Transcript CONTEXT FOR ORGANIZATION THEORY
CONTEXT FOR ORGANIZATION THEORY
PUA 713 DR. SPRINGER FALL 2005
INSIDE FORCES ON A PUBLIC AGENCY MANAGER
MORALE EMPLOYEE/UNION DEMANDS BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
HEAD OR MANAGER
HEAD OR MANAGER PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS.
DEMANDS OF UNITS NEED TO MAINTAIN OR INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & IT’S ADMINISTRATION
WHAT IS PUBLIC POLICY –
Public Policymaking in a Republic
–
Executive Powers
•
The Restricted View
–
Wm. Taft and Strict Constructionism
•
The Prerogative Theory
–
John Locke and Executive Privilege
•
The Stewardship Theory
–
T. Roosevelt and Actions in the Public Interest
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & ITS ADMINISTRATION
THE POLICY MAKING PROGRESS
–
Agenda Setting
• •
Process of ideas bubbling up for consideration Anthony Downs Phase – Preproblem, Alarmed Discovery, Recognition, Decline of Public Interest, Post Problem
– –
Decision Making
• •
Rational Intelligence, Recommending, Prescribing, Invoking, Application, Appraisal, and Terminating Phases Implementation – small decisions at the margin
•
Seven Reasons for Incrementalism
– –
Evaluation Feedback
RATIONAL ACCORDING TO HERMAN SIMON 1958
MAKING OPTIMAL CHOICES IN HIGHLY SPECIFIED ENVIRONMENT
– IDENTIFYING ALTERNATIVES A GIVEN – CONSEQUENCES FOR EACH • CERTAINTY, RISK, AND UNCERTAINTY – DECISIONMAKER CAN RANK CHOICES BASED UPON CONSEQUENCES – GOOD SELECTION POSSIBLE – MINIMAX RISK=MAXIMUM BENEFIT AND MINIMUM CONSEQUENCE
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & ITS ADMINISTRATION
POWER--THE EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE –
Pluralism
•
Assuming the shifting of power within a democracy
–
Group Theory
•
Madison – Federalist Paper #10
•
Interest Groups Will Be Heard and Can Be Managed
– –
Organizational Goals Internal Power Relationships
THE POLITICAL & CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY & ITS ADMINISTRATION
THE CULTURES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION –
The Outside Cultural Environment
–
The Inside Cultural Environment
–
Professional Socialization
–
Symbolic Management
THE EVOLUTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT THEORY
From Moses Meets a Management Consultant to New Public Management
A CHRONOLOGY
400 B.C. SOCRATES – MGT IS AN ART UNTO ITSELF 360 B.C. ARISTOTLE – CULTURAL CONTEXT 1776 ADAM SMITH – OPTIMAL ORGANIZATION OF PIN FACTOR 1813 ROBERT OWEN – EMPLOYEES ARE VITAL MACHINES
1910 LOUIS BRANDEIS AND FREDERICK TAYLOR - SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT 1922 MAX WEBER –BUREAUCRACY AS A STRUCTURE
A CHRONOLOGY
1937 GULICK’S POSDCORB 1940 MERTON AND THE DYSFUNCTIONS OF BUREAUCRACY 1946 SIMON ATTACKS THE PRINCIPLES APPROACH 1948 WALDO ATTACKS THE GOSPEL OF EFFICIENCY 1949 SELNICK AND TVA’S COOPTATION 1954 DRUCKER AND MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES 1957 ARGYRIS AND THE CONFLICT BETWEEN PERSONALITY AND THE ORGANIZATION
A CHRONOLOGY
1961 THOMPSON FINDS DYSFUNCTION DUE TO ABILITY VS AUTHORITY 1962 PRESTHUS’ UPWARDMOBILES, INDIFFERENTS AND AMBIVALENTS 1964 AN ORGANIZATION THAT CANNOT LEARN FROM ERRORS CROZIER – BUREAUCRACY AS 1966 BENNIS PROCLAIMS DEATH TO BUREAUCRATIC INSTITUTIONS 1968 HERZBERG – MOTIVATORS, SATISFIERS AND HYGIENE FACTORS 1972 CLEVELAND – CONTINUOUS IMPROVISATION IS REQUIRED 1976 GAMESMAN MACCOBY AND THE 1981 PFEFFER – POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS
A CHRONOLOGY
1983 ROSABETH MOSS KANTER AND THE CHANGEMASTER 1988 ZUBOFF AND THE AGE OF THE SMART MACHINE 1990 ARTIFACTS GAGLIARDI AND SYMBOLS AND 1992 OSBORNE AND GAEBLER RE INVENT GOVERNMENT 1997 BEYOND VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS AND 2000 SNOOK ANALYZES SYSTEMIC BREAKDOWN IN FRIENDLY FIRE 2002 PERROW AND ORGANIZING AMERICA: WEALTH, POWER AND ORIGINS OF CORPORATE CAPITALISM
MOSES CREATES FIRST BUREAUCRACY
JETHRO – INSTEAD OF COUNSELING EVERYONE – TEACHING ORDINANCES AND LAWS SO THEY FIND THEIR OWN WAY USING BASIC PRINCIPLES HAVING TO DEAL WITH ONLY THE HARD CHOICES
EIGHT DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATION
WEBER –
OBEY ORDERS
WALDO –
STRUCTURE OF INTER-RELATIONS
BARNARD –
CONSCIOUSLY COORDINATED ACTIVITIES
SELZNICK –
STRUCTURAL EXPRESSION OF RATIONAL ACTION
EIGHT DEFINITIONS OF ORGANIZATION
KATZ AND KAHN –
ENERGETIC AND INTERDEPENDENT INPUTS OUTPUTS
SILVERMAN –
SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS WITH SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND LEGITIMACY
COHEN, MARCH, OLSEN –
COLLECTION OF ISSUES LOOKING FOR RESOLUTION AND DECISION MAKERS LOOKING FOR WORK
BRINGING THEORIES INTO PERSPECTIVE
DOMINANT METAPHORS PRIMARY UNITS OF ANALYSIS RELATION OF INDIVIDUAL TO ORG.
MEANING OF RATIONALITY PRIMARY VALUES EMBODIES IN THEORITICAL PERSPECTIVES “GENERIC” NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR THEORIES???
