Transcript Document
PROPERTIES OF NONTHERMAL CAPACITIVELY
COUPLED PLASMAS GENERATED IN NARROW
QUARTZ TUBES FOR SYNTHESIS OF SILICON
NANOPARTICLES*
Sang-Heon Songa), Romain Le Picardb), Steven L. Girshickb),
Uwe R. Kortshagenb), and Mark J. Kushnera)
a)University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
[email protected], [email protected]
b)University
of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
40th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)
San Francisco, USA, June16-21, 2013
*
Work supported by National Science Foundation and DOE Plasma Science Center.
AGENDA
Plasma nanoparticle synthesis
Description of the model
Typical Ar/SiH4 plasma properties
Nanoparticle density
Power
Pressure
Flow rate
SiH4 fraction
Concluding remarks
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NANOCRYSTALS (QUANTUM DOT)
Size-dependent photoluminescence from Si nanocrystals
Si nanocrystals fluoresce
with properties akin to
direct band-gap
semiconductors. The
emission wavelength is a
function of the size of the
nanocrystal.
Applications
Photovoltaic device
Light emitting device
Quantum computing
Biological imaging
Ref: I. L. Medintz et al., Nature Material 4, 435 (2005).
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
PLASMA-SYNTHESIZED
SILICON NANOCRYSTALS
Gas-phase plasma processes for Si nanocrystal production are environmentally
friendly without producing liquid effluents.
The silicon nanoparticles (SiNP) are formed
by clustering of the dissociation products of
SiH4 passing through the plasma zone.
Exothermic reactions of H-atoms on the
surface of nanoparticles likely produce
temperatures sufficient to anneal
amorphous particles to crystals.
The quality of silicon nanocrystal (SiNC) can
be controlled by injecting additional gases
downstream of the primary plasma.
Ref: R. J. Anthony et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 21,
4042 (2011).
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
HYBRID PLASMA EQUIPMENT MODEL (HPEM)
Fluid Kinetics Module:
Heavy particles – Continuity, momentum, and
energy equations
Electron – Continuity and energy equations
Poisson’s equation
Electron Monte-Carlo Module (eMCS):
Secondary electron emission
HPEM is parallelized using OpenMP
Parallel successive over relaxation (SOR) utilized
red-black scheme for electron energy, gas
temperature, and Poisson’s equations.
eMCS optimized for parallel execution
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
GLOBAL CHEMISTRY MODEL (GLOCHE)
Time Dependent
Kinetics
Gas Phase Reaction
Mechanism
Plug flow reactor model
Reaction mechanism is compatible with HPEM.
Time dependent gas phase reaction kinetics are calculated using
predictor-corrector scheme (Adams-Bashforth-Moulton method).
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
REACTOR GEOMETRY: CCP TUBE
2D, cylindrically symmetric
Tube radius = 0.3 cm
Electrode separation = 2.2 cm
Operating conditions
Ar/SiH4 = 95/5 (range 99/1 – 90/10)
Pressure = 2 Torr (range 0.5 – 4 Torr)
Flow rate = 50 sccm (range 10 – 100 sccm)
Frequency = 25 MHz
Power = 1 W (range 1 – 10 W)
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NUCLEATION REACTIONS BY NEUTRALS
84 species are included in the mechanism
Medium sized silicon hydride = 63 species
Reaction hierarchy up to Si10H20. Higher silanes are “particles”
Nucleation reactions with neutrals
28 reactions: Silyl formation by H abstraction.
SinH2m + H → SinH2m-1 + H2
k =2.44×10–16T1.9exp(–2190/T) cm3/s
106 reactions for making higher silanes
SinH2m-1 + SijH2k-1 → Sin+jH2m+2k-2
k = 3.32 × 10−9 cm3/s
321 reactions for making particle (n + j ≥ 11)
SinH2m-1 + SijH2k-1 → particle
Ref: U. V. Bhandarkar et al., J. Phys. D: Appl.
