Venous Thromboembolism: Medical Consults
Download
Report
Transcript Venous Thromboembolism: Medical Consults
Venous Thromboembolism:
Diagnosis and Managament
R. Cavalcanti and B. Laluck
April, 2007
Learning objectives
• Review factors affecting risk of VTE
• Understand an approach to diagnosis of
VTE
• Review aspects of treatment of VTE
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
Cases
Diagnostic algorithm
Prophylaxis
Type and duration of anticoagulation
IVC filters
Case 1
• 68F Post op day #2 after R TKR
• Referred for fever + SOB
• PMHx: HTN, osteoporosis, 40pyr
smoker
• Meds: Alendronate, Atenolol/HCTZ,
Dalteparin 5000, Moxifloxacin
• Over 2 d has needed increasing O2
Case 1 (cont)
• OE:
HR110 RR24 BP90/50
SPO2 90% on 50%FM T 38.5
CVS N hs; JVP 4-5 cm ASA
Chest: Fine crackles over bases, long expiratory time
• Inv:
CBC: 98
11.7 318
Lytes 138 104 3.5 26
ABG: 7.43 34 65 23 on FiO2 0.5
CT Angio Chest
• No PE
• Diffuse interstitial changes consistent with
pulmonary edema
• Left lower lobe opacity
Case 2
• 23 F presents with shortness of breath
• OCP, smoker and recently flew in from
Berlin
• Now requires 2L O2 NP for SpO2 96%
Case 3
• 83 F presenting with BRBPR
C-Scope: large rectal tumour
Unilateral R leg swelling
• Doppler US LE: Positive for DVT
• Management?
Tests for VTE
•
•
•
•
•
•
Wells score:
D-dimers:
Venous Doppler US
CT Angio Chest
VQ scan
Conventional pulmonary angiography
Estimating risk
Risk of DVT
Wells Prediction Rule for Diagnosing Deep Venous Thrombosis:
Clinical Evaluation Table for Predicting Pretest Probability of Deep
Vein Thrombosis
Clinical Characteristic
Score
Active cancer (treatment ongoing, within previous 6 months, or palliative)
Paralysis, paresis, or recent plaster immobilization of the lower extremities
Recently bedridden >3 days or major surgery within 12 weeks requiring
general or regional anesthesia
Localized tenderness along the distribution of the deep venous system
Entire leg swollen
Calf swelling 3 cm larger than asymptomatic side (10 cm below tibial tuberosity)
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg
Collateral superficial veins (nonvaricose)
Alternative diagnosis at least as likely as deep venous thrombosis
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
–2
Note: Clinical probability: low 0; intermediate 1–2; high 3. In patients with symptoms in
both legs, the more symptomatic leg is used.
Reprinted from The Lancet, Vol 350, Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value
of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management, pp
1795–1798, Copyright 2002, with permission from Elsevier.
Adapted from Wells, Thromb Hemost 2000
Diagnostic approach
Diagnostic approach
• Assess risk
• D-dimer
• Lung Imaging
CT angiography of Chest
VQ Scan
• Leg imaging
CT venography
Venous doppler US
First step
• Assess risk
Wells prediction rule
Validated in number of studies (17 DVT / 3 PE)
Induvidual features low predictive value
Works best for younger patients without
comorbitidies or a history of VTE
Clinical judgement should be used in older patients
with co-morbidities
D-dimer
• Usefulness depends on number factors
Sensitivity (must be high or 3rd generation)
Other reason for +
Any trauma, surgery enough to get blood to clot will
elevate D-dimer
Probability of disease
• When used alone
In patient’s with comorbidity, older age, longer
duration of symptoms in low to moderate risk
Only 40 – 50% specificities
Wells + D-dimer
• If you have a patient with low pretest probability
of DVT / PE and a HIGH – sensitivity D-dimer is
negative
0.5% incidence of in 3 months of DVT
No need for further imaging
• If you have a patient with mod to high pretest
probability of DVT / PE and a HIGH – sensitivity
D-dimer is negative
3.5% and 21.4% DVT risk within 3 months
Further imaging needed
Leg Ultrasound performance depends
on symptoms
• NO SYMPTOMS
• Proximal DVT
positive test rules in
negative test
DOESN’T rule-out
sensitivity 60%
specificity 90-95%
• SYMPTOMS
PRESENT
• Proximal DVT
positive test rules in
negative test rules out
sensitivity 90-95%
specificity 95%
• Distal DVT
positive test rules in
negative test DOESN’T
rule out
sensitivity 60%;
specificity 90-95%
PIOPED II
• CT Angio chest
Sn 83%
Sp 96%
• CT Angio chest + CT Venography
Sn 90%
Sp 95%
Prevalence of PE by CT Angio
Results and Wells Score
High
Interm. Low
Total
CT +
99%
89%
38%
86%
CT -
39%
7%
0.5%
5%
PIOPED II NEJM 06
Controversy
• Are the next generation multidetector CTs better
• To what level does the study see clots
(segmental, subsegmental?)
• What should come first
Leg doppler vs CTA?
• In a patient with a high pretest probability for PE
Is CTA sufficiently sensitive?
VTE Prophylaxis
Treating medical and surgical
patients at high risk of developing
DVT
VTE Prophylaxis - non
pharmacological
• Mobilization
If possible
• Graduated compression stockings (GCS)
TEDS
• Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)
For surgical patients
VTE Prophylaxis - Rx
• Low dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH)
5000 u sc q12h or q8h
• Low molecular weight heparin intermediate dose
(LMWH)
Enoxaparin 30 mg bid or 40 mg od
Dalteparin 5000 u od
• Fondaparinux 2.5 mg sc od
VTE Treatment
VTE Treatment - Rx
• High dose unfractionated heparin (UFH)
IV Titrated drip
• Low molecular weight heparin treatment dose (LMWH)
Enoxaparin
Tinzaparin
Dalteparin and others
• Fondaparinux
• Coumadin (INR 2 – 3)
With at least 4-5 days of heparin
• Direct thrombin inhibitors
For patients with HIT (done via hematology)
VTE Treatment
• Heparin vs LMWH
Safety and efficacy
Multiple studies
LMWH superior for treatment
• Less mortality and major bleeding
• Magnitude not very large
LMWH at least as effective as UFH
VTE Treatment
• Outpatient vs Inpatient Treatment
Number of studies
Likely that LMWH at home is as least as safe
as inpatient treatment for DVT
In appropriately chosen patients with required
supports in place
VTE Treatment duration
• If OR is only RF - reversible
Recommeded duration 3 months
• If ongoing RF
At least 6 months
• For ongoing malignancy
LMWH (CLOT trial)
IVC Filters
• Limited evidence: no RCTs
• Retrievable filters are available
Can be removed up to 6 weeks
Recent case series: 91% retrievable
Risk of migration
• Can be adjunctives in patients with
existing recent DVT in which
anticoagulation contraindicated