THREE ARENAS OF PUBLIC ORGANIZATION
INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL
–
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR ACTS AS AGENT
INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL
–
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR HAS A PLACE IN THE ORGANIZATION
ORGANIZATION TO INDIVIDUAL
–
INTERACTIONS WITH INDIVIDUALS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE AND DISCRETION
BUREAUCRACY ACCORDING TO MAX WEBER
1. FIXED AND OFFICIAL JURISDICTIONAL AREAS DEFINED BY REGULATIONS 2. AUTHORITY AND SUPERVISION 3. WRITTEN AND PRESERVED FILES 4. EXPERT TRAINING IS ASSUMED 5. OFFICIAL ACTIVITY DEMANDS AND RECEIVES FULL CAPACITY 6. MANAGEMENT FOLLOWS STABLE, COMPLETE AND UNDERSTANDABLE RULES
POSTURE OF THE OFFICIAL ACCORDING TO WEBER
OFFICE HOLDING IS A VOCATION
SOCIAL ESTEEM
APPOINTED BY LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
TENURE FOR LIFE
COMPENSATION AND PENSION
SET FOR A CAREER WITHIN HIERARCHY OF PUBLIC SERVICE
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
THE ORGINS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
– – – – –
The Continuing Influence of Ancient Rome The Military Heritage of Public Administration Comparing Military & Civilian Principles The Principles Approach The Cross-Fertilization of Military & Civilian Management
–
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
Key Concepts
–
Merit system
–
Public Works
–
Police
–
Commander in Chief
–
Span of Control
–
Unity of Command
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
WHAT IS ORGANIZATION THEORY?
–
Classical Organization Theory
• • • •
Production related and economic goals Systematic Organization Division of Labor People Act Rationally
–
Adam Smith and the Pin Factory
•
Laissez-faire capitalism
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
THE ORGINS OF SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT
–
Frederick W. Taylor
• • • •
Time and Motion, Measuring Management Worker Development Worker Cooperation Division of Work
–
Fayol’s General Theory of Management
•
Six Principles – technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting, management
FREDERICK TAYLOR
PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MGT
.
DECEMBER, 1916
RESTRICTING WORKER OUTPUT HURTS THE WORKER PRACTICE PRECEDES THEORY GOODWILL IS CREATED AMONG WORKERS WORKERS ASSUME NEW BURDENS VOLUNTARILY THE SCIENCE OF SHOVELING AT BETHLEHEM STEEL COSTS MONEY AND JUSTIFIES PROFIT MR. BARTH INCREASING WORK 2-3 TIMES THROUGH ANALYSIS
FREDERICK TAYLOR
PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC MGT
.
DECEMBER, 1916
1ST PRINCIPLE: LEARNING THE SCIENCE OF WORK BY STUDYING MOTION AND TIME ON THE JOB 2 ND PRINCIPLE – SELECT AND DEVELOP WORKMEN 3 RD PRINCIPLE – BRINGING SCIENCE TOGETHER WITH TRAINED WORKERS 4 TH PRINCIPLE – DIVIDING WORK BETWEEN WORKERS AND MGT.
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
DIVISION OF WORK
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
DISCIPLINE
UNIT OF COMMAND
UNITY OF DIRECTION
SUBORDINATION OF INDIVIDUAL TO GENERAL INTEREST
REMUNERATION OF PERSONNEL
CENTRALIZATION
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
CLEAR LINE OF AUTHORITY ORDER EUITY STABILITY OF TENURE OF PERSONNEL INITIATIVE ESPRIT DE CORPS
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
•
THE PERIOD OF ORTHODOXY- between the wars
•
Paul Appleby’s Polemic
–
Govt is different because Govt is Politics
•
Luther Gulick’s POSDCORB
POSDCORB AS AN ORGANIZING PHILOSPHY
PRIMARY ACTIVITIES OF THE EXECUTIVE CONSEQUENCE: – EMPHACIZING MEANS OF ADMINISTRATION NOT PURPOSE – DICHOTOMY BETWEEN POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION – EFFICIENCY OF WORK IS IMPORTANT THRU DIVISION OF LABOR
POSDCORB AS AN ORGANIZING PHILOSPHY
PLANNING
ORGANIZING
STAFFING
DIRECTING
COORDINATING
REPORTING
BUDGETING
FOUR VIEWS OF ORGANIZATION
MACRO LEVEL DETERMINISTIC NATURAL SELECTION VOLUNTARISTIC COLLECTIVE ACTION VIEW SYSTEM STRUCTURAL VIEW STRATEGIC CHOICE MICRO LEVEL
FOUR BUREAUCRATIC POSTURES TOWARD A COMPOSITE APPROACH
APPROACH FORM SCOPE COVERAGE
MOTIVE OR VALUES
ORIGINS
NET IMPACT ON PUBLIC INTEREST NET IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE
WEBERIAN OR RESPONSIBLE
REPRESENTATIVE
PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC CHOICE
ADMINISTRATIVE
DECISION-MAKING
DECISION MAKING: CHOICES EFFICIENCY VS. EFFECTIVENESS PRODUCTIVITY –
WEBER
– LEGAL/RATIONAL (INSTRUMENTAL) AUTHORITY RIGHTS AND THE ADEQUACY OF PROCESS – PUBLIC WELFARE ADMINISTRATORS AND THEIR CLIENTS REPRESENTATION AND CONTROL OF DISCRETION – ROLE OF MORAL OBLIGATION/CODES OF ETHICS
WHAT DOES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION DEAL WITH?
DECISIONS THAT – AFFECT PEOPLE’S LIVES – ARE MADE IN THE NAME OF THE PUBLIC – USE PUBLIC RESOURCES TAME AND WICKED PROBLEMS PERSONAL VS. ORGANIZATIONAL ACTION
SYSTEM BETRAYED CASE
DECISIONS MADE – POLICY – ADMINISTRATION – SORTING THROUGH INTERESTS – ACCOUNTING FOR CONSEQUENCES – JUSTIFYING ACTIONS WHOSE TO BLAME?
FOUR QUESTIONS TO THINK ABOUT. . .
WHAT IS THE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION FRAMEWORK?
WHAT ARE THE THEORIES THAT APPLY TO ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR?
HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY?
COMPARE AND CONTRAST CLASSICAL AND NEOCLASSICAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR
MOVING FROM CLASSICAL ON. . .
INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION – EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS ORGANIZATION BY DECISION SETS ORGANIZATIONS AS PURPOSIVE ENTITIES INTEGRATING INDIVIDUALS ORGANIZING AS REVEALED SELF INTEREST ORGANIZING AS SOCIAL ACTION OGANIZING AS DISCOVERED RATIONALITY
SUPERINTENDENT’S REPORT
1856 – ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY SETTLED PRINCIPLES
DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITIES
POWER TO CARRY OUT
MEANS OF MEASUREMENT
PROMPT REPORT OF ERRORS SO CORRECTED
DAILY REPORTS, CHECKS AND BALANCES ADOPTION OF SYSTEM TO ALLOW GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT TO DETECT AND CORRECT ERRORS IMMEDIATELY
THE ENGINEER AS AN ECONOMIST
SEPARATE FROM THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS SHOP MANAGEMENT –
ORG. , RESPONSIBILITY, REPORTS, SYSTEMS OF WORK, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
SHOP ACCOUNTING –
TIME, WAGES, COSTS, BOOKKEEPING, EXPENSES, RECORDS OF RESULTS AND PROFITS
CLASSICAL SCHOOL 1930’S AND INFLUENTIAL TODAY
1. ORGS EXIST TO ACCOMPLISH PRODUCTION RELATED GOALS 2. ONE BEST WAY TO ORGANIZE 3. PRODUCTION IS MAXIMIZED THROUGH SPECIALIZATION AND DIVISION OF LABOR 4. PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RATIONAL ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES
THE ECONOMY OF INCENTIVES CHESTER BARNARD - 1938
SPECIAL INDUCEMENTS FOR PRODUCTIVITY
–
MATERIAL
– – –
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT WORKING CONDITIONS IDEAL BENEFACTIONS
•
SATISY PERSONAL IDEALS RELATED TO FUTURE AND ALTRUISM
–
ORGANIZATION ATTRACTIVENESS INCENTIVES DIFFER BY ORG. PURPOSE
– – –
INDUSTRIAL – PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL GOODS + LIMITED MATERIAL REWARDS POLITICAL – PERSONAL PRESTIGE/MATERIAL REWARDS IMPORTANT TO IDEAL BENEFACTIONS RELIGIOUS – FAITH/LOYALTY MADE POSSIBLE BY MATERIAL CONTRIBUTIONS
BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY
ROBERT MERTON - 1957
THE DYSFUNCTIONS OF BUREAUCRACY – SECRECY – OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOSIS – OVERCONFORMITY – SECULAR AND SACRED DIVISION OF LABOR – DEPERSONALIZATION – DISCREPANCY BETWEEN IDEOLOGY AND FACT • SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE?
– QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED • PRESTIGE SYMBOLS TO INNER CIRCLE?
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
“MODERN” STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION THEORY
–
Talcott-Parsons 1951
–
Social Systems vs. Political Organizations
–
Basic Assumptions
•
ORGANIZATIONS ARE RATIONAL
• • •
BEST STRUCTURES DIVISION OF LABOR PROBLEMS ARE STRUCTURAL
–
Mechanisms and Organic Systems
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
NEOCLASSICAL ORGANIZATION THEORY- 1776 TO 1937
ORGANIZATIONS DO NOT EXIST AS ISLAND
–
Herbert Simon’s Influence
• •
SATISFICING BOUNDED RATIONALITY
–
The Impact of Sociology
•
SELZNIK – GOALS AND VALUES NOT NECESSARILY ALIGNED
•
OPENING UP ORGANIZATIONS
ORGANIZATIONS AS NON-RATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
SELSNICK - 1948
ORGANIZATIONS AS ECONOMIES ORGANIZATIONS AS ADAPTIVE SOCIAL SYSTEMS STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS – SECURITY, STABILITY CONTINUITY, RECALCITRANCE, HOMOGENEITY OF OUTLOOK CO-OPTATION – PROCESS OF ABSORBING NEW ELEMENTS AS A MEANS OF AVERTING THREATS
ORGANIZATIONS AS A COLLECTION OF BEHAVIORS
Cyert & March -1959
COALITIONS – OBJECTIVES SET THRU BARGAINING, INTERNAL CONTROLS AND ADJUSTING TO EXPERIENCE – EXAMPLE: COMMITTEE AND PAINTING – PREDICTIVE THEORY • DEMANDS AND PROBLEMS FOR MEMBERS • TOOL TO CHANGE DEMAND OVER TIME • ATTENTION-FOCUS TOOL FOR DEMANDS • ATTENTION-FOCUS TOOL FOR PROBLEMS • DEMAND EVALUATION PROCEDURE • TOOL FOR CHOOSING AMONG VIABLE COALITIONS
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
SYSTEMS THEORY
–
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS-RIGOROUS COLLECTION, MANIPULATION AND EVALUATION OF DATA TO MAKE GOOD DECISIONS
–
CYBERNETICS – ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRING MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACHES
–
THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION-PERSONAL MASTERY, MENTAL MODELS, SHARED VISION, TEAM LEARNING, SYSTEMS THINKING
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
THE ORGINS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT
– – – – –
The Continuing Influence of Ancient Rome The Military Heritage of Public Administration Comparing Military & Civilian Principles The Principles Approach The Cross-Fertilization of Military & Civilian Management
NEO-CLASSICAL: ORGANIZATIONS AS DECISION SETS
FROM SYSTEM, HIERARCHY, STRUCTURE TO NEO-CLASSICAL:
–
HUMAN ANALYSIS
–
DECISIONMAKERS
–
SERIES OF CHOICES
–
RATIONAL LINKAGES
–
BOUNDED BY ORGANIZATIONAL PURPOSE
FAYOL’S FOURTEEN PRINCIPLES
PRINCIPLES APPLY DIFFERENTLY IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS ADMINISTRATION: TO BRING A BETTER, ORDERED LIFE FOR THE ORGANIZATION AND THOSE WORKING IN IT – SUBORDINATION OF INDIVIDUAL INTERESTS TO COMMON GOOD – HIERARCHY – CENTRALIZATION – UNITY OF COMMAND AND MANAGEMENT
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT-1916
