciplinary Division Affiliation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Faculty Disciplinary Divison Affiliation,
by Minority Status and Gender
100%
19
37
80%
60%
40%
20%
33
16
32
11
32
20
Minority
Female
34
28
10
14
29
35
0%
Minority Males
23
27
•
Selecting a divisional
affiliation is a step in
the tenure process.
Social
Faculty are not
Studies
required to identify
their divisional
Physical affiliation at the time
Sciences of hire, but many do.
• Women, especially
Arts and minority women, are
Humanities heavily concentrated
within the Social
Studies Division
Biological
Sciences
Non-Minority Non-Minority
Male
Female
Note: Chart excludes 24 faculty members who have not yet selected a disciplinary division, as they are not required to do so until they
go up for tenure. Data as of October 2010 payroll.
Indicator 12: Minority Faculty
Representation
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty
Headcount
17.6%
18
16.2%
15
13.2%
13.8%
14.3%
14.6%
15.1%
16.9% 16.8%
Two or More
Races, 0.6%
15.4%
Hispanic, 3.5%
American Indian,
0.5%
12
9
Asian, 10.9%
6
3
Black, 2.2%
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
•In 2010: 2,177
total faculty
members
•17.6% (384) of
Faculty are
racial/ethnic
minorities.
•8% increase in
minority faculty
since 1996
Instructional Academic Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of
the Total Headcount
18
15
11.5% 11.9%
12
10.5%
12.1%
11.2%
11.7%
11.8%
9
Two or More
Races,
.4% (8)
•11.8%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
2.6% (57)
American
Indian,
.2% (5)
9.8%
8.9%
8.8%
6
•In 2010, 2,225
Instructional
Academic Staff
members
(263) of
Instructional
Academic Staff
are racial/ethnic
minorities
•2.7% increase in
Asian,
7.1% (159) minority
3
Black,
1.5% (34)
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
instructional
academic staff
since 1996
Non-Instructional Academic Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a
Percent of the Total Headcount
18
15
•In 2010: 5,092
non-instructional
Two or More
Academic Staff
Races,
.5% (26)
12
11.2%
10.9% 11.1%
9.4%
9.6%
11.7%
12%
12%
12.3%
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
1.8% (90)
10.2%
9
American
Indian,
.5% (23)
•12.3% of noninstructional
Academic Staff
are minorities
•3.7% increase in
minority nonAsian,
8.0%
instructional
(406)
academic staff
Black,
since 1996
1.7% (85)
6
3
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified Staff
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total
Headcount
18
15
12
11%
11.3%
11.8%
12%
Two or
More
12.6% 12.9% Races,
0.5% (28)
•12.9% (697) of
Hispanic/ classified staff are
Latino/a,
5.4% (291) minorities
10%
9
8.1%
8.5%
•In 2010: 5,410
Classified Staff
members
9.1%
American
Indian,
.3% (16)
3
•8.7% increase in
minority classified
Asian,
4.3% (233) staff since 1996
0
Black,
2.4% (129)
6
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Executive/Director/Administrators
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Minority Executive/Director/Administrators as a
Percent of the Total Headcount
18
•In 2010: 410
Executive/Director
/Administrators
15
12
10.9%
11.1%
10.2%
10.8%
10.8%
11.2% 11.2%
11.6%
11.2%
9
6
Two or
11.9% More
Races,
.5% (2)
Hispanic/
Latino/a,
4.4% (18)
American
Indian,
.7% (3)
Asian,
1.5% (6)
3
Black,
4.9% (20)
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
•11.9% of
Executive/Director
/Administrators
are racial/ethnic
minorities
•1.4% increase in
minority
Executive/Director
/Administrators
since 1996.
All Employee Groups
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type
20%
18%
16%
14%
12%
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
Total
Faculty
Exec/Dir/
Admin
Instructional
Acad. Staff
Other Acad. Staff
-Around 13% of all employees are minorities
-A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.
2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010
Classified
Non-White Full-Time
Faculty as a Percent of
Total Full-Time Faculty
at AAU Public
Institutions, 2010-11
Average percent non-white
faculty for AAU public
institutions: 28%
UW-Madison: 17%
8 AAU public institutions
have a lower number of
non-white faculty.
Michigan
Pittsburgh
UC-Irvine
Purdue
Maryland
UCLA
Rutgers
Texas A & M
Iowa State
Minnesota
UC-Davis
Arizona
UC-San Diego
Buffalo
Illinois
Missouri
Michigan State
Iowa
Stony Brook
UC-Berkeley
Nebraska
Florida
Texas A & M
UC-Santa Barbara
Ohio State
Kansas
Colorado
North Carolina
Penn State
Washington
Indiana
Oregon
Virginia
Wisconsin
Source: IPEDS Fall HR, 2010-11 (AAUDE data)
*2009-10 Numbers for Colorado.
