Matching Performance and Strategy

Download Report

Transcript Matching Performance and Strategy

SMI: Ten years on

Presentation to the Policy Institute Trinity College Dublin 22 February 2005 Brendan Tuohy Secretary General Department of Communications, Marine & Natural Resources www.dcmnr.gov.ie

[email protected]

Outline of presentation

• • • • •

Introduction Report of the MSc Class 1993/’94

– – –

Review of the Irish Civil Service Theoretical Underpinnings of Reform Evaluation and Findings

Systems architecture, Policy processes, Dynamics of change management Developments over the past ten years Current and future challenges Conclusions

Strategic Management in the Irish Civil Service 1994

In 1994, the class of Trinity College MSc (Strategic Management – Public Sector) presented a dissertation with suggestions about strategic management in the Irish civil service.

The report covered the following areas: -

Strategic Management in the Irish Civil Service 1994

Legislation Government accounting & resource allocation Accountability Relationship between Ministers & Departments Roles of central and line departments and agencies Human resources Industrial relations Strategy setting process Political commitment to change

Theoretical underpinnings of public sector reforms: Public Choice Theory • • •

…..that all human behaviour is driven by self interest….

Minimal role for the State; contraints on politicians, civil servants and agencies; contestable policy advice, separated from implementation; privatisation and use of private contracts whenever possible

Group did not accept a comprehensive market model

Theoretical underpinnings of public sector reforms:Agency Theory • • • •

…based on one party, the principal, entering into a contract with another, the agent, for the performance of certain tasks All politics is seen as a chain of principal/agent relationships (citizen to politician to bureaucrat to service deliverer) – dual role of each, assymetry in information, difficult to measure marginal product of each worker Degree of sophistication for handling social and constitutional relationships?

Group recognised the role this could play

Theoretical underpinnings of public sector reforms: Transaction Cost Analysis • • • •

…maximisation of value is achieved by the reduction of transaction costs… Organisations aim to reduce their transaction costs by substituting hierarchies (control of suppliers/customers) for markets in order to reduce uncertainty & vulnerability to opportunism Useful for evaluating whether to provide the service directly or outsource

Group saw it as partially correct

• • • • • Theoretical underpinnings of public sector reforms:Managerialism & New Public Management

…. One generic set of theories that can be applied to the public and private sector From input to output control, devolution, new accountability measures, reduced bureaucratic structures, private sector practices (contracts, incentives, mission statements) NPM and public service culture?

Task and context of managing in the public service incl. inter-dependence

Group suggested a theoretical pluralism and pragmatism with traditional values

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture

Focus on outputs and outcomes, devolution and accountability

Change should take place from detailed input control to appropriations based on outputs and outcomes, substantial devolution (resources, staff, finance) to line managers with greater accountability

Corporate plans, annual reports linked to strategic framework, performance appraisal

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture

• •

Government accounting

Move to accruals-based accounting (in 5 years) Role of central departments

Reduced control over inputs, public expenditure and human resource management by DoF, with greater devolution to, and expertise within, departments

Assignment of HRM and public sector reform to a specific body – resourced, authority, structures and processes to deliver

New relationship needed between DoT and DoF and clarity of responsibilities for driving collective strategising and change agenda

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture- HRM

• •

Attitudes towards human resource management

Strategic issue, devolution, flexibility, professionalism, performance appraisal Generic principles

Need for political commitment

– – – – –

Need for legislative change Devolution Structures reflecting tasks Framework for HRM Central agency to drive the change

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture- HRM

• • • •

Professional approach to HRM Recruitment and selection

unified vs. uniform Induction training & development

% spend on training, linked to overall strategic objectives Appraisal, motivation & rewards

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture- HRM

• • • • •

Employment contracts Mobility Underperformance Leadership Equal opportunities

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture Policy Processes

• • •

Longer term vision for the country to 2010

With five year strategies Integrated Government strategy for medium term

Strategic plans, Strategic Results Areas, collective strategising Reflecting Government’s vision and SRA’s in Departmental objectives and Key Results Areas for Secretaries General

