Transcript Slide 1

1

To help you to take control of the planning for the next cycle of appraisal.

To consider ten key issues to which you should be alert during planning for
the next cycle.
2

Objectives represent a key means by which teachers’ performance is
evaluated during appraisal.

Objectives should also be regarded as a key way in which your pay,
pension, career and professional aspirations can be advanced.

It is therefore essential that you avoid agreeing to objectives that will set
you up to fail – the adverse consequences can be significant.

Using ‘cut and paste’ objectives is inappropriate:
- every teacher is unique and every teacher’s circumstances are unique objectives should therefore be tailored to the needs of each individual even if they are whole-school or departmental/team objectives.

Objectives should be set in the context of your role, responsibilities and job
description.
3

The NASUWT's action instructions specify that there should be no more
than three objectives per cycle.

This limit allows you, your reviewer and all other colleagues involved in
supporting you, to focus effectively on priorities for your professional
practice - an excessive number of objectives dilutes this focus and
undermines the process.

You should not agree to objectives that are broken down into multiple
subsections.
4

Objectives should be:
- realistic;
- clear;
- concise;
- achievable;
- specific; and
- fair.

Remember that a principle for objective-setting is to make sure that there will be
clarity about what success will look like at the end of the cycle.

Drafting objectives is a joint responsibility.

This responsibility should not be delegated to the reviewee.

It is poor practice for the reviewer to seek to impose predetermined individual
objectives, as the purpose of the meeting is to support a professional dialogue.
5

A key purpose of performance management is to allow you to develop your
professional practice.

If an objective does not relate to your professional duties, your role and
responsibilities or your job description, it cannot meet this purpose as it is outside
your direct influence or control.

Examples of inappropriate objectives of this nature include:
•
inclusion of a target for pupil attendance – you can’t control the extent to
which pupils attend school;
•
securing particular levels of parental engagement – you can provide
opportunities for parents to engage but you can’t control whether they engage
or not;
•
for line managers, objectives based on data indicators of the performance of
your team – you can provide an environment that allows team members to
perform to the best of their ability, but you can’t control their performance
directly.
6

Again, remember that factors relating to your pupils and to your wider
working environment over which you have no control or influence can have
a significant effect on what happens in your classroom - you cannot be held
accountable for these factors.
7

In almost all circumstances, objectives are designed to be completed during
the course of the appraisal cycle.

Think carefully about your objectives being achievable within the appraisal
cycle.

Where the timescale is shorter than the appraisal cycle, this does not mean
that a new or additional objective can be set.

The timescale for completing an objective may be longer than the appraisal
cycle, but the objectives should make clear what progress will be expected
by the next planning and review meeting.
8

Remember, if workload is an issue in your school, the NASUWT’s action
instructions are there to protect you.
Objectives must not add to your workload.

In particular, they should not require:
•
gathering portfolios of evidence;
•
working at weekends, evenings or during the holidays.
9

It is not legitimate for teachers to be set individual objectives, including
targets based on data.

Data can be used to inform discussion about objectives and to set targets
for pupils (e.g in AfL).

Pupils' attainment in the assessments used to generate such data can be
influenced by a range of factors outside of teachers' direct control.

Note that the producers of the value-added systems (e.g FFT) used by
some schools in objective-setting confirm that their systems do not
generate hard and fast targets, merely estimates.

For example, an objective that states, ‘Over X% of pupils in class Y (i.e your
class) will be assessed as achieving Level Z in writing by the end of the
year’, is unacceptable.
10

However, an objective that states, ‘I will contribute to the achievement of
(whole-school/team/departmental/class target x) by (e.g adopting a
particular teaching strategy, deployment of teaching assistants, adopting
new approach to the use of resources, accessing CPD)’ is more
acceptable.

Remember - targets are for pupils, not for teachers.

Make sure that the numerical targets are not included in success criteria.

Success criteria should reflect the professional practice agreed to in the
objective, not pupil performance data, e.g:
•
‘Teaching assistants were deployed appropriately to meet the needs
of learners, evident through the outcomes of lesson observation’;
•
‘Use of assessment for learning is evident in pupils’ books’.
11

It is not appropriate for objectives to include reference to the achievement
of Ofsted-style grades following classroom observations.

Ofsted has confirmed that inspectors will not grade teachers’ performance
in individual lessons.

The criteria for teaching and learning in the inspection framework are
designed to be applied across a whole school, not to individual lessons.

If Ofsted does not use ‘Ofsted grades’ to judge individual teachers, neither
should schools.
12
Remember, this is a collective issue –
‘Inspectors do not judge the overall lesson. But it is still possible for an
inspector to record a graded evaluation on an evidence form under one or
more of the four main judgement headings, including teaching, where there is
sufficiently compelling evidence gathered by observing routines, looking in
books, listening to students and so on…this is categorically not the same as
judging a teacher, or even the teaching, and especially not a lesson overall,
by evaluating the performance of the teacher in a lesson or a part of a lesson.’
Mike Cladingbowl, Ofsted National Director, Schools
13

Decide whether classroom observation is appropriate as a means of
gathering evidence of your performance.

If so, you should not agree to more than three observations for a total of no
more than three hours.

Use the advice set out in the NASUWT’s practical guide to appraisal.

The lesson observations should have a clear focus linked to your agreed
objectives.

Drop-ins and learning walks are observations by another name.
14

Objectives have to be considered in terms of the conditions and environment
within which teachers work.

This may require access to information, advice, training and CPD.

It may also require the provision of additional resources including staffing,
equipment and time.

You should ask your reviewer to confirm that the appraiser has the authority
to agree this support and that the request for such support will not be
interpreted as a sign of any professional inadequacy – this latter point is
confirmed by the DfE.

Participation in professional development might be an objective of itself.

You should not agree to access professional development and related
activities in your own time.
15

Professional development includes, but is certainly not restricted to,
participation in courses or attendance at events – examples of alternatives
include working with colleagues, participating in professional networks or
research and investigation.

Remember that the appraisal process can also be used to seek professional
development and training that is not related directly to the achievement of your
objectives.

These might include opportunities to help you develop your wider skills and
experience, or training that would support your career progression.
16

Given the focus of appraisal on your professional duties, roles and
responsibilities and areas covered within your job description, it is not
appropriate for objectives to relate to any voluntary or extra-curricular
activities you may undertake.

Such objectives may also be discriminatory – some teachers may not be
able to participate in voluntary activities due to personal or family
circumstances.

Under no circumstances should you accept any objectives of this nature.

This advice does not prevent voluntary participation by teachers in extracurricular activities.
17

If you work part time, your objectives should take this into account although you may still be set three objectives, these should reflect the hours
you are contracted to work.

If you have a disability or some other medical need, it is important (and a
legal obligation on your employer) that your objectives reflect this, as well
as any reasonable adjustments that have been made to support your
employment.

Account should also be taken of whether your school knows that you will be
absent from work for a significant period of time, e.g through maternity
leave, or are due to have medical treatment that may require absence from
work.

This underlines the importance of avoiding data-related targets.
18

Schools should have a standard recording format, including sections for
objectives, classroom observation, where appropriate, and training and
development, timescales and success criteria.

These points should be recorded where practical during the meeting by the
appraiser.

The appraisee may request changes.

Seek to resolve any disagreement by discussion in the meeting.

If agreement is reached, sign the statement.

If agreement cannot be reached, seek to have your concerns and
disagreement recorded and do not sign the statement.

Make sure you are given a written copy of the statement.

Seek advice from the NASUWT if necessary.
19