DIVISION OF WORK AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY DISCIPLINE UNIT OF COMMAND UNITY OF DIRECTION SUBORDINATION OF INDIVIDUAL TO GENERAL INTEREST REMUNERATION OF PERSONNEL
–
JOB, PIECE, BONUSES, PROFIT SHARING, PAYMENT IN KIND, WELFARE WORK, NON-FINANCIAL INCENTIVES CENTRALIZATION – ALWAYS THERE JUST QUESTION OF PROPORTION
FAYOL’S PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT
SCALAR CHAIN: CLEAR LINE OF AUTHORITY ORDER EQUITY STABILITY OF TENURE OF PERSONNEL INITIATIVE ESPRIT DE CORPS
CONSEQUENCES OF POSDCORB LUTHER GULICK
WILSONIAN CONTEXT: ACHIEVING MEANS WITHIN A DEMOCRACY
EMPHASIS ON DIVISION OF WORK
ORGANIZATION AS A TECHNICAL PROBLEM
CENTRALITY OF EFFICIENCY
KEY TERMS
SATISFICING: LIMITS TO DECISION MAKING RATIONAL MAN: ANALYZES COMPLEXITIES AND MAXIMIZES CHOOSING BEST ALTERNATIVE BOUNDED RATIONALITY: LIMITING ADMIISTRATIVE RATIONALITY DUE TO
–
COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF CONSEQUENCES
– –
FUTURE MUST BE ANTICIPATED ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORS LIMITED
– –
ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE
•
NARROW INTERPRETATION
KEY TERMS
INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY – SUBJECTIVE MEANS-END REASONING DECISION – CONCLUSION DRAWN FROM SET OF VALUE AND FACTUAL PREMISES EFFICIENCY –MAXIMIZE ATTAINMENT OF CERTAIN ENDS WITH SCARCE RESOURCES EFFECTIVENESS-ACCOMPLISHING ORG OBJECTIVES AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE PUBLIC PROBLEMS – EXTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL AUTHORITY –POWER TO MAKE DECISIONS WHICH GUIDE THE ACTIONS OF ANOTHER COORDINATION – THE PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATIONS IN TOTO OPERATING THRU A SUPERME COORDINATING AUTHORITY (URWICK)
SIMON’S ACCEPTED ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPLES
ADMIN. EFFICIENCY INCREASED BY: – SPECIALIZATION OF THE TASK – ARRANGING MEMBERS IN DETERMINATE HIERARCH OF AUTHORITY – LIMITING SPAN OF CONTROL TO A SMALL NUMBER – GROUPING WORKERS ACCORDING TO PURPOSE, PROCESS, CLIENTELE AND PLACE KNOWLEDGE IS NEUTRAL – VALUES OF USER APPLY TEHCNOLOGY IS APPLIED KNOWLEDGE AND NEUTRAL
RATIONAL ACCORDING TO HERMAN SIMON 1958
MAKING OPTIMAL CHOICES IN HIGHLY SPECIFIED ENVIRONMENT
– IDENTIFYING ALTERNATIVES A GIVEN – CONSEQUENCES FOR EACH • CERTAINTY, RISK, AND UNCERTAINTY – DECISIONMAKER CAN RANK CHOICES BASED UPON CONSEQUENCES – GOOD SELECTION POSSIBLE – MINIMAX RISK=MAXIMUM BENEFIT AND MINIMUM CONSEQUENCE
HERBERT SIMON’S ACCEPTED ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPLES
EFFICIENCY IS INCREASED BY 1 . SPECIALIZATION 2.
3.
GROUP IN HIERARCHY LIMITING SPAN OF CONTROL 4.
ORGANIZING ACCORDING TO PURPOSE, PROCESS, CLIENTELE AND PLACE OVERHAULING THE PROVERBS NOT PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATION 1. DEVELOP A VOCABULARY 2. STUDY THE LIMITS OF RATIONALITY
DECISION-SET CHARACTERISTICS
DECISION MAKING IS FOCAL POINT OF ADMINISTRATION
–
MAKING DECISIONS, ANALYSIS, PRIORITIZING, COMMUNICATION
CORE MODE OF OPERATION IS INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY
EFFICIENCY AS A MEASURE
ROLES MORE IMPORTANT THAN INDIVIDUALS
WHAT ROLE REPRESENTATION AND CONTROL OF DISCRETION??
OPEN SYSTEMS AND SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
OPEN SYSTEMS – ANY ORGANIZATION THAT INTERACTS WITH ITS ENVIRONMENT STRUCTURAL/FUNCTIONALISM – ORGS EXPLAINED IN TERMS OF CONTRIBUTION TO MAINTAINING THE SYSTEM SYSTEMS THEORY – DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIPS OF INPUTS, PROCESSES, OUTPUTS, FEEDBACK LOOPS, ENVIRONMENT
NEO-CLASSICAL APPROACHES
WHAT ARE THE DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS?
WHERE DO INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES FIT?
ARE THEY ALL THE SAME?
WHAT DO THEY MISS?
HOW WOULD THEY ADDRESS THE LOCAL EDUCATION AUTHORITY ALES RAKOVICH’S DILEMMA?
HUMAN RESOURCE THEORY PRINCIPLES
ORGANIZATIONS EXIST TO SERVE HUMAN NEEDS
ORGANIZATIONS AND PEOPLE NEED ONE ANOTHER
WHEN THE FIT IS POOR, ONE OR BOTH SUFFER
A GOOD FIT BENEFITS BOTH
HUMAN RESOURCE THEMES
LEADERSHIP MOTIVATION INDIVIDUALS IN TEAMS AND GROUPS EFFECTS OF WORK ENVIRONMENT USE OF POWER AND INFLUENCE ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE
HUMAN RESOURCE THEORY
MUNSTERBERG – FINDING AND SHAPING PEOPLE TO FIT NEEDS PEOPLE, GROUPS, RELATIONSHIPS AND ORG ENVIRONMENT HAWTHORNE EXPERIMENTS MASLOW’S THEORY THEORY X & THEORY Y MAXIMUM INFORMATION AND INFORMED DECISIONS (ARGYRIS, 1970) GROUPTHINK (JANIS, 1971)
WHAT ROLE LEADERSHIP?
MANAGER – FORMAL AUTHORITY LEADER – EFFECTIVE USE OF INFLUENCE – RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEOPLE WHERE INFLUENCE IS UNEVENLY DIVIDED – CANNOT FUNCTION IN ISOLATION
ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF LEADERS AS EXECUTIVES
CHESTER BARNARD - 1938
PROVIDE SYSTEM OF COMMUNICATION PROMOTE THE SECURING OF ESSENTIAL EFFORTS TO FORMULATE AND DEFINE THE PURPOSES AND GOALS OF AN ORGANIZATION
LEADERSHIP APPROACHES
TRAIT – LEADERS ARE BORN NOT MADE • PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTIC – TRANSACTIONAL • BASED ON AN INTERACTIONS • FOCUS ON THE LEADER AND ON SUBORDINATES – CONTINGENCY OR SITUATIONAL • PARTICIPATORY LEADERSHIP • LAW OF THE SITUATION • CONTINUUM FROM BOSS-CENTERED TO SUBORDINATE -CENTERED – CULTURAL AND TRANSFORMATIVE • CHANGING CULTURAL ASSUMPTIONS – WHERE TO FROM HERE?