• • • • • •

Evaluation & Findings: System Architecture Policy Processes

Collective agreement on Departmental objectives incl. budget

Need for system for on-going policy coherence More than one year policy/budget perspective – incl. ABA, programme expenditure Policy quality and contestability

To avoid capture, need for diverse sources of policy advice – NESC, ERSI, C&AG, others Interdependence of policy/executive functions Transparency in processes Programme evaluation

Evaluation & Findings: Dynamics of Change Management

• • • •

Change processes of critical importance

– – – –

Strategic plans with objectives Strategies to achieve the objectives Organisational structures & processes On-going review Theoretical vs. pragmatic approach Public sector reform linked to wider reform Cross-party political commitment is essential including at implementation stage

Evaluation & Findings: Dynamics of Change Management

• • • •

Role of legislation but also learning by experience Commitment of senior officials

Senior Executive Service Institutional focus and support for change

Specific body to drive the change with authority, resources and ability to deliver

Joint body with external input to oversee change Communication with public servants

Progress since 1994….

Since 1994, there has been quite an amount of progress across a range of areas.

The following summarises some of the key developments: -

SMI: some key developments

• • • • • •

Launch of SMI (1994) First Statements of Strategy (1995) Delivering Better Government (1996)

Coordinating Group of Secretaries

Working Groups established (6) Quality Customer Service (1997) SMI Implementation Group (1997) Review of Public Expenditure (1997)

SMI: some key developments

• • • • • •

Public Service Management Act, 1997

– – –

assignment of responsibilities (1998) first Statements of Strategy under PSMA (1998) business plans produced by Departments (1998) Freedom of Information Act, 1997 Privilege and Compellability of Witnesses Act, 1997 Reports of SMI Implementation Group Partnership structures agreed Proposals for multi-annual budgets and administrative budgets approved

SMI: some key developments

• • • • • • • •

Delivering Quality Public Service (1999) Enlarged Implementation Group Regulatory reform measures Change management fund Annual reports on implementation of modernisation programme published PMDS launched (2000) REACH CS Code of Standards & Behaviour

SMI: some key developments

• • • • • • • • •

New Statements of Strategy (2001) Customer Action Plans, 2001-2004 Regulatory reform group formed Independent evaluation of SMI eStrategy Statements by Departments Benchmarking Report (2002) and CSPVG CS Quality Assurance Group Report PSM Recruitment & Appointments Act, 2004 CS Regulation Bill, 2004

Elements of SMI

• • •

Programmes and initiatives

SMI, DBG, QCSI, PER, RIA Processes

SoS, business planning, Annual Reports, PMDS, Partnership, ABA, MAB, Change Management Fund, eStrategy, Benchmarking, Quality Assurance Legal and regulatory environment

– – –

PSMA, FOIA, P&CWA, PSR&AB, Institutional arrangements Coordinating Group, Implementation Group, A/Secs’ Groups, Cabinet Committees, REACH, (SES), New agencies and regulators

Today’s environment

• • •

But the external environment has moved on since 1994. Today’s environment is now different in many aspects.

Issues such as: Benchmarking, decentralisation, migration, public expectations, social challenges, non-traded sector performance….

Increased pace of change, international challenges and competition, alignment of strategies, developing capacity…..

Future external environment

• • • •

New world order – UN, WTO, EU Macroeconomic developments and context

Domestic and international Demographic trends & labour market Globalisation

Central & eastern Europe and Asia

Future external environment

• • • •

Competitiveness, competitive advantage, productivity

Moving up the value chain - Knowledge Society

– –

Importance of human and social capital Lifelong learning & citizen participation

Research and development Innovation – including institutional innovation Social inclusion and cohesion Spatial and environmental developments

Future changes needed

While we have done fairly well economically over the past decade, how well have we, as a society, addressed the social issues? Are we properly structured to do so?

How prepared is the civil and public service for the future? What further changes are needed and what opportunities are there for change?