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Peer
Comparisons
for Faculty
Diversity
N=2,203
N=1.723
N=662
N=819
N=1,028
N=1,097
N=739
N=637
N=624
N=1,223
N=849
N=741
N=705
N=408
N=574
N=785
N=648
N=601
N=381
N=1578
N=411
N=1,036
N=637
N=264
N=804
N=623
N=553*
N=649
N=670
N=736
N=488
N=245
N=374
N=545
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Faculty and Tenure
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on
• Faculty and Tenure
Faculty Tenure Data
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Notes about faculty tenure data:
• Tenure and promotion rates
are calculated at 6 and 9
years after hire, to account
for those who have
extensions on the tenure
clock.
• Data combine hires from
1989-90 to 2004-05 or 199293 to 2004-05. This is
necessary to account for
small numbers of hires.
• Small Ns make tenure rates
subject to large variation.
• Faculty who did not receive
tenure include:
– Those who were denied
tenure
– Those who left the
university for another
position elsewhere
– A few faculty members
still hold probationary
appointments after 9
years.
Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Gender
80
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,
within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
Men
Women
70
72%
67%
60
50
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
54%
40
42%
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty
Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status
80
Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority
Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) Years
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Non-Minority
70
71%
66%
60
50
40
50%
48%
30
20
10
0
6 Years
9 Years
• At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.
Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06
Promotion to Tenure
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• A lower
percentage of
women and men
are promoted to
tenure within the
Social Studies.
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Gender and Division
90
Men
80
70
60
50
Women
81%
N=144
72%
N=547
79% 81%
64%
N=279
N=89
N=93
74% 72%
N=190
66%
N=74
N=29
57%
N=124
40
48%
N=83
30
20
10
0
Total
Physical Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
Biological Sciences
Social Studies
• The largest gap in
tenure rates by
gender is within
the Physical
Sciences division.
Promotion to Tenure
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years,
by Minority Status and Division
90
Minority
80
50
85%
80% 79%
70
60
Non-Minority
66%
N=111
71%
N=580
N=45
73%
75%
N=115
N=40
68%
N=200
N=39
56%
N=156
46%
40
N=154
N=32
30
20
10
0
Total
Physical Sciences
Arts and
Humanities
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
Biological Sciences
• A lower
percentage of
faculty members
are promoted to
tenure within the
Social Studies
division.
Social Studies
• The largest gap in
tenure rates by
minority status is
within the Physical
Sciences and Arts
and Humanities.
Tenure/Promotion Data
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Key findings from tenure/promotion data:
• All groups have lower promotion rates within the Social Studies
division.
• Women, and especially minority women, are more likely to be
within the social studies division.
• For groups with small hiring pools, the effect of one person’s
tenure/non-tenure can affect the percent tenured dramatically.
• Those not receiving tenure includes those who took a position
elsewhere or still have a probationary appointment after 9
years.
Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05
Climate Studies and Surveys
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
This section includes information on
• Climate studies and surveys that include
climate-related questions
Climate Studies
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• UW-Madison participated in UW System Climate
Study (limited to CALS and Office of Student Life);
reports are available in Fall 2012
• Letters & Science Climate Study was conducted in
2009-10; with linkages to STEM, teaching and
learning communities
• NSSE Survey includes many climate-related
questions, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011
• WISELI Studies and Programs; on-going since 2002
Climate Studies
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
UW-Madison Participation in the UW System Climate
Study
• The UW System Climate Study was implemented at the request
of the Board of Regents. Tier I was implemented by several
UWs in 2008-09. Tier II was implemented in 2009-10. Tier III
was implemented in 2010-11
• UW-Madison’s Climate Survey was fielded in February 2011;
responses were anonymous and confidential
• Questionnaire went to all employees and students in CALS and
Division of Student Life
• Reports are now available; see CALS E&D committee poster
• More detail: http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity-climate.htm
National Survey of Student Engagement
(NSSE) 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Seniors who often or very much:
Understand people of other
racial/ethnic backgrounds
56
56
55
All
Non-Minority
Minority
Had serious conversations with
student of a different race or
ethnicity than your own
Included diverse perspectives in
class discussion or assignments
52
49
71
**
57
56
63
67
66
Tried to better understand someone
else's views by imagining how it
looks from their perspective
75
** significantly different
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm
**
NSSE 2011
Selected NSSE 2011 Results
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Percent of Seniors for whom the university emphasizes quite a bit or
very much:
72
72
71
Providing the support you need to
succeed academically
41
41
40
Providing the support you need to
thrive socially
All
Non-minority
Helping you cope with non-academic
responsibilities (work, family, etc)
Encouraging contact among students
from different economic, social, and
racial or ethnic backgrounds
Minority
22
21
25
46
47
44
See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm
Summary of Indicators
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
Indicators present in this report:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Percent enrollment of minority undergraduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority undergraduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority graduate students
Percent enrollment of targeted minority professional students
Percent enrollment of Pell grant recipients
Percent enrollment of first-generation students
Percent enrollment of undergraduates by gender
Percent enrollment of graduate/professional students by gender
Retention/Graduation rates of targeted minorities, Pell grant recipients,
and first-generation students.
Women as a percent of all Faculty
Minority Faculty recruitment
Minority Faculty representation
Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by gender
Percent of Faculty promoted to tenure by minority status
Diversity Update 2012
• Slideshow available at
http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm
• Questions about these slides:
– Sara Lazenby ([email protected])
– Jocelyn Milner ([email protected])