LIFE CYCLE OF LEADERSHIP
THE MANAGERIAL GRID – CONSIDERATION VS INITIATING STRUCTURE – TEAM MANAGEMENT VS IMPOVERISHED – ADDING AN EFFECTIVENESS GRID MOVING FROM – HIGH TASK LOW RELATIONSHIP TO HIGH ASK HIGH RELATIONSHIPS – LOW HIGH RELATIONSHIPS LOW TASK TO LOW TASK LOW RELATIONSHIPS LIKERT – EMPLOYEE CENTERED DIFFICULTIES – CHANGING STYLE – CHANGING PERFORMANCE
CONTINGENCY THEORY
SELECTION AND TRAINING OF LEADERS CO-ACTING TASK GROUPS ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPERVISORY STRATEGIES MOVING FROM NOVEL TO FAMILIAR STRUCTURED SITUATIONS VS. CRISES
CALLING FOR TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERS
TICHY AND ULRICH
ASSUMPTIONS
–
TRIGGER EVENTS INDICATE CHANGE IS NEEDED
– – –
A CHANGE UNLEASHES MIXED FEELINGS QUICK FIX LEADERSHIP LEADS TO DECLINE REVITALIZATION REQUIRES TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
• • •
VISION MOBILIZATION OF COMMITMENT INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF CHANGE
PHASES OF CHANGE
THREE-PHASE PROCESS – ENDINGS – NEUTRAL – NEW BEGINNINGS QUALITIES OF THE LEADER – EQUITY, POWER, FREEDOM AND DYNAMICS OF DECISIONMAKING, TOUGHNESS, SEIZING OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATE CULTURE PROVIDES A WAY OF UNDERSTANDING + MEANING
ROLES OF LEADERSHIP IN STRATEGY FORMULATION
ED SCHEIN
PERCEIVE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN ENVIRONMENT
INFORMATION THAT MOTIVATES CHANGE
VISION FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY
ACKNOWLEDE UNCERTAINTY
ACKNOWLEDGE ERROS IN THE LEARNING PROCESS
MANAGE THE PHASES OF CHANGE
LEARNING LEADERS
ED SCHEIN
PERCEPTION AND INSIGHT
MOTIVATION
EMOTIONAL STRENGTH
ABILITY TO CHANGE THE CULTURAL ASSUMPTIONS
ABILITY TO CREATE INVOLVEMENT AND PARTICIPATION
ABILITY TO LEARN A NEW CULTURE
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAKES A LEADER
DANIEL GOLEMAN
SELF-AWARENESS SELF-REGULATION MOTIVATION EMPATHY SOCIAL SKILL
LEADERS , DOUBT AND SENSEMAKING
KARL WEICK
THE VALUE OF UNCERTAINTY LEADING BY COMPASS – ANIMATION – IMPOVISATION – LIGHTNESS – AUTHENTICATION – LEARNING
EFFICACY AND EFFECTIVENESS
MARTIN CHEMERS
THE ROLE OF INTELLIGENCE FUNCTIONAL LEADERSHIP – IMAGE MANAGEMENT – RELATIONSHIP DEVELOPMENT – RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT – TRANSFORMATIONAL – TRANSCEND AND TRANSFORM •
WEBER’S CHARISMATIC
SELF EFFICACY FOUR TYPES OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE – TO FACIITATE THINKING – TO UNDERSTAND OWN EMOTIONS – EMPATHY – REGULATION OF SELF TO CONTROL AND PROMOTE PERSONAL GROWTH
FROM OLD PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE
FOUNDATIONS HUMAN BEHAVIOR PUBLIC INTEREST RESPONSIVENESS MECHANISMS ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION ASSUMED ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ASSUMED MOTIVATION BY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS AND SERVANTS
SERVING CITIZENS NOT CUSTOMERS
CIVIC VIRTUE AND DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP THEORIES OF CITIZENSHIP THE ROLE OF THE CITIZEN BUILDING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
–
FIVE TENETS PUBLIC SERVICE AS AN EXTENSION OF CITIZENSHIP NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION NEW PUBLIC SERVICE AND QUALITY CITIZEN SERVICE
ACCOUNTABILITY ISN’T SIMPLE
WHAT ARE WE RESPONSIBLE FOR?
TO WHOM ARE WE ACCOUNTABLE?
BY WHAT MEANS WILL WE ACHIEVE OUTCOMES AND BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEM?
SERVING CITIZENS NOT CUSTOMERS
CIVIC VIRTUE AND DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP THEORIES OF CITIZENSHIP THE ROLE OF THE CITIZEN BUILDING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
–
FIVE TENETS PUBLIC SERVICE AS AN EXTENSION OF CITIZENSHIP NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION NEW PUBLIC SERVICE AND QUALITY CITIZEN SERVICE
BUILDING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
ACHIEVE BEST POLITICAL OUTCOMES
SATISFY INTERESTS OF CITIZENS
LEGITIMIZE GOVERNMENT
DEMOCRATIC MORALITY
BUILDING CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
ACCESS TO INFORMATION
ACCESS TO DECISIONMAKING
ABILITY TO OPEN ISSUES FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
CONSIDERATION OF ALL CLAIMS ASSERTED
DEFINING PUBLIC SERVICE QUALITY
CARLSON + Schwarz, 1995
CONVENIENCE
SECURITY
RELIABILITY
PERSONAL ATTENTION
PROBLEM-SOLVING APPROACH
FAIRNESS
FISCAL RESPONSBILITY
CITIZEN INFLUENCE
SEEKING THE PUBLIC INTEREST
WHAT IS THE PUBLIC INTEREST?
NORMATIVE MODELS ABOLITIONIST VIEWS POLITICAL PROCESS THEORIES SHARED VALUES OLD AND NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST
WHAT ARE WE RESPONSIBLE FOR?
TO WHOM ARE WE ACCOUNTABLE?
BY WHAT MEANS WILL WE ACHIEVE OUTCOMES AND BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEM?