Phys. 33, 2731 (2000)
ICOPS_2013
k = 2.66 × 10-11Tg0.5 cm3/s
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
[e]
Te
Tgas
SiH4
PLASMA DENSITY and
TEMPERATURES
Highest quality nano-crystals
are produced with only a few W
of power deposition.
Moderate gas heating to 364 K
with 90% depletion of SiH4
indicates electron impact
dominates dissociation.
Gas heating is dominantly by
Franck-Condon processes.
Electron density (4 x 1010 cm-3)
is moderated by high rates of
diffusion loss but low rates of
attachment.
1 W, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
MIN
MAX
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
SiH3
SiH3–
H
SiH2
SiNP
SILICON
HYDRIDES
Exothermic recombination
of H atoms on nanocrystals is believed to be
important in annealing.
Negative ions are confined
at the peak of the time
average plasma potential at
the center of the tube.
Silicon nanoparticles
(SiNP) grow by successive
radical addition, and so
accumulate downstream.
1 W, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50
sccm
MIN
ICOPS_2013
MAX
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
DENSITIES vs POWER
In spite of low rates of
attachment,
confinement of
negative ions produces
largely electronegative
plasmas.
Depletion of SiH4 and
consumption of
radicals to form
nanoparticles limits
increase of SiHx with
power.
HPEM, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NANO PARTICLE vs POWER
More silyl radicals are
produced by hydrogen
abstraction reaction
due to increased
density of hydrogen
radicals at higher
power.
As a result, silyl
species are more likely
to find higher silyl
partners to form
nanoparticles and
saturated silanes.
GLOCHE, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
DENSITIES vs PRESSURE
Electron density
decreases with
increasing pressure
due more efficient
power deposition.
Due to longer
residence time at
higher pressure there
is more accumulation
of dissociation
products.
HPEM, 1 W, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NANO PARTICLE vs PRESSURE
Due to increased
residence time at
higher pressure silyl
density increases but
saturates by forming
nanoparticles.
Since nanoparticle
particle formation is
irreversible at low
temperature, the
density of particles
increases in this
pressure range,
provided sufficient
silyl radicals.
GLOCHE, 4 W, Ar/SiH4=95/5, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
DENSITIES vs FLOW RATE
SiH4 dissociation
fraction decreases
with increasing flow
rate at constant
power.
Electron density
decreases due to
larger average density
of SiH4.
H, SiH3, and SiH3–
increase but saturate
due to the shorter
residence time at
higher flow rate.
HPEM, 1 W, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NANO PARTICLE vs FLOW RATE
Due to smaller
electron density and
shorter residence
time at higher flow
rate, the production
of silyl radicals
capable of forming
nanoparticles is
limited.
GLOCHE, 4 W, 2 Torr, Ar/SiH4=95/5
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
DENSITIES vs SiH4 FRACTION
Plasma density
decreases with SiH4
fraction due to
electronegativity,
while SiH3 and SiH3–
increase due to larger
average density of
SiH4.
H increases but
quickly saturates due
to the smaller
electron density at
higher fraction of
SiH4.
HPEM, 1 W, 2 Torr, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
NANO PARTICLE vs SIH4 FRACTION
The nanoparticle
density increases by
increasing SiH4
fraction due to the
increasing density of
silyl species provided
by electron impact
and H abstraction.
Due to the smaller
electron density at
higher SiH4 fraction
the nanoparticle
density decreases
with SiH4 fraction.
GLOCHE, 4 W, 2 Torr, 50 sccm
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
As power increases, the electron density increases and
nanoparticle density increases due to more silyl species produced
by H radicals.
As pressure increases, the electron density decreases but the
nanoparticle density increases due to the increased concentration
and residence time of H, SiH3, and SiH3–
As flow rate increases, the electron density decreases and the
nanoparticle density decreases due to the reduced residence time.
As SiH4 fraction increases, the electron density decreases but the
nanoparticle density is maximized at optimum fraction of SiH4 due
to trade off between electron and silyl production from SiH4.
ICOPS_2013
University of Michigan
Institute for Plasma Science & Engr.