Pre-Award: Budget Development for Grants

Download Report

Transcript Pre-Award: Budget Development for Grants

Pre-Award: Budget
Development for Grants
UCLA School of Nursing
Research Support Team
November 14, 2011
1
Presentation Overview
 Preparing budgets
 Timeline
 Budget categories
 Project roles
 Post-award compliance
 Costing principles
 Managing project expenses
 Effort & progress reports
The Purpose of Budgets
 Demonstrate that PI has considered all costs of
achieving the specific aims and project goals
 Dedicate effort and resources to the project
 Delineate budget categories which must be
adhered to (±25%) once the project is underway
 Describe the scientific necessity of every line item
Specific Aims Drive the Budget
Expenses
Specific Aims
Budget
Timeline for Successful Budgets
 Three months before due date
 Develop Specific Aims
 Meet with Statistics Consultation Group to develop
power analysis and study size, statistician effort (if
applicable), data management plan
 Develop project timeline




What is the project duration?
Who is involved? Does effort fluctuate?
Enrollment timeline?
Analysis timeline?
Timeline for Successful Budgets
(continued)
 Two months before due date
 Identify personnel and performance
sites
 Rough draft of budget and justification
 One month before due date
 Final budget and justification
Timeline for Successful Budgets
(continued)
 Secure special arrangements earlier




Permission to exceed direct cost limitation?
Subawards to other Institutions?
Projects with an international component?
Quotes for equipment, consultants, vendor
agreements?
 Mandatory cost sharing?
 Program income?
Budget Foundations
Justification
Describe necessity
Cost categories
Effort, subcontracts, other costs
Project goals & specific aims
What is feasible/necessary to achieve goals?
Program announcement
Scope? Cost/category limitations? Modular or line item budget?
Call for Proposals
 Consider whether you chose the best
announcement for your scope of research
 Investigator-initiated R01s are scalable; earlystage investigators have a distinct advantage
 Each award type has underlying objectives –
don’t shoehorn your work into an ill-fitting
announcement
 Consider another announcement if expenses
are much greater/smaller than average award
Direct and Indirect costs
 Direct Costs
identified with a particular sponsored project and
directly assigned to that project with a high degree
of accuracy
Examples: scientific/technical personnel effort,
project supplies, subject renumeration,
scientific/technical computers
 Indirect Costs
For common or joint objectives which cannot be
identified specifically with a particular project
Examples: clerical effort, office supplies, general
purpose computers
Direct Cost Categories







Personnel: define effort devoted to the project
Materials and supplies
Travel (PI to study sites, conferences)
Consultants
Equipment
Subawards
Other costs
 Define categories and atypical line items at outset to ensure
allowability when project is underway
 Subject renumeration, TIF, fee remission, animal research,
pharmacy costs, rent, project-specific office-type supplies,
telephones, mailing, copying, machines (<5k), core services
Personnel Determinations




Personnel comprise the largest part of grant budgets
2% escalation per NOT-OD-11-068
All personnel have a project role, duties, and effort
Senior/Key Personnel
 individuals who contribute to the scientific development or
execution of the project in a substantive, measurable way
 Current staff or TBN?
 Actual salary/benefits vs institutional scales
Project roles: Senior/Key
 Multiple PI
 Requires Multiple PI leadership plan
 Co-Investigator
 Requires stated effort/salary
 Faculty Collaborator
 Other Significant Contributor
 Effort is “as needed”
Project roles: Other Personnel
 Use project role, not payroll title
 Payroll title is used to determine associated costs (e.g.
graduate fee remission, postdoctoral minima)
 Consolidate like appointments





Staff Scientist
Postdoctoral Scholar
Research Assistant/Coordinator
Technician
Consultant
Subaward, Vendor or Consultant?
 Subawards are the most common mechanism for
collaboration with another site that brings intellectual
value to the project. They have discrete, fully-formed
budgets authorized by an institutional official.
 Vendor Agreements are established when a site
performs work (assays, sample processing) on a feefor-service basis. No intellectual contribution.
 Consultants are non-UCLA individuals who perform
fee-for-service work at a fixed rate; always requires a
letter of support stating the rate, scope and expertise;
compliant with SB1467 “Public Contracts: Conflict of
Interest.”
Human and Animal Subjects
 Protocol defines timepoints and processes
for subject renumeration which must be
included in the budget
 Approvals must be in place before award
can be issued
 Start work on the protocol before award is
issued to ensure the project is not delayed
or restricted
Financial Characteristics of
Contracts & Grants
 Defined performance period
 Ongoing reporting – progress, effort
and technical reports
 Auditable financial reports
Financial Characteristics of
Contracts & Grants (continued)
 Most research grants are cost-reimbursable
 Specific scope of work
 Unobligated funds returned to agency
 Some contracts (clinical trials, subcontracts for
services) are fixed-rate
 Funds provided for services rendered
 Unobligated funds retained under Policy 913
 Research Office will advise PI regarding the
contract type
Federal Costing Principles
 OMB A-21
 Should I charge this to my grant?
 Allowability, Allocability, Reasonableness,
Consistency
 OMB A-110
 Competitive procurement
 Report submission and records retention
 Prior approval for rebudgeting beyond
established thresholds
Costing Principles (continued)
 Allowability
 Does the agency or announcement prohibit certain
costs?
 Allocability
 Is the expense tied directly and proportionally to the
project?
 Reasonableness
 Are the cost and units reasonable in light of the study
aims and scope of work?
 The Times test: does it pass public scrutiny?
 Consistency
 Are the costs consistent across projects and campus
units?
Managing Project Expenses
 Partnership between PI, requestor,
purchaser and grant analyst to adhere to
principles and facilitate timely correction
 Continuous, dynamic, collaborative review
 Review Process
 Research Office provides ad hoc, real-time
reports on expenditures
 PI defines steps to align expenses with budget
and goals
 Fund manager and requester take action
 Repeat
Managing Project Expenses
(continued)
 By approving a purchase, PI certifies that
the expense is necessary, directly benefits
and is used exclusively for the project
 Use exception processes sparingly or
never
 Out-of-pocket expenses, cost transfers, solesource purchases
 Expenses >90 days old cannot be moved to or
between research projects (NIH GPS 7.5)
Examples of reporting flags
 Categorical variances ± 25%
 Rebudgeting into/out of IDC-exclusion
categories
 Effort variances
 Unallowable/misattributed items
 Carryforward >25% to continuation year
Reporting
 Effort reports
 PI submits reports quarterly
 Prevents overlap and ensures effort is consistent
with stated levels
 Personnel effort must be ≥ pay
 Prior approval required if senior/key effort
decreases >25% from proposed effort
 Three reporting points: Other Support page, All
Personnel Report, Effort Reporting System
Reporting (continued)
 Progress reports
 Submitted to agency annually to secure
continuation funding
 Publications? Results? Project delays?
Changes to project? Enrollment? Effort?
Carryforward over threshold?
 Sloppy reports are frequently returned and will
delay continuation funding
Summary
 Budgets and expenses are a function of
the project goals and specific aims
 Budgets should be as realistic as possible
to minimize post-award changes
 PI and departmental coordinators are
jointly responsible for adhering to costing
principles and managing project expenses
Questions?
 Slides will be available on the web
(click Research, Past Presentations)
 Email [email protected]