Key Concepts
PUBLIC INTEREST AS THE BEST RESPONSE TO ALL INTERESTS AND CONCEPTS OF VALUE
PUBLIC INTEREST IS BEST UNDERSTOOD THROUGH INDIVIDUAL CHOICES
PUBLIC INTEREST IS DEFINED BY POLITICAL PROCESS
PUBLIC INTEREST AS PUBLIC VALUE CONSENSUS
FORCES THAT MISCONSTRUE THE PUBLIC INTEREST
SOCIAL – HIGH LEVEL OFFICIALS ARE NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF POPULATION SPECIALIZATION LEADS TO NARROW INTERESTS BUREAU IDEAOLOGY (DOWNS) –
POSITIVE BENEFITS VS. COSTS
– – – –
EXPANSION VS. CURTAILMENT GENERAL BENEFITS VS. SPECIAL PRESENT EFFICIENCIES VS. PAST FAILURES ACHIEVEMENTS AND CAPABILITIES VS. FAILURES AND LIMITATIONS
SHIFTING IN PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE AREAS
TRADITIONAL
– –
SINGLE SYSTEM FAIRNESS IS SAMENESS
– –
PROCESS/RULES PROMOTION BASED ON TECH. EXPERTISE
– –
JOB FOR LIFE PROTECTION JUSTIFIES TENURE
–
CENTRAL PERSONNEL AGENCY
NEW PUBLIC SERVICE
– –
MULTIPLE SYSTEMS DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN DIFF. TALENTS
– –
PERFORMANCE/RESULTS HIRE, DEVELOP, PROMOTE
– –
CORE VALUES PERFORMANCE AND EMP. NEED
–
CENTRAL AGENCY WITH EMPOWERED MANAGERS
NEW APPROACHES TO REGULATION
COMPLIANCE THROUGH DETERRANCE IS MISGUIDED AND MUST BE REPLACED BY: –
PARTNERS
– – – – – – –
ONE-STOP SERVICES IMPACTS VS. OUTPUTS PROBLEMS VS. VIOLATIONS FEASIBILITY VS. UNIVERSAL ENFORCEMENT NEGOTIATION AND EDUCATION AS TOOLS STRATEGIC ENFORCEMENT TARGETS DEALING EFFECTIVELY WITH WORST VIOLATORS
TOWARD NEW POLITICAL APPROACHES TO REGULATORY ADMINISTRATION
BEYOND POLITICAL HACKS OF THE PAST
PUBLIC AS AN AGENCY CONSTITUENCY
–
AARP, CONSUMER GROUPS
FORWARD LOOKING ASSESSMENT
–
NEPA, REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ACT, PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
LEGAL APPROACHES TO REGULATORY ADMINISTRATION
ADVERSARY PROCEDURES NEUTRALITY AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DUE PROCESS PROTECTION REASONABLENESS
–
PROPERTY RIGHTS AND TAKINGS
REGULATORY ADMINISTRATION
NARROW VS. BROAD PUBLIC INTEREST
BALANCING PRIVATE INTERESTS AGAINST ONE ANOTHER
PROTECTING AGAINST DISASTER
NEW PUBLIC SERVICE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENHANCING CITIZENSHIP AND SERVING THE PUBLIC INTEREST
VALUING CITIZENSHIP OVER ENTRPRENUEURSHIP
GOVERNANCE
–
EXERCISE OF PUBLIC AUTHORITY NEW ROLES FOR GOVERNMENT
– – –
LEGAL AND POLITICAL RULES PROTECTING ECONOMIC INTERESTS ASSURE DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL EQUITY ADMINISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATOR’S ROLES SERVICE PROCESS
– – – –
INVOLVEMENT INFORMATION CONSULTATION ACTIVE PARTICIPATION
REINVENTING THROUGH NATL PERFORMANCE REVIEW
1997
FLEXIBLE RESPONSIVE HIRING SYSTEMS REFORM PAY CLASSIFICATIONS ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AWARDS SUPPORT MGT IN DEALING WITH POOR PERFORMERS MARKET-DRIVEN TRAINING FAMILY FRIENDLY WORKPLACES CROSS-TRAINING AND INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION ELIMINATE RED TAPE – AUTOMATE INFORMATION LABOR-MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIPS INCENTIVES FOR VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS
DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY
STRUCTURING PUBLIC DELIBERATION FOR THOUGHTFULNESS AND ETHICS
DIALOGUE NOT MONOLOGUE
DIALOGUE FREE OF DOMINATION AND DISTORTION
INSTITUTIONALIZED DISCURSIVE STRUCTURES
3 CONDITIONS FOR LEGITIMACY
EQUALITY AND SYMMETRY
ALL HAVE RIGHT TO QUESTION
ALL HAVE RIGHTS TO CHANGE THE RULES OF DISCOURSE
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
LEGITIMACY
DIVERSITY AMONG CITIZENRY
FREEDOM AND LIBERTY
– – –
CHILLING EFFECT OVERBREADTH LEAST RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVE
PROPERTY RIGHTS
DUE PROCESS
INDIVIDUALITY
PRIVACY
EQUITY
MODERN STRUCTURAL THEORIES
PUA 713 –FALL 2005 DR. CHRISTINE SPRINGER
MOVING ON AFTER WORLD WAR II
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY IS THE ESSENCE OF ORG. RATIONALITY
RATIONALITY INCREASES PRODUCTION IN TERMS OF REAL GOODS AND SERVICES
STRUCTURE, CONTROL COORDINATION
ONE BEST STRUCTURE
SPECIALIZATION AND DIVISION OF LABOR STILL IMPORTANT
MOST ORG PROBLEMS ARE STRUCTURAL
ORGANIZATIONS AS NON-RATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
SELSNICK - 1948
ORGANIZATIONS AS ECONOMIES ORGANIZATIONS AS ADAPTIVE SOCIAL SYSTEMS STRUCTURAL-FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS – SECURITY, STABILITY CONTINUITY, RECALCITRANCE, HOMOGENEITY OF OUTLOOK CO-OPTATION – PROCESS OF ABSORBING NEW ELEMENTS AS A MEANS OF AVERTING THREATS
ORGANIZATIONS AS A COLLECTION OF BEHAVIORS
Cyert & March -1959
COALITIONS – OBJECTIVES SET THRU BARGAINING, INTERNAL CONTROLS AND ADJUSTING TO EXPERIENCE – EXAMPLE: COMMITTEE AND PAINTING – PREDICTIVE THEORY • DEMANDS AND PROBLEMS FOR MEMBERS • TOOL TO CHANGE DEMAND OVER TIME • ATTENTION-FOCUS TOOL FOR DEMANDS • ATTENTION-FOCUS TOOL FOR PROBLEMS • DEMAND EVALUATION PROCEDURE • TOOL FOR CHOOSING AMONG VIABLE COALITIONS
SOCIO-TECHNICAL APPROACH
BURNS AND STALKER - 1961
STABLE VS. DYNAMIC CONDITIONS MECHANISTIC VS. ORGANIC ORG.
