Transcript THE EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY SPACES
THE EVOLUTION OF TECHNOLOGY SPACES
Dave McGrath Director Business Development Construction, Facilities and Engineering Division
"The fatal conceit with managers is that tomorrow will look like today..."
Peter Druker © 2004 APC corporation.
Are we designing towards, or away from future problems?
© 2004 APC corporation.
More…
© 2004 APC corporation.
More…
© 2004 APC corporation.
High Density – today’s problem High Density Requirements
Increasing power Increasing need for cooling Increasing runtime Increase need for redundancy
Blade Servers
© 2004 APC corporation.
High-density is going to bite your customer
It’s not if, it’s when!
© 2004 APC corporation.
“Catch 22” for IT managers None of the above Poor location Excessive facility cost Insufficient raised floor Insufficient power Excessive heat 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
What is the greatest facility problem with your primary data center?
(Source: Gartner, 2006)
© 2004 APC corporation.
© 2004 APC corporation.
IT Facilities
How will it be solved
With a Clear and Concise language on Scalable, Modular datacenter design.
Rack, Power, and Cooling Infrastructure will be designed using pre-engineered modular components and configuration tools
© 2004 APC corporation.
Traditional Design Unable to Respond adequately to today’s growing power and heat loads
© 2004 APC corporation.
We must re-tool the design process
Power Cooling Service Engineering Space Improvements Racks
Thinking about Data Centers “by the square foot”
is obsolete
© 2004 APC corporation.
Blade Server Power Draw Watts per Chassis by Blade Model
25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 733 W/SF 500 W/SF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
# of Chassis (Max to a 42U Rack)
12 13 14 IBM HP Dell Sun © 2004 APC corporation.
Density Power & Cooling Challenges 18kW 18 kW POWER 3 kW 18 kW COOLING 3 kW 3 kW 30-amp circuits 208 / 230 V 3 kW 3 kW 3 kW
( Assume dual-corded blade chassis)
© 2004 APC corporation.
The Cooling Challenge 18kW 3 kW 3 kW 3 kW 2500 cfm 3 kW 3 kW 3 kW
© 2004 APC corporation.
2500 cfm
Limits of Floor Tile Cooling
500-700 cfm
Additionally requires grate-type tiles 12
Perf tile Grate tile Typical Capability With Effort Extreme Impractical
10 Rack Power (kW) 8 6 that can be tile with this airflow 4 2 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 [47.2] [94.4] [141.6] [188.8] [236.0] [283.2] [330.4] [377.6] [424.8] [471.9]
© 2004 APC corporation.
Traditional Configuration
© 2004 APC corporation.
Room-oriented cooling airflow patterns
© 2004 APC corporation.
In Row Configuration (Coupled Cooling)
© 2004 APC corporation.
Row-oriented cooling airflow patterns Predictable Performance
© 2004 APC corporation.
Alternative cooling architectures Method Traditional room oriented raised floor cooling In-row In-row with hot aisle containment Application Low density Very flexible Medium density General use Very high density Targeted zones Assured redundancy Rack-coupled Density 1-5kW per rack 3-15kW per rack 10-25kW per rack Very high density specific racks Mix of very high and low density 20-45kW per rack
© 2004 APC corporation.
Why is it so critical to address during design?
Cooling problem Efficiency problem Rate of change problem © 2004 APC corporation.
In-row rack-coupled architecture
“Coupled” to adjacent IT racks
Up to 40kW rating today with efficient designs
Higher availability via N+1 standards Predictable performance Mix into existing legacy data center
InfraStruXure Cooling Distribution Unit
© 2004 APC corporation.
IDC: Time to push ‘reboot’ button…
© 2004 APC corporation.
“…it appears that it will be cheaper to build new datacenters to accommodate blades than to attempt to retrofit the existing ones…”
It is getting to the CEO’s plate…
“Power will be #1 design issue for many IT shops over next two to three years…” “RFG predicts that power and cooling costs will increase to more than one-third of the total IT budget. This will
elevate this cost element into a priority position for CFOs
, facilities managers, and IT executives.” “
Coordination
with facilities management is crucial to successful power and cooling planning” -Robert Frances Group, January 06 © 2004 APC corporation.
We must all pay close attention…
© 2004 APC corporation.
Density is driving an unprecedented collision between IT, Facilities and vendors
We have a shared problem The traditional solutions won’t work, and the typical solution providers are either focused on making the problem worse or hoping it goes away
The shared problem is getting bigger and hairier by the minute
We need a shared language to promote learning Learning offers an opportunity for standardization, leading to lower costs, higher availability, and much greater productivity
Everyone has to decide if they are part of the problem or part of the solution
© 2004 APC corporation.
Network-Critical Physical Infrastructure (NCPI) Essential foundation of reliability
© 2004 APC corporation.
Rack Power
Implement designs with a completely scalable and modular approach at the rack level
Rack Power delivery must be scalable in response to density variation
Rack Power must be redundant (UPS N+1 or greater) Rack Power design must be completely flexible in configuration and voltage
The Rack is the Basic Building Block of any IT deployment.
© 2004 APC corporation.
Design the rack accordingly Rack Configuration:
Select rack IT actual loads reflected in design
Simulate 3 rd equipment party
Model power Model airflow
© 2004 APC corporation.
Scale & Manage Power at the Rack
1.4 kW - 12.5 kW, 15A - 50A, Horizontal or Vertical Mount
Control individual outlets
Turn unused outlets off
Recycle power to locked-up equipment
Monitor current
Avoid overloads Balance loads across phases
Sequence power-on
Avoid in-rush current
Switched Rack PDU
© 2004 APC corporation.
Power high density racks
Multi-branch units supports 12.5kW
Fit up to 4 units in one rack
42 outlets on one strip
Manage at the Row / Room
© 2004 APC corporation.
Rack Cooling
Eliminate the unpredictable nature of traditional cooling architectures in dense environments
Closely couple the IT load with cooling capacity
Increase Capacity per rack Increase Cooling Efficiency
Model the cooling requirements from day 1 and be prepared to adapt to change
Power In
equals
Heat Out
design in accordance with the dynamic nature of the load
© 2004 APC corporation.
CFD model of in-row with Hot Aisle Containment : Modeling failure of one CRAC
© 2004 APC corporation.
Rack-by-rack airflow analysis for various failure conditions
in real time during design
© 2004 APC corporation.
Integrate it all into Your Management Architecture Building Management System Integration
Manage critical building infrastructure from single system via modbus RTU
Enterprise Management System Integration
Forward SNMP traps to your preferred management system
Network Devices Network Manager Storage Manager Building Management System Enterprise Management System Server Manager Building Power Comfort Air Building Environment InfraStruXure® Manager Manage Network Critical Physical Infrastructure
Similar to server, storage and networking equipment.
Scalability
Manage up to 1000 APC networked devices
Cooling Devices Storage Devices Rack Devices Power Devices Server Devices
© 2004 APC corporation.
Summary “Man must sit in chair for very long time before roast duck fly in mouth…” Chinese Proverb Take Action …understand the Rack Level challenges and design accordingly!
© 2004 APC corporation.
© 2004 APC corporation.
For further information on these topics consult APC white papers at www.apc.com
#130 The Advantage of Row and Rack-Oriented Cooling
Architectures for Data Centers #131 Improved Chilled Water Piping Distribution Methodology for Data Centers
#125 Strategies for Deploying Blade Servers in Existing Data Centers #43 Dynamic Power Variations in Data Centers and Network Rooms
© 2004 APC corporation.