Suggested changes in HRM

• • • •

Recruitment

Open recruitment at all levels

4 AP’s ?

Greater movement between business, academia and public service Equality and family-friendly work practices Benchmarking of pay and conditions

Full flexibilities PMDS – linked to performance reward, promotion, resource planning, available to MC

Suggested changes in HRM

• • • •

Training, development & lifelong learning

developing organisational capability

– – –

multi-skilled staff – research, synthesise to 10% salary costs for training/education experts – HR,IT, policy analysis, research

Remedial, readiness and transformational Maximum devolution of HR function Support for the ‘reformers’ and risk takers Embedding PMDS linked to business plans and Statements of Strategy with quarterly reports

TLAC successful candidates

500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 No.Appls.

Internal External Ratio No of Applics Intern Success

459 124 481 232 123 305 217 249 111 107 13 4 16 10 8 18 11 19 6 10

Extern Success

2 1 0 6 2 5 5 2 4 4

TLAC successful candidates

25 20 15 10 5 0 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 Internal External Ratio Ratio: Avg. no. of applicants per post

Changes in organisational structures & processes

• • •

Establishing a Senior Executive Service to develop the leaders of the future particularly in a decentralised context Broaden the base to include the public service Ensure an agreed vision of the future and focus on developing leadership and organisational capacity

Changes in organisational structures & processes

• • •

Importance of information

for the business functions

measurement of performance outputs and outcomes at organisational level

for openness, transparency and the operation of democracy

for meaningful robust policy evaluation and foresight

Chief Information Officers Leveraging information systems business processes eGovernment – knowledge networks & structure, collaboration, sharing, eCabinet, services delivery

Changes in organisational structures & processes

• • • •

Financial Management

– –

multi annual budgets and financial envelopes focus on outputs and outcomes in budgets and annual reports

– – –

full costs of activities management information framework environmental and sustainability auditing Budgets linked to SoS, Business Plans Devolution to line departments and managers

with commensurate responsibility and accountability Balanced scorecard – updated report annually

Whole of Government balanced scorecard Quality of Life

Standard of living (vs. poverty)

Quality of social capital

Quality of family life

Multi-cultural harmony

Equality and fairness

Care of children

Quality of housing

Participation in democracy

Participation in leisure, cultural life

Physical and mental health

Literacy and education

Access to information

Integrity in public life National Economic Performance

GDP/GNP

Employment level

National debt

Business Buoyancy Profitability

Productivity

Rate of innovation

Industry structure etc.

Quality of Infrastructure

Roads

Education facilities

Health care

Environemnt, water and waste treatment

Zoned land

Theatres, leisure centres, urban parks etc.

From Eddie Molloy (CORI, 2000)

Changes in organisational structures & processes

Greater alignment to work of Oireachtas

Estimates, strategy committees and PAC

resources and accountability (parliamentary, EU and wider public)

Re-clarifying the relationship between Ministers and senior civil servants

Approach to change management

• • • • • •

Incremental or radical?

Pace and degree of change Local or whole of Government?

Top down vs. bottom up?

Uniform or unified?

Specific budgets and resources or within existing resources?

New Public Management vs. Active moderniser?

Conclusions

• • •

Public service is more effective today SMI has been instrumental in effecting change Need to urgently deliver major changes in

financial management

information systems

organisational change

human resource management incl. SES

Conclusions

More concentration needed on

– – – – –

leadership including role of the centre strategic thinking policy coherence – economic and social interface structural reform delivering effective devolved Government in a decentralised context

– – –

the future role of the State interaction with the political process parallel reform of the parliamentary system

Conclusions

• • •

NESC strategy (autumn 2005) will provide an opportunity for agreement on the key issues National partnership process will provide an opportunity for major changes in delivering a public service for the future which:

is much more flexible, proactive, strategic and focussed on delivery across agencies & departments

places greater emphasis on the role of the economic actors in delivering the social agenda and

the social actors in delivering the economic agenda Whole of Government scorecard will track progress annually

Contact details

Department of Communications, Marine and Natural Resources Main website - www.dcmnr.gov.ie

Brendan Tuohy [email protected]