SECURITY VS. UNCERTAINTY
FORMAL VS. INFORMAL ORGS
BARNARD – 1938
–
UNCONSCIOUS ATTITUDES, UNDERSTANDING, CUSTOMS, HABITS CREATING THE CONDITION UNDER WHICH FORMAL ORGANIZATION ARISES BLAU + SCOTT – 1962
–
BUREAUCRATIZATION = AMT OF EFFORT DEVOTED TO MAINTAINING THE ORG
–
NUMBER OF ADMIN. PERSONNEL, HIERARCHIAL CHARACTER, STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF RULES, REIGID COMPLIANCE TO RULES
STRUCTURING ACCORDING TO PRODUCT OR FUNCTION
WALKER AND LORSCH - 1968
GROUPING BY WORKER OR BY PRODUCT
–
MAXIMUM USE OF A SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE?
– –
EFFICIENT USE OF EQUIPMENT?
BEST CONTROL AND COORDINATION?
BEHAVIORIST FINDINGS
–
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACTIVITIES AND THOUGHTS AND BEHAVIORS
– –
COLLABORATION AND INTEGRATION COMMUNICATION AMONG SPECIALISTS CLUES FOR MANAGERS
– – –
CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAMS FULL-TIME INTEGRATORS MATRIX OR GRID ORGANIZATIONS
KEY TERMS
DIFFERENTIATION = SPECIALIZATION IN A RAPIDLY CHANGING ENVIRONMENT – REQUIRES CONTROL, COORDINATION AND INTEGRATION DONUT ORGANIZATIONS ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS
FIVE PARTS OF AN ORGANIZATION
MINTZBERG - 1979
OPERATING CORE STRATEGIC APEX THE MIDDLE LINE TECHNOSTRUCTURE SUPPORT STAFF
IN DEFENSE OF BUREAUCRACY
JAQUES - 1990
HIERARCHIAL LAYERS ALLOW ORGS TO COPE WITH DISCONTINUITIES MANAGERS NEED TO UNDERSTAND AND BE ACCOUNTABLE
–
FOR ADDING VALUE
– –
SUSTAINING TEAM SETTING DIRECTION AND ENGAGING SUBORDINATES ACCOUNTABILITY IS POSSIBLE WITH AUTHORITY
– –
VETO APPLICANTS MAKE WORK ASSIGNMENTS
– –
DECISIONS ABOUT RAISES AND REWARDS INITIATE REMOVAL
TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL
BURTON AND OBEL 1998
FORMALIZATION CENTRALIZATION COMPLEXITY CONFIGUATION COORDINATION CONTROL INCENTIVES
MARKET THEORIES: ORGANIZING AS REVEALED SELF-INTEREST
HOW INDUCE MGRS TO ACT IN BEST INTEREST OF OWNERS AND THOSE IN CONTROL ANSWERING ECONOMIC QUESTIONS
– – –
CONTRACTUAL NATURE BOUNDED RATIONALITY SIGNIFICANCE OF INVESTMENT IN SPECIRIC ASSETS
– –
SPECIFIC RIGHTS VS. RESIDUAL RIGHTS EFFECTS OF IMPERFECT INFORMATION EMERGENCE AND EXPANSION OF ORGS GIVEN COST OF UNCENTAINTY, INFORMATION, BOUNDED RATIONALITY AND COGNITIVE BARRIERS
KEY TERMS
AGENCY THEORY – MANAGERS ARE AGENTS OF THE OWNERS AND DELEGATED AUTHORITY PROPERTY RIGHTS THEORY – HOW COSTS AND REWARDS ARE ALLOCATED TO PARTICIPANTS IN AN ORGANIZATION TRANSACTION COST THEORY – HOW TO MAINTAIN PRINCIPAL-AGENT RELATIONSHIPS AND MINIMIZE COSTS OF TRANSACTIONS AND MANAGEMENT DECISIONS AND SOCIAL INTERDEPENDENCE UNANIMITY RULE – INDIVIDUALS ARE PROTECTED AGAINST COERCIAN AND EXTERNAL DAMAGE PUBLIC CHOICE – DECISION-MAKING ARRANGEMENTS ESTABLISH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR MAKING CHOICES.
–
MAKING GOVERNMENT MORE DEMOCRATIC AND EFFICIENT
MORE KEY TERMS
SELF-INTEREST – HEDONISM VS ALTRUISM
INCREMENTALISM - DECISIONS THAT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ONLY THE MARGINAL OR INCREMENTAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PROPOSAL AND EXISTING STATE OF AFFAIRS DISJOINTED – LACK OF CONSCIOUS COORDINATION IN DECISIONMAKING
CRITICS OF THE MARKET THEORIES
HIRSCHMAN - 1970
MARKET FORCES ARE AT BEST A PARTIAL CONDITION FOR ORG RESPONSIVENESS
EXIT, VOICE OR LOYALTY
CONDITIONS FOR CORRECTION
–
MEANS TO EXPRESS DISSATISFACTION
– –
TIME AND RESOURCES TO MEND WAYS SELF-INTERESTED REASONS FOR TAKING SERIOUSLY EXIT OR VOICE OF CLIENTS OR CITIZENS
POWER AND POLITICS
COMPLEX SYSTEMS OF INDIVIDUALS AND COALITIONS CONFLICT IS INEVITABLE INFLUENCE, POWER AND POLITICAL ACITIVTY PRIMARY TOOL GOALS ACHIEVED THROUGH MANUEVERING INTERDEPENDENCE OF ORG UNITS POWER IN ORGS
– –
CONTROL OVER SCARCE RESOURCES ACCESS TO POWER
– – –
CENTRAL POSITION IN POTENT COALITION WORKING THE RULES CREDIBILITY
KEY TERMS
POWER – THE ABILITY TO GET THINGS DONE THE WAY ONE WANTS THEM DONE AND TO INFLUENCE PEOPLE SOCIAL POWER – POWER BETWEEN TWO AGENTS BASED UPON REWARDS, COERCIVE , LEGITMATE, REFERENT AND EXPERT POWER
SOCIAL CHOICE-POWER IS THE RESULT OF INFLUENCE EXERTED BY NUMEROUS COMPONENTS AND RESPONSIVENESS IS A FUNCTION OF CHANCE, FORCE, OR PROCESS
THE EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION THEORY
“MODERN” STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION THEORY
–
Talcott-Parsons 1951
–
Social Systems vs. Political Organizations
–
Basic Assumptions
•
ORGANIZATIONS ARE RATIONAL
• • •
BEST STRUCTURES DIVISION OF LABOR PROBLEMS ARE STRUCTURAL
–
Mechanisms and Organic Systems
BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE AND PERSONALITY
ROBERT MERTON - 1957
THE DYSFUNCTIONS OF BUREAUCRACY
– – – – – –
SECRECY OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOSIS OVERCONFORMITY SECULAR AND SACRED DIVISION OF LABOR DEPERSONALIZATION DISCREPANCY BETWEEN IDEOLOGY AND FACT
• •
SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE?
QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERD
–
PRESTIGE SYMBOLS TO INNER CIRCLE?
KEY TERMS
SATISFICING: LIMITS TO DECISION MAKING RATIONAL MAN: ANALYZES COMPLEXITIES AND MAXIMIZES CHOOSING BEST ALTERNATIVE BOUNDED RATIONALITY: LIMITING ADMIISTRATIVE RATIONALITY DUE TO
–
COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF CONSEQUENCES
– –
FUTURE MUST BE ANTICIPATED ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORS LIMITED
– –
ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE
•
NARROW INTERPRETATION
KEY TERMS
INSTRUMENTAL RATIONALITY – SUBJECTIVE MEANS-END REASONING DECISION – CONCLUSION DRAWN FROM SET OF VALUE AND FACTUAL PREMISES EFFICIENCY –MAXIMIZE ATTAINMENT OF CERTAIN ENDS WITH SCARCE RESOURCES EFFECTIVENESS-ACCOMPLISHING ORG OBJECTIVES AND OVERALL PERFORMANCE PUBLIC PROBLEMS – EXTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL AUTHORITY –POWER TO MAKE DECISIONS WHICH GUIDE THE ACTIONS OF ANOTHER COORDINATION – THE PRINCIPLES OF ORGANIZATIONS IN TOTO OPERATING THRU A SUPERME COORDINATING AUTHORITY (URWICK)
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE
CHALLENGING RATIONAL THEORISTS ORGANIZATIONS AS COLLECTION OF VALUES, LIEFS, PERCEPTIONS, BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS BEHAVIOR IS PREDETERMINED BY MEMBERS’ ASSUMPTIONS ORGS ARE ONLY RATIONAL IF:
–
SELF-CORRECTING SYSTEM OF INTERDEPENDENT PEOPLE
–
CONSENSUS ON OBJECTIVES AND METHODS
–
COORDINATION THROUGH SHARED INFORMATION
–
PREDICTABLE PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
ORGANIZATIONAL SYMBOLISM
MEANINGS AS SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED REALITIES INTERPRETATION IS MOST IMPORTANT AMBIGUITY AND UNCERTAINTY PRECLUDE RATIONALITY PEOPLE USE SYMBOLS TO REDUCE AMBIGUITY
–
ROOT METAPHORS, SHARED MEANINGS, INTEGRATING SYMBOLS
CHANGING ORG.
CULTURES
TRICE AND BEYER 1993
CAPITALIZE ON PROPITIOUS MOMENTS COMBINE CAUTION WITH OPTIMISM UNDERSTAND RESISTANCE TO CHANGE CHANGE ELEMENTS BUT MAINTAIN CONTINUITY
CHANGING ORG.
CULTURES
TRICE AND BEYER 1993
RECOGNIZE IMPORTANCE OF IMPLEMENTATION SELECT, MODIFY AND CREATE RIGHT CULTURAL FORMS MODIFY SOCIALIZATION TACTICS FIND AND CULTIVATE INNOVATIVE LEADERSHIP
DEFINITIONS OF ORG CULTURE
SHARED BELIEFS SHARED UNDERSTANDINGS UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS COMMON ORIENTATION PATTERNS OF MEANING STORIES TOLD IN ORIENTATION
COMMON RITUALS
INITIATION
REWARD DEGRADATION
RENEWAL
CONFLICT REDUCTION
INTEGRATION
ENDING
COMPOUND
REFORM THROUGH CHANGE 1980’S AND 1990’S
LASTING ORG. REFORM REQUIRES CHANGE IN ORG CULTURE TOTAL QUALITY CONTROL – PRODUCTIVITY – FLEXIBILITY – RESPONSIVENESS – RE-EINGINEERING – CUSTOMER SERVICE
APPLYING JAPANESE METHODS
OUCHI - 1980
THEORY Z ORGS – CULTURAL CONSISTENCY NOT HIERARCHY – CLANS NOT MARKETS OR HIERARCHIES – DIFFICULTIES IN TRANSLATION – SOCIAL ORGS VS. FORMALITY – BUREAUCRACY VS. DISCRETION – BALANCING FREEDOM AND INTEGRATION
ATTRIBUTES OF EXCELLENCE
PETERS - WATERMAN BIAS FOR ACTION CLOSE TO CUSTOMER AUTONOMY ENTREPRENUERSHIP PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH PEOPLE HANDS-ON VALUE-DRIVEN STICK TO KNITTING SIMPLE FORM LEAN STAFF LOOSE-TIGHT
LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS
PETER SENGE - 1990
LEARNING HOW TO LEARN TOGETHER COMPONENT TECHNOLOGIES FIVE DISCIPLINES – SYSTEMS THINKING – PERSONAL MASTERY – MENTAL MODELS – BUILDING SHARED VISION – TEAM LEARNING
REINVENTING GOVERNMENT
OSBORNE & GAEBLER - 1992
CATALYTIC COMMNITY-OWNED MISSION DRIVEN RESULT ORIENTED CUSTOMER DRIVEN ENTERPRISING ANTICIPATORY DECENTRALIZED MARKET ORIENTED
GENDER AND DIVERSITY
PERPETUATING MALE REALITY
ACKER-1992
– GENDER DIVISIONS – SYMBOLS AND IMAES – INTERACTIONS – DEMANDS FOR GENDER NEUTRAL BEHAVIOR ORG CULTURES THAT ARE BARRIERS TO PERFORMANCE –
WORKFORCE 2000 – 1987
– MANAGING DIVERSITY IS A CRUCIAL COMPETENCY